75f61ca23b5b03c51dd02652d12020b4 bolasgeoesp_a2019n82p2795.pdf 02eec73f05cd13bfa1281a6be3c49946ceaafb80 bolasgeoesp_a2019n82p2795.pdf ada6eb4f0031b37045cb6f42f7b35f63db7e42a34c762e139b6e9faae2591f3e bolasgeoesp_a2019n82p2795.pdf Title: The geographical context of wastewater treatment and reuse: a benchmarking analysis for Spanish Mediterranean Wastewater Treatment Plants / El contexto geográfico del tratamiento y reutilización de aguas residuales: un análisis benchmarking para el litoral mediterráneo español Subject: This paper examines wastewater treatment and reuse in Catalonia and Valencia through a benchmarking analysis of energy intensities of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in the coastal municipalities of both regions also involving comparison with average European data on energy use by these plants. The comparison of European and Spanish Mediterranean WWTPs indicates that small Mediterranean plants are less energy intensive than their European counterparts, while for larger plants (above 10,000 m3 /day) the reverse is true. As to the comparison between Catalan and Valencian plants, the latter are generally smaller than the former, and also slightly more energy intensive. Regarding reuse, the geographical context would explain these differences in terms of the final destination of effluents treated in these plants. The important presence of irrigated agriculture in Valencia is responsible for the reuse of 45% of potentially reclaimed water while Catalonia, with a different socioterritorial reality, reuses less than 3% of the total effluent treated. / Este artículo examina los tratamientos y la reutilización de las aguas residuales en Cataluña y Valencia a través de un análisis comparativo (benchmarking) de las intensidades energéticas de todas las plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales (EDAR) ubicadas en los municipios costeros de ambas regiones, que también se comparan con los promedios europeos. La comparación de las EDAR mediterráneas europeas y españolas indica que la plantas mediterráneas más pequeñas son más eficientes energéticamente que sus equivalentes europeas, mientras que para las plantas grandes (más de 10 000 m3/día) se da el caso contrario. En cuanto a la comparación entre plantas catalanas y valencianas, estas últimas son generalmente más pequeñas que las primeras y un poco menos eficientes energéticamente. El contexto geográfico puede explicar estas diferencias en términos del destino final de los efluentes tratados en estas plantas. La g Keywords: wastewater treatment; wastewater reuse; benchmarking; Catalonia; Valencia; aguas residuales; reutilización; benchmarking; Cataluña; Valencia Author: Paula Rodríguez Creator: Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle Producer: Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle CreationDate: Wed Jul 17 17:21:49 2019 CEST ModDate: Wed Jul 17 17:25:40 2019 CEST Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 30 Encrypted: no Page size: 595.32 x 841.92 pts (A4) Page rot: 0 File size: 891604 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.7 name type encoding emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- --------- BCDEEE+Renner-it-LightItalic TrueType WinAnsi yes yes no 6 0 BCDFEE+Renner-it-Light TrueType WinAnsi yes yes no 9 0 BCDGEE+Renner-it-Light CID TrueType Identity-H yes yes yes 11 0 BCDHEE+Renner-it-Medium TrueType WinAnsi yes yes no 19 0 BCDIEE+Calibri-Bold TrueType WinAnsi yes yes no 21 0 BCDJEE+Renner-it-LightItalic CID TrueType Identity-H yes yes yes 25 0 BCDKEE+Renner-it-MediumItalic TrueType WinAnsi yes yes no 40 0 BCDLEE+Renner-it-Medium CID TrueType Identity-H yes yes yes 42 0 TimesNewRomanPSMT TrueType WinAnsi no no no 48 0 SymbolMT CID TrueType Identity-H yes no yes 63 0 ArialMT TrueType WinAnsi no no no 68 0 TimesNewRomanPSMT CID TrueType Identity-H yes no yes 130 0 Jhove (Rel. 1.22.1, 2019-04-17) Date: 2020-08-28 05:50:52 CEST RepresentationInformation: bolasgeoesp_a2019n82p2795.pdf ReportingModule: PDF-hul, Rel. 1.12.1 (2019-04-17) LastModified: 2020-08-27 17:55:18 CEST Size: 891604 Format: PDF Version: 1.7 Status: Well-Formed and valid SignatureMatches: PDF-hul MIMEtype: application/pdf PDFMetadata: Objects: 1278 FreeObjects: 1068 IncrementalUpdates: 2 DocumentCatalog: ViewerPreferences: HideToolbar: false HideMenubar: false HideWindowUI: false FitWindow: false CenterWindow: false DisplayDocTitle: true NonFullScreenPageMode: UseNone Direction: L2R ViewArea: CropBox ViewClip: CropBox PrintArea: CropBox PageClip: CropBox PageLayout: SinglePage PageMode: UseNone Language: en Outlines: Item: Title: 1 Introduction Destination: 1 Item: Title: 2 Wastewater, wastewater treatments, and recycled water Destination: 1 Item: Title: 3 Methodology Destination: 1 Item: Title: 4 Analysis Destination: 1 Children: Item: Title: 4.1 European WWTPs vs. Spanish Mediterranean WWTPs Destination: 1 Item: Title: 4.2 Catalan WWTPs vs Valencian WWTPs Destination: 1 Item: Title: 4.3 Energy requirements of Spanish Mediterranean WWTPs Destination: 1 Item: Title: 4.4 Water Reuse Destination: 1 Item: Title: 5 Discussion Destination: 1 Item: Title: 6 Conclusions Destination: 1 Item: Title: References Destination: 1 Info: Title: The geographical context of wastewater treatment and reuse: a benchmarking analysis for Spanish Mediterranean Wastewater Treatment Plants / El contexto geográfico del tratamiento y reutilización de aguas residuales: un análisis benchmarking para el litoral mediterráneo español Author: Paula Rodríguez Subject: This paper examines wastewater treatment and reuse in Catalonia and Valencia through a benchmarking analysis of energy intensities of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in the coastal municipalities of both regions also involving comparison with average European data on energy use by these plants. The comparison of European and Spanish Mediterranean WWTPs indicates that small Mediterranean plants are less energy intensive than their European counterparts, while for larger plants (above 10,000 m3 /day) the reverse is true. As to the comparison between Catalan and Valencian plants, the latter are generally smaller than the former, and also slightly more energy intensive. Regarding reuse, the geographical context would explain these differences in terms of the final destination of effluents treated in these plants. The important presence of irrigated agriculture in Valencia is responsible for the reuse of 45% of potentially reclaimed water while Catalonia, with a different socioterritorial reality, reuses less than 3% of the total effluent treated. / Este artículo examina los tratamientos y la reutilización de las aguas residuales en Cataluña y Valencia a través de un análisis comparativo (benchmarking) de las intensidades energéticas de todas las plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales (EDAR) ubicadas en los municipios costeros de ambas regiones, que también se comparan con los promedios europeos. La comparación de las EDAR mediterráneas europeas y españolas indica que la plantas mediterráneas más pequeñas son más eficientes energéticamente que sus equivalentes europeas, mientras que para las plantas grandes (más de 10 000 m3/día) se da el caso contrario. En cuanto a la comparación entre plantas catalanas y valencianas, estas últimas son generalmente más pequeñas que las primeras y un poco menos eficientes energéticamente. El contexto geográfico puede explicar estas diferencias en términos del destino final de los efluentes tratados en estas plantas. La g Keywords: wastewater treatment; wastewater reuse; benchmarking; Catalonia; Valencia; aguas residuales; reutilización; benchmarking; Cataluña; Valencia Creator: Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle Producer: Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle CreationDate: Wed Jul 17 17:21:49 CEST 2019 ModDate: Wed Jul 17 17:25:40 CEST 2019 ID: 0x976ee782d02b4847bd4047c144966877, 0x2929b6ff206ddb4d83b72cc65ca2ff42 Filters: FilterPipeline: FlateDecode FilterPipeline: DCTDecode Images: Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 16 ImageHeight: 16 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 59 ImageHeight: 20 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 16 ImageHeight: 16 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/jpg CompressionScheme: JPEG ImageWidth: 499 ImageHeight: 491 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Interpolate: true Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 975 ImageHeight: 443 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1377 ImageHeight: 697 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1453 ImageHeight: 686 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1457 ImageHeight: 726 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 864 ImageHeight: 538 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1368 ImageHeight: 696 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1464 ImageHeight: 669 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1448 ImageHeight: 672 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/png ImageWidth: 1429 ImageHeight: 702 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: FlateDecode Interpolate: false Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/jpg CompressionScheme: JPEG ImageWidth: 1280 ImageHeight: 1706 ColorSpace: RGB BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Interpolate: true Fonts: Type0: Font: BaseFont: TimesNewRomanPSMT Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: BCDJEE+Renner-it-LightItalic Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: BCDLEE+Renner-it-Medium Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: BCDGEE+Renner-it-Light Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: SymbolMT Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true TrueType: Font: Name: F9 BaseFont: TimesNewRomanPSMT FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 32 FontDescriptor: FontName: TimesNewRomanPSMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -568, -216, 2046, 693 Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F4 BaseFont: BCDHEE+Renner-it-Medium FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 243 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDHEE+Renner-it-Medium Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -126, -200, 1601, 800 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F11 BaseFont: ArialMT FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 32 FontDescriptor: FontName: ArialMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -665, -210, 2000, 728 Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F5 BaseFont: BCDIEE+Calibri-Bold FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 32 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDIEE+Calibri-Bold Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -519, -250, 1263, 750 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F1 BaseFont: BCDEEE+Renner-it-LightItalic FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 243 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDEEE+Renner-it-LightItalic Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -156, -200, 1514, 800 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F7 BaseFont: BCDKEE+Renner-it-MediumItalic FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 243 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDKEE+Renner-it-MediumItalic Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -313, -200, 1640, 800 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding Font: Name: F2 BaseFont: BCDFEE+Renner-it-Light FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 250 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDFEE+Renner-it-Light Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -126, -200, 1476, 800 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding CIDFontType2: Font: BaseFont: SymbolMT CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: SymbolMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: 0, -216, 1113, 693 FontFile2: true Font: BaseFont: TimesNewRomanPSMT CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: TimesNewRomanPSMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -568, -216, 2046, 693 FontFile2: true Font: BaseFont: BCDJEE+Renner-it-LightItalic CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDJEE+Renner-it-LightItalic Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -156, -200, 1514, 800 FontFile2: true Font: BaseFont: BCDLEE+Renner-it-Medium CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDLEE+Renner-it-Medium Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -126, -200, 1601, 800 FontFile2: true Font: BaseFont: BCDGEE+Renner-it-Light CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: BCDGEE+Renner-it-Light Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -126, -200, 1476, 800 FontFile2: true XMP: Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle wastewater treatment; wastewater reuse; benchmarking; Catalonia; Valencia; aguas residuales; reutilización; benchmarking; Cataluña; Valencia Microsoft® Word Office 365:lle 2019-07-17T17:21:49+02:00 2019-07-17T17:25:40+02:00 2019-07-17T17:25:40+02:00 uuid:82E76E97-2BD0-4748-BD40-47C144966877 uuid:53920766-6dd5-42dd-95ff-d07a646c0d29 False application/pdf Paula Rodríguez David Palma Manel Poch Miquel À. Cugueró-Escofet David Sauri The geographical context of wastewater treatment and reuse: a benchmarking analysis for Spanish Mediterranean Wastewater Treatment Plants / El contexto geográfico del tratamiento y reutilización de aguas residuales: un análisis benchmarking para el litoral mediterráneo español This paper examines wastewater treatment and reuse in Catalonia and Valencia through a benchmarking analysis of energy intensities of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in the coastal municipalities of both regions also involving comparison with average European data on energy use by these plants. The comparison of European and Spanish Mediterranean WWTPs indicates that small Mediterranean plants are less energy intensive than their European counterparts, while for larger plants (above 10,000 m3 /day) the reverse is true. As to the comparison between Catalan and Valencian plants, the latter are generally smaller than the former, and also slightly more energy intensive. Regarding reuse, the geographical context would explain these differences in terms of the final destination of effluents treated in these plants. The important presence of irrigated agriculture in Valencia is responsible for the reuse of 45% of potentially reclaimed water while Catalonia, with a different socioterritorial reality, reuses less than 3% of the total effluent treated. / Este artículo examina los tratamientos y la reutilización de las aguas residuales en Cataluña y Valencia a través de un análisis comparativo (benchmarking) de las intensidades energéticas de todas las plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales (EDAR) ubicadas en los municipios costeros de ambas regiones, que también se comparan con los promedios europeos. La comparación de las EDAR mediterráneas europeas y españolas indica que la plantas mediterráneas más pequeñas son más eficientes energéticamente que sus equivalentes europeas, mientras que para las plantas grandes (más de 10 000 m3/día) se da el caso contrario. En cuanto a la comparación entre plantas catalanas y valencianas, estas últimas son generalmente más pequeñas que las primeras y un poco menos eficientes energéticamente. El contexto geográfico puede explicar estas diferencias en términos del destino final de los efluentes tratados en estas plantas. La g wastewater treatment wastewater reuse benchmarking Catalonia Valencia aguas residuales reutilización benchmarking Cataluña Valencia Pages: Page: Sequence: 1 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 730, 243, 751 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 238, 403, 356, 423 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 231, 303, 363, 322 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 239, 202, 356, 222 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 222, 102, 372, 121 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Contents: C:\Users\Torian\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\orcid_16x16.png Rect: 343, 433, 356, 445 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Contents: C:\Users\Torian\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\orcid_16x16.png Rect: 331, 333, 343, 345 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Contents: C:\Users\Torian\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\orcid_16x16.png Rect: 329, 232, 341, 244 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Contents: C:\Users\Torian\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\orcid_16x16.png Rect: 375, 132, 388, 144 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 2 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 247, 742, 348, 762 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Contents: C:\Users\Torian\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Word\orcid_16x16.png Rect: 328, 772, 340, 784 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 3 Page: Sequence: 4 Page: Sequence: 5 Page: Sequence: 6 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 172, 239, 368, 256 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 7 Page: Sequence: 8 Page: Sequence: 9 Page: Sequence: 10 Page: Sequence: 11 Page: Sequence: 12 Page: Sequence: 13 Page: Sequence: 14 Page: Sequence: 15 Page: Sequence: 16 Page: Sequence: 17 Page: Sequence: 18 Page: Sequence: 19 Page: Sequence: 20 Page: Sequence: 21 Page: Sequence: 22 Page: Sequence: 23 Page: Sequence: 24 Page: Sequence: 25 Page: Sequence: 26 Page: Sequence: 27 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 710, 504, 736 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 540, 327, 565 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 227, 382, 461, 408 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 107, 271, 297, 297 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 120, 232, 540, 251 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 206, 388, 232 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 166, 540, 186 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 140, 190, 166 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 318, 101, 540, 121 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 75, 123, 101 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 28 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 706, 540, 725 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 680, 130, 706 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 144, 614, 411, 640 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 79, 549, 373, 575 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 81, 418, 310, 444 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 373, 371, 398 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 307, 286, 333 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 29 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 84, 719, 362, 745 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 654, 292, 680 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 226, 404, 452, 430 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 127, 359, 284, 385 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 293, 500, 319 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 280, 234, 540, 254 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 208, 292, 234 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 163, 350, 188 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 97, 251, 123 Flags: Print Page: Sequence: 30 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 87, 765, 540, 785 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 739, 227, 765 Flags: Print Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 54, 674, 257, 700 Flags: Print Checksum: 6d4c87c4 Type: CRC32 Checksum: 75f61ca23b5b03c51dd02652d12020b4 Type: MD5 Checksum: 02eec73f05cd13bfa1281a6be3c49946ceaafb80 Type: SHA-1