Published for SISSA by Springer Received: March 13, 2019 Revised: May 7, 2019 Accepted: May 13, 2019 Published: May 23, 2019 Measurement of VH, H → bb̄ production as a JHEP05(2019)141 function of the vector-boson transverse momentum in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector The ATLAS collaboration E-mail: atlas.publications@cern.ch Abstract: Cross-sections of associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom- quark pairs and an electroweak gauge boson, W or Z, decaying into leptons are measured as a function of the gauge boson transverse momentum. The measurements are performed in kinematic fiducial volumes defined in the ‘simplified template cross-section’ framework. The results are obtained using 79.8 fb−1 of proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. All measure- ments are found to be in agreement with the Standard Model predictions, and limits are set on the parameters of an effective Lagrangian sensitive to modifications of the Higgs boson couplings to the electroweak gauge bosons. Keywords: Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments), Higgs physics ArXiv ePrint: 1903.04618 Open Access, Copyright CERN, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2019)141 for the benefit of the ATLAS Collaboration. Article funded by SCOAP3 . Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Data and simulation samples 2 3 Event selection and categorisation 3 4 Cross-section measurements 4 JHEP05(2019)141 5 Results 9 6 Constraints on anomalous Higgs boson interactions 11 7 Conclusion 13 The ATLAS collaboration 19 1 Introduction A particle consistent with the Standard Model (SM) predictions for the Higgs boson [1–4] was observed in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations [5, 6] at the LHC. Further analysis of ATLAS and CMS data collected in proton-proton (pp) collisions at centre-of- mass energies of 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV in two LHC data-taking periods (Runs 1 and 2) has led to precise measurements of the mass of this particle (around 125 GeV) [7–9], tests of its spin and parity (J P = 0+ ) against alternative hypotheses [10, 11], as well as to measurements of its production and decay rates [12–14]. Recently, experiments at the LHC observed Higgs boson production in association with weak gauge bosons V = W, Z (V H production) [15] and Higgs boson decays into pairs of bottom quarks (H → bb̄) [15, 16]. With these results, the four most important Higgs boson production modes predicted by the SM, gluon-gluon fusion (ggF), vector-boson fusion (VBF), and associated production of a Higgs boson with either a weak gauge boson (V H) or a top-quark pair (tt̄H) are established. Similarly, several of the main modes of Higgs boson decays into fermionic (bb̄, τ τ ) and bosonic (W W , ZZ, γγ) final states are observed. All results, typically expressed in the form of ‘signal strengths’, defined as the ratio of the observed to the expected product of the production cross-section times branching ratio into a certain final state, are consistent with SM predictions within uncertainties. To probe the kinematic properties of Higgs boson production in more detail, to reduce the impact of theoretical uncertainties on the measurements and to make the measurements easier to compare with future updated calculations, the framework of simplified template cross-sections (STXS) has been introduced [17, 18]. In this framework, the cross-sections –1– for the various Higgs boson production modes are measured in exclusive regions carefully defined by fiducial selections based on the kinematic properties of Higgs boson production. The extrapolation from the phase space selected by the analysis criteria to that for which the cross-section measurements are presented is thus reduced. The STXS measurements are designed to proceed in stages of increasing granularity with more recorded data. In ‘stage 0’, cross-sections are measured separately for the four main production modes in a fiducial Higgs boson rapidity region |yH | < 2.5,1 mainly driven by the ATLAS and CMS detector acceptances for most of the reconstructed objects (leptons, photons and b-jets). In ‘stage 1’ these regions are split into 31 subregions according to kinematic properties such as the number of particle-level jets with transverse momentum JHEP05(2019)141 pT > 30 GeV (excluding any jets from Higgs boson decays), the transverse momentum of the Higgs boson, or the transverse momentum of the weak gauge boson V for V H, V → leptons production. In simulation, particle-level jets are built by clustering all generated stable particles (cτ > 10 mm), excluding the decay products of the Higgs boson as well as the neutrinos and charged leptons from the decays of the weak gauge boson, using the anti-kt clustering algorithm [19] with a radius parameter R = 0.4. Stage-0 STXS were measured recently with 36.1 fb−1 of 13 TeV ATLAS data using H → γγ [20] and H → ZZ ∗ → 4` decays [21], with results in agreement with SM predictions. In addition, refs. [20] and [21] contain some ‘reduced’ stage-1 STXS measurements of ggF and VBF regions, after merging together regions where the data lack sufficient sensitivity to Higgs boson production. Given the low V H production cross-sections, the only Higgs boson decay mode that can currently be measured is H → bb̄, with its large branching ratio of 58%. This paper presents a measurement of ‘reduced’ stage-1 V H STXS (defined in section 3) using H → bb̄ decays with 79.8 fb−1 of 13 TeV pp collisions collected by ATLAS between 2015 and 2017. The results are used to investigate the strength and tensor structure of the interactions of the Higgs boson with vector bosons using an effective Lagrangian approach [22]. 2 Data and simulation samples The data were collected with the ATLAS detector [23, 24] between 2015 and 2017, triggered by isolated charged leptons or large transverse momentum imbalance, ET miss . Only events with good data quality were kept. The Monte Carlo simulation samples used for the measurements presented here are identical to those used for the measurement of the inclusive V H, H → bb̄ signal strength [15]. Several samples of simulated events were produced for the signal (q q̄ → W H, q q̄ → ZH and gg → ZH) and main background (tt̄, single-top, V +jets and diboson) pro- cesses. They were used to optimise the analysis criteria and to determine the expected 1 ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the centre of the detector and the z-axis along the beam pipe. The x-axis points from the IP to the centre of the LHC ring, and the y-axis points upwards. Cylindrical coordinates (r, φ) are used in the transverse plane, φ being the azimuthal angle around the z-axis. The pseudorapidity is defined in terms of the polar angle θ as η = − ln tan(θ/2). When dealing with massive particles, the rapidity y = 1/2 ln[(E +pz )/(E −pz )] is used, where E is the energy and pz is the z-component of the momentum. –2– signal and background distributions of the discriminating variables used in the final fit to the data. The multijet background is largely suppressed by the selection criteria and is estimated using data-driven techniques. The signal templates in each STXS region were obtained from simulated q q̄ → W H and q q̄ → ZH events with zero or one additional jet, calculated at next-to-leading order (NLO), generated with the Powheg-Box v2 + GoSam + MiNLO generators [25–28]. The contribution from loop-induced gg → ZH production was simulated at leading order (LO) using the Powheg-Box v2 generator [25]. Additional scale factors were applied to the q q̄ → V H processes as a function of the generated vector-boson transverse momentum (pVT ) to account for electroweak (EW) corrections at NLO. These factors were determined JHEP05(2019)141 from the ratio between the V H differential cross-sections computed with and without these corrections by the Hawk program [29, 30]. The mass of the Higgs boson was fixed at 125 GeV. In the measurement of the pp → ZH cross-sections, the relative contributions of the q q̄ → ZH and gg → ZH processes are determined by the most accurate theoretical cross- section predictions currently available: next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in QCD and NLO in EW [31–37] for q q̄ → ZH, and next-to-leading order and next-to-leading logarithm (NLO+NLL) in QCD [38–42] for gg → ZH. 3 Event selection and categorisation The object reconstruction, event selection and classification into categories used for the measurements, are identical to those described in ref. [15]. The selection and the event categories are briefly summarised below. Events are retained if they are consistent with one of the typical signatures of V H, H → bb̄ production and decay, with Z → ν ν̄, W → `ν or Z → `` (` = e, µ). Vector-boson decays into τ -leptons are not targeted explicitly. However, they satisfy the selection criteria with reduced efficiency in the case of leptonic τ -lepton decays. In particular, events are kept if they contain at most two isolated electrons or muons, and two good-quality high-pT (> 45, 20 GeV) jets with |η| < 2.5 satisfying b-jet identifica- tion (’b-tagging’) requirements (which have an average efficiency of 70% for jets containing b-hadrons that are produced in inclusive tt̄ events [43]). The two b-jet candidates are used to reconstruct the Higgs boson candidate; their invariant mass is denoted by mbb . Additional jets are required to have pT > 20 GeV for |η| < 2.5 or pT > 30 GeV for 2.5 < |η| < 4.5, and not be identified as b-jets. Events with either zero, one or two isolated electrons or muons are classified as ‘0- lepton’, ‘1-lepton’ or ‘2-lepton’ events, respectively. The 0-lepton events and the 1-lepton events are required to have transverse momentum imbalance, as expected from the neutri- nos from Z → ν ν̄ or W → `ν decays; in the 2-lepton events, the leptons must have the same flavour (and opposite charge for events with muons) and an invariant mass close to the Z boson mass. Additional requirements are applied to suppress background from QCD production of multijet events in the 0-lepton and 1-lepton channels. To suppress the large tt̄ background, –3– Categories Channel 75 GeV < pV,r T < 150 GeV pV,r T > 150 GeV 2 jets ≥ 3 jets 2 jets 3 jets ≥ 3 jets 0-lepton — — SR SR — 1-lepton mbb ≥ 75 GeV or mtop ≤ 225 GeV — — SR SR — mbb < 75 GeV and mtop > 225 GeV — — CR CR — JHEP05(2019)141 2-lepton ee and µµ channels SR SR SR — SR eµ channel CR CR CR — CR Table 1. Summary of the reconstructed-event categories. Categories with relatively large fractions of the total expected signal yields are referred to as ‘signal regions’ (SR), while those with negligible expected signal yield, mainly designed to constrain some background processes, are called ‘control regions’ (CR). The quantity mtop is the reconstructed mass of a semileptonically decaying top-quark candidate in the 1-lepton channel. The calculation of mtop uses the four-momenta of one of the two b-jet candidates, the lepton, and the hypothetical neutrino produced in the event. The neutrino four-momentum is derived using the W boson mass constraint [15] and mtop is then reconstructed from the combination of the b-jet candidate and the value of the neutrino longitudinal momentum that yields the smallest top-quark candidate mass. The mtop ≤ 225 GeV requirement in the 1-lepton signal region is needed to maintain orthogonality with the W +HF control region. events with four or more jets are discarded in the 0-lepton and 1-lepton channels. Finally, a requirement on the reconstructed transverse momentum pV,r T of the vector boson V is applied. It is computed, depending on the number, Nlep , of selected electrons and muons, as either the missing transverse momentum ET miss (N lep = 0), the magnitude of the vector sum of the missing transverse momentum and the lepton pT (Nlep = 1), or the dilepton pT (Nlep = 2). The minimum value of pV,r T is 150 GeV in the 0- and 1-lepton channels, and 75 GeV in the 2-lepton channel. Events satisfying the previous criteria are classified into eight categories (also called signal regions in the following), shown in table 1, with different signal-to-background ra- tios. These categories are defined by the number of jets, Njet (including the two b-jet candidates), Nlep , and pV,r T . Additional categories (also called control regions in the fol- lowing) containing events satisfying alternative selections are introduced to constrain some background processes such as W boson production in association with jets containing heavy-flavour hadrons (W +HF), or top-quark pair production. The signal contribution in such categories is expected to be negligible. 4 Cross-section measurements The reduced V H, V → leptons stage-1 STXS regions used in this paper are summarised in table 2, which also indicates which reconstructed-event categories are most sensitive in –4– Merged region Merged region Reconstructed-event categories 3-POI scheme 5-POI scheme Stage 1 (modified) STXS region with largest sensitivity Nlep pV,r T interval Njet q q̄ → W H, 150 < pW T < 250 GeV, 0-jet W H, 150 < pW T < 250 GeV W H, pW T > 150 GeV q q̄ → W H, 150 < pW < 250 GeV, ≥ 1-jet 1 > 150 GeV 2, 3 T W H, pW T > 250 GeV q q̄ → W H, pW T > 250 GeV q q̄ → ZH, 75 < pZ T < 150 GeV ZH, 75 < pZ T < 150 GeV ZH, 75 < pZ T < 150 GeV 2 75–150 GeV 2, ≥ 3 gg → ZH, 75 < pZ T < 150 GeV q q̄ → ZH, 150 < pZ T < 250 GeV, 0-jet JHEP05(2019)141 gg → ZH, 150 < pZ T < 250 GeV, 0-jet ZH, 150 < pZ T < 250 GeV q q̄ → ZH, 150 < pZ T < 250 GeV, ≥ 1-jet 0 > 150 GeV 2, 3 ZH, pZ T > 150 GeV gg → ZH, 150 < pZ T < 250 GeV, ≥ 1-jet 2 > 150 GeV 2, ≥3 q q̄ → ZH, pZ T > 250 GeV ZH, pZ T > 250 GeV gg → ZH, pZ T > 250 GeV Table 2. The 3-POI and 5-POI ‘reduced stage-1’ sets of merged regions used for the measurements, the corresponding kinematic regions of the stage-1 V H simplified template cross-sections, and the reconstructed-event categories that are most sensitive in each merged region. The stage-1 regions are modified (i) by splitting the two ZH, pZ T < 150 GeV regions (from q q̄ and gg) into four regions, based on whether pZ T < 75 GeV or 75 < p Z Z T < 150 GeV; (ii) by adding a pT < 250 GeV requirement Z to the gg → ZH, pT > 150 GeV regions (with zero or at least one extra particle-level jet), and (iii) by adding a separate gg → ZH, pZ W T > 250 GeV region. The three regions W H, pT < 150 GeV, Z Z q q̄ → ZH, pT < 75 GeV and gg → ZH, pT < 75 GeV, in which the current analysis is not sensitive and whose corresponding cross-sections are fixed to the SM prediction in the fit, are not shown. each region. All leptonic decays of the weak gauge bosons (including Z → τ τ and W → τ ν) are considered for the STXS definition. Compared to the original stage-1 proposal presented in ref. [17], the following changes have been made for the reduced V H, V → leptons stage-1 STXS regions of table 2: • the pZ Z T < 150 GeV stage-1 regions are split into two subregions, pT < 75 GeV and 75 < pZT < 150 GeV, to avoid theory uncertainties from extrapolations to a phase space not accessible to this measurement; • an additional gg → ZH, pZ T > 250 GeV region has been introduced, similarly to what is already done for q q̄ → ZH. These two changes lead to a total of 14 modified stage-1 regions, which are then combined together in reduced stage-1 regions, chosen to keep the total uncertainty in the measure- ments near or below 100%, in the following way: • the q q̄ → ZH and gg → ZH regions are merged. There are currently not enough data events to distinguish q q̄ → ZH from gluon-induced ZH production despite their different kinematic properties; • the 150 < pVT < 250 GeV regions with zero or at least one particle-level jet are merged. –5– 0.35 Fraction of events / bin ATLAS Simulation 0.3 s = 13 TeV Total signal 150 < pV < 250 GeV 1 lepton, 2 jets, 2 b-tags T 0.25 V ,r pV > 250 GeV p ≥ 150 GeV T T All background 0.2 JHEP05(2019)141 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 −1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 BDTVH output Figure 1. BDTV H distributions for different pVT STXS regions in the 1-lepton, 2-jet reconstructed- event category. Only regions contributing at least 10% of the expected signal yield in the reconstructed-event category are displayed. The distributions of the total signal and background are also shown. The BDTV H distributions are scaled to the same (unit) area to highlight the shape differences. Two sets of reduced stage-1 regions are considered. In one, called the ‘5-POI (parame- ters of interest)’ scheme, five cross-sections, three for ZH production (75 < pZ T < 150 GeV, 150 < pT < 250 GeV and pT > 250 GeV) and two for W H production (150 < pW Z Z T < 250 GeV W and pT > 250 GeV), are measured. In the other one, called the ‘3-POI’ scheme, three cross-sections, two for ZH (75 < pZ Z T < 150 GeV and pT > 150 GeV) and one for W H W (pT > 150 GeV), are measured. The 5-POI scheme leads to measurements that have total uncertainties larger than those in the 3-POI scheme, but are more sensitive to enhance- ments at high pVT from potential anomalous interactions between the Higgs boson and the EW gauge bosons. The reconstructed-event categories do not distinguish between events with generated pT below or above 250 GeV. Discrimination between the two pVT regions 150–250 GeV and V > 250 GeV is provided by the different shapes of the boosted-decision-tree discriminant (BDTV H ) used in the final fit to the data, as illustrated in figure 1 in the case of the 1-lepton, 2-jet category. This arises from the fact that the reconstructed pV,r T is largely correlated with the BDTV H output, for which it constitutes one of the most discriminating input variables together with mbb and the angular separation of the two b-jets. –6– The product of the signal cross-section times the H → bb̄ branching ratio and the total leptonic decay branching ratio for W or Z bosons is determined in each of the reduced stage-1 regions by a binned maximum-likelihood fit to the data. The cross-sections are not constrained to be positive in the fit. Signal and background templates of the discriminating variables, determined from the simulation or data control regions, are used to extract the signal and background yields. A simultaneous fit is performed to all the signal and control regions. Systematic uncertainties are included in the likelihood function as nuisance parameters. The likelihood function is very similar to that described in ref. [15]. In particular, the same observables are used, namely BDTV H in the signal regions and either the invariant JHEP05(2019)141 mass mbb of the two b-jets or the event yield in the control regions. The treatment of the background and of its uncertainties is also unchanged. The only differences relative to the likelihood function in ref. [15] concern the treatment of the signal: • Instead of a single signal shape (for BDTV H or mbb ) or yield per category, multiple shapes or yields are introduced, one for each reduced stage-1 STXS region under study. • Instead of a single parameter of interest, the inclusive signal strength, the fit has multiple parameters of interest, i.e. the cross-sections of the reduced stage-1 regions, multiplied by the H → bb̄ and V → leptons branching ratios. • Overall theoretical cross-section and branching ratio uncertainties, which affect the signal strength measurements but not the STXS measurements, are not included in the likelihood function. The expected signal shapes of the discriminating variable distributions and the accep- tance times efficiency (referred to as ‘acceptance’ in the following) in each reduced stage-1 region are determined from simulated samples of SM V H, V → leptons, H → bb̄ events. The acceptance of each reconstructed-event category for signal events from the different regions of the 5-POI reduced stage-1 scheme is shown in figure 2a. The fraction of signal events in each reconstructed-event category originating from the different regions in the same scheme is shown in figure 2b. As shown in figure 2a, the current analysis is not sensitive to W H events with pW T < Z 150 GeV and to ZH events with pT < 75 GeV, since their acceptance in each category is at the level of 0.1% or smaller. Therefore, in the fits the signal cross-section in these regions is constrained to the SM prediction, within the theoretical uncertainties. Since these regions contribute only marginally to the selected event sample, the impact on the final results is negligible. A cross-check in which the relative signal cross-section uncertainty for the pW Z T < 150 GeV and pT < 75 GeV regions is conservatively set to 70% of the prediction (i.e. about seven times the nominal uncertainty) leads to variations of the measured STXS below 1%. The sources of systematic uncertainty are identical to those described in ref. [15], except for those associated with the Higgs boson signal simulation, which are re-evaluated [44]. In this re-evaluation the uncertainties are separated into two groups: –7– ATLAS Simulation s = 13 TeV 7 Acceptance × efficiency [%] V,r 0-lep,3-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 0.66 1.29 0.19 3.79 5.75 T V,r 6 0-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 0.64 1.39 0.15 3.79 6.17 T V,r 2-lep,≥3-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 5 T 0.02 2.75 3.62 V,r 2-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 0.01 1.24 1.43 4 T V,r 2-lep,≥3-jet,75

150 GeV,SR 0.05 3.30 5.62 0.12 0.25 T 1 V,r 1-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 0.04 3.52 6.14 0.08 0.17 T 0 WH WH WH ZH, Z ZH, ZH, ZH, Z , pW , 15 , W p < 75 < 150 p JHEP05(2019)141 < 15 0 < W pT > 2 T 75 G p Z< < p Z T > 250 T 0G p 5 0G eV 150 < GeV T < 25 GeVT 250 Ge eV eV T 0G eV V (a) ATLAS Simulation s = 13 TeV 100 Signal fraction [%] V,r 0-lep,3-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 1.37 11.64 6.77 7.06 52.54 20.57 T 90 V,r 0-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 1.08 11.39 7.25 5.70 52.56 22.01 80 T V,r 2-lep,≥3-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 1.62 73.42 24.87 70 T V,r 60 2-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 1.90 75.62 22.44 T 50 V,r 2-lep,≥3-jet,75

150 GeV,SR 8.34 59.02 29.67 0.34 1.67 0.91 20 T V,r 10 1-lep,2-jet,p >150 GeV,SR 5.86 60.95 31.33 0.15 1.11 0.59 T 0 WH WH WH ZH, Z ZH, ZH, ZH, Z , pW , 15 , W p < 75 < 150 p < 15 0 < W pT > 2 < p Z T > 250 T 0G p 50 G T 75 Ge p Z< 1 < G eV T < 25 eV V T 50 G T 250 eV 0G eV GeV eV (b) Figure 2. In the 5-POI reduced stage-1 scheme, (a) the acceptance (including the efficiency of the experimental selection) for V H, V → leptons, H → bb̄ events of each reconstructed-event category (y-axis) for each STXS signal region (x-axis), in percent; (b) the fraction of signal (in percent) from each STXS signal region (x-axis) in every reconstructed-event category (y-axis). Entries with acceptance times efficiency below 0.01% or signal fractions below 0.1% are not shown. • uncertainties affecting signal modelling — i.e. acceptance and shape of kinematic distributions — in each of the three or five reduced stage-1 regions (hereafter referred to as theoretical modelling uncertainties), and • uncertainties in the prediction of the production cross-section for each of these regions (hereafter referred to as theoretical cross-section uncertainties). While theoretical modelling uncertainties enter the measurement of the STXS, theoretical cross-section uncertainties do not affect the results, but only the predictions with which they are compared. The consequent reduction of the impact of the theoretical uncertainties on the results with respect to the signal strength measurements is one of the main advantages of measuring STXS. The two groups of systematic uncertainties are estimated for high-granularity STXS regions, and then merged into the reduced scheme under consideration. This approach –8– makes it easy to compute the systematic uncertainties for merging schemes different from those presented here. The uncertainties are evaluated by dividing the phase space into five pVT regions (with the following lower edges: 0 GeV, 75 GeV, 150 GeV, 250 GeV and 400 GeV), and each pVT region into three bins depending on the number of particle-level jets (zero, one, or at least two), independently for the q q̄ → V H and gg → ZH processes. When two STXS regions are merged, their relative theoretical cross-section uncertainties lead to a modelling uncertainty. These uncertainties are evaluated as the remnant of the theoretical cross-section uncertainties for the high-granularity regions after the subtraction of the theoretical cross-section uncertainty for the merged region. The high-granularity regions are used to calculate theoretical cross-section uncertain- JHEP05(2019)141 ties for the missing higher-order terms in the QCD perturbative expansion and for the uncertainties induced by the choices of the parton distribution function (PDF) and αS . Fourteen independent sources of uncertainties due to the missing higher-order terms lead to total uncertainties of 3%–4% for q q̄ → V H and 40%–50% for gg → ZH with pVT > 75 GeV [44]. Thirty-one independent sources of PDF and αS uncertainties, each of them usually smaller than 1%, lead to a total quadrature sum between 2% and 3% depending on the STXS region. The theoretical modelling uncertainties change the shapes of the reconstructed pV,r T and mbb distributions in the same way as described in ref. [15]. Four independent sources for the QCD expansion and two independent sources for the PDF and αS choices are considered. Systematic uncertainties in the signal acceptance and shape of the pV,r T and mbb dis- tributions due to the parton shower (PS) and underlying event (UE) models are esti- mated from the variations of acceptance and shapes of simulated events after changing the Pythia 8 PS parameters or after replacing Pythia 8 with Herwig 7 for the PS and UE models [15]. The signal acceptance uncertainties due to the PS and UE models (five independent sources) are typically of the order of 1% (5%–15%) with a maximum of 10% (30%) for the q q̄ → V H (gg → ZH) production mode. Two independent nuisance parame- ters account for the systematic uncertainties induced by the PS and UE models in the pV,r T and mbb distributions. In addition, a systematic uncertainty due to the EW corrections is parameterised as a change in shape of the pVT distributions for the q q̄ → V H processes [15]. 5 Results The measured reduced stage-1 V H cross-sections times the H → bb̄ and V → leptons branching ratios, σ×B, in the 5-POI and 3-POI schemes, together with the SM predictions, are summarised in table 3. The results of the 5-POI scheme are also illustrated in figure 3. The SM predictions are shown together with the theoretical cross-section uncertainty for the merged regions computed as described in the previous section. The measurements are in agreement with the SM predictions. The cross-sections measured in the pVT > 150 GeV intervals are not equal to the sum of those measured for 150 < pVT < 250 GeV and pVT > 250 GeV. This is because the signal template for pVT > 150 GeV in the 3-POI fit is computed from the sum of the templates of the two regions assuming that the ratio of yields in those regions is that predicted –9– Measurement region SM prediction Result Stat. unc. Syst. unc. [fb] (|yH | < 2.5, H → bb̄) [fb] [fb] [fb] Th. sig. Th. bkg. Exp. 5-POI scheme W → `ν; 150 < pVT < 250 GeV 24.0 ± 1.1 20 ± 25 ± 17 ± 2 ± 13 ± 9 W → `ν; pVT > 250 GeV 7.1 ± 0.3 8.8 ± 5.2 ± 4.4 ± 0.5 ± 2.5 ± 0.9 Z → ``, νν; 75 < pVT < 150 GeV 50.6 ± 4.1 81 ± 45 ± 35 ± 10 ± 21 ± 19 Z → ``, νν; 150 < pVT < 250 GeV 18.8 ± 2.4 14 ± 13 ± 11 ± 1 ± 6 ± 3 JHEP05(2019)141 Z → ``, νν; pVT > 250 GeV 4.9 ± 0.5 8.5 ± 4.0 ± 3.7 ± 0.8 ± 1.2 ± 0.6 3-POI scheme W → `ν; pVT > 150 GeV 31.1 ± 1.4 35 ± 14 ± 9 ± 2 ± 9 ± 4 Z → ``, νν; 75 < pVT < 150 GeV 50.6 ± 4.1 81 ± 45 ± 35 ± 10 ± 21 ± 19 Z → ``, νν; pVT > 150 GeV 23.7 ± 3.0 28.4 ± 8.1 ± 6.4 ± 2.4 ± 3.6 ± 2.3 Table 3. Best-fit values and uncertainties for the V H, V → leptons reduced stage-1 simplified template cross-sections times the H → bb̄ branching ratio, in the 5-POI (top five rows) and 3-POI (bottom three rows) schemes. The SM predictions for each region, computed using the inclusive cross-section calculations and the simulated event samples described in section 2, are also shown. The contributions to the total uncertainty in the measurements from statistical (Stat. unc.) or systematic uncertainties (Syst. unc.) in the signal modelling (Th. sig.), background modelling (Th. bkg.), and in experimental performance (Exp.) are given separately. The total systematic uncertainty, equal to the difference in quadrature between the total uncertainty and the statistical uncertainty, differs from the sum in quadrature of the Th. Sig., Th. Bkg., and Exp. systematic uncertainties due to correlations. All leptonic decays of the V bosons (including those to τ -leptons, ` = e, µ, τ ) are considered. by the SM, while in the 5-POI fit the normalisations of the two templates are floated independently. The cross-sections are measured with relative uncertainties varying between 50% and 125% in the 5-POI case, and between 29% and 56% for the 3-POI. The largest uncertainties are statistical, except for the W H cross-sections with pW T > 150 GeV in the 3-POI case and W with 150 < pT < 250 GeV in the 5-POI case. In the 5-POI case, an anti-correlation of the order of 40%–60% is observed between the cross-sections in the ranges pVT > 250 GeV and 150 < pVT < 250 GeV, which are measured with the same reconstructed-event categories. The dominant systematic uncertainties are due to the limited number of simulated background events and the theoretical modelling of the background processes. The uncer- tainties due to the theoretical modelling of the V H signal are small, with relative values ranging between 6% and 12%. The uncertainties in the predictions are 2–3 times larger for ZH than for W H in the same pVT interval due to the limited precision of the theoretical calculations of the gg → ZH process. – 10 – σi × B Hbb × B Vlep [fb] ATLAS VH, H→bb, V→leptons cross-sections: s=13 TeV, 79.8 fb-1 Observed Tot. unc. Stat. unc. SM Theo. unc. 103 V=W V=Z 102 10 JHEP05(2019)141 Ratio to SM 2 1 0 150 p W> 75< Z 150 p Z>

6 operators are further suppressed by powers of Λ. The results presented in this paper focus on the coefficients of the operators in the ‘Strongly Interacting Light Higgs’ formulation [46]. This formalism is defined as the effec- tive theory of a strongly interacting sector in which a light composite Higgs boson arises as a pseudo Goldstone boson, and is responsible for EW symmetry breaking. Among such operators, four directly affect the V H cross-sections because they introduce new Higgs boson interactions with W bosons (OHW , OW ) and Z bosons (all four operators): • OHW = i (Dµ H)† σ a (Dν H) Wµν a , • OHB = i (Dµ H)† (Dν H) Bµν ,   ↔ i † • OW = 2 H σ D H Dν Wµν a µ a ,   ↔ • OB = i 2 H † Dµ H ∂ ν Bµν . The corresponding CP -odd operators ÕHW , ÕHB , ÕW , and ÕB , are not considered. – 11 – Modifications of the gg → ZH production cross-section are only introduced by either higher-dimension (D ≥ 8) operators or corrections that are formally at NNLO in QCD, and are not included in this study, in which the expected gg → ZH contribution is kept fixed to the SM prediction. The operator Od = yd |H|2 Q̄L HdR (plus Hermitian conjugate) with Yukawa coupling strength yd , which modifies the coupling between the Higgs boson and down-type quarks, induces variations of the partial width Γbb H and of the total Higgs boson width ΓH , and therefore of the H → bb̄ branching ratio. This operator affects the measured cross-sections in the same way in each region. JHEP05(2019)141 Constraints are set on the coefficients of the five OW , OB , OHW , OHB and Od operators in the ‘Higgs Effective Lagrangian’ (HEL) implementation [47], using the known relations between such coefficients and the stage-1 STXS based on leading-order predictions [48]. Such relations include interference terms between the SM and non-SM amplitudes that are linear in the coefficients and of order 1/Λ2 , and the SM-independent contributions that are quadratic in the coefficients and of order 1/Λ4 . In the HEL implementation, the coefficients ci of interest are recast into the following dimensionless coefficients: m2W cHW m2W cHB m2W cW m2W cB cd c̄HW = , c̄HB = , c̄W = , c̄B = , c̄d = v 2 , g Λ2 g 0 Λ2 g Λ2 g 0 Λ2 Λ2 where g and g 0 are the SU(2) and U(1) SM gauge couplings, and v is the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs boson field. These dimensionless coefficients are equal to zero in the SM. The sum c̄W +c̄B is strongly constrained by precision EW data [49] and is thus assumed here to be zero, and constraints are set on c̄HW , c̄HB , c̄W − c̄B and c̄d . The relations between the HEL coefficients and the reduced STXS measured in this paper are obtained by averaging the relations for the regions that are merged with weights proportional to their respective cross-sections. Simultaneous maximum-likelihood fits to the five STXS measured in the 5-POI scheme are performed to determine c̄HW , c̄HB , c̄W − c̄B and c̄d . Due to the large sensitivity to the Higgs boson anomalous couplings to vector bosons provided by the pVT > 250 GeV cross- sections, the 5-POI results place tighter constraints on these coefficients (e.g. approximately a factor two for c̄HW ) than do the 3-POI results. For this reason, constraints obtained with the 3-POI results are not shown here. In each fit, all coefficients but one are assumed to vanish, and 68% and 95% confidence level (CL) one-dimensional intervals are inferred for the remaining coefficient. The negative- log-likelihood one-dimensional projections are shown in figure 4, and the 68% and 95% CL intervals for c̄HW , c̄HB , c̄W − c̄B and c̄d are summarised in table 4. The parameters c̄HW and c̄W − c̄B are constrained at 95% CL to be no more than a few percent, while the constraint on c̄HB is about five times worse, and the constraint on c̄d is of order unity. For comparison, table 4 also shows the 68% and 95% CL intervals for the dimensionless coefficients when the SM-independent contributions, which are of the same order (1/Λ4 ) as the dimension-8 operators that are neglected, are not considered. The constraints are typically 50% stronger than when the SM-independent contributions are not neglected. – 12 – 3 3 ) -∆lnL(c ) HB HW ATLAS VH, H→ bb ATLAS VH, H→ bb s=13 TeV, 79.8 fb-1 s=13 TeV, 79.8 fb-1 -∆lnL(c 2.5 2.5 Observed Observed Expected Expected 2 2 2σ 2σ 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1σ 1σ JHEP05(2019)141 0 0 −0.025 −0.02 −0.015 −0.01 −0.005 0 0.005 −0.12 −0.1 −0.08 −0.06 −0.04 −0.02 0 0.02 0.04 cHW cHB (a) (b) 3 -∆lnL(c ) 3 d -∆lnL(c - cB) ATLAS VH, H→ bb ATLAS VH, H→ bb s=13 TeV, 79.8 fb-1 s=13 TeV, 79.8 fb-1 2.5 2.5 W Observed Observed Expected Expected 2 2 2σ 2σ 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 1σ 1σ 0 0 −0.05 −0.04 −0.03 −0.02 −0.01 0 0.01 0.02 −2.5 −2 −1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 cW - cB cd (c) (d) Figure 4. The observed (solid) and expected (dotted) profiled negative-log-likelihood functions for the one-dimensional fits to constrain the coefficients (a) c̄HW , (b) c̄HB , (c) c̄W − c̄B and (d) c̄d of an effective Lagrangian (described in the text), when the other coefficients are assumed to vanish. 7 Conclusion √ Using 79.8 fb−1 of s = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC, the cross-sections for the associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom-quark pairs and an electroweak gauge boson W or Z decaying into leptons are measured as functions of the vector-boson transverse momentum pVT . The cross-sections are measured for Higgs bosons in a fiducial volume with rapidity |yH | < 2.5, in the ‘simplified template cross-section’ framework. The measurements are performed for two different choices of the number of pVT inter- vals. The results have relative uncertainties varying between 50% and 125% in one case, and between 29% and 56% in the other. The measurements are in agreement with the Standard Model predictions, even in high pVT (> 250 GeV) regions that are most sensitive to enhancements from potential anomalous interactions between the Higgs boson and the electroweak gauge bosons. – 13 – Coefficient Expected interval Observed interval Results at 68% confidence level c̄HW [−0.003, 0.002] [−0.001, 0.004] (interference only [−0.002, 0.003] [−0.001, 0.005]) S c̄HB [−0.066, 0.013] [−0.078, −0.055] [0.005, 0.019] (interference only [−0.016, 0.016] [−0.005, 0.030]) c̄W − c̄B [−0.006, 0.005] [−0.002, 0.007] (interference only [−0.005, 0.005] [−0.002, 0.008]) JHEP05(2019)141 S c̄d [−1.5, 0.3] [−1.6, −0.9] [−0.3, 0.4] (interference only [−0.4, 0.4] [−0.2, 0.7]) Results at 95% confidence level S c̄HW [−0.018, 0.004] [−0.019,−0.010] [−0.005, 0.006] (interference only [−0.005, 0.005] [−0.003, 0.008]) c̄HB [−0.078, 0.024] [−0.090, 0.032] (interference only [−0.033, 0.033] [−0.022, 0.049]) S c̄W − c̄B [−0.034, 0.008] [−0.036,−0.024] [−0.009, 0.010] (interference only [−0.009, 0.010] [−0.006, 0.014]) c̄d [−1.7, 0.5] [−1.9, 0.7] (interference only [−0.8, 0.8] [−0.6, 1.1]) Table 4. The expected and observed 68% CL (four top rows) and 95% CL (four bottom rows) intervals for the effective Lagrangian coefficients c̄HW , c̄HB , c̄W − c̄B and c̄d when the other co- efficients are assumed to vanish. Each row is composed of two sub-rows: the first one uses the interference between SM and non-SM amplitudes and the SM-independent contributions, while the second sub-row uses only the interference between SM and non-SM amplitudes. One-dimensional limits on four linear combinations of the coefficients of effective La- grangian operators affecting the Higgs boson couplings to the electroweak gauge bosons and to down-type quarks have also been set. For two of these parameters the constraint has a precision of a few percent. Acknowledgments We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently. We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Aus- tralia; BMWFW and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST and NSFC, China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR and VSC CR, Czech Republic; DNRF and DNSRC, Denmark; IN2P3-CNRS, CEA-DRF/IRFU, France; – 14 – SRNSFG, Georgia; BMBF, HGF, and MPG, Germany; GSRT, Greece; RGC, Hong Kong SAR, China; ISF and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; NWO, Netherlands; RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and NRC KI, Russian Federation; JINR; MESTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZŠ, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SERI, SNSF and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; MOST, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, United Kingdom; DOE and NSF, United States of America. In addition, individual groups and members have received support from BCKDF, CANARIE, CRC and Compute Canada, Canada; COST, ERC, ERDF, Horizon 2020, and Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions, European Union; JHEP05(2019)141 Investissements d’ Avenir Labex and Idex, ANR, France; DFG and AvH Foundation, Ger- many; Herakleitos, Thales and Aristeia programmes co-financed by EU-ESF and the Greek NSRF, Greece; BSF-NSF and GIF, Israel; CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain; The Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN, the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (U.K.) and BNL (U.S.A.), the Tier-2 facilities worldwide and large non-WLCG resource providers. Ma- jor contributors of computing resources are listed in ref. [50]. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. References [1] F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE]. [2] P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132 [INSPIRE]. [3] P.W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE]. [4] G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble, Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585 [INSPIRE]. [5] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE]. [6] CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE]. [7] ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp √ Collisions at s = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 191803 [arXiv:1503.07589] [INSPIRE]. – 15 – [8] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the H → ZZ ∗ → 4` and √ H → γγ channels with s = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 345 [arXiv:1806.00242] [INSPIRE]. [9] CMS collaboration, Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the √ four-lepton final state in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2017) 047 [arXiv:1706.09936] [INSPIRE]. [10] ATLAS collaboration, Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 476 [Erratum ibid. C 76 (2016) 152] [arXiv:1506.05669] [INSPIRE]. JHEP05(2019)141 [11] CMS collaboration, Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 012004 [arXiv:1411.3441] [INSPIRE]. [12] ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC √ pp collision data at s = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 08 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1606.02266] [INSPIRE]. [13] CMS collaboration, Observation of ttH production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 231801 [arXiv:1804.02610] [INSPIRE]. [14] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 173 [arXiv:1806.00425] [INSPIRE]. [15] ATLAS collaboration, Observation of H → bb̄ decays and V H production with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 786 (2018) 59 [arXiv:1808.08238] [INSPIRE]. [16] CMS collaboration, Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 121801 [arXiv:1808.08242] [INSPIRE]. [17] LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, CERN Publishing (2016). [18] J.R. Andersen et al., Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, in proceedings of the 9th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders (PhysTeV 2015), Les Houches, France, 1–19 June 2015, arXiv:1605.04692 [INSPIRE]. [19] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE]. [20] ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay √ channel with 36 fb−1 of pp collision data at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 052005 [arXiv:1802.04146] [INSPIRE]. [21] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson coupling properties in the √ H → ZZ ∗ → 4` decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 03 (2018) 095 [arXiv:1712.02304] [INSPIRE]. [22] ATLAS collaboration, Constraints on an effective Lagrangian from the combined √ H → ZZ ∗ → 4` and H → γγ channels using 36.1 fb−1 of s = 13 TeV pp collision data collected with the ATLAS detector, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-018 (2017). [23] ATLAS collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, 2008 JINST 3 S08003 [INSPIRE]. – 16 – [24] ATLAS IBL collaboration, Production and Integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, 2018 JINST 13 T05008 [arXiv:1803.00844] [INSPIRE]. [25] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE]. [26] G. Cullen et al., Automated One-Loop Calculations with GoSam, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1889 [arXiv:1111.2034] [INSPIRE]. [27] K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi, MINLO: Multi-Scale Improved NLO, JHEP 10 (2012) 155 [arXiv:1206.3572] [INSPIRE]. JHEP05(2019)141 [28] G. Luisoni, P. Nason, C. Oleari and F. Tramontano, HW ± /HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO, JHEP 10 (2013) 083 [arXiv:1306.2542] [INSPIRE]. [29] A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and A. Mück, Electroweak corrections to Higgs-strahlung off W/Z bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC with HAWK, JHEP 03 (2012) 075 [arXiv:1112.5142] [INSPIRE]. [30] A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, S. Kallweit and A. Mück, HAWK 2.0: A Monte Carlo program for Higgs production in vector-boson fusion and Higgs strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 195 (2015) 161 [arXiv:1412.5390] [INSPIRE]. [31] M.L. Ciccolini, S. Dittmaier and M. Krämer, Electroweak radiative corrections to associated WH and ZH production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 073003 [hep-ph/0306234] [INSPIRE]. [32] O. Brein, A. Djouadi and R. Harlander, NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 579 (2004) 149 [hep-ph/0307206] [INSPIRE]. [33] G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and F. Tramontano, Associated WH production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 152003 [arXiv:1107.1164] [INSPIRE]. [34] O. Brein, R. Harlander, M. Wiesemann and T. Zirke, Top-Quark Mediated Effects in Hadronic Higgs-Strahlung, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1868 [arXiv:1111.0761] [INSPIRE]. [35] G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and F. Tramontano, Higher-order QCD effects for associated WH production and decay at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2014) 039 [arXiv:1312.1669] [INSPIRE]. [36] G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and F. Tramontano, Associated ZH production at hadron colliders: the fully differential NNLO QCD calculation, Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 51 [arXiv:1407.4747] [INSPIRE]. [37] J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Associated production of a Higgs boson at NNLO, JHEP 06 (2016) 179 [arXiv:1601.00658] [INSPIRE]. [38] L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier, R.V. Harlander, H. Rzehak and T.J.E. Zirke, Gluon-induced Higgs-strahlung at next-to-leading order QCD, JHEP 02 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1211.5015] [INSPIRE]. [39] B. Hespel, F. Maltoni and E. Vryonidou, Higgs and Z boson associated production via gluon fusion in the SM and the 2HDM, JHEP 06 (2015) 065 [arXiv:1503.01656] [INSPIRE]. [40] R.V. Harlander, A. Kulesza, V. Theeuwes and T. Zirke, Soft gluon resummation for gluon-induced Higgs Strahlung, JHEP 11 (2014) 082 [arXiv:1410.0217] [INSPIRE]. – 17 – [41] R.V. Harlander, S. Liebler and T. Zirke, Higgs Strahlung at the Large Hadron Collider in the 2-Higgs-Doublet Model, JHEP 02 (2014) 023 [arXiv:1307.8122] [INSPIRE]. [42] O. Brein, R.V. Harlander and T.J.E. Zirke, vh@nnlo — Higgs Strahlung at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 998 [arXiv:1210.5347] [INSPIRE]. [43] ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of b-jet tagging efficiency with the ATLAS detector √ using tt events at s = 13 TeV, JHEP 08 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1805.01845] [INSPIRE]. [44] ATLAS collaboration, Evaluation of theoretical uncertainties for simplified template cross section measurements of V -associated production of the Higgs boson, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-035 (2018). JHEP05(2019)141 [45] R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Mühlleitner and M. Spira, Effective Lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE]. [46] G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE]. [47] A. Alloul, B. Fuks and V. Sanz, Phenomenology of the Higgs effective Lagrangian via FeynRules, JHEP 04 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.5150] [INSPIRE]. [48] C. Hays, V. Sanz Gonzalez and G. Zemaityte, Constraining EFT parameters using simplified template cross sections, LHCHXSWG-INT-2017-001 (2017). [49] J. Ellis, C.W. Murphy, V. Sanz and T. You, Updated Global SMEFT Fit to Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Data, JHEP 06 (2018) 146 [arXiv:1803.03252] [INSPIRE]. [50] ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-GEN-PUB-2016-002 (2016). – 18 – The ATLAS collaboration M. Aaboud35d , G. Aad101 , B. Abbott128 , D.C. Abbott102 , O. Abdinov13,∗ , A. Abed Abud70a,70b , D.K. Abhayasinghe93 , S.H. Abidi167 , O.S. AbouZeid40 , N.L. Abraham156 , H. Abramowicz161 , H. Abreu160 , Y. Abulaiti6 , B.S. Acharya66a,66b,n , S. Adachi163 , L. Adam99 , C. Adam Bourdarios132 , L. Adamczyk83a , L. Adamek167 , J. Adelman121 , M. Adersberger114 , A. Adiguzel12c,ah , S. Adorni54 , T. Adye144 , A.A. Affolder146 , Y. Afik160 , C. Agapopoulou132 , M.N. Agaras38 , A. Aggarwal119 , C. Agheorghiesei27c , J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra140f,140a,ag , F. Ahmadov79 , G. Aielli73a,73b , S. Akatsuka85 , T.P.A. Åkesson96 , E. Akilli54 , A.V. Akimov110 , K. Al Khoury132 , G.L. Alberghi23b,23a , J. Albert176 , M.J. Alconada Verzini88 , S. Alderweireldt119 , JHEP05(2019)141 M. Aleksa36 , I.N. Aleksandrov79 , C. Alexa27b , D. Alexandre19 , T. Alexopoulos10 , A. Alfonsi120 , M. Alhroob128 , B. Ali142 , G. Alimonti68a , J. Alison37 , S.P. Alkire148 , C. Allaire132 , B.M.M. Allbrooke156 , B.W. Allen131 , P.P. Allport21 , A. Aloisio69a,69b , A. Alonso40 , F. Alonso88 , C. Alpigiani148 , A.A. Alshehri57 , M.I. Alstaty101 , M. Alvarez Estevez98 , B. Alvarez Gonzalez36 , D. Álvarez Piqueras174 , M.G. Alviggi69a,69b , Y. Amaral Coutinho80b , A. Ambler103 , L. Ambroz135 , C. Amelung26 , D. Amidei105 , S.P. Amor Dos Santos140a,140c , S. Amoroso46 , C.S. Amrouche54 , F. An78 , C. Anastopoulos149 , N. Andari145 , T. Andeen11 , C.F. Anders61b , J.K. Anders20 , A. Andreazza68a,68b , V. Andrei61a , C.R. Anelli176 , S. Angelidakis38 , I. Angelozzi120 , A. Angerami39 , A.V. Anisenkov122b,122a , A. Annovi71a , C. Antel61a , M.T. Anthony149 , M. Antonelli51 , D.J.A. Antrim171 , F. Anulli72a , M. Aoki81 , J.A. Aparisi Pozo174 , L. Aperio Bella36 , G. Arabidze106 , J.P. Araque140a , V. Araujo Ferraz80b , R. Araujo Pereira80b , A.T.H. Arce49 , F.A. Arduh88 , J-F. Arguin109 , S. Argyropoulos77 , J.-H. Arling46 , A.J. Armbruster36 , L.J. Armitage92 , A. Armstrong171 , O. Arnaez167 , H. Arnold120 , A. Artamonov111,∗ , G. Artoni135 , S. Artz99 , S. Asai163 , N. Asbah59 , E.M. Asimakopoulou172 , L. Asquith156 , K. Assamagan29 , R. Astalos28a , R.J. Atkin33a , M. Atkinson173 , N.B. Atlay151 , H. Atmani132 , K. Augsten142 , G. Avolio36 , R. Avramidou60a , M.K. Ayoub15a , A.M. Azoulay168b , G. Azuelos109,av , A.E. Baas61a , M.J. Baca21 , H. Bachacou145 , K. Bachas67a,67b , M. Backes135 , F. Backman45a,45b , P. Bagnaia72a,72b , M. Bahmani84 , H. Bahrasemani152 , A.J. Bailey174 , V.R. Bailey173 , J.T. Baines144 , M. Bajic40 , C. Bakalis10 , O.K. Baker183 , P.J. Bakker120 , D. Bakshi Gupta8 , S. Balaji157 , E.M. Baldin122b,122a , P. Balek180 , F. Balli145 , W.K. Balunas135 , J. Balz99 , E. Banas84 , A. Bandyopadhyay24 , Sw. Banerjee181,i , A.A.E. Bannoura182 , L. Barak161 , W.M. Barbe38 , E.L. Barberio104 , D. Barberis55b,55a , M. Barbero101 , T. Barillari115 , M-S. Barisits36 , J. Barkeloo131 , T. Barklow153 , R. Barnea160 , S.L. Barnes60c , B.M. Barnett144 , R.M. Barnett18 , Z. Barnovska-Blenessy60a , A. Baroncelli60a , G. Barone29 , A.J. Barr135 , L. Barranco Navarro174 , F. Barreiro98 , J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa15a , R. Bartoldus153 , G. Bartolini101 , A.E. Barton89 , P. Bartos28a , A. Basalaev46 , A. Bassalat132,ap , R.L. Bates57 , S.J. Batista167 , S. Batlamous35e , J.R. Batley32 , B. Batool151 , M. Battaglia146 , M. Bauce72a,72b , F. Bauer145 , K.T. Bauer171 , H.S. Bawa31,l , J.B. Beacham49 , T. Beau136 , P.H. Beauchemin170 , P. Bechtle24 , H.C. Beck53 , H.P. Beck20,q , K. Becker52 , M. Becker99 , C. Becot46 , A. Beddall12d , A.J. Beddall12a , V.A. Bednyakov79 , M. Bedognetti120 , C.P. Bee155 , T.A. Beermann76 , M. Begalli80b , M. Begel29 , A. Behera155 , J.K. Behr46 , F. Beisiegel24 , A.S. Bell94 , G. Bella161 , L. Bellagamba23b , A. Bellerive34 , P. Bellos9 , K. Beloborodov122b,122a , K. Belotskiy112 , N.L. Belyaev112 , O. Benary161,∗ , D. Benchekroun35a , N. Benekos10 , Y. Benhammou161 , D.P. Benjamin6 , M. Benoit54 , J.R. Bensinger26 , S. Bentvelsen120 , L. Beresford135 , M. Beretta51 , D. Berge46 , E. Bergeaas Kuutmann172 , N. Berger5 , B. Bergmann142 , L.J. Bergsten26 , J. Beringer18 , S. Berlendis7 , N.R. Bernard102 , G. Bernardi136 , C. Bernius153 , F.U. Bernlochner24 , T. Berry93 , P. Berta99 , C. Bertella15a , G. Bertoli45a,45b , I.A. Bertram89 , G.J. Besjes40 , O. Bessidskaia Bylund182 , N. Besson145 , A. Bethani100 , S. Bethke115 , A. Betti24 , A.J. Bevan92 , – 19 – J. Beyer115 , R. Bi139 , R.M. Bianchi139 , O. Biebel114 , D. Biedermann19 , R. Bielski36 , K. Bierwagen99 , N.V. Biesuz71a,71b , M. Biglietti74a , T.R.V. Billoud109 , M. Bindi53 , A. Bingul12d , C. Bini72a,72b , S. Biondi23b,23a , M. Birman180 , T. Bisanz53 , J.P. Biswal161 , A. Bitadze100 , C. Bittrich48 , D.M. Bjergaard49 , J.E. Black153 , K.M. Black25 , T. Blazek28a , I. Bloch46 , C. Blocker26 , A. Blue57 , U. Blumenschein92 , G.J. Bobbink120 , V.S. Bobrovnikov122b,122a , S.S. Bocchetta96 , A. Bocci49 , D. Boerner46 , D. Bogavac114 , A.G. Bogdanchikov122b,122a , C. Bohm45a , V. Boisvert93 , P. Bokan53,172 , T. Bold83a , A.S. Boldyrev113 , A.E. Bolz61b , M. Bomben136 , M. Bona92 , J.S. Bonilla131 , M. Boonekamp145 , H.M. Borecka-Bielska90 , A. Borisov123 , G. Borissov89 , J. Bortfeldt36 , D. Bortoletto135 , V. Bortolotto73a,73b , D. Boscherini23b , M. Bosman14 , J.D. Bossio Sola30 , K. Bouaouda35a , J. Boudreau139 , E.V. Bouhova-Thacker89 , D. Boumediene38 , S.K. Boutle57 , A. Boveia126 , J. Boyd36 , D. Boye33b , JHEP05(2019)141 I.R. Boyko79 , A.J. Bozson93 , J. Bracinik21 , N. Brahimi101 , G. Brandt182 , O. Brandt61a , F. Braren46 , U. Bratzler164 , B. Brau102 , J.E. Brau131 , W.D. Breaden Madden57 , K. Brendlinger46 , L. Brenner46 , R. Brenner172 , S. Bressler180 , B. Brickwedde99 , D.L. Briglin21 , D. Britton57 , D. Britzger115 , I. Brock24 , R. Brock106 , G. Brooijmans39 , T. Brooks93 , W.K. Brooks147b , E. Brost121 , J.H Broughton21 , P.A. Bruckman de Renstrom84 , D. Bruncko28b , A. Bruni23b , G. Bruni23b , L.S. Bruni120 , S. Bruno73a,73b , B.H. Brunt32 , M. Bruschi23b , N. Bruscino139 , P. Bryant37 , L. Bryngemark96 , T. Buanes17 , Q. Buat36 , P. Buchholz151 , A.G. Buckley57 , I.A. Budagov79 , M.K. Bugge134 , F. Bührer52 , O. Bulekov112 , T.J. Burch121 , S. Burdin90 , C.D. Burgard120 , A.M. Burger129 , B. Burghgrave8 , K. Burka84 , J.T.P. Burr46 , V. Büscher99 , E. Buschmann53 , P.J. Bussey57 , J.M. Butler25 , C.M. Buttar57 , J.M. Butterworth94 , P. Butti36 , W. Buttinger36 , A. Buzatu158 , A.R. Buzykaev122b,122a , G. Cabras23b,23a , S. Cabrera Urbán174 , D. Caforio142 , H. Cai173 , V.M.M. Cairo153 , O. Cakir4a , N. Calace36 , P. Calafiura18 , A. Calandri101 , G. Calderini136 , P. Calfayan65 , G. Callea57 , L.P. Caloba80b , S. Calvente Lopez98 , D. Calvet38 , S. Calvet38 , T.P. Calvet155 , M. Calvetti71a,71b , R. Camacho Toro136 , S. Camarda36 , D. Camarero Munoz98 , P. Camarri73a,73b , D. Cameron134 , R. Caminal Armadans102 , C. Camincher36 , S. Campana36 , M. Campanelli94 , A. Camplani40 , A. Campoverde151 , V. Canale69a,69b , A. Canesse103 , M. Cano Bret60c , J. Cantero129 , T. Cao161 , Y. Cao173 , M.D.M. Capeans Garrido36 , M. Capua41b,41a , R. Cardarelli73a , F.C. Cardillo149 , I. Carli143 , T. Carli36 , G. Carlino69a , B.T. Carlson139 , L. Carminati68a,68b , R.M.D. Carney45a,45b , S. Caron119 , E. Carquin147b , S. Carrá68a,68b , J.W.S. Carter167 , M.P. Casado14,e , A.F. Casha167 , D.W. Casper171 , R. Castelijn120 , F.L. Castillo174 , V. Castillo Gimenez174 , N.F. Castro140a,140e , A. Catinaccio36 , J.R. Catmore134 , A. Cattai36 , J. Caudron24 , V. Cavaliere29 , E. Cavallaro14 , D. Cavalli68a , M. Cavalli-Sforza14 , V. Cavasinni71a,71b , E. Celebi12b , F. Ceradini74a,74b , L. Cerda Alberich174 , A.S. Cerqueira80a , A. Cerri156 , L. Cerrito73a,73b , F. Cerutti18 , A. Cervelli23b,23a , S.A. Cetin12b , A. Chafaq35a , D. Chakraborty121 , S.K. Chan59 , W.S. Chan120 , W.Y. Chan90 , J.D. Chapman32 , B. Chargeishvili159b , D.G. Charlton21 , C.C. Chau34 , C.A. Chavez Barajas156 , S. Che126 , A. Chegwidden106 , S. Chekanov6 , S.V. Chekulaev168a , G.A. Chelkov79,au , M.A. Chelstowska36 , B. Chen78 , C. Chen60a , C.H. Chen78 , H. Chen29 , J. Chen60a , J. Chen39 , S. Chen137 , S.J. Chen15c , X. Chen15b,at , Y. Chen82 , Y-H. Chen46 , H.C. Cheng63a , H.J. Cheng15a,15d , A. Cheplakov79 , E. Cheremushkina123 , R. Cherkaoui El Moursli35e , E. Cheu7 , K. Cheung64 , T.J.A. Chevalérias145 , L. Chevalier145 , V. Chiarella51 , G. Chiarelli71a , G. Chiodini67a , A.S. Chisholm36,21 , A. Chitan27b , I. Chiu163 , Y.H. Chiu176 , M.V. Chizhov79 , K. Choi65 , A.R. Chomont132 , S. Chouridou162 , Y.S. Chow120 , M.C. Chu63a , J. Chudoba141 , A.J. Chuinard103 , J.J. Chwastowski84 , L. Chytka130 , D. Cinca47 , V. Cindro91 , I.A. Cioară27b , A. Ciocio18 , F. Cirotto69a,69b , Z.H. Citron180 , M. Citterio68a , B.M. Ciungu167 , A. Clark54 , M.R. Clark39 , P.J. Clark50 , C. Clement45a,45b , Y. Coadou101 , M. Cobal66a,66c , A. Coccaro55b , J. Cochran78 , H. Cohen161 , A.E.C. Coimbra180 , L. Colasurdo119 , – 20 – B. Cole39 , A.P. Colijn120 , J. Collot58 , P. Conde Muiño140a,f , E. Coniavitis52 , S.H. Connell33b , I.A. Connelly57 , S. Constantinescu27b , F. Conventi69a,aw , A.M. Cooper-Sarkar135 , F. Cormier175 , K.J.R. Cormier167 , L.D. Corpe94 , M. Corradi72a,72b , E.E. Corrigan96 , F. Corriveau103,ac , A. Cortes-Gonzalez36 , M.J. Costa174 , F. Costanza5 , D. Costanzo149 , G. Cowan93 , J.W. Cowley32 , J. Crane100 , K. Cranmer124 , S.J. Crawley57 , R.A. Creager137 , S. Crépé-Renaudin58 , F. Crescioli136 , M. Cristinziani24 , V. Croft120 , G. Crosetti41b,41a , A. Cueto5 , T. Cuhadar Donszelmann149 , A.R. Cukierman153 , S. Czekierda84 , P. Czodrowski36 , M.J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa60b , J.V. Da Fonseca Pinto80b , C. Da Via100 , W. Dabrowski83a , T. Dado28a , S. Dahbi35e , T. Dai105 , C. Dallapiccola102 , M. Dam40 , G. D’amen23b,23a , J. Damp99 , J.R. Dandoy137 , M.F. Daneri30 , N.P. Dang181 , N.D Dann100 , M. Danninger175 , V. Dao36 , G. Darbo55b , O. Dartsi5 , A. Dattagupta131 , T. Daubney46 , S. D’Auria68a,68b , W. Davey24 , JHEP05(2019)141 C. David46 , T. Davidek143 , D.R. Davis49 , E. Dawe104 , I. Dawson149 , K. De8 , R. De Asmundis69a , A. De Benedetti128 , M. De Beurs120 , S. De Castro23b,23a , S. De Cecco72a,72b , N. De Groot119 , P. de Jong120 , H. De la Torre106 , A. De Maria15c , D. De Pedis72a , A. De Salvo72a , U. De Sanctis73a,73b , M. De Santis73a,73b , A. De Santo156 , K. De Vasconcelos Corga101 , J.B. De Vivie De Regie132 , C. Debenedetti146 , D.V. Dedovich79 , A.M. Deiana42 , M. Del Gaudio41b,41a , J. Del Peso98 , Y. Delabat Diaz46 , D. Delgove132 , F. Deliot145 , C.M. Delitzsch7 , M. Della Pietra69a,69b , D. Della Volpe54 , A. Dell’Acqua36 , L. Dell’Asta25 , M. Delmastro5 , C. Delporte132 , P.A. Delsart58 , D.A. DeMarco167 , S. Demers183 , M. Demichev79 , G. Demontigny109 , S.P. Denisov123 , D. Denysiuk120 , L. D’Eramo136 , D. Derendarz84 , J.E. Derkaoui35d , F. Derue136 , P. Dervan90 , K. Desch24 , C. Deterre46 , K. Dette167 , M.R. Devesa30 , P.O. Deviveiros36 , A. Dewhurst144 , S. Dhaliwal26 , F.A. Di Bello54 , A. Di Ciaccio73a,73b , L. Di Ciaccio5 , W.K. Di Clemente137 , C. Di Donato69a,69b , A. Di Girolamo36 , G. Di Gregorio71a,71b , B. Di Micco74a,74b , R. Di Nardo102 , K.F. Di Petrillo59 , R. Di Sipio167 , D. Di Valentino34 , C. Diaconu101 , F.A. Dias40 , T. Dias Do Vale140a,140e , M.A. Diaz147a , J. Dickinson18 , E.B. Diehl105 , J. Dietrich19 , S. Dı́ez Cornell46 , A. Dimitrievska18 , W. Ding15b , J. Dingfelder24 , F. Dittus36 , F. Djama101 , T. Djobava159b , J.I. Djuvsland17 , M.A.B. Do Vale80c , M. Dobre27b , D. Dodsworth26 , C. Doglioni96 , J. Dolejsi143 , Z. Dolezal143 , M. Donadelli80d , J. Donini38 , A. D’onofrio92 , M. D’Onofrio90 , J. Dopke144 , A. Doria69a , M.T. Dova88 , A.T. Doyle57 , E. Drechsler152 , E. Dreyer152 , T. Dreyer53 , Y. Du60b , Y. Duan60b , F. Dubinin110 , M. Dubovsky28a , A. Dubreuil54 , E. Duchovni180 , G. Duckeck114 , A. Ducourthial136 , O.A. Ducu109,w , D. Duda115 , A. Dudarev36 , A.C. Dudder99 , E.M. Duffield18 , L. Duflot132 , M. Dührssen36 , C. Dülsen182 , M. Dumancic180 , A.E. Dumitriu27b , A.K. Duncan57 , M. Dunford61a , A. Duperrin101 , H. Duran Yildiz4a , M. Düren56 , A. Durglishvili159b , D. Duschinger48 , B. Dutta46 , D. Duvnjak1 , G.I. Dyckes137 , M. Dyndal46 , S. Dysch100 , B.S. Dziedzic84 , K.M. Ecker115 , R.C. Edgar105 , T. Eifert36 , G. Eigen17 , K. Einsweiler18 , T. Ekelof172 , M. El Kacimi35c , R. El Kosseifi101 , V. Ellajosyula172 , M. Ellert172 , F. Ellinghaus182 , A.A. Elliot92 , N. Ellis36 , J. Elmsheuser29 , M. Elsing36 , D. Emeliyanov144 , A. Emerman39 , Y. Enari163 , J.S. Ennis178 , M.B. Epland49 , J. Erdmann47 , A. Ereditato20 , M. Escalier132 , C. Escobar174 , O. Estrada Pastor174 , A.I. Etienvre145 , E. Etzion161 , H. Evans65 , A. Ezhilov138 , M. Ezzi35e , F. Fabbri57 , L. Fabbri23b,23a , V. Fabiani119 , G. Facini94 , R.M. Faisca Rodrigues Pereira140a , R.M. Fakhrutdinov123 , S. Falciano72a , P.J. Falke5 , S. Falke5 , J. Faltova143 , Y. Fang15a , Y. Fang15a , G. Fanourakis44 , M. Fanti68a,68b , A. Farbin8 , A. Farilla74a , E.M. Farina70a,70b , T. Farooque106 , S. Farrell18 , S.M. Farrington178 , P. Farthouat36 , F. Fassi35e , P. Fassnacht36 , D. Fassouliotis9 , M. Faucci Giannelli50 , W.J. Fawcett32 , L. Fayard132 , O.L. Fedin138,o , W. Fedorko175 , M. Feickert42 , S. Feigl134 , L. Feligioni101 , A. Fell149 , C. Feng60b , E.J. Feng36 , M. Feng49 , M.J. Fenton57 , A.B. Fenyuk123 , J. Ferrando46 , A. Ferrari172 , P. Ferrari120 , R. Ferrari70a , D.E. Ferreira de Lima61b , A. Ferrer174 , D. Ferrere54 , C. Ferretti105 , F. Fiedler99 , – 21 – A. Filipčič91 , F. Filthaut119 , K.D. Finelli25 , M.C.N. Fiolhais140a , L. Fiorini174 , C. Fischer14 , F. Fischer114 , W.C. Fisher106 , I. Fleck151 , P. Fleischmann105 , R.R.M. Fletcher137 , T. Flick182 , B.M. Flierl114 , L.F. Flores137 , L.R. Flores Castillo63a , F.M. Follega75a,75b , N. Fomin17 , G.T. Forcolin75a,75b , A. Formica145 , F.A. Förster14 , A.C. Forti100 , A.G. Foster21 , D. Fournier132 , H. Fox89 , S. Fracchia149 , P. Francavilla71a,71b , M. Franchini23b,23a , S. Franchino61a , D. Francis36 , L. Franconi20 , M. Franklin59 , M. Frate171 , A.N. Fray92 , B. Freund109 , W.S. Freund80b , E.M. Freundlich47 , D.C. Frizzell128 , D. Froidevaux36 , J.A. Frost135 , C. Fukunaga164 , E. Fullana Torregrosa174 , E. Fumagalli55b,55a , T. Fusayasu116 , J. Fuster174 , A. Gabrielli23b,23a , A. Gabrielli18 , G.P. Gach83a , S. Gadatsch54 , P. Gadow115 , G. Gagliardi55b,55a , L.G. Gagnon109 , C. Galea27b , B. Galhardo140a,140c , E.J. Gallas135 , B.J. Gallop144 , P. Gallus142 , G. Galster40 , R. Gamboa Goni92 , K.K. Gan126 , S. Ganguly180 , J. Gao60a , Y. Gao90 , Y.S. Gao31,l , C. Garcı́a174 , JHEP05(2019)141 J.E. Garcı́a Navarro174 , J.A. Garcı́a Pascual15a , C. Garcia-Argos52 , M. Garcia-Sciveres18 , R.W. Gardner37 , N. Garelli153 , S. Gargiulo52 , V. Garonne134 , A. Gaudiello55b,55a , G. Gaudio70a , I.L. Gavrilenko110 , A. Gavrilyuk111 , C. Gay175 , G. Gaycken24 , E.N. Gazis10 , C.N.P. Gee144 , J. Geisen53 , M. Geisen99 , M.P. Geisler61a , C. Gemme55b , M.H. Genest58 , C. Geng105 , S. Gentile72a,72b , S. George93 , T. Geralis44 , D. Gerbaudo14 , L.O. Gerlach53 , G. Gessner47 , S. Ghasemi151 , M. Ghasemi Bostanabad176 , M. Ghneimat24 , A. Ghosh77 , B. Giacobbe23b , S. Giagu72a,72b , N. Giangiacomi23b,23a , P. Giannetti71a , A. Giannini69a,69b , S.M. Gibson93 , M. Gignac146 , D. Gillberg34 , G. Gilles182 , D.M. Gingrich3,av , M.P. Giordani66a,66c , F.M. Giorgi23b , P.F. Giraud145 , G. Giugliarelli66a,66c , D. Giugni68a , F. Giuli135 , M. Giulini61b , S. Gkaitatzis162 , I. Gkialas9,h , E.L. Gkougkousis14 , P. Gkountoumis10 , L.K. Gladilin113 , C. Glasman98 , J. Glatzer14 , P.C.F. Glaysher46 , A. Glazov46 , M. Goblirsch-Kolb26 , S. Goldfarb104 , T. Golling54 , D. Golubkov123 , A. Gomes140a,140b , R. Goncalves Gama53 , R. Gonçalo140a,140b , G. Gonella52 , L. Gonella21 , A. Gongadze79 , F. Gonnella21 , J.L. Gonski59 , S. González de la Hoz174 , S. Gonzalez-Sevilla54 , G.R. Gonzalvo Rodriguez174 , L. Goossens36 , P.A. Gorbounov111 , H.A. Gordon29 , B. Gorini36 , E. Gorini67a,67b , A. Gorišek91 , A.T. Goshaw49 , C. Gössling47 , M.I. Gostkin79 , C.A. Gottardo24 , C.R. Goudet132 , D. Goujdami35c , A.G. Goussiou148 , N. Govender33b,a , C. Goy5 , E. Gozani160 , I. Grabowska-Bold83a , P.O.J. Gradin172 , E.C. Graham90 , J. Gramling171 , E. Gramstad134 , S. Grancagnolo19 , M. Grandi156 , V. Gratchev138 , P.M. Gravila27f , F.G. Gravili67a,67b , C. Gray57 , H.M. Gray18 , C. Grefe24 , K. Gregersen96 , I.M. Gregor46 , P. Grenier153 , K. Grevtsov46 , N.A. Grieser128 , J. Griffiths8 , A.A. Grillo146 , K. Grimm31,k , S. Grinstein14,x , J.-F. Grivaz132 , S. Groh99 , E. Gross180 , J. Grosse-Knetter53 , Z.J. Grout94 , C. Grud105 , A. Grummer118 , L. Guan105 , W. Guan181 , J. Guenther36 , A. Guerguichon132 , F. Guescini168a , D. Guest171 , R. Gugel52 , B. Gui126 , T. Guillemin5 , S. Guindon36 , U. Gul57 , J. Guo60c , W. Guo105 , Y. Guo60a,r , Z. Guo101 , R. Gupta46 , S. Gurbuz12c , G. Gustavino128 , P. Gutierrez128 , C. Gutschow94 , C. Guyot145 , M.P. Guzik83a , C. Gwenlan135 , C.B. Gwilliam90 , A. Haas124 , C. Haber18 , H.K. Hadavand8 , N. Haddad35e , A. Hadef60a , S. Hageböck36 , M. Hagihara169 , M. Haleem177 , J. Haley129 , G. Halladjian106 , G.D. Hallewell101 , K. Hamacher182 , P. Hamal130 , K. Hamano176 , H. Hamdaoui35e , G.N. Hamity149 , K. Han60a,aj , L. Han60a , S. Han15a,15d , K. Hanagaki81,u , M. Hance146 , D.M. Handl114 , B. Haney137 , R. Hankache136 , P. Hanke61a , E. Hansen96 , J.B. Hansen40 , J.D. Hansen40 , M.C. Hansen24 , P.H. Hansen40 , E.C. Hanson100 , K. Hara169 , A.S. Hard181 , T. Harenberg182 , S. Harkusha107 , P.F. Harrison178 , N.M. Hartmann114 , Y. Hasegawa150 , A. Hasib50 , S. Hassani145 , S. Haug20 , R. Hauser106 , L. Hauswald48 , L.B. Havener39 , M. Havranek142 , C.M. Hawkes21 , R.J. Hawkings36 , D. Hayden106 , C. Hayes155 , R.L. Hayes175 , C.P. Hays135 , J.M. Hays92 , H.S. Hayward90 , S.J. Haywood144 , F. He60a , M.P. Heath50 , V. Hedberg96 , L. Heelan8 , S. Heer24 , K.K. Heidegger52 , J. Heilman34 , S. Heim46 , T. Heim18 , B. Heinemann46,aq , J.J. Heinrich131 , L. Heinrich36 , C. Heinz56 , J. Hejbal141 , – 22 – L. Helary61b , A. Held175 , S. Hellesund134 , C.M. Helling146 , S. Hellman45a,45b , C. Helsens36 , R.C.W. Henderson89 , Y. Heng181 , S. Henkelmann175 , A.M. Henriques Correia36 , G.H. Herbert19 , H. Herde26 , V. Herget177 , Y. Hernández Jiménez33c , H. Herr99 , M.G. Herrmann114 , T. Herrmann48 , G. Herten52 , R. Hertenberger114 , L. Hervas36 , T.C. Herwig137 , G.G. Hesketh94 , N.P. Hessey168a , A. Higashida163 , S. Higashino81 , E. Higón-Rodriguez174 , K. Hildebrand37 , E. Hill176 , J.C. Hill32 , K.K. Hill29 , K.H. Hiller46 , S.J. Hillier21 , M. Hils48 , I. Hinchliffe18 , F. Hinterkeuser24 , M. Hirose133 , S. Hirose52 , D. Hirschbuehl182 , B. Hiti91 , O. Hladik141 , D.R. Hlaluku33c , X. Hoad50 , J. Hobbs155 , N. Hod180 , M.C. Hodgkinson149 , A. Hoecker36 , F. Hoenig114 , D. Hohn52 , D. Hohov132 , T.R. Holmes37 , M. Holzbock114 , L.B.A.H Hommels32 , S. Honda169 , T. Honda81 , T.M. Hong139 , A. Hönle115 , B.H. Hooberman173 , W.H. Hopkins6 , Y. Horii117 , P. Horn48 , A.J. Horton152 , L.A. Horyn37 , J-Y. Hostachy58 , A. Hostiuc148 , S. Hou158 , JHEP05(2019)141 A. Hoummada35a , J. Howarth100 , J. Hoya88 , M. Hrabovsky130 , J. Hrdinka76 , I. Hristova19 , J. Hrivnac132 , A. Hrynevich108 , T. Hryn’ova5 , P.J. Hsu64 , S.-C. Hsu148 , Q. Hu29 , S. Hu60c , Y. Huang15a , Z. Hubacek142 , F. Hubaut101 , M. Huebner24 , F. Huegging24 , T.B. Huffman135 , M. Huhtinen36 , R.F.H. Hunter34 , P. Huo155 , A.M. Hupe34 , N. Huseynov79,ae , J. Huston106 , J. Huth59 , R. Hyneman105 , S. Hyrych28a , G. Iacobucci54 , G. Iakovidis29 , I. Ibragimov151 , L. Iconomidou-Fayard132 , Z. Idrissi35e , P.I. Iengo36 , R. Ignazzi40 , O. Igonkina120,z , R. Iguchi163 , T. Iizawa54 , Y. Ikegami81 , M. Ikeno81 , D. Iliadis162 , N. Ilic119 , F. Iltzsche48 , G. Introzzi70a,70b , M. Iodice74a , K. Iordanidou39 , V. Ippolito72a,72b , M.F. Isacson172 , N. Ishijima133 , M. Ishino163 , M. Ishitsuka165 , W. Islam129 , C. Issever135 , S. Istin160 , F. Ito169 , J.M. Iturbe Ponce63a , R. Iuppa75a,75b , A. Ivina180 , H. Iwasaki81 , J.M. Izen43 , V. Izzo69a , P. Jacka141 , P. Jackson1 , R.M. Jacobs24 , V. Jain2 , G. Jäkel182 , K.B. Jakobi99 , K. Jakobs52 , S. Jakobsen76 , T. Jakoubek141 , J. Jamieson57 , D.O. Jamin129 , R. Jansky54 , J. Janssen24 , M. Janus53 , P.A. Janus83a , G. Jarlskog96 , N. Javadov79,ae , T. Javůrek36 , M. Javurkova52 , F. Jeanneau145 , L. Jeanty131 , J. Jejelava159a,af , A. Jelinskas178 , P. Jenni52,b , J. Jeong46 , N. Jeong46 , S. Jézéquel5 , H. Ji181 , J. Jia155 , H. Jiang78 , Y. Jiang60a , Z. Jiang153,p , S. Jiggins52 , F.A. Jimenez Morales38 , J. Jimenez Pena174 , S. Jin15c , A. Jinaru27b , O. Jinnouchi165 , H. Jivan33c , P. Johansson149 , K.A. Johns7 , C.A. Johnson65 , K. Jon-And45a,45b , R.W.L. Jones89 , S.D. Jones156 , S. Jones7 , T.J. Jones90 , J. Jongmanns61a , P.M. Jorge140a,140b , J. Jovicevic168a , X. Ju18 , J.J. Junggeburth115 , A. Juste Rozas14,x , A. Kaczmarska84 , M. Kado132 , H. Kagan126 , M. Kagan153 , T. Kaji179 , E. Kajomovitz160 , C.W. Kalderon96 , A. Kaluza99 , A. Kamenshchikov123 , L. Kanjir91 , Y. Kano163 , V.A. Kantserov112 , J. Kanzaki81 , L.S. Kaplan181 , D. Kar33c , M.J. Kareem168b , E. Karentzos10 , S.N. Karpov79 , Z.M. Karpova79 , V. Kartvelishvili89 , A.N. Karyukhin123 , L. Kashif181 , R.D. Kass126 , A. Kastanas45a,45b , Y. Kataoka163 , C. Kato60d,60c , J. Katzy46 , K. Kawade82 , K. Kawagoe87 , T. Kawaguchi117 , T. Kawamoto163 , G. Kawamura53 , E.F. Kay176 , V.F. Kazanin122b,122a , R. Keeler176 , R. Kehoe42 , J.S. Keller34 , E. Kellermann96 , J.J. Kempster21 , J. Kendrick21 , O. Kepka141 , S. Kersten182 , B.P. Kerševan91 , S. Ketabchi Haghighat167 , R.A. Keyes103 , M. Khader173 , F. Khalil-Zada13 , A. Khanov129 , A.G. Kharlamov122b,122a , T. Kharlamova122b,122a , E.E. Khoda175 , A. Khodinov166 , T.J. Khoo54 , E. Khramov79 , J. Khubua159b , S. Kido82 , M. Kiehn54 , C.R. Kilby93 , Y.K. Kim37 , N. Kimura66a,66c , O.M. Kind19 , B.T. King90,∗ , D. Kirchmeier48 , J. Kirk144 , A.E. Kiryunin115 , T. Kishimoto163 , V. Kitali46 , O. Kivernyk5 , E. Kladiva28b,∗ , T. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus52 , M.H. Klein105 , M. Klein90 , U. Klein90 , K. Kleinknecht99 , P. Klimek121 , A. Klimentov29 , T. Klingl24 , T. Klioutchnikova36 , F.F. Klitzner114 , P. Kluit120 , S. Kluth115 , E. Kneringer76 , E.B.F.G. Knoops101 , A. Knue52 , D. Kobayashi87 , T. Kobayashi163 , M. Kobel48 , M. Kocian153 , P. Kodys143 , P.T. Koenig24 , T. Koffas34 , N.M. Köhler115 , T. Koi153 , M. Kolb61b , I. Koletsou5 , T. Kondo81 , N. Kondrashova60c , K. Köneke52 , A.C. König119 , T. Kono125 , R. Konoplich124,am , V. Konstantinides94 , N. Konstantinidis94 , B. Konya96 , R. Kopeliansky65 , S. Koperny83a , – 23 – K. Korcyl84 , K. Kordas162 , G. Koren161 , A. Korn94 , I. Korolkov14 , E.V. Korolkova149 , N. Korotkova113 , O. Kortner115 , S. Kortner115 , T. Kosek143 , V.V. Kostyukhin24 , A. Kotwal49 , A. Koulouris10 , A. Kourkoumeli-Charalampidi70a,70b , C. Kourkoumelis9 , E. Kourlitis149 , V. Kouskoura29 , A.B. Kowalewska84 , R. Kowalewski176 , C. Kozakai163 , W. Kozanecki145 , A.S. Kozhin123 , V.A. Kramarenko113 , G. Kramberger91 , D. Krasnopevtsev60a , M.W. Krasny136 , A. Krasznahorkay36 , D. Krauss115 , J.A. Kremer83a , J. Kretzschmar90 , P. Krieger167 , A. Krishnan61b , K. Krizka18 , K. Kroeninger47 , H. Kroha115 , J. Kroll141 , J. Kroll137 , J. Krstic16 , U. Kruchonak79 , H. Krüger24 , N. Krumnack78 , M.C. Kruse49 , T. Kubota104 , S. Kuday4b , J.T. Kuechler46 , S. Kuehn36 , A. Kugel61a , T. Kuhl46 , V. Kukhtin79 , R. Kukla101 , Y. Kulchitsky107,ai , S. Kuleshov147b , Y.P. Kulinich173 , M. Kuna58 , T. Kunigo85 , A. Kupco141 , T. Kupfer47 , O. Kuprash52 , H. Kurashige82 , L.L. Kurchaninov168a , Y.A. Kurochkin107 , JHEP05(2019)141 A. Kurova112 , M.G. Kurth15a,15d , E.S. Kuwertz36 , M. Kuze165 , J. Kvita130 , T. Kwan103 , A. La Rosa115 , J.L. La Rosa Navarro80d , L. La Rotonda41b,41a , F. La Ruffa41b,41a , C. Lacasta174 , F. Lacava72a,72b , D.P.J. Lack100 , H. Lacker19 , D. Lacour136 , E. Ladygin79 , R. Lafaye5 , B. Laforge136 , T. Lagouri33c , S. Lai53 , S. Lammers65 , W. Lampl7 , E. Lançon29 , U. Landgraf52 , M.P.J. Landon92 , M.C. Lanfermann54 , V.S. Lang46 , J.C. Lange53 , R.J. Langenberg36 , A.J. Lankford171 , F. Lanni29 , K. Lantzsch24 , A. Lanza70a , A. Lapertosa55b,55a , S. Laplace136 , J.F. Laporte145 , T. Lari68a , F. Lasagni Manghi23b,23a , M. Lassnig36 , T.S. Lau63a , A. Laudrain132 , A. Laurier34 , M. Lavorgna69a,69b , M. Lazzaroni68a,68b , B. Le104 , O. Le Dortz136 , E. Le Guirriec101 , M. LeBlanc7 , T. LeCompte6 , F. Ledroit-Guillon58 , C.A. Lee29 , G.R. Lee147a , L. Lee59 , S.C. Lee158 , S.J. Lee34 , B. Lefebvre168a , M. Lefebvre176 , F. Legger114 , C. Leggett18 , K. Lehmann152 , N. Lehmann182 , G. Lehmann Miotto36 , W.A. Leight46 , A. Leisos162,v , M.A.L. Leite80d , R. Leitner143 , D. Lellouch180,∗ , K.J.C. Leney42 , T. Lenz24 , B. Lenzi36 , R. Leone7 , S. Leone71a , C. Leonidopoulos50 , A. Leopold136 , G. Lerner156 , C. Leroy109 , R. Les167 , C.G. Lester32 , M. Levchenko138 , J. Levêque5 , D. Levin105 , L.J. Levinson180 , D.J. Lewis21 , B. Li15b , B. Li105 , C-Q. Li60a,al , F. Li60c , H. Li60a , H. Li60b , J. Li60c , K. Li153 , L. Li60c , M. Li15a , Q. Li15a,15d , Q.Y. Li60a , S. Li60d,60c , X. Li46 , Y. Li46 , Z. Liang15a , B. Liberti73a , A. Liblong167 , K. Lie63c , S. Liem120 , C.Y. Lin32 , K. Lin106 , T.H. Lin99 , R.A. Linck65 , J.H. Lindon21 , A.L. Lionti54 , E. Lipeles137 , A. Lipniacka17 , M. Lisovyi61b , T.M. Liss173,as , A. Lister175 , A.M. Litke146 , J.D. Little8 , B. Liu78 , B.L Liu6 , H.B. Liu29 , H. Liu105 , J.B. Liu60a , J.K.K. Liu135 , K. Liu136 , M. Liu60a , P. Liu18 , Y. Liu15a,15d , Y.L. Liu105 , Y.W. Liu60a , M. Livan70a,70b , A. Lleres58 , J. Llorente Merino15a , S.L. Lloyd92 , C.Y. Lo63b , F. Lo Sterzo42 , E.M. Lobodzinska46 , P. Loch7 , S. Loffredo73a,73b , T. Lohse19 , K. Lohwasser149 , M. Lokajicek141 , J.D. Long173 , R.E. Long89 , L. Longo36 , K.A. Looper126 , J.A. Lopez147b , I. Lopez Paz100 , A. Lopez Solis149 , J. Lorenz114 , N. Lorenzo Martinez5 , M. Losada22 , P.J. Lösel114 , A. Lösle52 , X. Lou46 , X. Lou15a , A. Lounis132 , J. Love6 , P.A. Love89 , J.J. Lozano Bahilo174 , H. Lu63a , M. Lu60a , Y.J. Lu64 , H.J. Lubatti148 , C. Luci72a,72b , A. Lucotte58 , C. Luedtke52 , F. Luehring65 , I. Luise136 , L. Luminari72a , B. Lund-Jensen154 , M.S. Lutz102 , D. Lynn29 , R. Lysak141 , E. Lytken96 , F. Lyu15a , V. Lyubushkin79 , T. Lyubushkina79 , H. Ma29 , L.L. Ma60b , Y. Ma60b , G. Maccarrone51 , A. Macchiolo115 , C.M. Macdonald149 , J. Machado Miguens137,140b , D. Madaffari174 , R. Madar38 , W.F. Mader48 , N. Madysa48 , J. Maeda82 , K. Maekawa163 , S. Maeland17 , T. Maeno29 , M. Maerker48 , A.S. Maevskiy113 , V. Magerl52 , N. Magini78 , D.J. Mahon39 , C. Maidantchik80b , T. Maier114 , A. Maio140a,140b,140d , O. Majersky28a , S. Majewski131 , Y. Makida81 , N. Makovec132 , B. Malaescu136 , Pa. Malecki84 , V.P. Maleev138 , F. Malek58 , U. Mallik77 , D. Malon6 , C. Malone32 , S. Maltezos10 , S. Malyukov36 , J. Mamuzic174 , G. Mancini51 , I. Mandić91 , L. Manhaes de Andrade Filho80a , I.M. Maniatis162 , J. Manjarres Ramos48 , K.H. Mankinen96 , A. Mann114 , A. Manousos76 , B. Mansoulie145 , I. Manthos162 , S. Manzoni120 , A. Marantis162 , G. Marceca30 , L. Marchese135 , G. Marchiori136 , M. Marcisovsky141 , C. Marcon96 , – 24 – C.A. Marin Tobon36 , M. Marjanovic38 , F. Marroquim80b , Z. Marshall18 , M.U.F Martensson172 , S. Marti-Garcia174 , C.B. Martin126 , T.A. Martin178 , V.J. Martin50 , B. Martin dit Latour17 , M. Martinez14,x , V.I. Martinez Outschoorn102 , S. Martin-Haugh144 , V.S. Martoiu27b , A.C. Martyniuk94 , A. Marzin36 , L. Masetti99 , T. Mashimo163 , R. Mashinistov110 , J. Masik100 , A.L. Maslennikov122b,122a , L.H. Mason104 , L. Massa73a,73b , P. Massarotti69a,69b , P. Mastrandrea71a,71b , A. Mastroberardino41b,41a , T. Masubuchi163 , A. Matic114 , P. Mättig24 , J. Maurer27b , B. Maček91 , S.J. Maxfield90 , D.A. Maximov122b,122a , R. Mazini158 , I. Maznas162 , S.M. Mazza146 , S.P. Mc Kee105 , T.G. McCarthy115 , L.I. McClymont94 , W.P. McCormack18 , E.F. McDonald104 , J.A. Mcfayden36 , M.A. McKay42 , K.D. McLean176 , S.J. McMahon144 , P.C. McNamara104 , C.J. McNicol178 , R.A. McPherson176,ac , J.E. Mdhluli33c , Z.A. Meadows102 , S. Meehan148 , T. Megy52 , S. Mehlhase114 , A. Mehta90 , T. Meideck58 , B. Meirose43 , D. Melini174 , JHEP05(2019)141 B.R. Mellado Garcia33c , J.D. Mellenthin53 , M. Melo28a , F. Meloni46 , A. Melzer24 , S.B. Menary100 , E.D. Mendes Gouveia140a,140e , L. Meng36 , X.T. Meng105 , S. Menke115 , E. Meoni41b,41a , S. Mergelmeyer19 , S.A.M. Merkt139 , C. Merlassino20 , P. Mermod54 , L. Merola69a,69b , C. Meroni68a , O. Meshkov113 , J.K.R. Meshreki151 , A. Messina72a,72b , J. Metcalfe6 , A.S. Mete171 , C. Meyer65 , J. Meyer160 , J-P. Meyer145 , H. Meyer Zu Theenhausen61a , F. Miano156 , R.P. Middleton144 , L. Mijović50 , G. Mikenberg180 , M. Mikestikova141 , M. Mikuž91 , H. Mildner149 , M. Milesi104 , A. Milic167 , D.A. Millar92 , D.W. Miller37 , A. Milov180 , D.A. Milstead45a,45b , R.A. Mina153,p , A.A. Minaenko123 , M. Miñano Moya174 , I.A. Minashvili159b , A.I. Mincer124 , B. Mindur83a , M. Mineev79 , Y. Minegishi163 , Y. Ming181 , L.M. Mir14 , A. Mirto67a,67b , K.P. Mistry137 , T. Mitani179 , J. Mitrevski114 , V.A. Mitsou174 , M. Mittal60c , A. Miucci20 , P.S. Miyagawa149 , A. Mizukami81 , J.U. Mjörnmark96 , T. Mkrtchyan184 , M. Mlynarikova143 , T. Moa45a,45b , K. Mochizuki109 , P. Mogg52 , S. Mohapatra39 , R. Moles-Valls24 , M.C. Mondragon106 , K. Mönig46 , J. Monk40 , E. Monnier101 , A. Montalbano152 , J. Montejo Berlingen36 , M. Montella94 , F. Monticelli88 , S. Monzani68a , N. Morange132 , D. Moreno22 , M. Moreno Llácer36 , P. Morettini55b , M. Morgenstern120 , S. Morgenstern48 , D. Mori152 , M. Morii59 , M. Morinaga179 , V. Morisbak134 , A.K. Morley36 , G. Mornacchi36 , A.P. Morris94 , L. Morvaj155 , P. Moschovakos10 , B. Moser120 , M. Mosidze159b , H.J. Moss149 , J. Moss31,m , K. Motohashi165 , E. Mountricha36 , E.J.W. Moyse102 , S. Muanza101 , F. Mueller115 , J. Mueller139 , R.S.P. Mueller114 , D. Muenstermann89 , G.A. Mullier96 , J.L. Munoz Martinez14 , F.J. Munoz Sanchez100 , P. Murin28b , W.J. Murray178,144 , A. Murrone68a,68b , M. Muškinja18 , C. Mwewa33a , A.G. Myagkov123,an , J. Myers131 , M. Myska142 , B.P. Nachman18 , O. Nackenhorst47 , K. Nagai135 , K. Nagano81 , Y. Nagasaka62 , M. Nagel52 , E. Nagy101 , A.M. Nairz36 , Y. Nakahama117 , K. Nakamura81 , T. Nakamura163 , I. Nakano127 , H. Nanjo133 , F. Napolitano61a , R.F. Naranjo Garcia46 , R. Narayan11 , D.I. Narrias Villar61a , I. Naryshkin138 , T. Naumann46 , G. Navarro22 , H.A. Neal105,∗ , P.Y. Nechaeva110 , F. Nechansky46 , T.J. Neep145 , A. Negri70a,70b , M. Negrini23b , S. Nektarijevic119 , C. Nellist53 , M.E. Nelson135 , S. Nemecek141 , P. Nemethy124 , M. Nessi36,d , M.S. Neubauer173 , M. Neumann182 , P.R. Newman21 , T.Y. Ng63c , Y.S. Ng19 , Y.W.Y. Ng171 , H.D.N. Nguyen101 , T. Nguyen Manh109 , E. Nibigira38 , R.B. Nickerson135 , R. Nicolaidou145 , D.S. Nielsen40 , J. Nielsen146 , N. Nikiforou11 , V. Nikolaenko123,an , I. Nikolic-Audit136 , K. Nikolopoulos21 , P. Nilsson29 , H.R. Nindhito54 , Y. Ninomiya81 , A. Nisati72a , N. Nishu60c , R. Nisius115 , I. Nitsche47 , T. Nitta179 , T. Nobe163 , Y. Noguchi85 , M. Nomachi133 , I. Nomidis136 , M.A. Nomura29 , M. Nordberg36 , N. Norjoharuddeen135 , T. Novak91 , O. Novgorodova48 , R. Novotny142 , L. Nozka130 , K. Ntekas171 , E. Nurse94 , F. Nuti104 , F.G. Oakham34,av , H. Oberlack115 , J. Ocariz136 , A. Ochi82 , I. Ochoa39 , J.P. Ochoa-Ricoux147a , K. O’Connor26 , S. Oda87 , S. Odaka81 , S. Oerdek53 , A. Ogrodnik83a , A. Oh100 , S.H. Oh49 , C.C. Ohm154 , H. Oide55b,55a , M.L. Ojeda167 , H. Okawa169 , Y. Okazaki85 , Y. Okumura163 , T. Okuyama81 , A. Olariu27b , L.F. Oleiro Seabra140a , S.A. Olivares Pino147a , – 25 – D. Oliveira Damazio29 , J.L. Oliver1 , M.J.R. Olsson171 , A. Olszewski84 , J. Olszowska84 , D.C. O’Neil152 , A. Onofre140a,140e , K. Onogi117 , P.U.E. Onyisi11 , H. Oppen134 , M.J. Oreglia37 , G.E. Orellana88 , Y. Oren161 , D. Orestano74a,74b , N. Orlando14 , R.S. Orr167 , B. Osculati55b,55a,∗ , V. O’Shea57 , R. Ospanov60a , G. Otero y Garzon30 , H. Otono87 , M. Ouchrif35d , F. Ould-Saada134 , A. Ouraou145 , Q. Ouyang15a , M. Owen57 , R.E. Owen21 , V.E. Ozcan12c , N. Ozturk8 , J. Pacalt130 , H.A. Pacey32 , K. Pachal49 , A. Pacheco Pages14 , C. Padilla Aranda14 , S. Pagan Griso18 , M. Paganini183 , G. Palacino65 , S. Palazzo50 , S. Palestini36 , M. Palka83b , D. Pallin38 , I. Panagoulias10 , C.E. Pandini36 , J.G. Panduro Vazquez93 , P. Pani46 , G. Panizzo66a,66c , L. Paolozzi54 , C. Papadatos109 , K. Papageorgiou9,h , A. Paramonov6 , D. Paredes Hernandez63b , S.R. Paredes Saenz135 , B. Parida166 , T.H. Park167 , A.J. Parker89 , M.A. Parker32 , F. Parodi55b,55a , E.W.P. Parrish121 , J.A. Parsons39 , U. Parzefall52 , L. Pascual Dominguez136 , V.R. Pascuzzi167 , JHEP05(2019)141 J.M.P. Pasner146 , E. Pasqualucci72a , S. Passaggio55b , F. Pastore93 , P. Pasuwan45a,45b , S. Pataraia99 , J.R. Pater100 , A. Pathak181 , T. Pauly36 , B. Pearson115 , M. Pedersen134 , L. Pedraza Diaz119 , R. Pedro140a,140b , S.V. Peleganchuk122b,122a , O. Penc141 , C. Peng15a , H. Peng60a , B.S. Peralva80a , M.M. Perego132 , A.P. Pereira Peixoto140a,140e , D.V. Perepelitsa29 , F. Peri19 , L. Perini68a,68b , H. Pernegger36 , S. Perrella69a,69b , V.D. Peshekhonov79,∗ , K. Peters46 , R.F.Y. Peters100 , B.A. Petersen36 , T.C. Petersen40 , E. Petit58 , A. Petridis1 , C. Petridou162 , P. Petroff132 , M. Petrov135 , F. Petrucci74a,74b , M. Pettee183 , N.E. Pettersson102 , K. Petukhova143 , A. Peyaud145 , R. Pezoa147b , T. Pham104 , F.H. Phillips106 , P.W. Phillips144 , M.W. Phipps173 , G. Piacquadio155 , E. Pianori18 , A. Picazio102 , R.H. Pickles100 , R. Piegaia30 , D. Pietreanu27b , J.E. Pilcher37 , A.D. Pilkington100 , M. Pinamonti73a,73b , J.L. Pinfold3 , M. Pitt180 , L. Pizzimento73a,73b , M.-A. Pleier29 , V. Pleskot143 , E. Plotnikova79 , D. Pluth78 , P. Podberezko122b,122a , R. Poettgen96 , R. Poggi54 , L. Poggioli132 , I. Pogrebnyak106 , D. Pohl24 , I. Pokharel53 , G. Polesello70a , A. Poley18 , A. Policicchio72a,72b , R. Polifka36 , A. Polini23b , C.S. Pollard46 , V. Polychronakos29 , D. Ponomarenko112 , L. Pontecorvo36 , S. Popa27a , G.A. Popeneciu27d , D.M. Portillo Quintero136 , S. Pospisil142 , K. Potamianos46 , I.N. Potrap79 , C.J. Potter32 , H. Potti11 , T. Poulsen96 , J. Poveda36 , T.D. Powell149 , M.E. Pozo Astigarraga36 , P. Pralavorio101 , S. Prell78 , D. Price100 , M. Primavera67a , S. Prince103 , M.L. Proffitt148 , N. Proklova112 , K. Prokofiev63c , F. Prokoshin147b , S. Protopopescu29 , J. Proudfoot6 , M. Przybycien83a , A. Puri173 , P. Puzo132 , J. Qian105 , Y. Qin100 , A. Quadt53 , M. Queitsch-Maitland46 , A. Qureshi1 , P. Rados104 , F. Ragusa68a,68b , G. Rahal97 , J.A. Raine54 , S. Rajagopalan29 , A. Ramirez Morales92 , K. Ran15a,15d , T. Rashid132 , S. Raspopov5 , M.G. Ratti68a,68b , D.M. Rauch46 , F. Rauscher114 , S. Rave99 , B. Ravina149 , I. Ravinovich180 , J.H. Rawling100 , M. Raymond36 , A.L. Read134 , N.P. Readioff58 , M. Reale67a,67b , D.M. Rebuzzi70a,70b , A. Redelbach177 , G. Redlinger29 , R.G. Reed33c , K. Reeves43 , L. Rehnisch19 , J. Reichert137 , D. Reikher161 , A. Reiss99 , A. Rej151 , C. Rembser36 , H. Ren15a , M. Rescigno72a , S. Resconi68a , E.D. Resseguie137 , S. Rettie175 , E. Reynolds21 , O.L. Rezanova122b,122a , P. Reznicek143 , E. Ricci75a,75b , R. Richter115 , S. Richter46 , E. Richter-Was83b , O. Ricken24 , M. Ridel136 , P. Rieck115 , C.J. Riegel182 , O. Rifki46 , M. Rijssenbeek155 , A. Rimoldi70a,70b , M. Rimoldi20 , L. Rinaldi23b , G. Ripellino154 , B. Ristić89 , E. Ritsch36 , I. Riu14 , J.C. Rivera Vergara147a , F. Rizatdinova129 , E. Rizvi92 , C. Rizzi36 , R.T. Roberts100 , S.H. Robertson103,ac , D. Robinson32 , J.E.M. Robinson46 , A. Robson57 , E. Rocco99 , C. Roda71a,71b , Y. Rodina101 , S. Rodriguez Bosca174 , A. Rodriguez Perez14 , D. Rodriguez Rodriguez174 , A.M. Rodrı́guez Vera168b , S. Roe36 , O. Røhne134 , R. Röhrig115 , C.P.A. Roland65 , J. Roloff59 , A. Romaniouk112 , M. Romano23b,23a , N. Rompotis90 , M. Ronzani124 , L. Roos136 , S. Rosati72a , K. Rosbach52 , N-A. Rosien53 , G. Rosin102 , B.J. Rosser137 , E. Rossi46 , E. Rossi74a,74b , E. Rossi69a,69b , L.P. Rossi55b , L. Rossini68a,68b , J.H.N. Rosten32 , R. Rosten14 , M. Rotaru27b , J. Rothberg148 , D. Rousseau132 , D. Roy33c , A. Rozanov101 , Y. Rozen160 , – 26 – X. Ruan33c , F. Rubbo153 , F. Rühr52 , A. Ruiz-Martinez174 , A. Rummler36 , Z. Rurikova52 , N.A. Rusakovich79 , H.L. Russell103 , L. Rustige38,47 , J.P. Rutherfoord7 , E.M. Rüttinger46,j , Y.F. Ryabov138 , M. Rybar39 , G. Rybkin132 , S. Ryu6 , A. Ryzhov123 , G.F. Rzehorz53 , P. Sabatini53 , G. Sabato120 , S. Sacerdoti132 , H.F-W. Sadrozinski146 , R. Sadykov79 , F. Safai Tehrani72a , P. Saha121 , S. Saha103 , M. Sahinsoy61a , A. Sahu182 , M. Saimpert46 , M. Saito163 , T. Saito163 , H. Sakamoto163 , A. Sakharov124,am , D. Salamani54 , G. Salamanna74a,74b , J.E. Salazar Loyola147b , P.H. Sales De Bruin172 , D. Salihagic115,∗ , A. Salnikov153 , J. Salt174 , D. Salvatore41b,41a , F. Salvatore156 , A. Salvucci63a,63b,63c , A. Salzburger36 , J. Samarati36 , D. Sammel52 , D. Sampsonidis162 , D. Sampsonidou162 , J. Sánchez174 , A. Sanchez Pineda66a,66c , H. Sandaker134 , C.O. Sander46 , M. Sandhoff182 , C. Sandoval22 , D.P.C. Sankey144 , M. Sannino55b,55a , Y. Sano117 , A. Sansoni51 , C. Santoni38 , H. Santos140a,140b , S.N. Santpur18 , JHEP05(2019)141 A. Santra174 , A. Sapronov79 , J.G. Saraiva140a,140d , O. Sasaki81 , K. Sato169 , E. Sauvan5 , P. Savard167,av , N. Savic115 , R. Sawada163 , C. Sawyer144 , L. Sawyer95,ak , C. Sbarra23b , A. Sbrizzi23a , T. Scanlon94 , J. Schaarschmidt148 , P. Schacht115 , B.M. Schachtner114 , D. Schaefer37 , L. Schaefer137 , J. Schaeffer99 , S. Schaepe36 , U. Schäfer99 , A.C. Schaffer132 , D. Schaile114 , R.D. Schamberger155 , N. Scharmberg100 , V.A. Schegelsky138 , D. Scheirich143 , F. Schenck19 , M. Schernau171 , C. Schiavi55b,55a , S. Schier146 , L.K. Schildgen24 , Z.M. Schillaci26 , E.J. Schioppa36 , M. Schioppa41b,41a , K.E. Schleicher52 , S. Schlenker36 , K.R. Schmidt-Sommerfeld115 , K. Schmieden36 , C. Schmitt99 , S. Schmitt46 , S. Schmitz99 , J.C. Schmoeckel46 , U. Schnoor52 , L. Schoeffel145 , A. Schoening61b , E. Schopf135 , M. Schott99 , J.F.P. Schouwenberg119 , J. Schovancova36 , S. Schramm54 , A. Schulte99 , H-C. Schultz-Coulon61a , M. Schumacher52 , B.A. Schumm146 , Ph. Schune145 , A. Schwartzman153 , T.A. Schwarz105 , Ph. Schwemling145 , R. Schwienhorst106 , A. Sciandra24 , G. Sciolla26 , M. Scornajenghi41b,41a , F. Scuri71a , F. Scutti104 , L.M. Scyboz115 , C.D. Sebastiani72a,72b , P. Seema19 , S.C. Seidel118 , A. Seiden146 , T. Seiss37 , J.M. Seixas80b , G. Sekhniaidze69a , K. Sekhon105 , S.J. Sekula42 , N. Semprini-Cesari23b,23a , S. Sen49 , S. Senkin38 , C. Serfon76 , L. Serin132 , L. Serkin66a,66b , M. Sessa60a , H. Severini128 , F. Sforza170 , A. Sfyrla54 , E. Shabalina53 , J.D. Shahinian146 , N.W. Shaikh45a,45b , D. Shaked Renous180 , L.Y. Shan15a , R. Shang173 , J.T. Shank25 , M. Shapiro18 , A.S. Sharma1 , A. Sharma135 , P.B. Shatalov111 , K. Shaw156 , S.M. Shaw100 , A. Shcherbakova138 , Y. Shen128 , N. Sherafati34 , A.D. Sherman25 , P. Sherwood94 , L. Shi158,ar , S. Shimizu81 , C.O. Shimmin183 , Y. Shimogama179 , M. Shimojima116 , I.P.J. Shipsey135 , S. Shirabe87 , M. Shiyakova79,aa , J. Shlomi180 , A. Shmeleva110 , M.J. Shochet37 , S. Shojaii104 , D.R. Shope128 , S. Shrestha126 , E. Shulga180 , P. Sicho141 , A.M. Sickles173 , P.E. Sidebo154 , E. Sideras Haddad33c , O. Sidiropoulou36 , A. Sidoti23b,23a , F. Siegert48 , Dj. Sijacki16 , M. Silva Jr.181 , M.V. Silva Oliveira80a , S.B. Silverstein45a , S. Simion132 , E. Simioni99 , M. Simon99 , R. Simoniello99 , P. Sinervo167 , N.B. Sinev131 , M. Sioli23b,23a , I. Siral105 , S.Yu. Sivoklokov113 , J. Sjölin45a,45b , E. Skorda96 , P. Skubic128 , M. Slawinska84 , K. Sliwa170 , R. Slovak143 , V. Smakhtin180 , B.H. Smart144 , J. Smiesko28a , N. Smirnov112 , S.Yu. Smirnov112 , Y. Smirnov112 , L.N. Smirnova113,s , O. Smirnova96 , J.W. Smith53 , M. Smizanska89 , K. Smolek142 , A. Smykiewicz84 , A.A. Snesarev110 , I.M. Snyder131 , S. Snyder29 , R. Sobie176,ac , A.M. Soffa171 , A. Soffer161 , A. Søgaard50 , F. Sohns53 , G. Sokhrannyi91 , C.A. Solans Sanchez36 , E.Yu. Soldatov112 , U. Soldevila174 , A.A. Solodkov123 , A. Soloshenko79 , O.V. Solovyanov123 , V. Solovyev138 , P. Sommer149 , H. Son170 , W. Song144 , W.Y. Song168b , A. Sopczak142 , F. Sopkova28b , C.L. Sotiropoulou71a,71b , S. Sottocornola70a,70b , R. Soualah66a,66c,g , A.M. Soukharev122b,122a , D. South46 , S. Spagnolo67a,67b , M. Spalla115 , M. Spangenberg178 , F. Spanò93 , D. Sperlich19 , T.M. Spieker61a , R. Spighi23b , G. Spigo36 , L.A. Spiller104 , M. Spina156 , D.P. Spiteri57 , M. Spousta143 , A. Stabile68a,68b , B.L. Stamas121 , R. Stamen61a , M. Stamenkovic120 , S. Stamm19 , E. Stanecka84 , R.W. Stanek6 , B. Stanislaus135 , – 27 – M.M. Stanitzki46 , M. Stankaityte135 , B. Stapf120 , E.A. Starchenko123 , G.H. Stark146 , J. Stark58 , S.H Stark40 , P. Staroba141 , P. Starovoitov61a , S. Stärz103 , R. Staszewski84 , G. Stavropoulos44 , M. Stegler46 , P. Steinberg29 , B. Stelzer152 , H.J. Stelzer36 , O. Stelzer-Chilton168a , H. Stenzel56 , T.J. Stevenson156 , G.A. Stewart36 , M.C. Stockton36 , G. Stoicea27b , M. Stolarski140a , P. Stolte53 , S. Stonjek115 , A. Straessner48 , J. Strandberg154 , S. Strandberg45a,45b , M. Strauss128 , P. Strizenec28b , R. Ströhmer177 , D.M. Strom131 , R. Stroynowski42 , A. Strubig50 , S.A. Stucci29 , B. Stugu17 , J. Stupak128 , N.A. Styles46 , D. Su153 , S. Suchek61a , Y. Sugaya133 , V.V. Sulin110 , M.J. Sullivan90 , D.M.S. Sultan54 , S. Sultansoy4c , T. Sumida85 , S. Sun105 , X. Sun3 , K. Suruliz156 , C.J.E. Suster157 , M.R. Sutton156 , S. Suzuki81 , M. Svatos141 , M. Swiatlowski37 , S.P. Swift2 , A. Sydorenko99 , I. Sykora28a , M. Sykora143 , T. Sykora143 , D. Ta99 , K. Tackmann46,y , J. Taenzer161 , A. Taffard171 , R. Tafirout168a , E. Tahirovic92 , H. Takai29 , R. Takashima86 , JHEP05(2019)141 K. Takeda82 , T. Takeshita150 , E.P. Takeva50 , Y. Takubo81 , M. Talby101 , A.A. Talyshev122b,122a , J. Tanaka163 , M. Tanaka165 , R. Tanaka132 , B.B. Tannenwald126 , S. Tapia Araya173 , S. Tapprogge99 , A. Tarek Abouelfadl Mohamed136 , S. Tarem160 , G. Tarna27b,c , G.F. Tartarelli68a , P. Tas143 , M. Tasevsky141 , T. Tashiro85 , E. Tassi41b,41a , A. Tavares Delgado140a,140b , Y. Tayalati35e , A.J. Taylor50 , G.N. Taylor104 , P.T.E. Taylor104 , W. Taylor168b , A.S. Tee89 , R. Teixeira De Lima153 , P. Teixeira-Dias93 , H. Ten Kate36 , J.J. Teoh120 , S. Terada81 , K. Terashi163 , J. Terron98 , S. Terzo14 , M. Testa51 , R.J. Teuscher167,ac , S.J. Thais183 , T. Theveneaux-Pelzer46 , F. Thiele40 , D.W. Thomas93 , J.O. Thomas42 , J.P. Thomas21 , A.S. Thompson57 , P.D. Thompson21 , L.A. Thomsen183 , E. Thomson137 , Y. Tian39 , R.E. Ticse Torres53 , V.O. Tikhomirov110,ao , Yu.A. Tikhonov122b,122a , S. Timoshenko112 , P. Tipton183 , S. Tisserant101 , K. Todome23b,23a , S. Todorova-Nova5 , S. Todt48 , J. Tojo87 , S. Tokár28a , K. Tokushuku81 , E. Tolley126 , K.G. Tomiwa33c , M. Tomoto117 , L. Tompkins153,p , K. Toms118 , B. Tong59 , P. Tornambe102 , E. Torrence131 , H. Torres48 , E. Torró Pastor148 , C. Tosciri135 , J. Toth101,ab , D.R. Tovey149 , C.J. Treado124 , T. Trefzger177 , F. Tresoldi156 , A. Tricoli29 , I.M. Trigger168a , S. Trincaz-Duvoid136 , W. Trischuk167 , B. Trocmé58 , A. Trofymov132 , C. Troncon68a , M. Trovatelli176 , F. Trovato156 , L. Truong33b , M. Trzebinski84 , A. Trzupek84 , F. Tsai46 , J.C-L. Tseng135 , P.V. Tsiareshka107,ai , A. Tsirigotis162 , N. Tsirintanis9 , V. Tsiskaridze155 , E.G. Tskhadadze159a , M. Tsopoulou162 , I.I. Tsukerman111 , V. Tsulaia18 , S. Tsuno81 , D. Tsybychev155 , Y. Tu63b , A. Tudorache27b , V. Tudorache27b , T.T. Tulbure27a , A.N. Tuna59 , S. Turchikhin79 , D. Turgeman180 , I. Turk Cakir4b,t , R.J. Turner21 , R.T. Turra68a , P.M. Tuts39 , S Tzamarias162 , E. Tzovara99 , G. Ucchielli47 , I. Ueda81 , M. Ughetto45a,45b , F. Ukegawa169 , G. Unal36 , A. Undrus29 , G. Unel171 , F.C. Ungaro104 , Y. Unno81 , K. Uno163 , J. Urban28b , P. Urquijo104 , G. Usai8 , J. Usui81 , L. Vacavant101 , V. Vacek142 , B. Vachon103 , K.O.H. Vadla134 , A. Vaidya94 , C. Valderanis114 , E. Valdes Santurio45a,45b , M. Valente54 , S. Valentinetti23b,23a , A. Valero174 , L. Valéry46 , R.A. Vallance21 , A. Vallier36 , J.A. Valls Ferrer174 , T.R. Van Daalen14 , P. Van Gemmeren6 , I. Van Vulpen120 , M. Vanadia73a,73b , W. Vandelli36 , A. Vaniachine166 , R. Vari72a , E.W. Varnes7 , C. Varni55b,55a , T. Varol42 , D. Varouchas132 , K.E. Varvell157 , M.E. Vasile27b , G.A. Vasquez176 , J.G. Vasquez183 , F. Vazeille38 , D. Vazquez Furelos14 , T. Vazquez Schroeder36 , J. Veatch53 , V. Vecchio74a,74b , L.M. Veloce167 , F. Veloso140a,140c , S. Veneziano72a , A. Ventura67a,67b , N. Venturi36 , A. Verbytskyi115 , V. Vercesi70a , M. Verducci74a,74b , C.M. Vergel Infante78 , C. Vergis24 , W. Verkerke120 , A.T. Vermeulen120 , J.C. Vermeulen120 , M.C. Vetterli152,av , N. Viaux Maira147b , M. Vicente Barreto Pinto54 , I. Vichou173,∗ , T. Vickey149 , O.E. Vickey Boeriu149 , G.H.A. Viehhauser135 , L. Vigani135 , M. Villa23b,23a , M. Villaplana Perez68a,68b , E. Vilucchi51 , M.G. Vincter34 , V.B. Vinogradov79 , A. Vishwakarma46 , C. Vittori23b,23a , I. Vivarelli156 , M. Vogel182 , P. Vokac142 , G. Volpi14 , S.E. von Buddenbrock33c , E. Von Toerne24 , V. Vorobel143 , K. Vorobev112 , M. Vos174 , J.H. Vossebeld90 , N. Vranjes16 , M. Vranjes Milosavljevic16 , V. Vrba142 , – 28 – M. Vreeswijk120 , T. Šfiligoj91 , R. Vuillermet36 , I. Vukotic37 , T. Ženiš28a , L. Živković16 , P. Wagner24 , W. Wagner182 , J. Wagner-Kuhr114 , H. Wahlberg88 , S. Wahrmund48 , K. Wakamiya82 , V.M. Walbrecht115 , J. Walder89 , R. Walker114 , S.D. Walker93 , W. Walkowiak151 , V. Wallangen45a,45b , A.M. Wang59 , C. Wang60b , F. Wang181 , H. Wang18 , H. Wang3 , J. Wang157 , J. Wang61b , P. Wang42 , Q. Wang128 , R.-J. Wang136 , R. Wang60a , R. Wang6 , S.M. Wang158 , W.T. Wang60a , W. Wang15c,ad , W.X. Wang60a,ad , Y. Wang60a,al , Z. Wang60c , C. Wanotayaroj46 , A. Warburton103 , C.P. Ward32 , D.R. Wardrope94 , A. Washbrook50 , A.T. Watson21 , M.F. Watson21 , G. Watts148 , B.M. Waugh94 , A.F. Webb11 , S. Webb99 , C. Weber183 , M.S. Weber20 , S.A. Weber34 , S.M. Weber61a , A.R. Weidberg135 , J. Weingarten47 , M. Weirich99 , C. Weiser52 , P.S. Wells36 , T. Wenaus29 , T. Wengler36 , S. Wenig36 , N. Wermes24 , M.D. Werner78 , P. Werner36 , M. Wessels61a , T.D. Weston20 , K. Whalen131 , N.L. Whallon148 , A.M. Wharton89 , JHEP05(2019)141 A.S. White105 , A. White8 , M.J. White1 , R. White147b , D. Whiteson171 , B.W. Whitmore89 , F.J. Wickens144 , W. Wiedenmann181 , M. Wielers144 , C. Wiglesworth40 , L.A.M. Wiik-Fuchs52 , F. Wilk100 , H.G. Wilkens36 , L.J. Wilkins93 , H.H. Williams137 , S. Williams32 , C. Willis106 , S. Willocq102 , J.A. Wilson21 , I. Wingerter-Seez5 , E. Winkels156 , F. Winklmeier131 , O.J. Winston156 , B.T. Winter52 , M. Wittgen153 , M. Wobisch95 , A. Wolf99 , T.M.H. Wolf120 , R. Wolff101 , R.W. Wölker135 , J. Wollrath52 , M.W. Wolter84 , H. Wolters140a,140c , V.W.S. Wong175 , N.L. Woods146 , S.D. Worm21 , B.K. Wosiek84 , K.W. Woźniak84 , K. Wraight57 , S.L. Wu181 , X. Wu54 , Y. Wu60a , T.R. Wyatt100 , B.M. Wynne50 , S. Xella40 , Z. Xi105 , L. Xia178 , D. Xu15a , H. Xu60a,c , L. Xu29 , T. Xu145 , W. Xu105 , Z. Xu60b , Z. Xu153 , B. Yabsley157 , S. Yacoob33a , K. Yajima133 , D.P. Yallup94 , D. Yamaguchi165 , Y. Yamaguchi165 , A. Yamamoto81 , T. Yamanaka163 , F. Yamane82 , M. Yamatani163 , T. Yamazaki163 , Y. Yamazaki82 , Z. Yan25 , H.J. Yang60c,60d , H.T. Yang18 , S. Yang77 , X. Yang60b,58 , Y. Yang163 , Z. Yang17 , W-M. Yao18 , Y.C. Yap46 , Y. Yasu81 , E. Yatsenko60c,60d , J. Ye42 , S. Ye29 , I. Yeletskikh79 , E. Yigitbasi25 , E. Yildirim99 , K. Yorita179 , K. Yoshihara137 , C.J.S. Young36 , C. Young153 , J. Yu78 , X. Yue61a , S.P.Y. Yuen24 , B. Zabinski84 , G. Zacharis10 , E. Zaffaroni54 , J. Zahreddine136 , R. Zaidan14 , A.M. Zaitsev123,an , T. Zakareishvili159b , N. Zakharchuk34 , S. Zambito59 , D. Zanzi36 , D.R. Zaripovas57 , S.V. Zeißner47 , C. Zeitnitz182 , G. Zemaityte135 , J.C. Zeng173 , O. Zenin123 , D. Zerwas132 , M. Zgubič135 , D.F. Zhang15b , F. Zhang181 , G. Zhang60a , G. Zhang15b , H. Zhang15c , J. Zhang6 , L. Zhang15c , L. Zhang60a , M. Zhang173 , R. Zhang60a , R. Zhang24 , X. Zhang60b , Y. Zhang15a,15d , Z. Zhang63a , Z. Zhang132 , P. Zhao49 , Y. Zhao60b , Z. Zhao60a , A. Zhemchugov79 , Z. Zheng105 , D. Zhong173 , B. Zhou105 , C. Zhou181 , M.S. Zhou15a,15d , M. Zhou155 , N. Zhou60c , Y. Zhou7 , C.G. Zhu60b , H.L. Zhu60a , H. Zhu15a , J. Zhu105 , Y. Zhu60a , X. Zhuang15a , K. Zhukov110 , V. Zhulanov122b,122a , D. Zieminska65 , N.I. Zimine79 , S. Zimmermann52 , Z. Zinonos115 , M. Ziolkowski151 , G. Zobernig181 , A. Zoccoli23b,23a , K. Zoch53 , T.G. Zorbas149 , R. Zou37 , L. Zwalinski36 1 Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide; Australia 2 Physics Department, SUNY Albany, Albany NY; United States of America 3 Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB; Canada 4 (a) Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara(b) , Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul(c) , Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara; Turkey 5 LAPP, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy; France 6 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL; United States of America 7 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ; United States of America 8 Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington TX; United States of America 9 Physics Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens; Greece 10 Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou; Greece 11 Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX; United States of America – 29 – 12 (a) Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul (b) , Istanbul Bilgi University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul(c) , Department of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul(d) , Department of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep; Turkey 13 Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku; Azerbaijan 14 Institut de Fı́sica d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona; Spain 15 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing(b) , Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing(c) , Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing(d) , University of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS), Beijing; China 16 Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade; Serbia 17 Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen; Norway JHEP05(2019)141 18 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley CA; United States of America 19 Institut für Physik, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin; Germany 20 Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern; Switzerland 21 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; United Kingdom 22 Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogota; Colombia 23 (a) INFN Bologna and Universita’ di Bologna, Dipartimento di Fisica(b) , INFN Sezione di Bologna; Italy 24 Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn; Germany 25 Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston MA; United States of America 26 Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham MA; United States of America 27 (a) Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov(b) , Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest(c) , Department of Physics, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Iasi(d) , National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department, Cluj-Napoca(e) , University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest(f ) , West University in Timisoara, Timisoara; Romania 28 (a) Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava (b) , Department of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice; Slovak Republic 29 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY; United States of America 30 Departamento de Fı́sica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires; Argentina 31 California State University, CA; United States of America 32 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; United Kingdom 33 (a) Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town(b) , Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg(c) , School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; South Africa 34 Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa ON; Canada 35 (a) Faculté des Sciences Ain Chock, Réseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies — Université Hassan II, Casablanca(b) , Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn-Tofail, Kénitra(c) , Faculté des Sciences Semlalia, Université Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech(d) , Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohamed Premier and LPTPM, Oujda(e) , Faculté des sciences, Université Mohammed V, Rabat; Morocco 36 CERN, Geneva; Switzerland 37 Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago IL; United States of America 38 LPC, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand; France 39 Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington NY; United States of America 40 Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen; Denmark 41 (a) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria, Rende(b) , INFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati; Italy – 30 – 42 Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX; United States of America 43 Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson TX; United States of America 44 National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Agia Paraskevi; Greece 45 (a) Department of Physics, Stockholm University(b) , Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm; Sweden 46 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen; Germany 47 Lehrstuhl für Experimentelle Physik IV, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund; Germany 48 Institut für Kern und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden; Germany 49 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham NC; United States of America 50 SUPA — School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh; United Kingdom 51 INFN e Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati; Italy 52 Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg; Germany 53 II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen; Germany JHEP05(2019)141 54 Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Genève; Switzerland 55 (a) Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Genova(b) , INFN Sezione di Genova; Italy 56 II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen; Germany 57 SUPA — School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow; United Kingdom 58 LPSC, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble INP, Grenoble; France 59 Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA; United States of America 60 (a) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei(b) , Institute of Frontier and Interdisciplinary Science and Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation (MOE), Shandong University, Qingdao(c) , School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, KLPPAC-MoE, SKLPPC, Shanghai(d) , Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai; China 61 (a) Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg (b) , Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg; Germany 62 Faculty of Applied Information Science, Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima; Japan 63 (a) Department of Physics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong (b) , Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong(c) , Department of Physics and Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; China 64 Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu; Taiwan 65 Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington IN; United States of America 66 (a) INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine(b) , ICTP, Trieste(c) , Dipartimento Politecnico di Ingegneria e Architettura, Università di Udine, Udine; Italy 67 (a) INFN Sezione di Lecce(b) , Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università del Salento, Lecce; Italy 68 (a) INFN Sezione di Milano(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano, Milano; Italy 69 (a) INFN Sezione di Napoli(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli, Napoli; Italy 70 (a) INFN Sezione di Pavia(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pavia, Pavia; Italy 71 (a) INFN Sezione di Pisa(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica E. Fermi, Università di Pisa, Pisa; Italy 72 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma; Italy 73 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata(b) , Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma; Italy 74 (a) INFN Sezione di Roma Tre(b) , Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università Roma Tre, Roma; Italy 75 (a) INFN-TIFPA(b) , Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento; Italy 76 Institut für Astro und Teilchenphysik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität, Innsbruck; Austria 77 University of Iowa, Iowa City IA; United States of America 78 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA; United States of America 79 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; Russia – 31 – 80 (a) Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora(b) , Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro (c) , Universidade Federal de São João del Rei (UFSJ), São João del Rei(d) , Instituto de Fı́sica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo; Brazil 81 KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba; Japan 82 Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe; Japan 83 (a) AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow(b) , Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow; Poland 84 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow; Poland 85 Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto; Japan 86 Kyoto University of Education, Kyoto; Japan 87 Research Center for Advanced Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Kyushu University, JHEP05(2019)141 Fukuoka; Japan 88 Instituto de Fı́sica La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata; Argentina 89 Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster; United Kingdom 90 Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool; United Kingdom 91 Department of Experimental Particle Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute and Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana; Slovenia 92 School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London; United Kingdom 93 Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham; United Kingdom 94 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London; United Kingdom 95 Louisiana Tech University, Ruston LA; United States of America 96 Fysiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund; Sweden 97 Centre de Calcul de l’Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3), Villeurbanne; France 98 Departamento de Fı́sica Teorica C-15 and CIAFF, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid; Spain 99 Institut für Physik, Universität Mainz, Mainz; Germany 100 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester; United Kingdom 101 CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille; France 102 Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA; United States of America 103 Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal QC; Canada 104 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria; Australia 105 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI; United States of America 106 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI; United States of America 107 B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk; Belarus 108 Research Institute for Nuclear Problems of Byelorussian State University, Minsk; Belarus 109 Group of Particle Physics, University of Montreal, Montreal QC; Canada 110 P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Russia 111 Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics of the National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Moscow; Russia 112 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow; Russia 113 D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow; Russia 114 Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München; Germany 115 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), München; Germany 116 Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science, Nagasaki; Japan 117 Graduate School of Science and Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya; Japan 118 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM; United States of America 119 Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen/Nikhef, Nijmegen; Netherlands – 32 – 120 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Netherlands 121 Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb IL; United States of America 122 (a) Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics and NSU, SB RAS, Novosibirsk(b) , Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk; Russia 123 Institute for High Energy Physics of the National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Protvino; Russia 124 Department of Physics, New York University, New York NY; United States of America 125 Ochanomizu University, Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo; Japan 126 Ohio State University, Columbus OH; United States of America 127 Faculty of Science, Okayama University, Okayama; Japan 128 Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK; JHEP05(2019)141 United States of America 129 Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK; United States of America 130 Palacký University, RCPTM, Joint Laboratory of Optics, Olomouc; Czech Republic 131 Center for High Energy Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene OR; United States of America 132 LAL, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay; France 133 Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka; Japan 134 Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo; Norway 135 Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford; United Kingdom 136 LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris; France 137 Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA; United States of America 138 Konstantinov Nuclear Physics Institute of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, PNPI, St. Petersburg; Russia 139 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA; United States of America 140 (a) Laboratório de Instrumentação e Fı́sica Experimental de Partı́culas — LIP (b) , Departamento de Fı́sica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa (c) , Departamento de Fı́sica, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra(d) , Centro de Fı́sica Nuclear da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa(e) , Departamento de Fı́sica, Universidade do Minho, Braga(f ) , Universidad de Granada, Granada (Spain)(g) , Dep Fı́sica and CEFITEC of Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica; Portugal 141 Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague; Czech Republic 142 Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague; Czech Republic 143 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague; Czech Republic 144 Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot; United Kingdom 145 IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette; France 146 Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA; United States of America 147 (a) Departamento de Fı́sica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago (b) , Departamento de Fı́sica, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa Marı́a, Valparaı́so; Chile 148 Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA; United States of America 149 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; United Kingdom 150 Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano; Japan 151 Department Physik, Universität Siegen, Siegen; Germany 152 Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC; Canada 153 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford CA; United States of America 154 Physics Department, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm; Sweden 155 Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY; United States of America 156 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton; United Kingdom 157 School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney; Australia – 33 – 158 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei; Taiwan 159 (a) E. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi (b) , High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi; Georgia 160 Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa; Israel 161 Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv; Israel 162 Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki; Greece 163 International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo; Japan 164 Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo; Japan 165 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo; Japan 166 Tomsk State University, Tomsk; Russia JHEP05(2019)141 167 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto ON; Canada 168 (a) TRIUMF, Vancouver BC(b) , Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto ON; Canada 169 Division of Physics and Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba; Japan 170 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford MA; United States of America 171 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine CA; United States of America 172 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala; Sweden 173 Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana IL; United States of America 174 Instituto de Fı́sica Corpuscular (IFIC), Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia — CSIC, Valencia; Spain 175 Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC; Canada 176 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria BC; Canada 177 Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg; Germany 178 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry; United Kingdom 179 Waseda University, Tokyo; Japan 180 Department of Particle Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot; Israel 181 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI; United States of America 182 Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Fachgruppe Physik, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal; Germany 183 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven CT; United States of America 184 Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan; Armenia a Also at Centre for High Performance Computing, CSIR Campus, Rosebank, Cape Town; South Africa b Also at CERN, Geneva; Switzerland c Also at CPPM, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille; France d Also at Département de Physique Nucléaire et Corpusculaire, Université de Genève, Genève; Switzerland e Also at Departament de Fisica de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona; Spain f Also at Departamento de Fı́sica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; Portugal g Also at Department of Applied Physics and Astronomy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah; United Arab Emirates h Also at Department of Financial and Management Engineering, University of the Aegean, Chios; Greece i Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; United States of America – 34 – j Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield; United Kingdom k Also at Department of Physics, California State University, East Bay; United States of America l Also at Department of Physics, California State University, Fresno; United States of America m Also at Department of Physics, California State University, Sacramento; United States of America n Also at Department of Physics, King’s College London, London; United Kingdom o Also at Department of Physics, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg; Russia p Also at Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA; United States of America q Also at Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg; Switzerland r Also at Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI; United States of America s Also at Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow; Russia t Also at Giresun University, Faculty of Engineering, Giresun; Turkey u Also at Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka; Japan JHEP05(2019)141 v Also at Hellenic Open University, Patras; Greece w Also at Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest; Romania x Also at Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, ICREA, Barcelona; Spain y Also at Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg; Germany z Also at Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen/Nikhef, Nijmegen; Netherlands aa Also at Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy (INRNE) of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia; Bulgaria ab Also at Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest; Hungary ac Also at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP); Canada ad Also at Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei; Taiwan ae Also at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku; Azerbaijan af Also at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi; Georgia ag Also at Instituto de Fisica Teorica, IFT-UAM/CSIC, Madrid; Spain ah Also at Istanbul University, Dept. of Physics, Istanbul; Turkey ai Also at Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; Russia aj Also at LAL, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay; France ak Also at Louisiana Tech University, Ruston LA; United States of America al Also at LPNHE, Sorbonne Université, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris; France am Also at Manhattan College, New York NY; United States of America an Also at Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Dolgoprudny; Russia ao Also at National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow; Russia ap Also at Physics Department, An-Najah National University, Nablus; Palestine aq Also at Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg; Germany ar Also at School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou; China as Also at The City College of New York, New York NY; United States of America at Also at The Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter (CICQM), Beijing; China au Also at Tomsk State University, Tomsk, and Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Dolgoprudny; Russia av Also at TRIUMF, Vancouver BC; Canada aw Also at Universita di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli; Italy ∗ Deceased – 35 –