RESEARCH ARTICLE Low, borderline and normal ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the Mediterranean based-population ARTPER cohort after 9 years follow-up M. Teresa Alzamora ID1,2*, Rosa Forés1,2,3, Guillem Pera2, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez4,5, Marta Valverde ID5,6, Pere Torán ID2 1 Centre d’Atenció Primària Riu Nord- Riu Sud Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Direcció d’Atenció Primària Barcelonés Nord i Maresme, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain, 2 Unitat de Suport a la Recerca a1111111111 Metropolitana Nord, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), a1111111111 Mataró, Spain, 3 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain, 4 Centre a1111111111 d’Atenció Primària La Marina, Direcció d’Atenció Primària Barcelona Ciutat, Institut Català de la Salut, a1111111111 Barcelona, Spain, 5 Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Barcelona, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció a1111111111 Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain, 6 Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Escaldes- Engordany, Andorra * maiteal2007@gmail.com, mtalzamora.bnm.ics@gencat.cat OPEN ACCESS Citation: Alzamora MT, Forés R, Pera G, Baena- Abstract Dı́ez JM, Valverde M, Torán P (2019) Low, borderline and normal ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the Background Mediterranean based-population ARTPER cohort Guidelines recommended adopting the same cardiovascular risk modification strategies after 9 years follow-up. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0209163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. used for coronary disease in case of low Ankle-brachial index (ABI), but here exist few stud- pone.0209163 ies on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with borderline ABI and even fewer on Editor: Rudolf Kirchmair, Medical University the general population. Innsbruck, AUSTRIA Received: June 12, 2018 Aim Accepted: December 2, 2018 The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between long-term cardiovas- Published: January 23, 2019 cular events and low, borderline and normal ABI after a 9-year follow up of a Mediterranean population with low cardiovascular risk. Copyright: © 2019 Alzamora et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which Design and setting permits unrestricted use, distribution, and A population-based prospective cohort study was performed in the province of Barcelona, reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Spain. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information Method files. A total of 3,786 subjects >49 years were recruited from 2006–2008. Baseline ABI was 1.08 Funding: Funding was provided by Instituto de ± 0.16. Subjects were followed from the time of enrollment to the end of follow-up in 2016 via Salud Carlos III (PI15/00510, PI11/00765, PI07/ phone calls every 6 months, systematic reviews of primary-care and hospital medical rec- 90415) to MTA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to ords and analysis of the SIDIAP (Information System for Primary Care Research) database publish, or preparation of the manuscript. to confirm the possible appearance of cardiovascular events. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 1 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Competing interests: The authors have declared Results that no competing interests exist. 3146 individuals participated in the study. 2,420 (77%) subjects had normal ABI, 524 (17%) had borderline ABI, and 202 (6.4%) had low ABI. In comparison with normal and borderline subjects, patients with lower ABI had more comorbidities, such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes. Cumulative MACE incidence at 9 years was 20% in patients with low ABI, 6% in border- line ABI and 5% in normal ABI. The annual MACE incidence after 9 years follow-up was significantly higher in people with low ABI (26.9/1000py) (p<0.001) than in borderline (6.6/1000py) and in normal ABI (5.6/1000py). Subjects with borderline ABI are at significantly higher risk for coronary disease (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.02–2, 43; p = 0,040) compared to subjects with normal ABI, after adjustment. Conclusion The results of the present study support that low ABI was independently associated with higher incidence of MACE, ICE, cardiovascular and no cardiovascular mortality; while bor- derline ABI had significantly moderate risk for coronary disease than normal ABI. Introduction The Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is a simple and non-invasive tool used to diagnose Peripheral arterial disease (PAD). An ABI of <0.9 has been considered abnormal and has been not only associated with the diagnosis of PAD, but has been also a marker of incident cardiovascular events and mortality in both symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of PAD [1–7]. It has been repeatedly associated with a three to six times greater risk of cardiovascular events and mortal- ity [8]. On the other hand, to add ABI <0.9 to the cardiovascular risk scales improve the predictive capacity of them, as a tool to help reclassify coronary risk. This increased risk is independent from traditional cardiovascular risk factors [8, 9]. It is very important to determine the epidemiology of this disease since PAD prevalence is increasing globally in high-, middle- and low-income countries [10]. Between 8% and 23% of people over 50 years of age are affected by PAD [10–11]. Management of PAD includes inter- vention targeted at specific arterial symptoms as well as general prevention of cardiovascular risk. Several studies carried out in countries with high and low rates of cardiovascular disease have detected a high incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with PAD [1–7]. The evidence is strong enough that guidelines recommend adopting the same cardiovascu- lar risk modification strategies used for coronary arterial disease in cases of PAD [12–15]. PAD, however, is underdiagnosed (in spite of significant efforts made by primary health care centers) [12]. This may be attributed to the fact that up to two-thirds of patients with PAD in the community are asymptomatic [13]. The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines on management of PAD patients recommend that an ankle-brachial index between 0.90 and 0.99 be considered borderline; patients with borderline ABI should be considered a PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 2 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort high-risk group, as should patients with abnormal ABI (<0.9) [14,15]. Patients with borderline ABI (0.90–.99) should undergo further diagnostic tests. However, there exist few studies on long-term future cardiovascular events in patients with borderline ABI [16, 17] and even fewer on the general population. To resolve this issue, we evaluated the relationship between future cardiovascular events and low, borderline and normal ABI in a Mediterranean population-based cohort (ARTPER). Material and methods ARTPER study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (IDIAP Jordi Gol Foundation of Investigation in Primary Care and Instituto de Salud Carlos III) Committee in July 2006 and the approval was renewed in September 2011 and March 2016. All the patients provided informed written consent. Study population The design of the ARTPER study has previously been described and is summarized in the patient flow-chart Fig 1. [18]. The study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort initi- ated in October 2006. Baseline ABI was measured in 3,786 randomly selected patients older than 49 years of age who were ascribed to 28 primary health care centers in the Barcelona area from September 2006 through June 2008. Diagnosis and definition ABI was calculated to estimate lower-extremity arterial disease. Supine systolic blood pressures were measured in both arms. Ankle systolic blood pressures in bilateral posterior tibial and Fig 1. Flow-chart of study participants. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163.g001 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 3 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort dorsalis pedis arteries were obtained using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and a standard Doppler ultrasound device with an 8 MHz probe. Leg-specific ABI was calculated by dividing the higher of the two systolic pressure readings taken from the legs by the higher of the two systolic pressure readings taken from the arms. PAD was defined as ABI <0.9, borderline ABI 0.90–0.99, normal ABI 1.00–1.39 and arterial calcification �1.40. Incident vascular events (ICE) were defined as a myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, tran- sient ischemic attack, symptomatic aneurysm of abdominal aorta, vascular surgery (coronary, intracranial, and extracranial) and mortality. Deaths were adjusted for the presence or absence of a cardiovascular cause. Incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular mortality. Follow-up and endpoint adjudication Subjects were followed from the time of enrollment to the end of follow-up in November 2016 via phone calls every 6 months, systematic reviews of primary-care and hospital medical rec- ords and analysis of the SIDIAP (Information System for Primary Care Research) database. A medical committee comprising members who carry out routine clinical practice reviewed all clinical incident events, which were grouped as follows: coronary disease (myocardial infarction or angina), cerebrovascular disease (stroke or transient ischemic attack), symptom- atic aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (SAAA), vascular surgery, cardiovascular morbidity (any of the previous four types), vascular mortality (presence of vascular cause), non-vascular mortality (absence of vascular cause), overall mortality (vascular or non-vascular), or morbi- mortality (any of the events). Only the first episode for each type of event was taken into account even though any recurring events were recorded. Any patient that had had an event at the time of or prior to recruitment was excluded from the analysis. Statistical analysis All ABI group comparisons have been made in 2 pairs: normal ABI vs. low ABI and normal ABI vs. borderline ABI. For categorical variables frequencies and percentage are shown and for continuous variables means and standard deviations, being tested using chi squared and Student’t-test respectively. MACE and ICE Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard functions have been estimated and plotted, including their 95% confidence intervals, for each of the 3 ABI groups. The percentage of subjects in each ABI group that at the end of follow-up had MACE (or ICE) has been computed dividing the new MACE (or ICE) diagnoses by the baseline num- ber of subjects in each group. At the end of follow-up, incidence for MACE (or ICE) has been computed using only the first episode of MACE (or ICE), with the time to the first episode or end of follow-up (if not a case) from the recruitment as the time being at risk for each subject. Log-rank tests have been used to compare the survivor functions between the different ABI groups. For different cardiovascular events, different proportional risk Cox regression models have been used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of having these events depending on the ABI group, raw and adjusted by age, gender, smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and hyper- cholesterolemia. Incidence of PAD among each ABI group was computed after excluding those with baseline PAD. HRs have been computed to assess the risk of having borderline PAD vs. normal PAD on developing PAD, raw and adjusted by age, gender, smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. All the tests performed were bilateral and the significance was < 0.05. We used the Stata v15 to perform the statistical analysis. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 4 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Results Baseline characteristics by ankle-brachial index (ABI) The study population included 3,786 subjects with a mean age of 65 ± 9 years and 54% (n = 2040) were female. Average ABI for the entire population was 1.08 ± 0.16. Of the 3786 subjects, 640 were excluded in the analyzed for this study (408 for prevalent car- diovascular events, 205 for arterial calcification (ABI � 1.4) and 27 for undetermined events in the follow-up) Fig 1, leaving a total of 3,146 subjects with a mean age of 64 ± 9 and 57% were women (n = 1807). Subjects were followed up during an average of 8.7 years (SD 1.8, range 51 days-10.3 years), adding up to 27,469 person-years (py). Of 3,146 patients, a total of 2,420 (77%) subjects had normal ABI, 524 (17%) patients had borderline ABI, and 202 (6.4%) patients had low ABI. Mean ABI was 1.11 ± 0.09; 0.95 ± 0.03 and 0.74 ± 0.13 for normal, borderline and low ABI, respectively. In comparison with normal and borderline subjects, patients with lower ABI had more comorbidities, such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes. There were no differences between normal and borderline ABI groups except in age, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. Table 1. All-cause MACE based on ABI category During a mean follow-up period of 8.7 years, there were 188 MACEs (80 myocardial infarc- tion, 71 strokes and 73 vascular mortalities): 41 in patients with low ABI, 30 in patients with borderline ABI and 117 in patients with normal ABI. Fig 2. This represents a cumulative MACE incidence at 10 years of 20% in patients with low ABI, 6% in borderline ABI and 5% in normal ABI. The annual MACE incidence after 10 years follow-up was significantly higher in people with low ABI (26.9/1000py) (p<0.001) than in borderline (6.6/1000py) and in normal ABI (5.6/1000py). Differences between borderline and normal ABI were not statistical significant (p = 0.456). All-cause ICE based on ABI category In the same period of follow-up, there were 289 ICEs, 61 in patients with low ABI, 50 in patients with borderline ABI and 178 in patients with normal ABI. Fig 3. This represents a cumulative ICE incidence at 10 years of 30% in patients with low ABI, 10% in borderline ABI and 7% in normal ABI. The annual ICE incidence after 10 years follow-up was significantly higher in people with low ABI (43.5/1000py) (p<0.001) than in borderline (11.2/1000py) and in normal ABI (8.6/1000py). Differences between borderline and normal ABI were not statistical significant (p = 0.107) All-cause morbimortality In multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis, we evaluated ABI as a predictor for the clinical outcomes MACE and ICE. Subjects with low ABI are at significantly higher risk for all event types except for cerebro- vascular disease and non-vascular mortality compared to patients with normal ABI. PAD increased the risk of MACE more than two fold (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.67–3.56; p<0.01), as well as the risk of coronary disease (HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.91–4.60; p<0.01) and vascular mor- tality (HR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.79–5.48; p<0.01). Table 2. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 5 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients according to ABI classification. Normal ABI (1.00– Borderline ABI (0.90– Low ABI (<0.90) p values 1.39) 0.99) n = 2420 n = 524 n = 202 Normal vs Borderline Normal vs Low Age (years) 64 ±8 65 ±9 70 ±10 0,015 <0.001 Women, n (%) 1396 (58%) 320 (61%) 91 (45%) 0,154 <0.001 General obesity � , n (%) Men 319 (31%) 72 (35%) 32 (29%) 0,250 0,610 Women 545 (39%) 134 (42%) 43 (47%) 0,364 0,125 Abdominal obesity �� , n (%) Men 461 (45%) 90 (44%) 54 (49%) 0,742 0,511 Women 984 (71%) 238 (75%) 72 (79%) 0,150 0,098 Ever smoker, n (%) 985 (41%) 232 (44%) 116 (57%) 0,132 <0.001 ABI value 1,12 ±0,08 0,95 ±0,03 0,76 ±0,13 <0.001 <0.001 Medical records, n (%) Hypertension 1000 (41%) 232 (44%) 127 (63%) 0,214 <0.001 Hypercholesterolemia 1068 (44%) 232 (44%) 112 (55%) 0,952 0,002 Diabetes 326 (13%) 63 (12%) 61 (30%) 0,375 <0.001 Blood analysis Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 218 ±38 223 ±37 215 ±43 0,010 0,285 HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 56 ±14 58 ±15 54 ±15 0,028 0,009 LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) 137 ±33 140 ±33 133 ±36 0,111 0,102 Treatments (medical records), n (%) Antihypertensives 876 (36%) 206 (39%) 115 (57%) 0,180 <0.001 Antiplatelet/anticoagulant 192 (8%) 46 (9%) 53 (26%) 0,520 <0.001 Hypolipidemics 618 (26%) 142 (27%) 75 (37%) 0,459 <0.001 Hypoglycemics 251 (10%) 41 (8%) 55 (27%) 0,077 <0.001 Cardiovascular risk REGICOR��� 5,6 ±3,5 5,9 ±3,9 8,3 ±5,3 0,100 <0.001 SCORE��� 3,0 ±3,1 3,3 ±3,6 5,1 ±5,5 0,115 <0.001 � Defined as body mass index�30 Kg/m2 �� Defined as ��� REGICOR and SCORE only computed among those younger than 75 and 66 years respectively. HDL, high density lipoprotein. LDL, low density lipoprotein. Missing values: general obesity (4), abdominal obesity (22), total cholesterol (25), LDL cholesterol (30). Results are mean ± standard deviation, unless otherwise stated. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163.t001 Subjects with borderline ABI are at significantly higher risk for coronary disease (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.02–2, 43; p = 0,040) compared to subjects with normal ABI, after adjustment. PAD incidence PAD incidence after 5 years of follow-up population-based cohort ARTPER was previously calculated [19]. We considered PAD incident when the second cross section Ankle brachial Index was <0.9 in any of the lower limbs, with normal baseline (0.9 to 1.4). The incidence of PAD, at 5 years follow-up was remarkably higher in subjects with border- line ABI (n = 51; 12.3%) than in those with normal ABI (n = 44; 2.2%) (p<0.001). PAD was (HR = 5.44, 95% CI 3.63–8.15; p = 0.000). After adjustment by (age, gender, smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia), subjects with borderline ABI had PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 6 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Fig 2. Cumulative hazard of MACE for lower, borderline and normal ABI. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163.g002 significant higher risk for PAD compared with normal ABI subjects (HR = 4.21, 95% CI 2.76– 6.40; p = 0.000). Discussion Up to the present time, the ARTPER low cardiovascular risk population cohort evaluated the incidence of vascular events as well as the improvement in the reclassification of the cardiovas- cular risk scales to the addition of the ABI <0.9 in them [5, 9]. The present study was performed to evaluate incident events in low, borderline and normal ABI subjects. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 7 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Fig 3. Cumulative hazard of ICE for lower, borderline and normal ABI. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163.g003 Our main findings were as follows: (1) general population subjects with low ABI presented the most incident events of all-cause morbimortality even after adjusting for classical cardio- vascular risk factors (with the exception of stroke); (2) A total of 16.7% of subjects with normal ABI were reclassified as having borderline ABI (n = 524). (3) General population subjects with borderline ABI had significantly higher incident coro- nary disease results, even after adjustment. (4) Borderline ABI was independently associated with PAD incidence in the five-year follow-up. While low ABI has been examined in previous population-based studies [10, 11, 15, 18], the prevalence of borderline ABI has not been investigated as extensively. In our study, the PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 8 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort Table 2. Cox proportional regression analysis for clinical outcomes. Normal vs Borderline Normal vs Low HR 95%CI p value HR 95%CI p value MACE raw 1,16 0,78 1,74 0,456 4,88 3,42 6,96 <0.001 MACE adjusted� 1,04 0,69 1,55 0,866 2,43 1,67 3,56 <0.001 Myocardial infarction raw 1,39 0,77 2,54 0,276 5,91 3,49 9,99 <0.001 Myocardial infarction adjusted 1,32 0,72 2,42 0,363 3,20 1,82 5,64 <0.001 Coronary disease�� raw 1,60 1,04 2,45 0,033 5,13 3,37 7,80 <0.001 Coronary disease�� adjusted 1,58 1,02 2,43 0,040 2,99 1,91 4,69 <0.001 Stroke raw 0,78 0,38 1,59 0,494 2,61 1,33 5,14 0,005 Stroke adjusted 0,72 0,35 1,47 0,364 1,31 0,65 2,66 0,455 Cerebrovascular disease��� raw 0,77 0,40 1,45 0,417 3,16 1,80 5,54 <0.001 Cerebrovascular disease��� adjusted 0,69 0,36 1,31 0,252 1,55 0,86 2,79 0,149 Morbidity raw 1,22 0,85 1,75 0,290 4,19 2,96 5,94 <0.001 Morbidity adjusted 1,15 0,80 1,66 0,447 2,29 1,58 3,31 <0.001 Vascular intervention raw 1,45 0,83 2,54 0,197 6,24 3,81 10,21 <0.001 Vascular intervention adjusted 1,49 0,85 2,62 0,168 4,06 2,38 6,91 <0.001 Vascular mortality raw 1,59 0,85 3,00 0,148 8,22 4,88 13,84 <0.001 Vascular mortality adjusted 1,25 0,65 2,38 0,500 3,13 1,79 5,48 <0.001 Non-vascular mortality raw 0,96 0,66 1,39 0,834 2,88 2,00 4,15 <0.001 Non-vascular mortality adjusted 0,82 0,56 1,19 0,300 1,32 0,90 1,94 0,156 Morbimortality raw 1,11 0,87 1,41 0,397 4,18 3,33 5,24 <0.001 Morbimortality adjusted 1,01 0,79 1,28 0,960 2,12 1,67 2,70 <0.001 � Adjusted by age, gender, smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. �� Includes myocardialinfarction and angina ��� Incudes stroke and transient ischaemic attack https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163.t002 prevalence of low and borderline ABI in patients >49 years old was 6.4% and 16.6%, respec- tively. Our results are lower than those found in patients from countries with high rates of car- diovascular disease, such as the United States (8.7% and 27.8%, respectively) [20]. In previous studies, low ABI has been associated with an increased risk of incident outcome and all-cause mortality in selected and general populations [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10]. In a Cardiovascular health study (5,714 participants) patients with ABI <0.9 revealed an increased all-cause mortality of 1.62 and an increased cardiovascular mortality of 2.03 [21]. A multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (6,570 participants) identified an increased preva- lence of subclinical atherosclerosis among women and men with borderline ABI [22]. In a previous analysis of the low cardiovascular risk ARTPER cohort [5], the importance of low ABI as an independent risk factor was confirmed. Low ABI had a two times greater risk of coronary disease (HR = 2.0) and an increased risk of vascular surgery (HR = 5.6) and mortal- ity (HR = 1.8). On the other hand, the prognostic significance of borderline ABI has not been investigated as extensively in population-based studies. The ankle-brachial index collaboration meta-analysis (which included more than 50,000 subjects from 16 international studies) [8] already found that subjects with an ABI between 0.91 and 1.10 were at a slightly increased risk. Based on these findings, the American Heart Association modified the definition of normal ABI values and created the definition of border- line ABI [23]. Nevertheless, this prognostic has not been fully clarified for the general popula- tion. In a Japanese retrospective hospital-based cohort study, Tanaka et al. found that PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 9 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort borderline ABI was independently and statistically significant associated with a high risk of all- cause mortality (HR 2.27) and cardiovascular events (HR 1.38;) [16]. Natsuaky et al. also found that borderline ABI was associated with high risk of mortality in diabetic patients (3,981) [17]. In the present study performed in a Mediterranean based-population cohort with a low car- diovascular risk, we found that subjects with borderline ABI are at significantly greater risk for coronary disease (HR: 1.58) but we did not find differences for others events. Our data is simi- lar to that yielded by the long-term general Japanese population-based cohort (2,954) (Hisayana Study) that found no relationship between borderline ABI and cardiovascular events [24]. One explanation of the lack of associations between borderline ABI and ICE or MACE could be that both are small population-based cohorts and both studies excluded subjects with previous cardiovascular events. Some authors studied selected populations, such as diabetics or a hospital-population including ischaemic heart disease, and did not exclude subjects with prevalent events [16, 17]. As some authors suggest, perhaps the optimal cutoff point for the diagnosis of borderline ABI should be narrowed to: ABI 0.91–0.94 and 0.95–0.99 (n = 238 vs. n = 286 respectively) [16]. We don’t analyze the optimal cutoff point because this represented a small size in our cohort. The present study has several strong points. Firstly, this is an ongoing prospective observa- tional-based cohort population study with a mean follow-up period of 8.7 years. Secondly, all clinical incident events have been checked by a medical committee comprising members who perform routine clinical practice. Thirdly, any patient that had had an event at the time of or prior to recruitment was excluded from the analysis. Concerning to the limitations of the study, first, we did not know the real data of beginning cardiovascular risk factors as diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia and these risk factors might affect the incident cardiovascular events. Second, we did not enroll subjects who were younger than 49 years old and consequently ours results cannot be applied in young peo- ple. Third, relatively small sample size of patients with low and borderline ABI in addition to the limited number of events. This could lead to a lack of power to detect differences between, mainly, borderline vs normal subjects, and even more for the adjusted models. However, first: the HRs of the normal vs borderline comparisons are always lower than those corresponding to the normal vs low comparisons, second: the differences in the HRs using raw or adjusted models are little for the normal vs borderline comparisons, and third: although HRs decrease when adjusting the normal vs low comparisons, most of them are still statistical significant (p<0.05). Patients with elevated ABI were excluded as in other studies (17,20 because their clinical significance and treatment are different compared to patient with low ABI and we did not per- form toe-brachial index to know really if patients with ABI �1.4 have PAD or not. Conclusions In conclusion, the results of the present study support that low ABI was independently associ- ated with higher incidence of MACE, ICE, cardiovascular and no cardiovascular mortality; while borderline ABI had significantly moderate risk for coronary disease than normal ABI. Supporting information S1 Fig. CEIC 2006. (DOC) PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 10 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort S2 Fig. CEIC 2011. (PDF) S3 Fig. CEIC 2016. (PDF) S1 File. Additional information from the study database. (XLS) Acknowledgments The study group would like to thank all the members of the ARTPER cohort for their partici- pation in the study. They also thank the Jordi Gol University Institute for Primary Care and the Catalan Institute of Health. The authors are grateful to the professionals who confirmed the incident outcomes and especially Dr. Elena López-Cancio. They would also like to thank Colleen McCarroll for linguistic correction. Author Contributions Conceptualization: M. Teresa Alzamora, Rosa Forés, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez, Pere Torán. Data curation: Guillem Pera. Formal analysis: Guillem Pera. Investigation: M. Teresa Alzamora, Rosa Forés, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez, Marta Valverde. Methodology: M. Teresa Alzamora, Guillem Pera, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez, Pere Torán. Supervision: M. Teresa Alzamora, Rosa Forés, Guillem Pera, Marta Valverde, Pere Torán. Validation: M. Teresa Alzamora, Guillem Pera, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez, Pere Torán. Writing – original draft: M. Teresa Alzamora. Writing – review & editing: M. Teresa Alzamora, Rosa Forés, Guillem Pera, José Miguel Baena-Dı́ez, Marta Valverde, Pere Torán. References 1. Criqui MH, McClelland RL, McDermott MM, Allison MA, Blumenthal RS, Aboyans V, et al: The ankle- brachial index and incident cardiovascular events in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 56:1506–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.060 PMID: 20951328 2. Diehm C, Lange S, Darius H, Pittrow D, von Stritzky B, Tepohl G, et al: Association of low ankle brachial index with high mortality in primary care. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:1743–1749. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehl092 PMID: 16782720 3. Meves SH, Diehm C, Berger K, Pittrow D, Trampisch HJ, Burghaus I, et al; getABI Study Group. Periph- eral arterial disease as an independent predictor for excess stroke morbidity and mortality in primary- care patients: 5-year results of the getABI study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010, 29:546–54. https://doi.org/10. 1159/000306640 PMID: 20375496 4. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Shah S, Child E, Antoniou GA, Torella F. Prognostic significance of ankle brachial pressure index: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vascular. 2017, 25:208–224 https:// doi.org/10.1177/1708538116658392 PMID: 27411571 5. Alzamora MT, Forés R, Pera G, Torán P, Heras A, Sorribes M, et al. Ankle-brachial index and the inci- dence of cardiovascular events in the Mediterranean low cardiovascular risk population ARTPER cohort. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2013; 13:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-119 PMID: 24341531 6. Velescu A, Clara A, Peñafiel J, Ramos R, Marti R, Grau M,et al. REGICOR Study Group. Adding low ankle brachial index to classical risk factors improves the prediction of major cardiovascular events. The PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 11 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort REGICOR study. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241:357–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015. 05.017 PMID: 26071658 7. Miura T, Minamisawa M, Ueki Y, Abe N, Nishimura H, Hashizume N, et al. Impressive predictive value of ankle-brachial index for very long-term outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: IMPACT- ABI study. PLoS One 2017 12(6):e0177609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177609 PMID: 28617815 8. Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration, Fowkes FG, Murray GD, Butcher I, Heald CL, Lee RJ, et al. Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.2.197 PMID: 18612117 9. Forés R, Alzamora MT, Pera G, Baena-Dı́ez JM, Mundet-Tuduri X, Torán P. Contribution of the ankle- brachial index to improve the prediction of coronary risk: The ARTPER cohort. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16; 13(1):e0191283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191283 PMID: 29338049 10. Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet 2013, 382:1329–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0 PMID: 23915883 11. Murphy TP, Dhangana R, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr. Ankle-brachial index and cardiovascular risk prediction: an analysis of 11,594 individuals with 10-yearfollow-up. Atherosclerosis 2012, 220:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.10.037 PMID: 22099055 12. National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence. Peripheral arterial disease diagnosis and manage- ment. CG147. London: National Clinical Guidance Centre, 2012. 13. Davies Jane H, Richards Jonathan, Conway Kevin, Kenkre Joyce E, Lewis Jane EA, Williams E Mark. Primary care screening for peripheral arterial disease: a cross-sectional observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2017, 67(655) 14. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guide- lines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 21;69:e71–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.007.2016 15. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, Bjorck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2018; 71:111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2017.12.014 PMID: 29425606 16. Tanaka S, Kaneko H, Kano H, Matsuno S, Suzuki S, Takai H; et al. The predictive value of the border- line ankle-brachial index for long-term clinical outcomes: An observational cohort study. Atherosclero- sis. 2016, 250:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.014 PMID: 27182960 17. Natsuaki C, Inoguchi T, Maeda Y, Yamada T, Sasaki S, Sonoda N, et al. Association of borderline ankle-brachial index with mortality and the incidence of peripheral artery disease in diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis. 2014; 234:360–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.03.018 PMID: 24732575 18. Alzamora MT, Forés R, Baena-Dı́ez JM, Pera G, Toran P, Sorribes M; et al. PERART/ARTPER study group. The peripheral arterial disease study (PERART/ARTPER): prevalence and risk factors in the general population. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-38 PMID: 20529387 19. Alzamora MT, Forés R, Pera G, Baena-Dı́ez JM, Heras A, Sorribes M, et al. Incidence of peripheral arterial disease in the ARTPER population cohort after 5 years of follow-up. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016; 16:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0170-6 PMID: 26758025 20. Menke A, Muntner P, Wildman RP, Dreisbach AW, Raggi P. Relation of borderline peripheral arterial disease to cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98:1226–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amjcard.2006.05.056 PMID: 17056334 21. Newman AB, Shemanski L, Manoli TA, Cushman M, Mittelmark M, Polak JF, et al. Ankle-arm index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999; 19:538–545. PMID: 10073955 22. McDermott MM, Liu K, Criqui MH, Ruth K, Goff D, Saad MF, et al. Ankle-brachial index and subclinical cardiac and carotid disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162:33– 41. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi167 PMID: 15961584 23. Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C et al. American Heart Associa- tion Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clini- cal Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Measurement and interpretation PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 12 / 13 Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the ARTPER cohort of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 126:2890–909. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb PMID: 23159553 24. Kojima I, Ninomiya T, Hata J, Fukuhara M, Hirakawa Y, Mukai N, et al. A low ankle brachial index is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease: the Hisayama study. J Atheroscler Thromb.2014; 21:966–73. PMID: 24727729 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209163 January 23, 2019 13 / 13