PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE The conventional isoproterenol-induced heart failure model does not consistently mimic the diaphragmatic dysfunction observed in patients Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera ID1,2,3, Bryan Falcones1, Alicia Calvo-Fernández4,5, Begoña Benito4,6,7, Esther Barreiro8,9,10, Joaquim Gea8,9,10, Ramon Farré1,10,11, Isaac Almendros1,10,11, Núria Farré ID2,4,5* a1111111111 1 Unitat de Biofı́sica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, a1111111111 Barcelona, Spain, 2 Heart Diseases Biomedical Research Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research a1111111111 Institute), Barcelona, Spain, 3 Department of Human Movement Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Faculty of a1111111111 Health Sciences, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile, 4 Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 5 Heart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, a1111111111 Spain, 6 Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain, 7 CIBER de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain, 8 Respiratory Department, Hospital del Mar and Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain, 9 Health and Experimental Sciences Department (CEXS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 10 CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain, 11 Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August OPEN ACCESS Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain Citation: Cabrera-Aguilera I, Falcones B, Calvo- * NFarreLopez@parcdesalutmar.cat Fernández A, Benito B, Barreiro E, Gea J, et al. (2020) The conventional isoproterenol-induced heart failure model does not consistently mimic the diaphragmatic dysfunction observed in patients. Abstract PLoS ONE 15(7): e0236923. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 Heart failure (HF) impairs diaphragm function. Animal models realistically mimicking HF should feature both the cardiac alterations and the diaphragmatic dysfunction characterizing Editor: Vincenzo Lionetti, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, ITALY this disease. The isoproterenol-induced HF model is widely used, but whether it presents diaphragmatic dysfunction is unknown. However, indirect data from research in other fields Received: May 20, 2020 suggest that isoproterenol could increase diaphragm function. The aim of this study was to Accepted: July 16, 2020 test the hypothesis that the widespread rodent model of isoproterenol-induced HF results in Published: July 30, 2020 increased diaphragmatic contractility. Forty C57BL/6J male mice were randomized into 2 Copyright: © 2020 Cabrera-Aguilera et al. This is an groups: HF and healthy controls. After 30 days of isoproterenol infusion to establish HF, open access article distributed under the terms of in vivo diaphragmatic excursion and ex vivo isolated diaphragm contractibility were mea- the Creative Commons Attribution License, which sured. As compared with healthy controls, mice with isoproterenol-induced HF showed the permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original expected changes in structural and functional echocardiographic parameters and lung author and source are credited. edema. isoproterenol-induced HF increased in vivo diaphragm excursion (by �30%, Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are p<0.01) and increased by �50% both ex vivo peak specific force (p<0.05) and tetanic force within the manuscript. (p<0.05) at almost all 10–100 Hz frequencies (p<0.05), with reduced fatigue resistance Funding: ICA is supported by ANID-PFCHA – (p<0.01) when compared with healthy controls. Expression of myosin genes encoding the Chilean Doctorate Fellowship 2017; Grant No. main muscle fiber types revealed that Myh4 was higher in isoproterenol-induced HF than in 72180089. The funders had no role in study healthy controls (p<0.05), suggesting greater distribution of type IIb fibers. These results design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. show that the conventional isoproterenol-induced HF model increases diaphragm contrac- tion, a finding contrary to what is observed in patients with HF. Therefore, this specific model Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 1 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction seems limited for translational an integrative HF research, especially when cardio-respira- tory interactions are investigated. Introduction Heart failure (HF) is a very prevalent disease and a major public health problem with consid- erably associated mortality and health system expenditure. Noteworthy, the current high prevalence of HF is expected to increase worldwide as a result of the obesity epidemics and population ageing [1, 2]. In addition to primary cardiocirculatory alterations, HF also impacts the respiratory system by inducing lung edema and breathlessness/dyspnea [3, 4], particularly in patients with advanced stage of the disease and appearing either in stable con- ditions and during acute HF exacerbations. Remarkably, it has been reported that patients with HF also present weakness of the respiratory muscles, specifically the diaphragm [5], which in association with lung edema could contribute to hinder correct ventilation, thus promoting hypoxia and dyspnea. Accordingly, animal models for optimally studying the pathophysiology of HF not only must exhibit the cardiac alterations characterizing the disease but also should realistically mimic the diaphragmatic dysfunction observed in patients with HF, particularly when study- ing exercise interventions in HF animal models [6–8]. The HF model based on infusion of iso- proterenol is widely used since it features realistic structural and functional cardiac alterations and has the advantage of being experimentally simple [9]. Indeed, contrary to requiring major surgeries as when HF is induced by myocardial infarction or aortic ligation, HF is induced almost non-invasively by simply placing a subcutaneous pump to continuously infuse isopro- terenol. It is noteworthy, however, that there are no data describing whether this widely used HF model results in diaphragm dysfunction. Nevertheless, indirect data from research in other fields where isoproterenol is applied at different doses and modes suggest that this agent elicits an increase in the contractile performance of skeletal muscles [10, 11] and in particular of the diaphragm. For instance, it was observed that intravenous injection of isoproterenol enhanced contractility of canine diaphragm [12]. Moreover, in isolated muscle testing of rats with septic peritonitis, isoproterenol added to organ bath increased diaphragmatic contractility [13], simi- larly as reported when imposing cardiac pressure overload by transverse aorta constriction in a rodent model [14]. In case that, as indirectly suggested from the afore mentioned studies [12–14], application of systemic isoproterenol with the specific dosage and duration as in the HF model would result in diaphragm reinforcement ―exactly the reverse alteration found in HF patients― the cardio-respiratory interest of this model would be challenged. Therefore, the aim if this study was to test the hypothesis that the widespread rodent model of HF based on isoproterenol infu- sion results in increased diaphragmatic contractility. To this end, diaphragmatic function in the conventional murine model of isoproterenol-induced HF was assessed in vivo by ultra- sound echography and ex vivo by isolated muscle contractility testing. Materials and methods Animals The study was carried out on forty adult male C57BL/6J mice (10 weeks old; Charles River Laboratories, Saint Germain sur L’arbresle, France) maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle room (light on 8:00 am to 8:00 pm) with water and food ad libitum. In a first series, 20 mice PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 2 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction were randomly assigned to HF and healthy controls (N = 10 each) and were subjected to non- invasive evaluation of muscle function with echocardiography. Similarly, in a second series of mice, ex-vivo diaphragm contraction was measured. Diaphragm samples were used for assess- ing gene expression of myosin types. The intervention protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of Barcelona. Heart failure model HF was induced by continuous infusion of isoproterenol with an osmotic pump, following the conventional procedure in this model [9]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with a mixture of inhaled isoflurane and oxygen-enriched air (1.25% during induction and 1% during mainte- nance) and a small incision was made on the back of each animal between the shoulder blades after removing the hair from the area using depilatory cream. The skin was carefully separated from underlying connective tissues using blunt-ended scissors and an osmotic mini-pump (Alzet, model 1004) containing isoproterenol (Sigma Aldrich) at 30 mg/kg per day dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution or only 0.9% NaCl solution (for healthy controls) was implanted subcutaneously for delivery pharmacological agent or placebo for 30 days and the incision was sutured with surgical staples (Autoclip, Fine Science Tools). The procedure was performed under aseptic conditions. The surgery platform was continuously warmed to maintain body temperature until the end of anesthesia. Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) was subcutaneously administered 10 minutes before surgery and after 24 hours. Suture staples were removed 7 days after surgery. Assessment of heart failure by echocardiography At baseline (before pump implantation) and 30 days after treatment with isoproterenol or saline (end-point), echocardiography (Vivid IQ and L8-18i-D Linear Array 5-15MHz, General Electric Healthcare, Horten, Norway) was measured by a single operator (NF) who was blind to the animal group following a standard protocol [15]. Briefly, using the same anesthesia as for mini-pump implantation, chest and abdominal hair were removed using depilatory cream, then the mouse was placed in supine position on a continuously warmed platform to maintain body temperature and the four limbs were fixed. Ultrasound gel was applied on the left hemi- thorax and the following echocardiographic indices were subsequently computed: left ventric- ular end-diastolic (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fraction shortening (FS). In vivo diaphragmatic echography Diaphragmatic echography was performed immediately after echocardiography by the same operator and with the same device following a standard protocol for non-invasively measuring diaphragm function in mice [16]. After applying gel on the area overlying the diaphragm just below the rib cage, an ultrasound probe (Vivid IQ and L8-18i-D Linear Array 5-15MHz, Gen- eral Electric Healthcare, Horten, Norway) was placed along the transverse mid-sternal axis of the mouse, in order to locate the diaphragm on both sides of the body and M-mode was used to measure the diaphragm movement during normal breathing cycles, detecting contraction (positive deflection) and relaxed state (negative deflection) of diaphragm. Diaphragmatic excursion was quantified as the amplitude of movement between the lowest and peak point of the contraction. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 3 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Ex vivo assessment of diaphragmatic contractile function Contractile function of the diaphragm at end point was assessed ex vivo using an isolated mus- cle test system (Aurora Scientific, Aurora, ON, Canada). All force data were recorded using a customized software implemented in LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and analyzed with MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, United States). Diaphragm dissection and preparation of muscle strips were carried out following pre- viously described procedures [17]. Immediately after euthanasia by exsanguination, dia- phragms were dissected with ribs attached and placed into ice-cold buffer (118 mmol/L NaCl, 4.7 mmol/L KCl, 2.5 mmol/L CaCl2, 1.2 mmol/L KH2PO4, 0.57 mmol/L MgSO4, 25 mmol/ L HEPES and 5.5 mmol/L glucose; pH 7.2). This ringer solution was continuously bubbled with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Diaphragm strips were prepared with the ribs at the distal end and the central tendon at the proximal end. The side of the rib was anchored and kept fixed, the central tendon was attached to a force transducer (305C Dual-Mode Muscle Lever, Aurora Scientific) using sutures [18] and the diaphragm strip was submerged into the above oxygenated ringer solution at 22˚C to prolong muscle stability for testing. The muscle strip remained at rest for 5 minutes prior to functional testing. Supramaximal stimulation condi- tions and optimum length was determined following established procedures [17]. A single twitch was elicited for 3 times (supra-maximal stimulation, 0.5 milliseconds) from which twitch force (peak force), time to peak force (contraction time) and time to 50% relaxa- tion (half-relaxation time) were determined. The force-frequency relationship was then deter- mined by sequentially stimulating the muscle strips at 10–100 Hz (10 Hz intervals) for 1 second at each stimulus frequency interspersed by 2-minutes recovery intervals between each stimulus, allowing measuring the maximum tetanic force. Fatigue resistance was measured as the decay time in force production while the diaphragm was stimulated continuously at 50 Hz for 40 seconds. From this curve we calculated the time until the initial maximum force decreased to 50% [18] and the strength decrement index (SDI) as a decay of force production at second 30 respect to the maximum force production [19]. Finally, the ribs and central ten- don were removed, and the wet mass of the muscle tissue was weighted. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was computed as CSA = m/(l�d), where m and l are strip mass and length, respec- tively, and d (= 1.06 g/cm3) is muscle density [17, 20]. Preparation of diaphragm strips was performed by a researcher (IC-A) who was blind to the mice groups. Indeed, the optimum length of diaphragm strips did not show significant differences when comparing HF (7.74 ± 0.15 mm2) and healthy control (7.62 ± 0.33 mm2) mice (p = 0.751; t-test). Strip weight was 23.8 ± 1 mg and 23.5 ± 1 mg for HF and healthy controls, respectively, with no difference between groups (p = 0.866; t-test). Consistently, strip CSA showed no significant differences when comparing HF (3.0 ± 0.1 mm2) and healthy controls (3.2 ± 0.2 mm2) mice (t-test p = 0.604). Myosin gene expression in the diaphragm Diaphragm samples extracted from the animals immediately after sacrifice were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80˚C for further analysis. All reagents were purchased from ThermoScientific (Waltham, MO) unless specified. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after all dia- phragm samples were collected, they were thawed and immediately lysed in a Polytron PT2100 homogenizer (Kinematica AG, Lucerne, Switzerland). RNA isolated from the tissue was employed to synthetize cDNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR; TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents). Afterwards, changes in gene expression were ana- lyzed by qPCR using the Taqman Fast Advanced Master Mix in a StepOne Plus thermocycler. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 4 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction The candidate genes analyzed were chosen regarding its association with a specific muscle fiber type. Hence, the muscle fiber type MyHC-I correlates with Myh6, MyHC-IIa with Myh2, MyHC-IId/x with Myh1 and MyHC-IIb with Myh4 [21, 22]. Expression of the four genes was normalized to the expression of peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA) used as an internal control. Relative gene expression levels are expressed as fold-change of the 2-ΔCt compared to the base- line group of healthy control mice [23]. Assessment of lung edema Lungs obtained immediately after diaphragm excision were stored at -80 ˚C and subsequently thawed at room temperature for 4 h, dried in an oven at 80 ˚C for 48 h and weighted again. Edema in each lung was assess as the wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio [24]. Statistics All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Comparison of ex vivo variables between HF and healthy control groups were carried out by t-tests. When normality tests failed, the Mann- Whitney non-parametric test was used. In the case of in vivo variables (echocardiography and diaphragm echography) where data for each animal were available both at base line and end- point, comparisons were carried out for the variable change from baseline to end-point. For all tests, p<0.05 was considered as statically significant. Results As expected from previous reports using the isoproterenol model, mice showed echocardio- graphic indices characteristic of HF. As a result of random distribution of animals among HF and healthy control groups, baseline cardiac indices (LVEDD = 3.49 ± 0.05 mm, LVESD = 2.27 ± 0.06 mm, LVEF = 71.20 ± 1.29%, FS = 35.20 ± 1.08%) did not show significant differ- ences between groups. However, at end-point mice in the HF group showed a significant increase in structural parameters (LVEDD and LVESD) and a significant decrease in func- tional parameters (LVEF and FS) as compared with healthy controls, confirming heart hyper- trophy and decay in cardiac function (Table 1). As indicated in Table 2, HF mice showed slight but significant increase in body weight as compared with healthy controls (Table 2). Moreover, organ weight showed that the animals in HF group exhibited heart hypertrophy (Table 2). Consistently with HF, mice in the isoproterenol group had pulmonary edema since their lung W/D weight ratio was significantly greater than in healthy controls (Table 2). In contrast with findings in HF patients, diaphragm function in mice subjected to isopro- terenol-induced HF was considerably enhanced as compared with healthy animals, both in in vivo and ex vivo measurements. In vivo echography confirmed that, whereas diaphragmatic excursion at baseline was 2.12 ± 0.10 mm, with no significant differences between groups Table 1. The isoproterenol-induced Heart Failure (HF) model significantly modifies echocardiographically-measured left ventricular structure and function. Baseline Healthy ControlΔ Heart FailureΔ p value LVESD (mm) 2.27 ± 0.06 -0.17 ± 0.10 -0.54 ± 0.05 0.008 LVEDD (mm) 3.49 ± 0.05 -0.13 ± 0.11 -0.59 ± 0.05 0.019 LVEF (%) 71.20 ± 1.29 -0.80 ± 1.75 -8.50 ± 1.37 0.003 FS (%) 35.20 ± 1.08 -0.70 ± 1.45 -6.20 ± 0.98 0.006 Δ indicates the change in heart variable from baseline to day 30 after isoproterenol or placebo infusion start for each heart failure and in healthy control animals, respectively (n = 10 each group). LVEED: end-diastolic diameter; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; FS: fraction shortening. Values are mean ± SEM. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.t001 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 5 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Table 2. The isoproterenol-induced Heart Failure (HF) model induces cardiac hypertrophy and lung edema. Healthy Control Heart Failure p value Body weight (BW) (g) 28.71±0.52 30.77±0.61 0.028 Heart weight (HW) (g) 0.15±0.004 0.19±0.012 0.0001 Normalized HW (100�HW/BW) 0.52±0.01 0.64±0.05 0.011 Lung edema (W/D) 4.58±0.19 5.93±0.32 0.004 Data were measured in the HF and heathy control and the groups at end point (after 30 days of continuous perfusion of isoproterenol or placebo, respectively). Lung edema index was measured as the ratio between wet (W) and dry (D) lungs (see Methods for explanation). Values are mean ± SEM. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.t002 (p = 0.600), the increase in diaphragm excursion was significantly higher in HF mice as com- pared with healthy animals at the end of the experiment (Fig 1). Moreover, ex vivo muscle assessment also showed increased diaphragm contractility in iso- proterenol-induced HF as compared with healthy controls. Indeed, HF diaphragms exhibited a significant increase in peak specific twitch force in response to a single supra-maximal stimu- lus compared with healthy controls (Fig 2). However, contraction time corresponding to this stimulus did not significantly (p = 0.397) differ between HF (0.03±0.03 ms) and healthy controls (0.03±0.04 ms). Also, non-significant differences (p = 0.294) were found in half relaxation time (0.03 ± 0.003 ms for healthy controls and 0.04 ± 0.003 ms for HF animals). Maximum force production observed with tetanic con- traction using a continuous stimulus was higher in HF animals (Fig 3). We also evaluated the tetanic contraction at increasing stimulation frequencies to describe the force-frequency relationship, confirming a significant increase of force production in almost all frequencies in the HF group when compared with healthy mice (Fig 4). Finally, fatigue resistance experiments showed a significant decrease in time to half initial force in HF when compared with healthy control mice and a significant increase in the same group in the strength decrement index (SDI) at 30 seconds (Fig 5), indicating increased fatigue in HF diaphragms. Gene expression of Myh6, Myh2, and Myh1 at the diaphragm samples showed no signifi- cant differences when comparing HF and healthy mice. By contrast, Myh4 expression showed a significant 2-fold increase in HF animals (Fig 6). These results support a greater predominance of type IIb fibers over other types of muscle fibers in diaphragm samples of isoproterenol-induced HF animals. Discussion The results of this study reveal that the conventional HF rodent model based on continuous infusion of isoproterenol for 30 days is associated with considerable enhancement of dia- phragm contractility. Therefore, whereas this model is very effective in mimicking the cardiac alterations and lung edema characterizing HF, it fails in reproducing the well-known weaken- ing of diaphragm in patients with HF [5], which has been extensively documented by measur- ing muscle strength in voluntary maximal inspiratory or sniff maneuvers [24–31] as well as in no-volitional measures using phrenic nerve stimulation [25, 29, 32, 33], and which is associ- ated with breathlessness/dyspnea, loss of functional capacity, exercise intolerance, reduced lev- els of quality of life and survival in HF patients [34–39]. The methodology of the present study for both setting the HF model and for assessing dia- phragm contractibility has been widely used in the literature. Indeed, we implemented the mouse model of HF by applying a conventional procedure (subcutaneous pump, dose and PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 6 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 1. The isoproterenol-induced Heart Failure (HF) model significantly modifies echocardiographically- measured diaphragm function. Diaphragm echography in a representative HF mouse at base line (A) and at end- point (after 30-day of continuous isoproterenol infusion) (B), showing increased excursion during spontaneous breathing. Figures in the excursion scale in the right side of (A) and (B) are mm. (C) Δ indicates the change in diaphragm excursion from baseline to day 30 after starting isoproterenol infusion in HF and in healthy control animals. Values are mean ± SEM. �� : p<0.01. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g001 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 7 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 2. Diaphragm contractile force in a single supramaximal twitch is improved in the isoproterenol-induced heart failure (HF) model. (A) Representative examples of force recordings from healthy (gray) and HF (black) groups. (B) HF animals showed an increase in peak force with respect to healthy mice. Values are mean ± SEM. � : p<0.05. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g002 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 8 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 3. Diaphragm contractile force in a continuous stimulus to generate tetanic contraction is improved in the isoproterenol-induced heart failure (HF) model. (A) Representative examples of tetanic contraction records from healthy (gray) and HF (black) groups. (B) HF animals showed an increase in tetanic force respect healthy group. Values are mean ± SEM. � : p<0.05. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g003 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 9 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 4. Force frequency relationship between groups at different incremental frequencies. Isoproterenol-induced heart failure (HF) model showed a significant increase in force production for almost all frequencies respect healthy animals. Values are mean ± SEM. � : p<0.05. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g004 duration of isoproterenol application). Accordingly, mice experienced the expected HF struc- tural and functional cardiac changes: increase in LVEDD (by 17%) and in LVESD (by 24%) for structural parameters and decay in functional parameters LVEF (by 12%) and FS (by 18%) as compared with healthy controls. Moreover, HF consistently presented significant lung edema (increase by 29% in the W/D index). Regarding assessment of diaphragm contractibil- ity, we used echography and ex vivo specific force measurements. Echography has been vali- dated for detecting time-dependent changes in diaphragmatic function, showing excellent correlation with ex vivo force measurement over a wide range of diaphragm excursion values ranging from wild type mice to mutants of Duchenne muscular dystrophy with/out treatment [40]. Ex vivo force measurements were carried on diaphragm strips following conventional procedures, achieving values of peak specific twitch and tetanic forces in control mice (�40 and �135 mN/mm2, respectively) which were very close to the ones reported for wild type mice when using a similar methodology (�35 and �170 mN/mm2, respectively) [41]. This ex vivo experimental model allowed us to focus on muscle tissue contractibility thus avoiding the potential effect of isoproterenol on neural activation. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 10 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 5. Diaphragmatic fatigue in the isoproterenol-induced Heart Failure (HF) model. (A) Representative examples of fatigue stimulus and decay of force production of healthy and HF diaphragms. (B) HF animals showed a decrease in time to half maximum force and a significant increase in strength decrement index (C) as compared with healthy mice. Values are the mean ± SEM. � : p<0.05 and �� : p<0.01. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g005 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 11 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Fig 6. Gene expression of Myh6, Myh2, Myh1 and Myh4 in diaphragm muscle of isoproterenol-induced Heart Failure (HF) mice. (A)Myh6, (B) Myh2, (C) Myh1 and (D) Myh4 as fold-change compared to control healthy mice. Values are the mean ± SEM. � : p<0.05. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923.g006 The increase in diaphragm contractility in the isoproterenol-induced HF in mice, as com- pared with healthy controls, was considerable either when assessed noninvasively as dia- phragm excursion (by �30%) or when measured ex vivo (by �50% in both peak specific twitch and tetanic forces). Such enhancement in diaphragm function in the isoproterenol model strongly contrasts with findings in other rodent models of HF at similar timepoints. For instance, diaphragm dysfunction has been reported in rat models where HF is induced by left coronary artery ligation [7, 8, 42–45], aorto-caval fistula or aortic banding [46–48] or mono- crotaline administration [49]. Regarding mouse models, diaphragm weakening has also been reported when HF is induced by left coronary artery ligation [6, 50–52], transverse aortic con- striction [16, 53] or in transgenic mice [54]. Therefore, the novel data reported in the present study on the increased diaphragm contractibility observed in isoproterenol-induced HF at 30 days indicates that, as far as this respiratory muscle function is concerned, the model does not behave as in HF patients and in other rodent models of the disease. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 12 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction Isoproterenol is a nonselective beta-adrenergic agonist inducing early cardiac hypertrophy and hypercontractility followed by HF with cardiac dilation and ventricular dysfunction sec- ondary to by chronic adrenergic overstimulation [9]. The diaphragm contractility enhance- ment we report here for the first time in the conventional isoproterenol-induced HF model was hypothesized based on previous indirect data on the effects of this nonselective beta- adrenergic agonist in non-cardiac muscles. Indeed, it was known that the consequences of sys- temic or global administration of isoproterenol can affect skeletal muscles by activating their beta receptors responsible of fiber contraction. In contrast to the morphological and functional changes described in the heart, chronic stimulation of beta receptors have been shown to pre- vent muscle atrophy in peripheral skeletal muscle in denervated rats [55]. Also, dietary admin- istration of beta adrenoceptor agonist in rats produce growth-promoting protein anabolic effects in muscle tissue [56]. Chronic administration of these agonists causes hypertrophy of skeletal muscle in mice [57] and hypertrophy of diaphragm in hamsters [58]. Moreover, when investigated in different experimental settings other than the HF model, isoproterenol increased canine and rodent diaphragm contractibility [12–14]. It is interesting to note that isoproterenol may also increase the contractile force of skeletal muscles, as it has been reported when added to the bath of ex vivo preparations of mouse soleus and extensor digitorum longus [10, 11]. However, whether continuous chronic infusion of isoproterenol as in the HF mouse model induces enhancement of skeletal muscle contractibility is unknown. Noteworthy, in addition to production of enhanced force, the diaphragm of isoproterenol- induced HF failure mice also showed fast decrease rate and hence a tendency to fatigue (Fig 5). Interestingly, an increase in force production and less fatigue resistance are both characteristic features of muscles with a greater distribution of type IIb fibers [59–61]. The significant increase in Myh4 (related to MyHC-IIb, the most fast-glycolytic muscle fiber type) in our HF mice (Fig 6) could partially explain the results observed in the ex vivo muscle testing. This fiber distribution contrasts with the results reported from diaphragm biopsies in patients with severe HF, showing a shift from fast to slow fibers with higher levels of type I and lower levels of type II fibers compared with healthy controls [62]. Likewise, in animal models of chronic HF that adequately reproduce diaphragmatic weakness some studies also described the same tendency with increase in type I and IIa muscle fibers accompanied by decreases in type IId/x and IIb fibers [43, 47, 63]. The shift from a more fast-glycolytic to a slow-oxidative metabolism in HF partially explains diaphragm weakness and his relationship with breathlessness/dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Therefore, although more detailed fiber analysis could be carried out, our results from myosin gene expression in diaphragms from isoproterenol-induced HF (Fig 6) suggest that changes in fiber types differ from those described in HF patients and explain the greater force production together with the greater vulnerability to fatigue. This study has some limitations. First, to selectively identify the effect of isoproterenol, a subcutaneous pump releasing saline was implanted into the mice in the healthy control group. It should be noted, however, that implantation of such a subcutaneous pump is a minor proce- dure with very unlikely systemic consequences. Second, as we mainly focused on documenting the existence of isoproterenol-induced diaphragm increase in contractile force, we did not focus on involved mechanisms, such as whether force production correlated to Ca+2 handling, or on ultrastructural analysis of the diaphragm fibers. the HF model was evaluated at 30 days of continuous isoproterenol infusion, which is a previously validated method [64]. Whether further beta-adrenergic stimulation during longer periods of time could lead to greater vulner- ability to diaphragm fatigue and secondary dysfunctional contractility (reproducing the effects of chronic beta-stimulation at the heart) is unknown. However, our preliminary data showing mRNA expression of myosin genes diverging from those described in other HF models with similar timepoints and in HF patients do not support this hypothesis. Interestingly, detailed PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 13 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction analysis at different time points in the model would allow characterizing the progression of the diaphragmatic alterations and the correlation between the magnitude of diaphragm contract- ibility and the severity of heart failure [14]. Conclusions In summary, this study has demonstrated a previously unreported and relevant limitation of the conventional rodent model of isoproterenol-induced HF. Indeed, whereas this model is suitable for mimicking the cardiac structural and functional alterations in HF, its considerable increase in diaphragm contractibility is the reverse of the diaphragmatic weakening observed in patients with this disease, thereby questioning its translational interest in HF research, espe- cially when aimed at integrating cardiorespiratory alterations. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Mr. Miguel Rodriguez and Ms. Elisabet Urrea for their excellent technical assistance. Author Contributions Conceptualization: Ramon Farré, Núria Farré. Formal analysis: Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera, Núria Farré. Funding acquisition: Ramon Farré. Investigation: Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera, Bryan Falcones, Alicia Calvo-Fernández, Ramon Farré, Isaac Almendros, Núria Farré. Methodology: Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera, Bryan Falcones, Begoña Benito, Esther Barreiro, Joa- quim Gea, Ramon Farré, Isaac Almendros, Núria Farré. Resources: Begoña Benito, Núria Farré. Supervision: Ramon Farré, Núria Farré. Writing – original draft: Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera, Ramon Farré, Núria Farré. Writing – review & editing: Ignacio Cabrera-Aguilera, Bryan Falcones, Alicia Calvo-Fernán- dez, Begoña Benito, Esther Barreiro, Joaquim Gea, Ramon Farré, Isaac Almendros. References 1. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, Bluemke DA, Butler J, Fonarow GC, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May; 6(3):606–19. https://doi.org/10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a PMID: 23616602 2. Farré N, Vela E, Clèries M, Bustins M, Cainzos-Achirica M, Enjuanes C, et al. Real world heart failure epidemiology and outcome: A population-based analysis of 88,195 patients. Lazzeri C, editor. PLoS One. 2017 Feb; 12(2):e0172745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172745 PMID: 28235067 3. Figueroa MS, Peters JI. Congestive heart failure: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, therapy, and implications for respiratory care. In: Respiratory Care. Respiratory Care; 2006. p. 403–12. PMID: 16563194 4. Cross TJ, Kim CH, Johnson BD, Lalande S. The interactions between respiratory and cardiovascular systems in systolic heart failure. J Appl Physiol. 2020 Jan 1; 128(1):214–24. https://doi.org/10.1152/ japplphysiol.00113.2019 PMID: 31774354 5. Kelley RC, Ferreira LF. Diaphragm abnormalities in heart failure and aging: mechanisms and integration of cardiovascular and respiratory pathophysiology. Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Mar; 22(2):191–207. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10741-016-9549-4 PMID: 27000754 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 14 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction 6. Mangner N, Bowen TS, Werner S, Fischer T, Kullnick Y, Oberbach A, et al. Exercise training prevents diaphragm contractile dysfunction in heart failure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov 1; 48(11):2118–24. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001016 PMID: 27327028 7. Jaenisch RB, Quagliotto E, Chechi C, Calegari L, dos Santos F, Borghi-Silva A, et al. Respiratory Mus- cle Training Improves Chemoreflex Response, Heart Rate Variability, and Respiratory Mechanics in Rats With Heart Failure. Can J Cardiol [Internet]. 2017; 33(4):508–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca. 2016.11.004 PMID: 28132741 8. Jaenisch RB, Stefani GP, Durante C, Chechi C, Hentschke VS, Rossato DD, et al. Respiratory muscle training decreases diaphragm DNA damage in rats with heart failure. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018; 96(3):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2017-0069 PMID: 28787581 9. Chang SC, Ren S, Rau CD, Wang JJ. Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Mouse Model Using Osmotic Pump Implantation. Methods Mol Biol. 2018; 1816:207–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8597- 5_16 PMID: 29987822 10. Reading SA, Murrant CL, Barclay JK et al. Increased cAMP as a positive inotropic factor for mammalian skeletal muscle in vitro. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003; 81:986–996. https://doi.org/10.1139/y03-104 PMID: 14608417 11. Blackwood S.J., Katz A. Isoproterenol enhances force production in mouse glycolytic and oxidative muscle via separate mechanisms. Pflugers Arch—Eur J Physiol 2019; 471: 1305–1316. 12. Howell S, Roussos C. Isoproterenol and aminophylline improve contractility of fatigued canine dia- phragm. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984; 129(1):118–24. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1984.129.1.118 PMID: 6703471 13. Fujimura N, Sumita S, Narimatsu E, Nakayama Y, Shitinohe Y, Namiki A. Effects of isoproterenol on diaphragmatic contractility in septic peritonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(2 I):440–6. 14. Foster AJ, Platt MJ, Huber JS, Eadie AL, Arkell AM, Romanova N, et al. Central-Acting therapeutics alleviate respiratory weakness caused by heart failure-induced ventilatory overdrive. Sci Transl Med. 2017 May 17; 9(390). 15. Gao S, Ho D, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Echocardiography in Mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2011 Mar; 1:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470942390.mo100130 PMID: 21743841 16. Zuo L, Roberts WJ, Evans KD. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging of Mouse Diaphragm Function. J Vis Exp. 2014 Apr;(86). 17. Moorwood C, Liu M, Tian Z, Barton ER. Isometric and eccentric force generation assessment of skeletal muscles isolated from murine models of muscular dystrophies. J Vis Exp [Internet]. 2013 Jan 31 [cited 2019 Jun 27];(71):e50036. https://doi.org/10.3791/50036 PMID: 23407283 18. Dawson NJ, Lyons SA, Henry DA, Scott GR. Effects of chronic hypoxia on diaphragm function in deer mice native to high altitude. Acta Physiol. 2018 May 1; 223(1). 19. Clarke HH, Shay CT, Mathews DK. Strength decrement index: a new test of muscle fatigue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1955 Jun; 36(6):376–8. PMID: 14377763 20. Brooks S V., Faulkner JA. Contractile properties of skeletal muscles from young, adult and aged mice. J Physiol. 1988 Oct 1; 404(1):71–82. 21. Miwa Y, Sunohara M, Iwao Sato. Expression of myosin heavy chain isoforms in the postnatal mouse masseter muscle.; 86(3):105–10. 22. Kurapati R, McKenna C, Lindqvist J, Williams D, Simon M, LeProust E, et al. Myofibrillar myopathy caused by a mutation in the motor domain of mouse MyHC IIb. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Apr 15; 21 (8):1706–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr605 PMID: 22199023 23. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 PMID: 11846609 24. Almendros I, Gutierrez PT, Closa D, Navajas D, Farre R. One-lung overventilation does not induce inflammation in the normally ventilated contralateral lung. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008 Jun 30; 162 (1):100–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2008.04.009 PMID: 18502699 25. Carmo MM, Bárbara C, Ferreira T, Branco J, Ferreira S, Rendas AB. Diaphragmatic function in patients with chronic left ventricular failure. Pathophysiology. 2001; 8(1):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928- 4680(01)00065-7 PMID: 11476974 26. Hammond MD, Bauer KA, Sharp JT, Rocha RD. Respiratory muscle strength in congestive heart fail- ure. Chest. 1990 Nov; 98(5):1091–4. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.98.5.1091 PMID: 2225950 27. Coirault C, Hagège A, Chemla D, Fratacci MD, Guérot C, Lecarpentier Y. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy improves respiratory muscle strength in patients with heart failure. Chest. 2001 Jun 1; 119(6):1755–60. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.6.1755 PMID: 11399702 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 15 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction 28. McParland C, Krishnan B, Wang Y, Gallagher CG. Inspiratory muscle weakness and dyspnea in chronic heart failure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 146(2):467–72. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.467 PMID: 1489142 29. Evans SA, Watson L, Hawkins M, Cowley AJ, Johnston IDA, Kinnea WJM. Respiratory muscle strength in chronic heart failure. Thorax. 1995; 50(6):625–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.50.6.625 PMID: 7638803 30. Witt C, Borges AC, Haake H, Reindl I, Kleber FX, Baumann G. Respiratory muscle weakness and nor- mal ventilatory drive in dilative cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 1997 Aug; 18(8):1322–8. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015445 PMID: 9458426 31. Ambrosino N, Opasich C, Crotti P, Cobelli F, Tavazzi L, Rampulla C. Breathing pattern, ventilatory drive and respiratory muscle strength in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Respir J. 1994; 7(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.94.07010017 PMID: 8143818 32. Filusch A, Ewert R, Altesellmeier M, Zugck C, Hetzer R, Borst MM, et al. Respiratory muscle dysfunc- tion in congestive heart failure-The role of pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 15; 150 (2):182–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.006 PMID: 20444510 33. Hughes PD, Polkey MI, Harris M Lou, Coats AJS, Moxham J, Green M. Diaphragm strength in chronic heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160(2):529–34. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2. 9810081 PMID: 10430724 34. Dall’Ago P, Chiappa GRS, Guths H, Stein R, Ribeiro JP. Inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart failure and inspiratory muscle weakness: A randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21; 47 (4):757–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.052 PMID: 16487841 35. Dubé BP, Agostoni P, Laveneziana P. Exertional dyspnoea in chronic heart failure: The role of the lung and respiratory mechanical factors. Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Sep 1; 25(141):317–32. https://doi.org/10. 1183/16000617.0048-2016 PMID: 27581831 36. Ribeiro JP, Chiappa GR, Neder AJ, Frankenstein L. Respiratory muscle function and exercise intoler- ance in heart failure. Vol. 6, Current Heart Failure Reports. 2009. p. 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11897-009-0015-7 PMID: 19486593 37. Taylor BJ, Bowen TS. Respiratory Muscle Weakness in Patients with Heart Failure: Time to Make It a Standard Clinical Marker and a Need for Novel Therapeutic Interventions? Vol. 24, Journal of Cardiac Failure. Churchill Livingstone Inc.; 2018. p. 217–8. 38. Yamada K, Kinugasa Y, Sota T, Miyagi M, Sugihara S, Kato M, et al. Inspiratory Muscle Weakness is Associated with Exercise Intolerance in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Preliminary Study. J Card Fail. 2016; 22(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.010 PMID: 26505812 39. Meyer FJ, Borst MM, Zugck C, Kirschke A, Schellberg D, Kübler W, et al. Respiratory muscle dysfunc- tion in congestive heart failure: clinical correlation and prognostic significance. Circulation. 2001 May 1; 103(17):2153–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.17.2153 PMID: 11331255 40. Whitehead NP, Bible KL, Kim MJ, Odom GL, Adams ME, Froehner SC. Validation of ultrasonography for non-invasive assessment of diaphragm function in muscular dystrophy. J Physiol. 2016 Dec 15; 594 (24):7215–27. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP272707 PMID: 27570057 41. Manning J, Buckley MM, O’Halloran KD, O’Malley D. Combined XIL-6R and urocortin-2 treatment restores MDX diaphragm muscle force. Muscle Nerve. 2017; 56(6):E134–E140. https://doi.org/10. 1002/mus.25644 PMID: 28294390 42. Coblentz PD, Ahn B, Hayward LF, Yoo JK, Christou DD, Ferreira LF. Small-hairpin RNA and pharmaco- logical targeting of neutral sphingomyelinase prevent diaphragm weakness in rats with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Am J Physiol—Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2019 Apr 1; 316(4):L679–90. https:// doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00516.2018 PMID: 30702345 43. Okoshi K, Guizoni DM, Oliveira SA, Martinez PF, Dal-Pai Silva M, Damatto RL, et al. Heart Failure- Induced Diaphragm Myopathy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014; 34(2):333–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000363003 PMID: 25060722 44. Van Hees HWH, Andrade Acuña GL, Linkels M, Dekhuijzen PNR, Heunks LMA. Levosimendan improves calcium sensitivity of diaphragm muscle fibres from a rat model of heart failure. Br J Pharma- col. 2011 Feb; 162(3):566–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01048.x PMID: 20880026 45. Van Hees HWH, Ottenheijm CAC, Granzier HL, Dekhuijzen PNR, Heunks LMA. Heart failure decreases passive tension generation of rat diaphragm fibers. Int J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 11; 141(3):275–83. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.12.042 PMID: 19150150 46. Coirault C, Guellich A, Barbry T, Samuel JL, Riou B, Lecarpentier Y. Oxidative stress of myosin contrib- utes to skeletal muscle dysfunction in rats with chronic heart failure. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol. 2007 Feb; 292(2). PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 16 / 17 PLOS ONE Isoproterenol-induced heart failure and diaphragmatic dysfunction 47. De Sousa E, Veksler V, Bigard X, Mateo P, Serrurier B, Ventura-Clapier R. Dual influence of disease and increased load on diaphragm muscle in heart failure. In: Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiol- ogy. Academic Press; 2001. p. 699–710. 48. Benes J, Kazdova L, Drahota Z, Houstek J, Medrikova D, Kopecky J, et al. Effect of metformin therapy on cardiac function and survival in a volume-overload model of heart failure in rats. Clin Sci. 2011 Jul; 121(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20100527 PMID: 21275906 49. Lopes FDS, Carvalho RF, Campos GER, Sugizaki MM, Padovani CR, Nogueira CR, et al. Down-regu- lation of MyoD gene expression in rat diaphragm muscle with heart failure. Int J Exp Pathol. 2008 Jun; 89(3):216–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2613.2008.00587.x PMID: 18460074 50. Adams V, Bowen TS, Werner S, Barthel P, Amberger C, Konzer A, et al. Small-molecule-mediated chemical knock-down of MuRF1/MuRF2 and attenuation of diaphragm dysfunction in chronic heart fail- ure. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Oct 1; 10(5):1102–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12448 PMID: 31140761 51. Ahn B, Beharry AW, Frye GS, Judge AR, Ferreira LF. NAD(P)H oxidase subunit p47phox is elevated, and p47phox knockout prevents diaphragm contractile dysfunction in heart failure. Am J Physiol—Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015 Sep 1; 309(5):L497–505. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00176.2015 PMID: 26209274 52. Bowen TS, Mangner N, Werner S, Glaser S, Kullnick Y, Schrepper A, et al. Diaphragm muscle weak- ness in mice is early-onset post-myocardial infarction and associated with elevated protein oxidation. J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jan 1; 118(1):11–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00756.2014 PMID: 25359720 53. Gillis TE, Klaiman JM, Foster A, Platt MJ, Huber JS, Corso MY, et al. Dissecting the role of the myofila- ment in diaphragm dysfunction during the development of heart failure in mice. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol. 2016 Mar 1; 310(5):H572–86. 54. Li X, Moody MR, Engel D, Walker S, Clubb FJ, Sivasubramanian N, et al. Cardiac-specific overexpres- sion of tumor necrosis factor-α causes oxidative stress and contractile dysfunction in mouse diaphragm. Circulation. 2000 Oct 3; 102(14):1690–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.14.1690 PMID: 11015349 55. Agrawal S, Thakur P, Katoch SS. Beta adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol, and isoproterenol retard denervation atrophy in rat gastrocnemius muscle: Use of 3-methylhistidine as a marker of myofibrillar degeneration. Jpn J Physiol. 2003 Jun; 53(3):229–37. https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.53.229 PMID: 14529584 56. MacLennan PA, Edwards RHT. Effects of clenbuterol and propranolol on muscle mass. Evidence that clenbuterol stimulates muscle β-adrenoceptors to induce hypertrophy. Biochem J. 1989; 264(2):573–9. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2640573 PMID: 2481447 57. Lynch GS, Hinkle RT, Faulkner JA. Year-long clenbuterol treatment of mice increases mass, but not specific force or normalized power, of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999 Feb; 26 (2):117–20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03001.x PMID: 10065331 58. Van Der Heijden HFM, Dekhuijzen PNR, Folgering H, Ginsel LA, Van Herwaarden CLA. Long-term effects of clenbuterol on diaphragm morphology and contractile properties in emphysematous ham- sters. J Appl Physiol. 1998 Jul; 85(1):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.215 PMID: 9655778 59. Pette D, Staront RS. Mammalian skeletal muscle fiber type transitions. Vol. 170, International Review of Cytology. Academic Press Inc.; 1997. p. 143–223. 60. Watchko JF, Daood MJ, Sieck GC. Myosin heavy chain transitions during development. Functional implications for the respiratory musculature. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1998 Mar; 119(3):459–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0491(98)00006-6 PMID: 9734330 61. Tikunova S, Belevych N, Doan K, Reiser PJ. Desensitizing mouse cardiac troponin C to calcium con- verts slow muscle towards a fast muscle phenotype. J Physiol. 2018 Oct 1; 596(19):4651–63. https:// doi.org/10.1113/JP276296 PMID: 29992562 62. Tikunov B, Levine S, Mancini D. Chronic congestive heart failure elicits adaptations of endurance exer- cise in diaphragmatic muscle. Circulation. 1997; 95(4):910–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.4.910 PMID: 9054750 63. Stassijns G, Gayan-Ramirez G, De Leyn P, De Bock V, Dom R, Lysens R, et al. Effects of dilated car- diomyopathy on the diaphragm in the Syrian hamster. Eur Respir J. 1999 Feb; 13(2):391–7. https://doi. org/10.1183/09031936.99.13239199 PMID: 10065687 64. Cabrera-Aguilera I, Benito B, Tajes M, Farré R, Gozal D, Almendros I, et al. Chronic Sleep Fragmenta- tion Mimicking Sleep Apnea Does Not Worsen Left-Ventricular Function in Healthy and Heart Failure Mice. Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 9; 10:1364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01364 PMID: 31993015 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236923 July 30, 2020 17 / 17