RESEARCH ARTICLE E-cigarettes: Effects in phagocytosis and cytokines response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Andromeda-Celeste Gómez ID1,2,3☯, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández1,2,3☯, Raquel Villar- Hernández1,3, Isidre Gibert2,3, Beatriz Muriel-Moreno1, Alicia Lacoma ID1, Cristina Prat- Aymerich1,3, Jose Domı́nguez ID1,3* 1 Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Badalona, Catalonia, Spain, a1111111111 2 Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra a1111111111 (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 3 Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, a1111111111 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain a1111111111 a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * jadominguez@igtp.cat Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Gómez A-C, Rodrı́guez-Fernández P, Cigarette smoking and tuberculosis are a significant cause of death worldwide. Several epi- Villar-Hernández R, Gibert I, Muriel-Moreno B, demiological studies have demonstrated cigarette smoking is a risk factor for tuberculosis. Lacoma A, et al. (2020) E-cigarettes: Effects in Electronic cigarettes have recently appeared as a healthier alternative to conventional phagocytosis and cytokines response against smoking, although their impact in tuberculosis is not well understood. The aim of this study Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0228919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. was to explore the effect of electronic cigarettes in phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tubercu- pone.0228919 losis and cytokines production. In vitro infection was carried out by exposing THP-1 macro- Editor: Frederick Quinn, The University of Georgia, phages to four electronic vapor extracts and the intracellular burden of M. tuberculosis was UNITED STATES determined. The percentage of infection was evaluated by confocal microscopy and the Received: August 26, 2019 cytokine production by Luminex. A reduction of intracellular M. tuberculosis burden in THP- 1 macrophages was found after its exposure to electronic vapor extract; the same trend was Accepted: January 22, 2020 observed by confocal microscopy when Mycobacterium bovis BCG-GFP strain was used. Published: February 10, 2020 Electronic cigarettes stimulate a pro-inflammatory cytokine response. We conclude that Copyright: © 2020 Gómez et al. This is an open electronic cigarettes impair the phagocytic function and the cytokine response to M. access article distributed under the terms of the tuberculosis. Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information Introduction files. Both cigarette smoking and tuberculosis (TB) are a significant cause of death worldwide. The Funding: This work was supported by: SEPAR World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.3 and 7 million people died in 2017 of TB (Spanish Society for Pulmonology and Thoracic and cigarette smoking respectively [1, 2]. It is noteworthy that countries with a high incidence Surgery; Extraordinary Call for Research PII of TB tend to also have an elevated proportion of smokers [3]. The link between TB and ciga- Smoking, Research Project nº:16/024); European Respiratory Society Long-Term Research rette smoke has already been suggested since 1918 and it has been confirmed by several epide- Fellowship (LTRF-2015-5934); Instituto de Salud miological studies [4, 5]. There is evidence that cigarette smoke is a risk factor for TB, aiding Carlos III (PI16/1912 y PI17/01139 projects, the infection, the progression to the active disease and the severity of the illness [6, 7]. In PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 1 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response integrated in the National Plan R+D+I and funded addition, it has been observed that cigarette smoke delays in the culture conversion during TB by the ISCIII and the European Regional treatment, increasing the risk of transmission to the population [8, 9]. Development Fund.) and the CERCA Programme/ Many studies have been focused on understanding the cause-effect relationship between Generalitat de Catalunya. José Domı́nguez is an investigator of the Program Miguel Servet from cigarette smoke and TB, however, many aspects currently remain unclear. Cigarette smoke Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Pablo Rodrı́guez- effects include: loss of phagocytic capacity, failure to contain the intracellular growth of myco- Fernández is the recipient of a fellowship from the bacteria in macrophages, attenuation of cytokine and chemokine response as well as attenua- Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and tion of apoptosis [10–13]. Universities, as a part of the Program Training of In the last years, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and especially electronic cig- University Staff (FPU14/01854). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and arettes (e-cigs) have appeared as a cooler, cheaper and healthier alternative to conventional analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the tobacco, proving more attractive to the younger population. However, in the medical commu- manuscript. nity there is a growing concern due to: i) the health effects from ENDS, ii) the inexact labelling Competing interests: The authors have declared of the electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) components, iii) the lack of international laws for that no competing interests exist. quality production, iv) non-smokers being converted by e-cigs into dual users [14–16]. E-cigs deliver an aerosol (known as vapor) from e-liquids that can contain propylene glycol (PG), vegetable glycerol (VG), flavors and nicotine in different concentrations and ratios [17]. Although the percentage of toxic compounds found in e-cig vapor (e-vapor) are lower than cigarette smoke [17], some studies have shown a toxic effect on cells like alveolar macrophages [18], lung epithelial cells [19–22] and monocytic cells [23] as well as proteomic changes in the cells of the lower airways [24] and pro-inflammatory response [19, 21, 23, 25]. Moreover, func- tion damage in macrophages has been observed and therefore an enhancement of infections caused by microorganisms such as Haemophilus influenzae [26], Escherichia coli [18], Staphy- lococcus aureus [18, 21] and Streptococcus pneumoniae [27]. In addition, it has been shown that e-cigs promote influenza A virus infection in mice [27]. To obtain a better understanding of the relation between TB and e-vapor, we studied the influence of them on phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and cytokines production of infected THP-1 macrophages. Materials and methods THP-1 cell line and mycobacteria growth conditions The human monocytic cell line THP-1 (ATCC TIB-202™) was maintained in RPMI 1640 Glu- taMax (Gibco, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37˚C in 5% CO2. The cells were passaged every 3 days. THP-1 monocytes were stimulated to macrophages using 0.1 μM of Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA, Sigma, St Louis, USA) for 72 hours (37˚C in 5% CO2). RPMI was replaced by fresh medium 24 hours before the experiments. M. tuberculosis H37Rv and Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing green fluorescent protein (BCG-GFP) strains were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with 0.05% tween 80 and 10% albumin-dextrose-catalase (ADC), or on 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% oleic acid- albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC). For M. bovis BCG-GFP, 0.08% of glycerol and 20 μg/mL of kanamycin were also added. The mycobacteria cultures were incubated at 37˚C. M. bovis BCG-GFP was kindly provided by Carlos Martı́n from the University of Zaragoza, Spain. Cigarette smoke and e-vapor extraction Cigarette smoke extract (CS extract) was prepared from commercial cigarettes (Marlboro: 10 mg Tar, 0.8 mg Nicotine, Philip Morris Sàrl Neuchâtel, Switzerland) as was previously reported [28]. Briefly, one cigarette was combusted using a syringe-modified apparatus, which draws the smoke into a sterile glass containing 10 mL of RPMI medium or 7H9-tween. 60 mL of smoke was extracted for 10 sec following a 30 sec break; this process was repeated six times PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 2 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response per cigarette and the CS extract was sterilized using a 0.22 μm filter. The resulting solution was considered as a 100% CS extract. The absorbance (320nm) was measured for each batch to assure reproducibility and adjusted to 1.2 ± 0.2 [29, 30]. The working solution was 10% CS extract, equivalent to the smoke of between half a pack and 2 packs of cigarettes per day [31]. For each experiment, fresh extract was used and added to the cultures within 30 min of preparation. For e-vapor extract, a similar protocol was carried out. QHIT e-cigarette (Puff, Moncalieri, Italy) was used with a Cartomicer CE4 device, 3.7 V. The e-liquid base was a compound of 55% PG: 45% VG. The e-liquid base was used with nicotine (8 mg/g) and without, or with Cof- fee flavour (Irish Cloud) with and without nicotine (8 mg/g) (Puff It, Puff, Moncalieri, Italy). Coffee flavor was chosen because of the toxic effect observed in fibroblasts [32]. 60 mL of e- vapor was extracted for 3 sec, after which a 30 sec break followed; the process was repeated 40 times (average of puffs found in literature), in 10 mL of RPMI medium or 7H9-tween [21, 26]. The e-vapor extract was also sterilized using a 0.22 μm filter. Like for CS extract, fresh extract was used and added to cultures within 30 min of preparation at 100% concentration according to literature [21, 26]. Cytotoxicity assay To determinate the cytotoxic effect of the cigarette smoke and e-vapor extracts on THP-1 mac- rophages, EZ4U (Biomedica, Vienna, Austria) assay was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. THP-1 monocytes were seeded at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells per well in 96-well tissue culture plates with clear bottoms (Falcon1, Tewksbury, USA) using RPMI with- out phenol red containing PMA. The plates were incubated for 72 h (37˚C in 5% CO2 atmo- sphere). CS extract or e-vapor extract were diluted in 200 μL of RPMI without phenol red per well at different concentrations and incubated for 3 hours for CS extract and 24 hours for e- vapor extract. The monolayers were washed once with Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS) and then 200 μL of fresh medium without phenol red and 20 μL of EZ4U were added. The absorbance was read after 4 h of incubation (day 0), and also at days 3 and 6. For the plates of day 6, medium was changed on day 3. A microplate reader (Victor 3, Wallac, Waltham, USA) was used with a wavelength of 450 nm with 620 nm as reference. The results are expressed as viabil- ity percentage using cells unexposed as a control. Macrophage infection with M. tuberculosis THP-1 macrophages were exposed to CS or e-vapor extract, and then infected with M. tuber- culosis following a protocol previously reported [33], with some modifications. Briefly, 3 × 105 cells per well were PMA stimulated and seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates with clear bot- toms (Falcon1). Freshly prepared 10% CS extract or 100% e-vapor extract were added to the cells and incubated for 3 hours for CS extract and 24 hours for e-vapor extract at 37˚C in 5% CO2. For the infection, mid-log phase M. tuberculosis were washed twice with DPBS+ 0.05% tween and subsequently once with DPBS after which they stood for 5 min, before the superna- tant were collected. The bacteria were then diluted in RPMI with CS extract or e-vapor extract and added to the THP-1 macrophages at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1. After 3 h of contact at 37˚C in 5% CO2, the macrophages were treated with 200 μg/mL amikacin for 1 h and washed three times with DPBS to eliminate any extracellular bacteria. Lastly, 1 mL of RPMI with CS extract or e-vapor extract was added to each well and incubated at 37˚C in 5% CO2. Fresh medium with CS extract or e-vapor extract was added at day 3. Intracellular growth was assessed by lysis of the monolayers by the addition of 500 μL of water followed by a 30 min incubation at room temperature and serial dilution in PBS-tween plating onto Middlebrook PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 3 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response 7H10 solid medium at days 0, 1, 2, 3 and 6. Colonies were counted after 3–4 weeks incubation at 37˚C and the average CFUs/mL determined. Confocal microscopy THP-1 macrophages were seeded on a 12mm circular coverslips in 24-well plate. The infection was performed as described above but using M. bovis BCG-GFP strain or 1-μm-diameter yel- low green latex beads (Sigma, St Louis, USA) with a MOI of 10. After infection, cells were fixed overnight with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Coverslips were washed twice with DPBS and incubated with DPBS-BSA 1% 10 min. For staining, coverslips were washed once with DPBS and then 200 μL of DPBS containing Hoechst 33342 (1:1000) and texas red-X-phalloidin (1:200) were added and incubated for 10 min. Hoechst and red-X-phalloidin were purchased in Invitrogen (Waltham, USA). Finally, the coverslips were washed once with DPBS, once with water and subsequently mounted with Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (Invitrogen). For quan- tification, 900 cells from three independent experiments (300 cells/coverslip) were counted per day and treatment. The images were taken with an Olympus Fluoview 1000 microscope at days 0, 3 and 6 for the experiments with M. bovis BCG-GFP and at day 0 for the latex beads experiments. The images were analysed using ImageJ software [34]. Latex beads were used in order to determine if phagocytosis was impaired in a general or specific mycobacteria pathway. Cytokines detection Cytokines production from infected and uninfected THP-1 macrophages, which were either exposed or non-exposed to e-vapor extract or CS extract, were assessed using the human mag- netic luminex assay kit (LXSAHM, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) according to the manu- facturer’s instructions. Analysis included detection of some of the most important cytokines involved in the immune response against M. tuberculosis infection: tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, IL-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ. Superna- tants were recovered from infection assays with M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain and sterilized using a 0.22 μm filter. For the supernatants of day 6, 500 μL extra of fresh RPMI (with or with- out e-vapor extract or CS extract) were added on day 3 (this extra volume was taken in account in the calculation of cytokine production). Cytokine levels were calculated using the Lumi- nex1 200™ system and the xPONENT1 3.1 software (Luminex Technologies, Inc., Austin, USA). Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad PRISM 6.0 software package (San Diego, California, USA). Differences between treatments were compared by the Mann-Witney test. A p-value �0,05 was considered as a statistically significant. Results E-vapor extract and cigarette smoke extract are not toxic for THP-1 and mycobacteria at the concentrations used We evaluated if the concentrations found in literature: 10% CS extract and 100% e-vapor extract were nontoxic in THP-1 macrophages [21, 26]. The macrophages were exposed to e- vapor or CS extracts for 6 days and the cell viability was assessed using the formazan-based cell proliferation assay EZ4U at days 0, 3 and 6. The assessed concentrations assessed of CS extract PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 4 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response Fig 1. THP-1 viability after exposition to cigarette smoke (CS) extract and e-vapor extract. Formazan-based test EZ4U was performed at 4 hours (day 0), 3 and 6 days of exposition to 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. The viability percentage was calculated using cells unexposed as a control. The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of six replicates of at least two independent experiments. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g001 and e-vapor extract (both non-flavored and coffee flavored on a base with or without nicotine) did not affect the viability of THP-1 (Fig 1). On the other hand, we studied the effect of e-vapor extract and CS extract on M. tuberculo- sis H37Rv growth. The cultures were exposed to e-vapor extract and CS extract for two weeks and the OD600nm was measured every 24 hours. The results obtained showed no significant changes. A slight increase in the growth of M. tuberculosis was observed when it was exposed to e-vapor extract and a slight decrease when the bacteria were exposed to CS extract (Fig 2). Fig 2. Growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv exposed to 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of duplicates of at least two independent experiments. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g002 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 5 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response E-vapor and cigarette smoke extracts reduce the phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis by THP-1 macrophages As was previously reported in literature for other microorganisms, we studied if the extracts of e-vapor and cigarette smoke had any effect in the phagocytic function after infection with M. tuberculosis. Therefore, macrophages were exposed to e-vapor extract and CS extract for 24 hours and 3 hours respectively, and then infected with H37Rv strain. The intracellular CFUs were evaluated during 6 days. When the macrophages were exposed to e-vapor extract base and e-vapor extract base with nicotine, a reduction of the number of viable intracellular M. tuberculosis was observed compared with the control. Less mycobacteria were recovered when the cells were exposed to e-vapor extract base with nicotine compared with e-vapor extract base without nicotine. A similar tendency was observed when the macrophages were exposed to e-vapor extract with coffee flavor, however the CFUs counts were higher than e-vapor extract base. The highest decrease in the CFUs counts were observed when the macrophages were exposed to CS extract compared with e-vapor extract and control. The highest decrease in the CFUs counts were observed when the macrophages were exposed to CS extract com- pared with e-vapor extract and control (Fig 3). In order to confirm the results obtained in CFUs counts, we determined the percentage of infected cells using confocal microscopy. The fluorescent strain M. bovis BCG-GFP was used, following the same infection protocol used with M. tuberculosis. As was observed in the CFUs counts, the results show that there is a significant reduction in the uptake of M. bovis BCG-GFP when the macrophages are exposed to CS extract compared with the control (Fig 4). Moreover, there is a trend toward an increasing in the uptake of mycobacteria after the exposition to e-vapor extract compared with CS extract, but to a lesser extent than the control sample (Fig 4). Subsequently, the results obtained by confocal microscopy confirm the results obtained by CFUs counts. To determinate if the reduction of mycobacteria uptake is due to a general or specific defect in the phagocytic function, we evaluated the effect of CS extract and e-vapor extract in the capacity to phagocyte inert material like latex beads. Macrophages were exposed to e-vapor or CS extracts and then the latex beads were in contact during 3 hours. The images were analyzed and the results show no major changes in phagocytosis, suggesting a specific defect in some specific pathway when the cells are exposed to CS extract (Fig 5). Less macrophages with latex Fig 3. M. tuberculosis intracellular CFUs counts over 6 days. THP-1 macrophages exposed to 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of triplicates of at least three independent experiments. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g003 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 6 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response Fig 4. Phagocytosis of M. bovis BCG-GFP by THP-1 macrophages. Macrophages were exposed 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of triplicates of at least three independent experiments using confocal microscopy. Significance from control, P<0,05, Mann-Whitney U test. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g004 beads inside were observed when the cells were exposed to e-vapor coffee extract with and without nicotine (Fig 5). E-vapor extract and cigarette smoke extract alter cytokine production Given that previous studies have shown that e-vapor extract and CS extract alter the cytokine secretion and consequently the clearance of infections, we explored the cytokine response to e- vapor extract and CS extract in THP-1 macrophages. In general, the tendency observed was that the unexposed macrophages produced more cytokines when they were infected. It was also observed that macrophages exposed to CS produced less cytokine response than unex- posed cells or cells exposed to e-cigs (Fig 6). Regarding e-cigs vapor exposed cells, cytokine production was related to the cytokine and the e-cigs vapor extract used. As a general trend, the cytokine response was higher than the cells exposed to CS and even than unexposed cells. The production of TNF-α was higher in infected cells at day 6 exposed to e-vapor with coffee flavour (with and without nicotine) (Fig 6A). IL-8 is was the cytokine produced in higher amount (Fig 6B). The IL-1β was highly Fig 5. Phagocytosis of GFP-latex beads by THP-1 macrophages. Macrophages were exposed to 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. 300 cells were counted. The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of at least two independent experiments using confocal microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g005 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 7 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response Fig 6. Cytokine production by THP-1 exposed and non-exposed to e-vapor extract and CS extract. Macrophages were exposed to 10% CS extract, 100% e-vapor base extract with and without nicotine and e-vapor coffee flavor extract with and without nicotine. Macrophages were uninfected or infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain. (A) tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). (B) Interleukin 8 (IL-8). (C) interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β). (D) interferon gamma (IFN-γ). The results are expressed as the average and standard deviation of at least two independent experiments. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g006 produced by cells exposed to M. tuberculosis infection (Fig 6C). Finally, the production of IFN-γ was similar between uninfected and infected cells (Fig 6D). IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-18 were all of them below the detection levels. In Fig 7 is shown the ratio between the amount of cytokine produced by each exposed, infected and the non-infected cells. It is observed, that the cells exposed to CS and e- vapor extract with coffee flavor (with and without nicotine) have an impaired response to infection in comparison with unexposed cells and e-cigs base and without flavor or nicotine. Discussion It has been widely proven that CS has an adverse impact in the human health and despite the efforts oriented to reduce its use, it still remains as an issue worldwide. E-cigs have been PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 8 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response Fig 7. Increment of the cytokine production at day 3 in infected cells compared with the uninfected cells with the same exposure. The numbers in the figure are the result of dividing the amount of cytokine in infected cells between uninfected cells. Values higher than 1.0 mean production of cytokines in infected cells are higher than in uninfected. The higher the number, the higher the increment. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919.g007 marketed as a healthier option, however like CS, it has been related with cytotoxicity and abnormal immune response compromising the clearance of pathogens. In this study, we evalu- ated the impact of e-cigs and CS on the phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis and cytokines produc- tion of infected THP-1 macrophages. Our results show that e-cigs and CS have a deleterious impact in the immune response against TB. We tested the effect of 100% e-vapor and 10% CS extracts on viability of THP-1 macro- phages and we did not observe a cytotoxic effect, this result confirms that e-vapor is less toxic than CS, since it has been reported that higher than 10% concentrations of cigarette smoke are toxic in several cell lines [35, 36]. This was also observed by us when higher concentrations than 10% were tested (data not shown). Free radicals are involved in the tobacco cytotoxicity and they are produced not only in the tobacco combustion, but also when e-liquid is heated in the atomizer [37]. Scott et al. detected lower cytotoxicity in alveolar macrophages in the liquid form compared to the vaped [38]. The lower cytotoxicity observed in e-vapor extract can be related with the low concentration of toxicants due to the low temperature of evaporation of the e-liquid compared with the tobacco combustion when a cigarette is smoked [32, 37, 39]. On the other hand, our results are in line with the results obtained by Farsalinos et al. and Romagna et al. in which the presence of nicotine in e-vapor extract did not affect the cell via- bility [32, 39]. The results found in literature, regarding the cytotoxicity of e-vapor extract fla- vored are contradictory; some studies have shown a cytotoxic effect when tobacco, cherry, cinnamon and coffee flavors were tested [32, 40–42]. However, in agreement with our results, Ween et al. observed that cytotoxicity in THP-1 macrophages was not related with the e-cig flavor [26]. It has been suggested that cell line used, nicotine, flavors, PG/PV ratio, voltage and potency of the device can influence in the toxicity effects of e-vapor [43]. Innate immune response is crucial for the outcome of TB infection as well as for the adap- tive immune response [44]. Macrophages are a pivotal piece of the innate immunity for TB and its response is affected by cigarette smoke and e-vapor. Our results showed a decrease of the intracellular M. tuberculosis in THP-1 macrophages under the exposition to e-vapor extract as well as CS extract, where even less viable M. tuberculosis where found compared with the control. Similar trend was obtained by confocal microscopy using BCG-GFP strain. These results suggest that e-vapor extract and CS extract cause a phagocytosis impairment in THP-1. This kind of damage has been observed in monocytes from smokers TB patients [12], in alveo- lar macrophages from smokers [13], in lung-tissue and alveolar macrophages from smoking PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 9 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response mice [45, 46] and in alveolar macrophages and THP-1 macrophages when cells exposed to CS extract were infected with H. influenzae [26, 36]. The reduction in the phagocytic ability has been related with the decrease of the expression of recognition molecules for apoptotic cells [13], the inhibition proteins involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements [46], the blockage of PI3K signaling cascade [36] as well as the decrease of the expression of bacterial recognition receptors [26, 47, 48]. However, it has been also observed opposite results. Shang et al. found an increase of viable intracellular M. tuberculosis in THP-1 macrophages after the exposition to CS extract (from 3R4F standard cigarette) compared with the macrophages non-treated. In the study of Shang et al., an increase in the intracellular burden was also found in alveolar mac- rophages obtained from autopsies of smokers [10]. Other studies showed similar results using the BCG and H37Ra strains in alveolar macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) [11, 35]. Moreover, Bai et al. observed that the nicotine component of CS extract reduces the number of autophagosomes leading an increase of M. tuberculosis burden in alveo- lar macrophages [3]. Although, it is important to highlight that the cell line, the strain, the type of cigarette/e-cig, the extraction method, the exposure dose and time all have an influence in the results obtained [49]. On the other hand, in line with our results with cigarette smoke, other studies have shown similar results in e-cigs. In mice model, it has been observed that the exposure to e-vapor extract decreased also the phagocytic ability [27]. Phagocytosis of H. influenzae is also decreased in THP-1 macrophages by e-vapor flavored with or without nicotine but not with e- vapor base extract, suggesting that flavors could have a role in the phagocytosis impairment [26]. However, our results showed the opposite, as we did not observe that coffee flavor affect more the growth of H37Rv or BCG-GFP inside macrophages exposed to e-vapor extract fla- vored although in our case, the flavor tested is different from Ween et al. [26]. Additionally, our results showed that the macrophages exposed to e-vapor extract with nicotine had less intracellular mycobacteria than the cells exposed to e-vapor extract without nicotine, suggest- ing that nicotine in e-vapor extract has an effect in the phagocytosis of mycobacteria. On the other hand, Ween et al. observed that the impairment of phagocytosis by e-cigs was also linked with the expression of bacterial recognition receptors [26]. It has been observed that CS extract produce damage in specific phagocytosis pathways in alveolar macrophages [36], and in our experience, the results obtained with M. bovis and with latex beads also suggest the same specific impairment to phagocyte alive particles with both, e- vapor with and without nicotine. As important mediators of the immune system, macrophages release cytokines in order to regulate both innate and adaptive immunity [50]. Cytokines are produced by macrophages activated by M. tuberculosis infection [51]. This is in agreement with our results where the release of cytokines is stimulated for the infection in unexposed cells, compared with the unin- fected control. It has been observed that another effect of e-cigs and CS on macrophages is the alteration of cytokines production, stimulating both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses [45]. TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ are pro-inflammatory cytokines that are important in the host defence after M. tuberculosis infection [51]. TNF-α also initiates the activation of the phagocyte [51]. Similar to our results, several studies have found that CS extract decrease the production of TNF-α in uninfected alveolar macrophages, THP-1, Ana-1 macrophages, monocyte-derived macrophages and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [11, 26, 50, 52, 53] and IL-1β also in uninfected THP-1, monocyte-derived macrophages and PBMC [26, 52, 54]. We observed the same tendency in infected cells exposed to CS extract, which produced less TNF-α and IL-1β compared with the infected cells non-exposed to CS extract. Despite some studies have shown that IFN-γ is decreased by CS [8, 35, 55], we did not observe important changes in its release, compared to control in THP-1 macrophages. IL-8 is PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 10 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response a neutrophil chemoattractant that mediates the inflammatory process [51] that is increased in uninfected THP-1 macrophages exposed to CS extract [26]. Our results show the same tendency. The effect of e-vapor extract in the cytokines production is different to the observed in CS extract, with a tendency to produce a pro-inflammatory response. A pattern of elevated cyto- kine production after e-cig inhalation was observed in mice model [21]. Our results show a trend to increase TNF-α in infected and uninfected cells. Opposite results were obtained by Ween et al. where TNF-α was decreased in uninfected THP-1, however the cytokine was mea- sured at 24 hours, when the production could be lower [26] and we speculate that e-vapor extract can require more time in order to see the effect in the cytokines production. Addition- ally, an increase in the TNF-α production by e-vapor extract in HaCaT cells and by e-cig con- densate in THP-1 was observed [18, 22]. On the other hand, the e-vapor extract effect observed on uninfected THP-1 as observed by Ween et al. showed a decrease of IL-1β [26] which we did not observe. However, we found this decrease in infected cells mainly on the last day of the experiment. Cervellati et al. showed that IFN-γ was increased in uninfected HaCaT cells exposed to e-vapor extract [22], although we observed only a slight increase also the last day of the experiment. Contributing to the inflammation process, IL-8 is increased in infected and uninfected THP-1 macrophages; this finding is similar to several studies in uninfected cells including THP-1 [18, 20, 22, 23, 26]. As it is observed in other studies where the e-cig are used, this study has some limitations: i) the use of only one type of e-cig of second-generation and only one flavour although there is a wide range of e-liquid brands and devices available on the market, ii) as an in vitro study, the lung environment is not completely represented, iii) not all experiments were done with viru- lent M. tuberculosis strain because of biosafety normatives and cannot be assumed that response of nonvirulent mycobacteria would be the same, iv) it is difficult to estimate if the concentrations and duration of CS and e-vapor are representative of what happens in the smokers [35]. The topography between vaping and cigarette smoking is also different, and e- cigs users could vape more reaching a similar effect to tobacco. In summary, e-cigs impair the phagocytic function of THP-1 macrophages as well as pro- mote the pro-inflammatory response. Moreover, we confirm that CS affects also the phago- cytic function and decreases the effector cytokines response (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-8). Although e-cigs are advertised as a better option and its effect is not as strong as cigarette smoke, the dependency and long term consequences are not still well known. Our data con- tributes to explain some of the mechanisms behind the epidemiological link between TB and smoking, and to support the policy efforts to reduce the exposure to smoke and e-vapor as part of the TB control strategies. Supporting information S1 Dataset. (XLSX) Acknowledgments M. bovis BCG-GFP was kindly provided by Carlos Martı́n from the University of Zaragoza, Spain. We are grateful to the Servei de Cultius Cel�lulars (UAB) and the Servei de Microscopia for the technical assistance. The authors thank Dr. Camiel Janssen for comments on the manuscript. PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 11 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response Author Contributions Conceptualization: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Cristina Prat- Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Data curation: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar- Hernández. Formal analysis: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar- Hernández, Isidre Gibert, Alicia Lacoma, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Funding acquisition: Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Investigation: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar-Her- nández, Beatriz Muriel-Moreno, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Methodology: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar-Her- nández, Isidre Gibert, Beatriz Muriel-Moreno, Alicia Lacoma, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Project administration: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Resources: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Software: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar- Hernández. Supervision: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Cristina Prat-Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Validation: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Cristina Prat-Aymer- ich, Jose Domı́nguez. Visualization: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Cristina Prat- Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. Writing – original draft: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Jose Domı́nguez. Writing – review & editing: Andromeda-Celeste Gómez, Pablo Rodrı́guez-Fernández, Raquel Villar-Hernández, Isidre Gibert, Beatriz Muriel-Moreno, Alicia Lacoma, Cristina Prat- Aymerich, Jose Domı́nguez. References 1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva; 2018. 2. WHO. WHO Report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: monitoring tobacco use and prevention poli- cies. Geneva; 2017. 3. Bai X, Stitzel JA, Bai A, Zambrano CA, Phillips M, Marrack P, et al. Nicotine Impairs Macrophage Con- trol of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017; 57(3):324–333. https://doi.org/10. 1165/rcmb.2016-0270OC PMID: 28398760 4. Bishwakarma R, Kinney WH, Honda JR, Mya J, Strand MJ, Gangavelli A, et al. Epidemiologic link between tuberculosis and cigarette/biomass smoke exposure: Limitations despite the vast literature. Respirology. 2015; 20(4):556–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12515 PMID: 25808744 5. Chan ED, Kinney WH, Honda JR, Bishwakarma R, Gangavelli A, Mya J, et al. Tobacco exposure and susceptibility to tuberculosis: is there a smoking gun? Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014; 94(6):544–550. 6. Sitas F, Urban M, Bradshaw D, Kielkowski D, Bah S, Peto R. Tobacco attributable deaths in South Africa. Tob Control. 2004; 13(4):396–399. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.007682 PMID: 15564624 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 12 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response 7. Bates MN, Khalakdina A, Pai M, Chang L, Lessa F, Smith KR. Risk of tuberculosis from exposure to tobacco smoke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167(4):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.4.335 PMID: 17325294 8. Altet N, Latorre I, Jimenez-Fuentes MA, Maldonado J, Molina I, Gonzalez-Diaz Y, et al. Assessment of the influence of direct tobacco smoke on infection and active TB management. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8): e0182998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182998 PMID: 28837570 9. Rodriguez-Fernandez P, Prat-Aymerich C, Dominguez J. Interaction between Environmental Pollution and Respiratory Infections. Arch Bronconeumol. 2018. 10. Shang S, Ordway D, Henao-Tamayo M, Bai X, Oberley-Deegan R, Shanley C, et al. Cigarette smoke increases susceptibility to tuberculosis—evidence from in vivo and in vitro models. J Infect Dis. 2011; 203(9):1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir009 PMID: 21357942 11. O’Leary SM, Coleman MM, Chew WM, Morrow C, McLaughlin AM, Gleeson LE, et al. Cigarette smok- ing impairs human pulmonary immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 190(12):1430–1436. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201407-1385OC PMID: 25390734 12. Aryanpur M, Mortaz E, Masjedi MR, Tabarsi P, Garssen J, Adcock IM, et al. Reduced Phagocytic Capacity of Blood Monocyte/Macrophages in Tuberculosis Patients Is Further Reduced by Smoking. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016; 15(3):174–182. PMID: 27424132 13. Hodge S, Hodge G, Ahern J, Jersmann H, Holmes M, Reynolds PN. Smoking alters alveolar macro- phage recognition and phagocytic ability: implications in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007; 37(6):748–755. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2007-0025OC PMID: 17630319 14. Cooke A, Fergeson J, Bulkhi A, Casale TB. The Electronic Cigarette: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3(4):498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.05.022 PMID: 26164573 15. Grana R, Benowitz N, Glantz SA. E-cigarettes: a scientific review. Circulation. 2014; 129(19):1972– 1986. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007667 PMID: 24821826 16. Bals R, Boyd J, Esposito S, Foronjy R, Hiemstra PS, Jimenez-Ruiz CA, et al. Electronic cigarettes: a task force report from the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J. 2019; 53(2). 17. Margham J, McAdam K, Forster M, Liu C, Wright C, Mariner D, et al. Chemical Composition of Aerosol from an E-Cigarette: A Quantitative Comparison with Cigarette Smoke. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016; 29 (10):1662–1678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00188 PMID: 27641760 18. Scott A, Lugg ST, Aldridge K, Lewis KE, Bowden A, Mahida RY, et al. Pro-inflammatory effects of e-cig- arette vapour condensate on human alveolar macrophages. Thorax. 2018. 19. Lerner CA, Sundar IK, Yao H, Gerloff J, Ossip DJ, McIntosh S, et al. Vapors produced by electronic cig- arettes and e-juices with flavorings induce toxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response in lung epithelial cells and in mouse lung. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0116732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0116732 PMID: 25658421 20. Bengalli R, Ferri E, Labra M, Mantecca P. Lung Toxicity of Condensed Aerosol from E-CIG Liquids: Influence of the Flavor and the In Vitro Model Used. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(10). 21. Hwang JH, Lyes M, Sladewski K, Enany S, McEachern E, Mathew DP, et al. Electronic cigarette inhala- tion alters innate immunity and airway cytokines while increasing the virulence of colonizing bacteria. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016; 94(6):667–679. 22. Cervellati F, Muresan XM, Sticozzi C, Gambari R, Montagner G, Forman HJ, et al. Comparative effects between electronic and cigarette smoke in human keratinocytes and epithelial lung cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2014; 28(5):999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.04.012 PMID: 24809892 23. Muthumalage T, Prinz M, Ansah KO, Gerloff J, Sundar IK, Rahman I. Inflammatory and Oxidative Responses Induced by Exposure to Commonly Used e-Cigarette Flavoring Chemicals and Flavored e- Liquids without Nicotine. Front Physiol. 2017; 8:1130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01130 PMID: 29375399 24. Ghosh A, Coakley RC, Mascenik T, Rowell TR, Davis ES, Rogers K, et al. Chronic E-Cigarette Expo- sure Alters the Human Bronchial Epithelial Proteome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198(1):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201710-2033OC PMID: 29481290 25. Wu Q, Jiang D, Minor M, Chu HW. Electronic cigarette liquid increases inflammation and virus infection in primary human airway epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e108342. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0108342 PMID: 25244293 26. Ween MP, Whittall JJ, Hamon R, Reynolds PN, Hodge SJ. Phagocytosis and Inflammation: Exploring the effects of the components of E-cigarette vapor on macrophages. Physiol Rep. 2017; 5(16). PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 13 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response 27. Sussan TE, Gajghate S, Thimmulappa RK, Ma J, Kim JH, Sudini K, et al. Exposure to electronic ciga- rettes impairs pulmonary anti-bacterial and anti-viral defenses in a mouse model. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (2):e0116861. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116861 PMID: 25651083 28. Regueiro V, Campos MA, Morey P, Sauleda J, Agusti AG, Garmendia J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-bind- ing protein and CD14 are increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of smokers. Eur Respir J. 2009; 33(2):273–281. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00087708 PMID: 19010986 29. McEachern EK, Hwang JH, Sladewski KM, Nicatia S, Dewitz C, Mathew DP, et al. Analysis of the effects of cigarette smoke on staphylococcal virulence phenotypes. Infect Immun. 2015; 83(6):2443– 2452. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00303-15 PMID: 25824841 30. Yang SR, Chida AS, Bauter MR, Shafiq N, Seweryniak K, Maggirwar SB, et al. Cigarette smoke induces proinflammatory cytokine release by activation of NF-kappaB and posttranslational modifications of his- tone deacetylase in macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006; 291(1):L46–57. https:// doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00241.2005 PMID: 16473865 31. Su Y, Han W, Giraldo C, De Li Y, Block ER. Effect of cigarette smoke extract on nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998; 19(5):819–825. https://doi.org/10. 1165/ajrcmb.19.5.3091 PMID: 9806747 32. Romagna G, Allifranchini E, Bocchietto E, Todeschi S, Esposito M, Farsalinos KE. Cytotoxicity evalua- tion of electronic cigarette vapor extract on cultured mammalian fibroblasts (ClearStream-LIFE): com- parison with tobacco cigarette smoke extract. Inhal Toxicol. 2013; 25(6):354–361. https://doi.org/10. 3109/08958378.2013.793439 PMID: 23742112 33. Gomez A, Andreu N, Ferrer-Navarro M, Yero D, Gibert I. Triclosan-induced genes Rv1686c-Rv1687c and Rv3161c are not involved in triclosan resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:26221. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26221 PMID: 27193696 34. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth- ods. 2012; 9(7):671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 PMID: 22930834 35. van Zyl-Smit RN, Binder A, Meldau R, Semple PL, Evans A, Smith P, et al. Cigarette smoke impairs cytokine responses and BCG containment in alveolar macrophages. Thorax. 2014; 69(4):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204229 PMID: 24287167 36. Marti-Lliteras P, Regueiro V, Morey P, Hood DW, Saus C, Sauleda J, et al. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae clearance by alveolar macrophages is impaired by exposure to cigarette smoke. Infect Immun. 2009; 77(10):4232–4242. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00305-09 PMID: 19620348 37. Leigh NJ, Lawton RI, Hershberger PA, Goniewicz ML. Flavourings significantly affect inhalation toxicity of aerosol generated from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Tob Control. 2016; 25(Suppl 2): ii81–ii87. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053205 PMID: 27633767 38. Scott A, Lugg ST, V DS, Lewis K, Dosanjh D, Naidu B, et al. Effects of vaped e-cegarette liquid conden- sate upon human alveolar macrophage function. To vape or not to vape that is the question? Thorax. 2016; 71(Suppl 3):A1:A288. 39. Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Allifranchini E, Ripamonti E, Bocchietto E, Todeschi S, et al. Comparison of the cytotoxic potential of cigarette smoke and electronic cigarette vapour extract on cultured myocar- dial cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10(10):5146–5162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph10105146 PMID: 24135821 40. Bahl V, Lin S, Xu N, Davis B, Wang YH, Talbot P. Comparison of electronic cigarette refill fluid cytotoxic- ity using embryonic and adult models. Reprod Toxicol. 2012; 34(4):529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. reprotox.2012.08.001 PMID: 22989551 41. Behar RZ, Davis B, Wang Y, Bahl V, Lin S, Talbot P. Identification of toxicants in cinnamon-flavored electronic cigarette refill fluids. Toxicol In Vitro. 2014; 28(2):198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013. 10.006 PMID: 24516877 42. Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Prokopowicz A, Kurek J, Zaciera M, Knysak J, et al. Cherry-flavoured elec- tronic cigarettes expose users to the inhalation irritant, benzaldehyde. Thorax. 2016; 71(4):376–377. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207895 PMID: 26822067 43. Besaratinia A, Tommasi S. An opportune and unique research to evaluate the public health impact of electronic cigarettes. Cancer Causes Control. 2017; 28(10):1167–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10552-017-0952-5 PMID: 28861656 44. Queval CJ, Brosch R, Simeone R. The Macrophage: A Disputed Fortress in the Battle against Myco- bacterium tuberculosis. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8:2284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02284 PMID: 29218036 45. Hodge S, Matthews G, Mukaro V, Ahern J, Shivam A, Hodge G, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced changes to alveolar macrophage phenotype and function are improved by treatment with procysteine. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011; 44(5):673–681. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2009-0459OC PMID: 20595463 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 14 / 15 E-cigarettes impair immune response 46. Minematsu N, Blumental-Perry A, Shapiro SD. Cigarette smoke inhibits engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages through inhibition of actin rearrangement. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011; 44(4):474– 482. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2009-0463OC PMID: 20525804 47. Droemann D, Goldmann T, Tiedje T, Zabel P, Dalhoff K, Schaaf B. Toll-like receptor 2 expression is decreased on alveolar macrophages in cigarette smokers and COPD patients. Respir Res. 2005; 6:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-68 PMID: 16004610 48. Kent L, Smyth L, Clayton C, Scott L, Cook T, Stephens R, et al. Cigarette smoke extract induced cyto- kine and chemokine gene expression changes in COPD macrophages. Cytokine. 2008; 42(2):205– 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2008.02.001 PMID: 18358739 49. Lopez-Hernandez Y, Rivas-Santiago CE, Lopez JA, Mendoza-Almanza G, Hernandez-Pando R. Tuberculosis and cigarette smoke exposure: An update of in vitro and in vivo studies. Exp Lung Res. 2018; 44(2):113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01902148.2018.1444824 PMID: 29565741 50. Zhao J, Li X, Xie F, Yang Z, Pan X, Zhu M, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of cigarette smoke conden- sate in mouse macrophage cell line. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2017; 30(3):315–321. https://doi. org/10.1177/0394632017716370 PMID: 28627972 51. Domingo-Gonzalez R, Prince O, Cooper A, Khader SA. Cytokines and Chemokines in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. Microbiol Spectr. 2016; 4(5). 52. Ouyang Y, Virasch N, Hao P, Aubrey MT, Mukerjee N, Bierer BE, et al. Suppression of human IL-1beta, IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha production by cigarette smoke extracts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 106(2):280–287. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2000.107751 PMID: 10932071 53. Dacie R, Belchamber K, Donnelly L. S123 The effects of electronic cigarette flavourings on macrophage cytokine release and phagocytosis. Thorax 2016; 71:A72–A73. 54. Han S, Jerome JA, Gregory AD, Mallampalli RK. Cigarette smoke destabilizes NLRP3 protein by pro- moting its ubiquitination. Respir Res. 2017; 18(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0485-6 PMID: 28056996 55. Feng Y, Kong Y, Barnes PF, Huang FF, Klucar P, Wang X, et al. Exposure to cigarette smoke inhibits the pulmonary T-cell response to influenza virus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2011; 79(1):229–237. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00709-10 PMID: 20974820 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228919 February 10, 2020 15 / 15