Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Incidence of Melanoma in Catalonia, Spain, Is Rapidly Increasing in the Elderly Population. A Multicentric Cohort Study Sebastian Podlipnik 1,2, * , Cristina Carrera 1,2,3 , Aram Boada 4 , Nina Richarz 4 , Joaquim Marcoval 5 , Josep Ramón Ferreres 5 , Domingo Bodet 6 , Rosa María Martí 7 , Sonia Segura 8 , Mireia Sabat 9 , Joan Dalmau 10 , Mònica Quintana 11 , Antoni Azon 12 , Neus Curcó 13 , Manel Formigon 14 , María Rosa Olivella-Garcés 15 , Pedro Zaballos 16 , Joaquim Sola 17 , Loida Galvany 18 , Carola Baliu-Piqué 19 , Marta Alegre 20 , Paola Pasquali 21 , Josep Malvehy 1,2,3 , Susana Puig 1,2,3 and on behalf of the Network of Melanoma Centres of Catalonia † 1 Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; criscarrer@yahoo.es (C.C.); jmalvehy@gmail.com (J.M.); susipuig@gmail.com (S.P.) 2 Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain 3 Biomedical Research Networking Center on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, 28029 Barcelona, Spain 4 Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain; aramboada@gmail.com (A.B.); ninaricharz@hotmail.com (N.R.) 5 Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospital de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain; jmarcoval@bellvitgehospital.cat (J.M.); joseramonferreresriera@yahoo.es (J.R.F.) 6 Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; dombodet@hotmail.com 7 Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain; marti@medicina.udl.cat 8 Hospital del Mar, IMIM, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; ssegura@parcdesalutmar.cat 9 Hospital Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain; msabat@tauli.cat 10 Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; jdalmau@santpau.es 11 Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, 08029 Barcelona, Spain; mquintanacodina@gmail.com 12 Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, 43204 Reus, Spain; azon3030@gmail.com 13 Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, 08221 Terrassa, Spain; ncurco@mutuaterrassa.cat 14 Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, 08224 Terrassa, Spain; mformigon@cst.cat 15 Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, 08970 Barcelona, Spain; MariaRosa.OlivellaGarces@sanitatintegral.org 16 Hospital Sant Pau i Santa Tecla, 43003 Tarragona, Spain; pzaballos@aedv.es 17 Hospital General de Granollers, 08402 Barcelona, Spain; quimsola@yahoo.com 18 Hospital Dos de Maig, 08025 Barcelona, Spain; Loida.GalvanyRossell@sanitatintegral.org 19 Hospital d’Igualada, Consorci Sanitari de l’Anoia, 08700 Igualada, Spain; carola.baliu.pique@gmail.com 20 Hospital Plató, 08006 Barcelona, Spain; marta.alegre@hospitalplato.com 21 Pius Hospital de Valls, 43800 Valls, Spain; pasqualipaola@gmail.com * Correspondence: podlipnik@clinic.cat; Tel.: +34-932279867 † Colaborators of the Network of Melanoma Centres of Catalonia: Marc Sagristà (Hospital de Calella), Oriol Yélamos (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau), Sara Martín-Sala (Hospital Moisès Broggi. Consorci Sanitari Integral), Clara Matas-Nadal, Joan Angel, Xavier Soria and Sonia Gatius (Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida), Montserrat Bonfill-Ortí (Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge), Ane Jaka and Ariadna Quer (Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona), Inés Zarzoso Muñoz, Emili Masferrer (Hospital Universitari Mututa Terrassa), Fani Martínez (Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus).  Received: 18 September 2020; Accepted: 20 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020  Abstract: The incidence of melanoma has been increasing worldwide during recent decades. The objective of the study was to analyse the trends in incidence for in situ and invasive melanoma in the Spanish region of Catalonia during the period of 2008–2017. We designed a cross-sectional study with an age-period-cohort analysis of melanoma patient data from the Network of Melanoma J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396; doi:10.3390/jcm9113396 www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 2 of 11 Centres in Catalonia. Our database covered a population of over seven million and included a total of 8626 patients with incident melanoma. The main outcome measures were crude and age-standardised incidence rates to the European 2013 standard population. Joinpoint regression models were used to evaluate the population trends. We observed an increase in the age-standardised incidence rate (per 100,000 population) of all melanoma subtypes from 11.56 in 2008 to 13.78 in 2017 with an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 3.5%. This incidence increase was seen exclusively in the older population. Moreover, the stratified analysis showed a statistically significant increase in the age-standardised incidence rate for invasive (AAPC 2.1%) and in situ melanoma (AAPC 6.5%). In conclusion, the incidence of melanoma has continued to increase in the elderly population over recent decades, with a rapidly increasing trend of in situ melanomas and the lentigo maligna subtype. Keywords: melanoma; incidence; population-based study; epidemiology; Spain; skin cancer 1. Introduction Melanoma is responsible for 1%–2% of all cancers worldwide and accounts for only 5% of all malignant skin tumours. However, it is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer and causes 75–90% of skin cancer-related deaths [1]. In addition, melanoma is one of the cancers that presents earlier in life and is one of the solid neoplasms that produces the greatest number of potential life years lost [2–4]. Despite the fact that major primary prevention campaigns have been implemented in recent decades [5–9], the number of melanoma cases continues to rise every year [10,11]. Recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry indicate that the incidence of melanoma is rapidly increasing, especially in older patients [10]. However, what it is even more worrying is the fact that there has been an increase in the incidence of melanoma in young adults, especially women between 25 and 39 years of age, often with high associated mortality [12]. In addition, incidence and mortality vary widely among different geographical areas, due to diverse ethnicities and social conditions, with the white race being the most affected in raw numbers [4]. WHO estimates of age-standardised incidence rates worldwide vary widely and show higher incidences in Australia and New Zealand with 33.6 cases per 100,000 population/year, followed by Europe with rates between 9 and 18.8 cases per 100,000 population and the United States with 12.6 cases per 100,000 population [11]. Specifically in Spain there is an incidence rate of 6.4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year and a prevalence of skin melanoma in the last five years of 18,181 cases [11]. Although the incidence of melanoma has been increasing globally over recent decades, SEER data has shown that for the first time, the mortality rate decreased by 17.9% in the period 2013–2016 [11,13]. These data may suggest that new drugs, introduced during the last decade for the management of metastatic and locally advanced melanoma, appear to improve survival [13,14]. In the present study, we analysed the population-based age-specific data for cutaneous melanoma in the Catalan population. A thorough knowledge of the incidence of melanoma in Spain is necessary to improve public health policies. 2. Material and Methods This is a descriptive study with an age-period-cohort analysis of melanoma in the region of Catalonia, located in north-east Spain. We obtained the data on the Catalonian population from the Statistical Institute of Catalonia (IDESCAT) [15], and totals 16.23% of the Spanish population with 7,496,276 inhabitants in 2017, and corresponds to a predominantly white population. The melanoma incidence data was obtained from the Catalan registry of melanoma (Xarxa-melanoma) for the period of 2008–2017. The Xarxa-melanoma is a collaborative prospective database in which a total of 19 hospitals participate, covering most of the population of Catalonia. Cases diagnosed and monitored exclusively J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 3 of 11 in private centres were not included in the database. These cases are a minority in Catalonia since most melanoma patients are seen in public hospitals, especially in the case of invasive tumours. The research protocol received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (IRB number: HCB/2015/0298). All data were collected prospectively during the time period. This study followed the “strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology” (STROBE) statement [16]. We analysed all cases of invasive and in situ cutaneous melanoma, including all ages. To evaluate age periods, we used equally spaced two-year calendar periods to analyse differences in time. Category variables were compared using Pearson’s x2 test, or Fisher’s exact test, when the expected observations were fewer than five. For continuous variables, we used the mean and standard deviation and linear model ANOVA test. Annual incidence rates were age-standardised to the European standardised population [17] by the direct method to remove the confounding effect of age and to make valid comparisons between the incidence rates from different countries and 95% confidence intervals for age-adjusted rates were calculated using the Fay and Feuer method [18]. To examine the population trends in age-standardised incidence rate according to sex and histological subtype (invasive vs in situ), joinpoint regression models were used. We calculated the average annual percent change (AAPC) for each variable independently using a fixed period between 2008 and 2017 for an easier comparison of the subgroups. Moreover, we calculated the average annual percentage change (APC) with a maximum number of possible joinpoints set to one, based on the number of data points in the series [19]. A permutation test was used to determine the location of the joinpoints, when the change in trend was statistically significant. The resulting slope was recorded as the APC. Statistical analyses were performed using the computing environment R and RStudio [20,21], and the Joinpoint Regression Software, version 4.8.0.1 (National Cancer Institute) [22]. All statistical analyses were two sided and assessed for statistical significance at P < 0.05. 3. Results During the study period of 2008 to 2017, we identified a total of 8753 new cases of melanoma in the Catalonian region, of which 2896 were in situ and 5857 invasive. The analysis stratified by two-year groups revealed that there were no differences between the proportion of men and women over that time; however, the age of presentation of melanoma increased from a mean of 58.2 (SD 17.3) years in 2008 to 63.3 (SD 17.1) in 2017 (P < 0.001). Table 1 Moreover, there was a clear trend to diagnose a higher proportion of in situ than invasive melanomas, and the proportion of the lentigo maligna subtype also increased from 13.9% to 22.6%. (Table 1 and Figure 1). Age-standardised incidence rate of melanoma data is summarised in Table 2. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in the age-standardised incidence rate of melanoma per 100,000 population/year from 11.56 (95% CI, 11.38–11.75) in 2008 to 13.78 (95% CI, 13.57–13.98) in 2017. This means a 19% global increase with an average annual percentage change (AAPC) of 3.5% (95% CI, 2.1%, 5.0%) and an annual percentage change (APC) of 4.9% (95% CI, 2.7%, 7.0%). Moreover, the stratified curves for age-standardised incidence for subtypes of melanoma showed an increased trend for both groups. However the magnitude was greater for in situ melanomas (AAPC of 6.5%; 95% CI, 4.4%, 8.6%) than invasive melanomas (AAPC of 2.1%; 95% CI, 0.1%, 4.1%). The stratified analysis by sex showed a higher age-adjusted incidence of melanoma in men over the whole study period, and also showed a similar upward trend in both groups with an AAPC of 3.9% (95% CI, 2.2%, 5.6%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.6%, 4.9%) for men and women respectively (Figures 2 and 3). Age-specific crude incidence rates by 10-year age bands for 2008 to 2017 showed a stable incidence rate during the follow-up period in patients under 60 years; however, from the 60–70 year age group, a rapid increase in incidence is seen as the age of presentation increases. Additionally, in 2017, the crude incidence rate for patients over the age of 80 years was 50.25 cases per 100,000 population (Figure 2). J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 4 of 11 Moreover, a pyramid plot stratified by sex showed that in women there is a double peak of incidence of melanoma in the 45–49 year bracket and then between 60 and 64 years, while men present a single peak of incidence later in life, between 65 and 69 years (Figure 4A). Moreover, the mean age at presentation of melanoma was 59.1 years in women (SD 17.7) and 62.8 years (16.6) in men (P < 0.001). A ridgeline plot shows the distribution of cases represented as density over the years in the study, clearly showing a bimodal distribution of cases in women and only one peak of incidence in men which is maintained during the study period (Figure 4B). Table 1. Basal characteristics of the tumours. 2008–2009 2010–2011 2012–2013 2014–2015 2016–2017 Total P Value (N = 1543) (N = 1500) (N = 1696) (N = 1906) (N = 2108) (N = 8753) Gender 0.496 Female 789 (51.1%) 751 (50.1%) 897 (52.9%) 971 (50.9%) 1060 (50.3%) 4468 (51.0%) Male 754 (48.9%) 749 (49.9%) 799 (47.1%) 935 (49.1%) 1048 (49.7%) 4285 (49.0%) Age <0.001 Mean (SD) 58.2 (17.3) 59.6 (17.3) 60.4 (17.3) 61.9 (17.0) 63.3 (17.1) 60.9 (17.3) Staging <0.001 In situ 466 (30.2%) 476 (31.7%) 524 (30.9%) 638 (33.5%) 792 (37.6%) 2896 (33.1%) invasive 1077 (69.8%) 1024 (68.3%) 1172 (69.1%) 1268 (66.5%) 1316 (62.4%) 5857 (66.9%) Breslow index 0.219 Mean (SD) 2.2 (6.0) 2.4 (4.5) 2.4 (3.6) 2.2 (4.1) 2.1 (3.2) 2.3 (4.3) Tumour Location 0.001 Trunk 551 (41.4%) 527 (40.2%) 573 (38.8%) 740 (43.1%) 888 (45.1%) 3279 (42.0%) Head and neck 278 (20.9%) 302 (23.1%) 310 (21.0%) 371 (21.6%) 412 (20.9%) 1673 (21.4%) Lower limbs 254 (19.1%) 231 (17.6%) 280 (18.9%) 268 (15.6%) 298 (15.1%) 1331 (17.1%) Upper limbs 145 (10.9%) 148 (11.3%) 190 (12.9%) 219 (12.8%) 237 (12.0%) 939 (12.0%) Acral 97 (7.3%) 85 (6.5%) 107 (7.2%) 92 (5.4%) 107 (5.4%) 488 (6.3%) Mucosa 7 (0.5%) 17 (1.3%) 18 (1.2%) 27 (1.6%) 27 (1.4%) 96 (1.2%) Missing values 211 190 218 189 139 947 Histological subtype <0.001 SSM 871 (63.9%) 806 (61.7%) 884 (60.2%) 965 (59.5%) 1011 (55.1%) 4537 (59.7%) LMM 190 (13.9%) 183 (14.0%) 227 (15.5%) 306 (18.9%) 414 (22.6%) 1320 (17.4%) Nodular 180 (13.2%) 176 (13.5%) 193 (13.1%) 180 (11.1%) 189 (10.3%) 918 (12.1%) Acral lentiginous 65 (4.8%) 51 (3.9%) 85 (5.8%) 73 (4.5%) 74 (4.0%) 348 (4.6%) Mucosal 4 (0.3%) 13 (1.0%) 11 (0.7%) 16 (1.0%) 20 (1.1%) 64 (0.8%) Desmoplastic 10 (0.7%) 14 (1.1%) 10 (0.7%) 8 (0.5%) 15 (0.8%) 57 (0.8%) Spitzoid 3 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 8 (0.5%) 11 (0.7%) 21 (1.1%) 44 (0.6%) Nevoid 3 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 4 (0.2%) 8 (0.4%) 17 (0.2%) Other 37 (2.7%) 62 (4.7%) 50 (3.4%) 60 (3.7%) 82 (4.5%) 291 (3.8%) Missing values 180 193 227 283 274 1157 Only includes the evaluation of invasive melanomas. Staging In situ Invasive A 700 B 100% 600 Number of melanomas 75% 500 Proportion 400 50% 300 200 25% 100 0 0% 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Year Year Figure 1. Distribution of invasive and in situ melanomas. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 5 of 11 Finally, the analysis of melanoma subtypes showed that the age-standardised incidence rate of superficial spreading melanoma and lentigo maligna melanoma is increasing, while the proportion of patients with nodular, acral lentiginous and other subtypes of melanoma remains constant (Figure 2). A 18 B 18 16 16 Male 14 Total 14 rate per 100,000 Population rate per 100,000 Population Age standarized Incidence Age standarized incidence Female 12 12 10 10 8 Invasive 8 6 In situ 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Year C 80+ D 50 7 SSM 6 40 rate per 100,000 Population rate per 100,000 Population Age standarized Incidence 70-80 5 Crude incidence 30 4 60-70 LMM 3 20 50-60 2 Nodular 40-50 10 Other 30-40 1 ALM 20-30 0 10-20 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Year Figure 2. Trends in the incidence of melanoma in Catalunya. Abbreviations: ALM, acral lentiginous melanoma, LMM, lentiginous malignant melanoma; SSM, superficial spreading melanoma. Table 2. Incidence of melanoma in Catalonia. Year Population Cases Crude Rate ASIR 95% CI Melanoma (Including In Situ Melanoma) 2008 7,298,313 792 10.85 11.56 [11.38–11.75] 2009 7,416,605 751 10.13 10.80 [10.62–10.97] 2010 7,462,044 727 9.74 10.35 [10.18–10.52] 2011 7,501,853 773 10.30 10.88 [10.7–11.06] 2012 7,515,398 809 10.76 11.25 [11.07–11.43] 2013 7,478,968 887 11.86 12.30 [12.11–12.49] 2014 7,433,894 887 11.93 12.23 [12.05–12.43] 2015 7,424,754 1019 13.72 13.86 [13.65–14.06] 2016 7,448,332 1064 14.29 14.34 [14.14–14.55] 2017 7,496,276 1044 13.93 13.78 [13.57–13.98] J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 6 of 11 Table 2. Cont. Year Population Cases Crude Rate ASIR 95% CI Invasive melanoma 2008 7,298,313 560 7.67 8.19 [8.04–8.35] 2009 7,416,605 517 6.97 7.38 [7.23–7.52] 2010 7,462,044 481 6.45 6.83 [6.7–6.98] 2011 7,501,853 543 7.24 7.64 [7.49–7.79] 2012 7,515,398 556 7.40 7.73 [7.58–7.88] 2013 7,478,968 616 8.24 8.57 [8.41–8.73] 2014 7,433,894 585 7.87 8.04 [7.89–8.2] 2015 7,424,754 683 9.20 9.23 [9.06–9.4] 2016 7,448,332 698 9.37 9.32 [9.16–9.49] 2017 7,496,276 618 8.24 8.08 [7.92–8.24] Abbreviations: ASIR, age-standardised incidence rate. a All cases b Invasiveness 16 10 2008−2010 APC = −4.67 2008−2010 APC = −4.56 2010−2017 APC = 4.85* 2010−2017 APC = 3.31* 8 14 Invasive Age−Adjusted Rate Age−Adjusted Rate 6 12 In situ 4 10 2008−2012 APC = −0.22 2012−2017 APC = 10.54* 2 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 year year c Female d Male 16 2008−2010 APC = −5.50 16 2010−2017 APC = 4.74* 2008−2012 APC = −0.63 2012−2017 APC = 5.91* 14 Age−Adjusted Rate Age−Adjusted Rate 14 12 12 10 10 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 year year Figure 3. Joinpoint regression analysis of melanoma age-standardised incidence rate. European age-standardised incidence rate trends for melanoma lesions in Catalonia in the period 2008–2017. Squares shapes represent the observed values and dashed lines represent the joinpoint models. (*) APCs were significantly different from zero at alpha = 0.05. Abbreviations: APC, annual percent change. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 7 of 11 A Male Female 90plus years 85-89 years 80-84 years 75-79 years 70-74 years 65-69 years 60-64 years 55-59 years 50-54 years 45-49 years 40-44 years 35-39 years 30-34 years 25-29 years 20-24 years 15-19 years 10-14 years 500 250 0 250 500 Number of cases B Male Female 2017 2016 Year of diagnosis 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Age Figure 4. Pyramid plot in (A) shows that cases occur at younger ages in women showing a double peak of incidence; however, in men they present in a single peak of incidence at older ages. (B) shows a ridgeline with the distribution trend across the years of the study. 4. Discussion Our study demonstrates that the incidence of melanoma in Catalonia continued to increase during the 2008 to 2017 period with a rising trend which mainly affected elderly patients. This increase has been consistently observed in other countries with predominantly Caucasian populations [23–25] and this rising trend is consisted with a previous period studied in Catalonia [26]. Despite this increase in incidence, the age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) of invasive melanoma in Spain is relatively low (ASIR 6.4) in the GLOBOCAN registry in comparison with other European Mediterranean countries such as France (ASIR 13.6), Italy (ASIR 12.4), Greece (ASIR 8.7) and Malta (ASIR 8.0) [23]. This could be explained in part by an underestimation due to the lack of a comprehensive national Spanish melanoma registry. Another explanation could be the patient’s phenotype (e.g., skin type, red hair) [27] and genotype (e.g., MC1R polymorphisms status), sunlight incidence during the year [28], sun-exposure behavior [29] and the Mediterranean diet which has also been reported as a favorable modifying factor of melanoma incidence [30]. A further possible explanation is the large foreign population living in Catalonia mainly coming from countries with a pigmented skin population and/or low melanoma incidence. In 2017, there were 1,041,362 immigrants which corresponds to 13.9% of the Catalan population: 27.7% were from Africa and 17.4% from South America which could dilute the cases of melanoma and lower the incidence rate [15]. Recent epidemiological data have shown a steady increase in the incidence of melanoma of 3% per year and it is expected that by 2030 the number of melanoma cases will double that of 2016 [25]. Our data showed an AAPC of 3.5% and APC of 4.9% during the last period which is consistent with J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 8 of 11 what has been reported in the literature. If these predictions are accurate, the expected increase in melanoma prevalence will be associated with higher treatment costs, as some of these patients will require new target treatments and immunotherapy [25]. The analysis by melanoma subtype showed that the age-standardised incidence rate of invasive melanomas increased slightly with an AAPC of 2.1% while in situ melanomas almost doubled their incidence with an AAPC of 6.5%. These results are consistent with the findings of a large European study by Sacchetto et al. [31], who observed a significant incidence increase in both invasive (AAPC 4.0%) and more markedly for in situ melanoma (AAPC 7.7%). An increase in incidence of these proportions could mean a lifetime risk of developing in situ melanoma of 1 in 58 people [32]. Although the incidence of invasive melanoma is not as marked as in situ melanoma, the absolute number of thick melanomas continues to rise, which could have an serious impact in the mortality of the patients and costs related to the new treatments [32]. We have observed in this cohort that the proportion of invasive melanomas is higher than in situ melanomas with a ratio of approximately 2:1. This ratio is in line with other European cohorts [31]. On the other hand, in the SEER registry the ratio of invasive versus in-situ melanoma is close to 1:1 [10,33]. One possible explanation is that many low-risk patients are normally seen in private clinics and some of them are not entered in the regional registries. The increasing trend in incidence during the study decade was observed in the 60–70 age group and above, while the younger age groups remained fairly stable. Moreover, the histological subtype that increased notably during this period is the lentigo maligna subtype. This trend was observed in the study by Swetter et al. who reported a significant increase in melanoma in-situ in the older population. They also found that lentigo maligna accounted for 79–83% of the total diagnoses of the in-situ subtype [34]. All these findings could be explained by accumulated harm from UV (ultraviolet) radiation since childhood as UV exposure and resulting from occupations with high sun exposure (>20 years) leading to the development of melanoma [27]. Large public initiatives to decrease sun exposure have been carried out for many years [5–9,35], but unfortunately, these campaigns will not benefit older people today who could have already had intense sun exposure during childhood. This could explain the significant increase in incidence from age 50 years onwards which we have seen in our study and the important increase in the lentigo maligna melanoma subtype. Another possible explanation for the increase in incidence has partially been attributed to the development of highly sensitive diagnostic techniques during the last decade, principally the use of dermatoscopy which has allowed the detection of clinically unidentifiable tumors [36]. In the stratified analysis by sex, we observed that in both sexes the age-standardised incidence rate showed a rising trend with an AAPC of 3.9% for men and 3.2% in women; moreover, the age-standardised incidence rate was higher in men throughout the study period. Different authors have described that melanoma incidence differs between men and women by age, with women having higher rates of melanoma early in life and men at later stages of life [37–39]. One biological explanation for this difference could be related to the hormonal profile. It has been seen that high levels of oestrogen during a woman’s fertile period can promote the formation of reactive oxygen species which seem to favour the development of melanoma seen in younger women [40]. Strengths and Limitations A strength of this study was the ability to collect all data prospectively from the main reference hospitals in Catalonia. As a limitation of the study, private centres are not included, resulting in a possible underestimation of a proportion of early melanomas as well as possible differences in melanoma subtypes. Furthermore, this study does not include mortality data. - Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, all authors; formal analysis, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik) and S.P. (Susana Puig); funding acquisition—supporting, S.P. (Susana Puig), C.C. and J.M. (Josep Malvehy); investigation, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik); methodology S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik), S.P. (Susana Puig), C.C. and J.M. (Josep Malvehy); data curation, all authors; software, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik); supervision, S.P. (Susana Puig) and J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 9 of 11 J.M. (Josep Malvehy); validation, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik) and S.P. (Susana Puig); visualisation, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik); writing—original, S.P. (Sebastian Podlipnik); writing—review and editing all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: The study in the Melanoma Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona was supported in part by grants from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias P.I. 12/00840, PI 15/00956, and PI 15/00716 Spain; by the CIBER de Enfermedades Raras of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, co-funded by “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). Unión Europea. Una manera de hacer Europa”; by the AGAUR 2014_SGR_603 and 2017_SGR_1134 of the Catalan Government, Spain; by a grant from “Fundació La Marató de TV3, 201331-30”, Catalonia, Spain; by the European Commission under the 6th Framework Programme, Contract no : LSHC-CT-2006-018702 (GenoMEL); by CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya; by a Research Grant from “Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer” GCB15152978SOEN, Spain; by a grant from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) (PPRC-2017/19). Part of the work was developed at the building Centro Esther Koplowitz. Melanoma research at the Department of Dermatology of Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida is supported by grants from ISCIII (PI15/00711 to RMM, cofinanced by FEDER “Una manera de hacer Europa” and CIBERONC- CB16/12/00231) and from Fundació la Marató de TV3 (FMTV 201331-31 to RMM). Acknowledgments: Thanks to our patients and their families who are the main reason for our studies. To Paul Hetherington for his help with English editing and correction of the manuscript in English. Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, nor in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. References 1. Miller, A.J.; Mihm, M.C. Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 51–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Guy, G.P.; Ekwueme, D.U. Years of Potential Life Lost and Indirect Costs of Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. PharmacoEconomics 2011, 29, 863–874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Burnet, N.G.; Jefferies, S.J.; Benson, R.J.; Hunt, D.P.; Treasure, F.P. Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden—And should be considered when allocating research funds. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 241–245. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Schadendorf, D.; van Akkooi, A.C.J.; Berking, C.; Griewank, K.G.; Gutzmer, R.; Hauschild, A.; Stang, A.; Roesch, A.; Ugurel, S. Melanoma. Lancet 2018, 392, 971–984. [CrossRef] 5. Stratigos, A.J.; Forsea, A.M.; van der Leest, R.J.T.; de Vries, E.; Nagore, E.; Bulliard, J.L.; Trakatelli, M.; Paoli, J.; Peris, K.; Hercogova, J.; et al. Euromelanoma: A dermatology-led European campaign against nonmelanoma skin cancer and cutaneous melanoma. Past, present and future. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 167, 99–104. [CrossRef] 6. Melia, J.; Cooper, E.J.; Frost, T.; Graham-Brown, R.; Hunter, J.; Marsden, A.; Du Vivier, A.; White, J.; Whitehead, S.; Warin, A.P. Cancer Research Campaign health education programme to promote the early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Characteristics and incidence of melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 1995, 132, 414–21. [CrossRef] 7. Stang, A.; Jöckel, K.H.; Heidinger, O. Skin cancer rates in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany before and after the introduction of the nationwide skin cancer screening program (2000–2015). Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 33, 303–312. [CrossRef] 8. Katalinic, A.; Waldmann, A.; Weinstock, M.A.; Geller, A.C.; Eisemann, N.; Greinert, R.; Volkmer, B.; Breitbart, E. Does skin cancer screening save lives? Cancer 2012, 118, 5395–5402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. Berwick, M.; Buller, D.B.; Cust, A.; Gallagher, R.; Lee, T.K.; Meyskens, F.; Pandey, S.; Thomas, N.E.; Veierød, M.B.; Ward, S. Melanoma Epidemiology and Prevention. In Melanoma. Cancer Treatment and Research; Kaufman, H., Mehnert, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 17–49._2. [CrossRef] 10. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html (accessed on 22 October 2020). 11. International Agency for Research on Cancer; WHO. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Worldwide in 2018; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2018. 12. Wong, D.J.L.; Ribas, A. Melanoma. In Cancer Treatment and Research; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 167, pp. 251–262. [CrossRef] 13. Berk-Krauss, J.; Stein, J.A.; Weber, J.; Polsky, D.; Geller, A.C. New Systematic Therapies and Trends in Cutaneous Melanoma Deaths Among US Whites, 1986–2016. Am. J. Public Health 2020, 110, 731–733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 10 of 11 14. Poizeau, F.; Kerbrat, S.; Happe, A.; Rault, C.; Drezen, E.; Balusson, F.; Tuppin, P.; Guillot, B.; Thuret, A.; Boussemart, L.; et al. Patients with metastatic melanoma receiving anticancer drugs: Changes in overall survival, 2010–2017. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Idescat. Tema. Población. Cifras de población. Available online: https://www.idescat.cat/ (accessed on 22 October 2012). 16. Von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007, 370, 1453–1457. [CrossRef] 17. Eurostat. Revision of the European Standard Population. Report of Eurostat’s Task Force; Number 1346; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2013; p. 121. [CrossRef] 18. Fay, M.P.; Feuer, E.J. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: A method based on the gamma distribution. Stat. Med. 1997, 16, 791–801.:7<791::aid-sim500>3.0.co;2-%23. [CrossRef] 19. Number of Joinpoints—Joinpoint Help System. Available online: https://surveillance.cancer. gov/help/joinpoint/setting-parameters/method-and-parameters-tab/number-of-joinpoints (accessed on 22 October 2012). 20. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; RStudio Team: Boston, MA, USA, 2018. Available online: http://www.rstudio.com/ (accessed on 22 October 2012). 21. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2020. 22. Joinpoint Regression Program, Version 4.8.0.1–April 2020; Statistical Methodology and Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute. Available online: https://surveillance.cancer. gov/joinpoint/(accessed on 22 October 2020). 23. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [CrossRef] 24. Clarke, C.A.; McKinley, M.; Hurley, S.; Haile, R.W.; Glaser, S.L.; Keegan, T.H.; Swetter, S.M. Continued Increase in Melanoma Incidence across all Socioeconomic Status Groups in California, 1998–2012. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 2282–2290. [CrossRef] 25. Gershenwald, J.E.; Guy, G.P. Stemming the Rising Incidence of Melanoma: Calling Prevention to Action. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2016, 108, djv381–djv381. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 26. Puig, S.; Marcoval, J.; Paradelo, C.; Azon, A.; Bartralot, R.; Bel, S.; Bigata, X.; Boada, A.; Campoy, A.; Carrera, C.; et al. Melanoma incidence increases in the elderly of Catalonia but not in the younger population: Effect of prevention or consequence of immigration? Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015, 95, 422–426. [CrossRef] 27. Carr, S.; Smith, C.; Wernberg, J. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Melanoma. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 100, 1–12. [CrossRef] 28. Moan, J.; Baturaite, Z.; Porojnicu, A.C.; Dahlback, A.; Juzeniene, A. UVA, UVB and incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Norway and Sweden. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2012, 11, 191–198. [CrossRef] 29. Bataille, V.; Winnett, A.; Sasieni, P.; Newton Bishop, J.; Cuzick, J. Exposure to the sun and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma in the UK: A case—Control study. Eur. J. Cancer 2004, 40, 429–435. [CrossRef] 30. Fortes, C.; Mastroeni, S.; Melchi, F.; Pilla, M.A.; Antonelli, G.; Camaioni, D.; Alotto, M.; Pasquini, P. A protective effect of the Mediterranean diet for cutaneous melanoma. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008, 37, 1018–1029. [CrossRef] 31. Sacchetto, L.; Zanetti, R.; Comber, H.; Bouchardy, C.; Brewster, D.; Broganelli, P.; Chirlaque, M.; Coza, D.; Galceran, J.; Gavin, A.; et al. Trends in incidence of thick, thin and in situ melanoma in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 92, 108–118. [CrossRef] 32. Glazer, A.M.; Winkelmann, R.R.; Farberg, A.S.; Rigel, D.S. Analysis of Trends in US Melanoma Incidence and Mortality. JAMA Dermatol. 2017, 153, 225. [CrossRef] 33. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 34. Swetter, S.M.; Boldrick, J.C.; Jung, S.Y.; Egbert, B.M.; Harvell, J.D. Increasing incidence of lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes: Northern California and national trends 1990–2000. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005, 125, 685–691. [CrossRef] 35. Olsen, C.M.; Whiteman, D.C. Clinical Epidemiology of Melanoma. In Cutaneous Melanoma; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 425–449._47. [CrossRef] J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3396 11 of 11 36. Lallas, A.; Apalla, Z.; Chaidemenos, G. New Trends in Dermoscopy to Minimize the Risk of Missing Melanoma. J. Skin Cancer 2012, 2012, 1–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Olsen, C.M.; Thompson, J.F.; Pandeya, N.; Whiteman, D.C. Evaluation of Sex-Specific Incidence of Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2020, 156, 553. [CrossRef] 38. Rastrelli, M.; Tropea, S.; Rossi, C.R.; Alaibac, M. Melanoma: Epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis and classification. In Vivo 2014, 28, 1005–1011. 39. Najita, J.S.; Swetter, S.M.; Geller, A.C.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Zelen, M.; Lee, S.J. Sex Differences in Age at Primary Melanoma Diagnosis in a Population-Based Analysis (US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, 2005–2011). J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 1894–1897. [CrossRef] 40. Lira, F.; Podlipnik, S.; Potrony, M.; Tell-Martí, G.; Calbet-Llopart, N.; Barreiro, A.; Carrera, C.; Malvehy, J.; Puig, S. Inherited MC 1R variants in patients with melanoma are associated with better survival in women. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. c 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).