catalysts Review Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Assisted by Covalent Organic Frameworks Nuria Romero, Roger Bofill * , Laia Francàs, Jordi García-Antón and Xavier Sala * Department of Chemistry, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain; Nuria.Romero@uab.cat (N.R.); Laia.Francas@uab.cat (L.F.); Jordi.GarciaAnton@uab.es (J.G.-A.) * Correspondence: Roger.Bofill@uab.cat (R.B.); Xavier.Sala@uab.cat (X.S.); Tel.: +34-93-581-2886 (R.B.); +34-586-8295 (X.S.) Abstract: Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are crystalline porous organic polymers built from covalent organic blocks that can be photochemically active when incorporating organic semiconduct- ing units, such as triazine rings or diacetylene bridges. The bandgap, charge separation capacity, porosity, wettability, and chemical stability of COFs can be tuned by properly choosing their constitu- tive building blocks, by extension of conjugation, by adjustment of the size and crystallinity of the pores, and by synthetic post-functionalization. This review focuses on the recent uses of COFs as photoactive platforms for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), in which usually metal nanopar- ticles (NPs) or metallic compounds (generally Pt-based) act as co-catalysts. The most promising COF-based photocatalytic HER systems will be discussed, and special emphasis will be placed on rationalizing their structure and light-harvesting properties in relation to their catalytic activity and stability under turnover conditions. Finally, the aspects that need to be improved in the coming years  will be discussed, such as the degree of dispersibility in water, the global photocatalytic efficiency,  and the robustness and stability of the hybrid systems, putting emphasis on both the COF and the Citation: Romero, N.; Bofill, R.; metal co-catalyst. Francàs, L.; García-Antón, J.; Sala, X. Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution Keywords: covalent organic framework; covalent triazine framework; photocatalysis; hydrogen Assisted by Covalent Organic evolution; metal nanoparticle; co-catalyst; Pt-doped COF; bandgap; charge separation; apparent Frameworks. Catalysts 2021, 11, 754. quantum efficiency https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060754 Academic Editor: Víctor A. de la Peña O’Shea 1. Introduction Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are 2D or 3D low density crystalline porous Received: 1 June 2021 Accepted: 17 June 2021 materials with periodically ordered skeletons constituted by organic molecules linked Published: 21 June 2021 through covalent bonds. They were first reported by Yaghi and collaborators in 2005 from condensation of benzenediboronic acid (BDBA) alone and in the presence of hexahydroxyt- Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral riphenylene (HHTP) in a simple one-pot procedure at 120 ◦ C, obtaining a boroxine COF with regard to jurisdictional claims in (COF-1) and a boronate ester COF (COF-5), respectively [1]. Since then, there has been published maps and institutional affil- steady growth in the number of published works dealing with the synthesis, properties, iations. and catalytic applications of COFs. In contrast to other porous organic polymers (POPs), COFs are crystalline (long-range ordered) by definition. In fact, some authors consider POPs to be amorphous COFs, and classify COFs according to their type of long-range order (0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D COFs) [2]. The crystallinity of COFs is governed by their predesigned Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. tailor-made structures, which involve a geometric combination of rigid monomers to guide Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. the growth of polygonal structures [3]. On the other hand, the porosity of COFs is intrinsi- This article is an open access article cally linked to the geometry and topicity of the nodes and linkers selected. In fact, one can distributed under the terms and find COFs with regular pores of a single geometry (trigonal, tetragonal, rhombohedral, or conditions of the Creative Commons hexagonal), with a mixture of two geometries (two different trigonal ones or hexagonal plus Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// trigonal), or with irregular geometrical pores [3]. The formation of the pores is generally creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ driven by intermolecular interactions, mainly π-stacking and hydrogen bonds [4], but new 4.0/). strategies using templates are being developed [5]. Catalysts 2021, 11, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060754 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 2 of 17 Semiconductors are materials able to harvest light that can be used to induce photo- chemical transformations, such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), if they exhibit appropriate bandgaps. Under these conditions, electrons are excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) by photons with an energy greater than the bandgap, which are then used to reduce protons to H2 . Historically, semiconductors used for HER photocatalysis have been CdS [6] and Ag3 PO4 [7], absorbing in the visible region but containing expensive and polluting metals, or graphitic C3 N4 (g-C3 N4 ), which absorbs in the visible range although its bandgap tuning is constrained by its fixed structure [8]. In 2014, Lotsch et al. described for the first time the photocatalytic HER ability of a Pt-doped hydrazone-linked COF derived from 1,3,5-tris-(4-formyl-phenyl)triazine (TFPT-COF) [9]. Thanks to the visible-light-absorbing properties of the crystalline honeycomb-type planar organic scaffold, TFPT-COF can act as the photosensitizer, while Pt acts as the co-catalyst. Afterwards, a large amount of work has been done in this area because COFs show several advantages compared with commonly used semiconductors: (1) they are 100% organic, reducing the price of the photocatalyst; (2) they allow for the tuning of the bandgap by modifying the building blocks; (3) they are mostly obtained under mild reaction conditions (in contrast to g-C3 N4 ); (4) they are highly porous and show a large exposed surface area that allows the light to pass through the material without substantial energy loss while offering high accessibility to electrolytes, sacrificial components, and co-catalysts; (5) they are usually stable within a large range of pH thanks to the covalent bonds between their building blocks, which is a key requisite for water splitting reactions; and (6) they are rigid, which enhances the excited state lifetime and allows for conjugation and stacking, which increase the charge mobility and prevent deactivation. The authors do not pretend in this review to make a comprehensive list of all COFs used in the photocatalytic HER, since excellent reviews on this topic have been pub- lished recently and the readers can refer to them for more detailed information (see for example [2,10–17]), but to give a critical perspective of the strong points and the future goals to be achieved within this exciting research field. In addition, the authors have chosen to address this review exclusively to photocatalytically active COFs, and thus electrocataly- sis studies are excluded. When comparing photocatalytic systems, the authors have been careful, as the given values of hydrogen formation rate (µmol·h−1 or µmol·h−1 ·g−1 ) often strongly depend on the light source (wavelength and intensity), reactor size, photocatalyst concentration, and the co-catalyst’s nature and amount. Unfortunately, a benchmarking protocol has yet to be established. Therefore, this review will focus more on general trends than on numerical comparisons, although some quantitative figures will be given to give the reader an idea of the order of magnitude of photocatalytic HER activity. Furthermore, the COFs that have provided a breakthrough in the field because of their novelty and significant contribution to opening up new exciting opportunities will be described in special detail. 2. Crucial Aspects Determining the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Performance of COF-Mediated Systems When analyzing the photocatalytic hydrogen production mediated by COFs, several aspects need to be considered to improve the overall yield of the process, which will be listed and further developed in the following subsections. Photocatalysis starts with the absorption of light by a semiconducting COF and the concomitant formation of electron–hole pairs, also called excitons, that later are dissociated to form charge carriers. Light energy should be higher than the bandgap between the HOMO and LUMO orbitals to excite electrons and lead to the occupation of the CB and the generation of holes (positive charges) in the VB. Thus, to maximize the visible light absorption of the COFs, their bandgaps should be small. This bandgap can be tuned by properly modifying the aromatic nodes and linkages, as will be exemplified later (Section 2.3.2). After exciton formation upon light absorption, the electron–hole pairs need to be separated into free charges and migrate to the surface of the COF to interact with the Catalysts 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 19 properly modifying the aromatic nodes and linkages, as will be exemplified later (Section Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 3 of 17 2.3.2). After exciton formation upon light absorption, the electron–hole pairs need to be sep‐ arated into free charges and migrate to the surface of the COF to interact with the substrate and perform substrate andcatalysis. perform In the HERIn catalysis. case, the weHER arecase, interested we areininterested the capability of capability in the electrons toof electrons to reduce protons into hydrogen; therefore, the CB should have a morepotential reduce protons into hydrogen; therefore, the CB should have a more negative negative than that than potential H+/H of thethat of2 couple the H+at /Hthe2 working couple at pH. the Additionally, working pH. holes in the Additionally, VB need holes to be in the consumed VB need tobybetrapping consumed electrons (promoting by trapping an oxidation electrons reaction) (promoting to compensate an oxidation for theto reaction) global chargefor compensate of the the global semiconductor. charge ofTherefore, when the HER the semiconductor. is studied Therefore, independently when the HER is from the anodic counterpart (where typically the challenging studied independently from the anodic counterpart (where typically the challenging water oxidation reaction water takes place), a sacrificial electron donor (SED) is needed. Thus, oxidation reaction takes place), a sacrificial electron donor (SED) is needed. Thus, SED compounds suchSEDas triethanolamine (TEOA), triethylamine (TEA), diethylamine compounds such as triethanolamine (TEOA), triethylamine (TEA), diethylamine (DEA), (DEA), and ascorbic acid (AA)ascorbic and as hole acid scavengers (AA) asare used hole to consume scavengers are the used photogenerated to consume theholes and facilitateholes photogenerated the global and photocatalytic facilitate the global process. Usually, process. photocatalytic the reaction with the Usually, the reaction SED takes place with thebefore the SED takes catalytic place process before itself, and the catalytic in consequence process itself, and inthe former process consequence is responsible the former process isfor generat‐ responsible inggenerating for long‐lived charges. long-lived In addition, charges. In thisaddition, process alsothis avoids processthe degradation also avoids theofdegradation the photo‐ of the photocatalyst that the accumulation of energetic holes may cause. However,redox catalyst that the accumulation of energetic holes may cause. However, before such before processes such redoxtake place attake processes the surface place atofthe thesurface COF, thereof theis the COF,possibility there is that the photogen‐ the possibility that erated the electrons andelectrons photogenerated holes recombine and holes inrecombine the so‐called charge in the recombination so-called process, re‐ charge recombination leasing the process, initialthe releasing harvested energy inenergy initial harvested the form of form in the radiation (fluorescence) of radiation or heat,orthus (fluorescence) heat, decreasing the global performance of the whole photocatalytic thus decreasing the global performance of the whole photocatalytic process. A general process. A general over‐ view of the overview of photocatalytic the photocatalytic HERHER mediated mediated by COFs by COFs in a in colloidal a colloidaldispersion is shown dispersion is shownin Figure in Figure 1a.1a. Another Another approach approach that thatcan can bebeused usedtotoavoid avoidthe theuse useofofa aSED SEDisisthe thedeposition deposition of the of the COF COF onto onto an an electrode electrode to to bebe used used as as working workingelectrode electrodeintointoaaphotoelectrochemical photoelectrochemical system. In this approach, the holes generated in system. In this approach, the holes generated in the VB will be filled the VB will be filled withwith electrons ex‐ electrons tracted from the oxidative reaction taking place in the counter extracted from the oxidative reaction taking place in the counter electrode (Figure 1b). electrode (Figure 1b). Figure1.1.General Figure Generaloverview overviewofofthe thephotocatalytic photocatalyticHER HERmediated mediatedbybyCOFs COFsinina acolloidal colloidaldispersion dispersion(a)(a) and deposited and onto deposited an onto electrode (b). (b). an electrode Despite the thermodynamic Despite the thermodynamicand andkinetic kinetic aspects aspects related related to the to the photocatalytic photocatalytic pro- process cess itself described above, the stability and fate of the whole system under itself described above, the stability and fate of the whole system under turnover condi‐ turnover conditions tions cannotcannot be disregarded. be disregarded. This includes This includes both theboth the part organic organic part (COF) and(COF) and the the metallic metallic (co‐catalyst) part. Regarding the former, during the last 6 years it has been made clearmade (co-catalyst) part. Regarding the former, during the last 6 years it has been that clear that imine-derived imine‐derived [18], triazine-containing [18], triazine‐containing [9,19–22], [9,19–22], diacetylene-containing diacetylene‐containing [23], [23], β- β‐ketoena‐ ketoenamine-derived mine‐derived [23–25],[23–25], and and fully fully π-conjugated π‐conjugated sp2 C [26–28] sp2 C [26–28] COFs are COFs veryare very resistant resistant under under photocatalytic conditions, in contrast to the great tendency towards hydrolysis of boroxine and boronic ester-derived COFs [2,29]. Additionally, N-rich COFs have arisen as highly crystalline, porous, and chemically stable materials, showing enhanced light- harvesting and charge separation properties [14,29,30]. Therefore, these systems will constitute the core of this review. In contrast, the fate of co-catalysts under turnover conditions has not been paid much attention yet [9]. Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 4 of 17 2.1. Common Synthetic Pathways to Build Efficient and Robust COFs In this section, we will give a short overview of the synthetic pathways (Figure 2) and the building units (Figure 3) that give rise to COFs with remarkable HER photocatalytic properties. Condensation reactions are amongst the most used. For example, Lotsch and collaborators synthesized a series of four azine-linked triphenylaryl COFs by condensation of aldehyde groups with hydrazine (see Figure 2a as a simple condensation example be- tween an arylaldehyde and hydrazine to form an azine linker [14]) containing a central aryl ring with different N contents, from 0 to 3 (Nx -COF, x = 0–3, Figure 4a) [19], which will be thoroughly described in Section 2.2. Another example can be found in the con- densation reaction between 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzene-1,3,5-tricarbaldehyde (also named 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol, TP) and 3,9-diamino-benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b0 ]bis[1]benzothiophene sulfone (Figure 2b), involving the formation of a Schiff base between the aldehyde and the amino groups after dehydration, and the subsequent irreversible enol-to-keto conversion to form the β-ketoenamine-linked FS-COF [24] (Figure 4d) containing the sulfone func- tional groups (FS stands for fused sulfone). Additionally, covalent triazine framework (CTF)-based COFs are among the most relevant photocatalytic examples, whose properties will be discussed later [31]. CTF-COFs can be synthesized under mild conditions by con- densation at 120 ◦ C of aldehydes (e.g., 1,4-benzenedialdehyde, Figure 2c) and amidines (e.g., terephthalimidamide, Figure 2c) involving the formation of a Schiff base between Catalysts 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW the aldehyde and the amidine groups after dehydration, followed by a Michael addition 5 of 19 reaction to form the triazine ring after the elimination of ammonia (Figure 2c) [20,21]. Figure 2. Figure 2. Selected Selected condensation condensation reactions reactions to to achieve achieve the the synthesis synthesis of of COFs. COFs. Note Note that that for for the the sake sake of of simplicity simplicity only only the the reactivity of one end of both reactants is shown. reactivity of one end of both reactants is shown. There has been a growing interest in the use of donor–acceptor (D‐A) building units in COFs, for example incorporating conjugated aromatic rings (D) and cyano groups (A). In those cases, a pathway to obtain rough COFs is by C=C bond formation. Vinyl bonds are obtained, for example, by condensation between a pyrene D group (1,3,6,8‐tetrakis(p‐ formylphenyl)pyrene, TFPPyr) and 1,4‐phenylenediacetonitrile (PDAN) in the presence of the A end‐capping agent 3‐ethylrhodanine (ERDN) for the formation of sp2 c‐COFERDN [26], where TFPPyr has been functionalized with ERDN at the 3,6 positions and linked at the 1,8 positions through sp2 C‐bonds to PDAN (Figure 2d). Another remarkable example Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 5 of 17 Catalysts 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 19 Figure 3. Structures Figure 3. Structures of of the the starting starting building building blocks blocks used usedin insome someof ofthe theworks workscited citedin inthis thisreview. review. There Tuning has thebeen a growing building blocksinterest has also in been the use of donor–acceptor explored for some COFs, (D-A) building leading units to ration‐ in COFs, for example incorporating conjugated aromatic rings (D) and cyano ally improved activities. For example, Zhang et al. obtained COFs of different pore sizes groups (A). In those cases, a pathway to obtain rough COFs is by C=C bond formation. and crystallinities via the condensation reaction of arylmethyl C atoms with aromatic al‐ Vinyl bonds are obtained, dehydes for example, derived by condensation from terphenyl, biphenyl,between a pyrene D group or trisphenylbenzene [28].(1,3,6,8-tetrakis(p- Due to its appro‐ formylphenyl)pyrene, priate band energy levels, the system with a terphenyl spacer and larger the TFPPyr) and 1,4-phenylenediacetonitrile (PDAN) in presence pores, g‐C40Nof3‐ the A end-capping agent 3-ethylrhodanine (ERDN) for the formation of sp2 c-COF [26], COF (Figure 2e, Figure 4c), resulted the most active in the HER. Additionally, β‐ketoena‐ ERDN where TFPPyr has been mine linked honeycomb‐like functionalized with ERDN at the 3,6 positions and COFs have been formed by condensation of 1,3,5‐tri‐ linked at the 1,8 positions through sp 2 C-bonds to PDAN (Figure 2d). Another remarkable example is formylphloroglucinol (TP) with 4,4′‐diamino‐p‐terphenyl (TPh‐NH2) and three deriva‐ shown in Figurein tives consisting 2e,replacing where the C=C the bond central condensation phenyl reaction between ring by anthracene 4,4”-diformyl-p- (Ant), tetrazine (Tz), or terphenyl (DFPTP) and the methyl groups in 3,5-dicyano-2,4,6-trimethylpyridine (DCTMP) benzothiadiazole (BT), namely TPh‐Ant‐NH2, TPh‐Tz‐NH2, and HTPh‐BT‐NH2, as de‐ yielded the highly crystalline g-C40 N3 -COF [28] (Figure 4c). In this work, the authors picted in Figure 3, in order to study the effect of the linker in isoreticular COFs in the highlight the common difficulties in obtaining highly crystalline COFs containing C=C overall HER photocatalytic activity [32]. Another crystalline β‐ketoenamine linked COF bridges due to the poor reversibility of the traditional C=C forming reactions, and the (TP‐BDDA COF) has been synthesized by Thomas et al., in this case bearing diphenyl novel synthetic strategy they develop leading to high crystallinity based on a self-healing diacetylene bridges, by mixing TP and 4,4′‐(buta‐1,3‐diyne‐1,4‐diyl)dianiline (BDDA) reversible process. Other D-A building blocks that yield COFs with remarkable activity are (Figure 3) [23]. The importance of the presence of the diacetylene bridges is made clear also shown in Figure 3. Thus, pyrene (Pyr)-containing D-A COFs have been synthesized when comparing the behavior of the TP‐BDDA COF (showing steady photochemical H2 by fusion of the D unit 4,40 ,400 ,4000 (pyrene-1,3,6,8-tetrayl)benzaldehyde (Pyr-CHO) with a evolution for 10 h) with that of the corresponding COF with a diphenyl acetylene bridge terphenyl (TPh)-based diamine annulated with the A unit benzothiadiazole (BT)—both instead (TP‐EDDA COF, EDDA standing for 4,4′‐(ethyne‐1,2‐diyl)dianiline), Figure 3. For unmodified, HTPh-BT-NH2 , and dichlorinated, ClTPh-BT-NH2 —after condensation of the the latter, almost no hydrogen evolution is observed. terminal aldehyde and amino groups through formation of imine bonds [18]. Other functionalization steps have been explored to favor the coordination of metals other than Pt as co‐catalysts. Thus, the imine‐linked HDCOF formed by reaction of 2,3,6,7,10,11‐hexaaminotriphenylene (HATP) with 2,6‐diformylphenol (DFP) offers N,N,O,O‐tetradentate Shiff base sites to coordinate Cu(II) ions [33]. Additionally, a Co‐ Catalysts 2021,11, Catalysts2021, 11,754 x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of6 19 of 17 Figure4.4.Highly Figure Highlycrystalline crystallineN Nxx-COFs ‐COFs (x == 0–3) 0–3) and and the thePTP‐COF PTP-COF[19] [19](a), (a),CTF‐HUST‐C1 CTF-HUST-C1[20] [20](b), (b),the theg‐C g-C 403N 40N 3 -COF ‐COF [28] [28] (c),(c), andthe and theFS-COF FS‐COF[24] [24](d). (d).The The π-stacking π‐stacking interactions interactions in the N33‐COF the N -COFand andPTP‐COF PTP-COFare arealso alsodisplayed displayedinin(a). (a). Tuning the building COFs’ crystallinity is blocks closely has alsotobeen related the explored stability offor thesome systemsCOFs, leading in the to ratio- photocata‐ nally improved lytic HER. Thus, activities. monitoringFor example, with its evolution Zhang et under time al. obtained turnover COFs of different conditions becomes pore sizes key toand crystallinities understanding thevia the condensation durability and fate of thereaction tested of arylmethyl systems. Thus,C foratoms example,withthearo- matic highlyaldehydes crystalline derived from Pyr‐ClTPh‐BT‐COF imine‐linked terphenyl, biphenyl, [18]orand trisphenylbenzene the triazine‐linked [28]. Due to N3‐COF its appropriate [19], possessingbandplanar energy levels, the π‐delocalized system planes andwith π‐π astacking terphenyl spacer and interactions larger par‐ between pores, g-C N3 -COF allel40planes, (Figure produce H2e, Figure 2 under 4c), resulted continuous the most irradiation at pH active 7 for in the HER. 2 days without Additionally, any crys‐ β-ketoenamine linked tallinity or porosity honeycomb-like loss. Other examplesCOFs have been of crystalline COFsformed with by condensation long‐term ofun‐ stability 1,3,5- triformylphloroglucinol der photocatalytic HER (TP) with 4,4 conditions 0 -diamino-p-terphenyl are the β‐ketoenamine‐linked (TPh-NH FS‐COF ) and three [24] and deriva- the 2 tives consisting TpDTz‐COF [25].inThese replacing COFsthe central (see Sectionphenyl 2.5), ring and abyrecently anthracene (Ant), reported tetrazine thiazole (Tz), (TZ)‐ bridged or highly porous benzothiadiazole fully (BT), aromatic namely framework2 ,[38], TPh-Ant-NH all exhibit TPh-Tz-NH 2 , photocatalytic and HTPh-BT-NH hydrogen 2 , as de- evolution picted for more in Figure 3, inthan order50toh with studyno sign the of crystallinity effect of the linker degradation. in isoreticular COFs in the overall HER There is only one photocatalytic exception activity to the rule [32]. Another that directly crystalline relates crystallinity β-ketoenamine linked COF and photo‐ (TP-BDDA chemical COF) hasHER beenactivity [32]. Inby synthesized this work, Seki, Thomas et al.,Abe et al.case in this systematically bearing diphenylanalyze diacetylene the effect of all possible bridges, factors by mixing TPonand the 0 -(buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl)dianiline 4,4photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of the β‐ketoenamine (BDDA) (Figure 3) [23]. The importance of the presence of the diacetylene bridges is made clear when comparing Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 7 of 17 the behavior of the TP-BDDA COF (showing steady photochemical H2 evolution for 10 h) with that of the corresponding COF with a diphenyl acetylene bridge instead (TP-EDDA COF, EDDA standing for 4,40 -(ethyne-1,2-diyl)dianiline), Figure 3. For the latter, almost no hydrogen evolution is observed. Other functionalization steps have been explored to favor the coordination of met- als other than Pt as co-catalysts. Thus, the imine-linked HDCOF formed by reaction of 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene (HATP) with 2,6-diformylphenol (DFP) offers N,N,O,O-tetradentate Shiff base sites to coordinate Cu(II) ions [33]. Additionally, a Co-modified hydrazone-based NUS-55 COF has been synthesized by reaction of 2,20 - bipyridine-5,50 -dicarbohydrazine (BPDC) and 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol (TP) [34]. All these building units are plotted in Figure 3. Finally, a recent report has demonstrated the great power of the post-functionalization strategies. In this work, a β-ketoenamine linked COF derived from TP and bipyridine (TP-Bpy-COF) was covalently modified by reaction with 1,2-dibromoethane, yielding the quaternization of some of the Bpy-bridging units. The ethylene bridge formed between two cationic adjacent N atoms (Tp-2C/Bpy2+ -COF) acts as an integrated electron mediator, resulting in a concomitant increase in photocatalytic HER activity when combined with a Pt co-catalyst [35]. Another post-functionalization strategy has also been reported recently, in which a CTF-COF has been treated in HCl after having been exfoliated by ball-milling, thus generating the formation of Cl-intercalated CTF-1 through Cl-C and Cl-N covalent bonds within the triazine ring [36]. The formed COF interlayer channels facilitate charge separation and mobility as well as a narrowing of the bandgap, therefore enhancing its light absorption and photocatalytic HER capabilities. 2.2. Secondary Interactions In addition to the covalent bonds, secondary interactions, mostly π-stacking of aro- matic rings, play a relevant role in the photocatalytic activity of COFs, as they govern their porosity and increase their crystallinity to a great extent. A high degree of crystallinity provides efficient pathways for charge separation and transport as well as a broader light absorption capability and higher thermal/photocatalytic stability. A paradigmatic example is found for Nx -COFs (x = 0–3, Figure 4a), where the crys- tallinity is strongly dependent on the geometrical constraints imposed by the central aromatic nodes. Thus, with increased N content the dihedral angle between the central ring and the surrounding rings decreases, increasing the planarity of the layers. This favors the crystallinity and porosity of the systems and facilitates the charge mobility through the layers and in the axial direction as well, which yields faster H2 production and higher AQE values [19]. In addition, the increase in crystallinity leads to an increase in the number of Nx - COF layers, which in turn provokes an increase in the HOMO energy level and a decrease in the LUMO one, leading to a decreased bandgap and a higher visible light absorption capability [19]. Furthermore, the replacement of the central triazine ring of N3 -COF by a phenyl ring and of the terminal 4-benzaldehyde groups by 3-pyridinecarboxyaldehyde yields a phenyl-tripyridyl-derived COF (PTP-COF, Figure 4a) [37], allowing for the analysis of the differences between the two COFs containing the three N atoms at different positions. The lower symmetry of the PTP-COF compared with the N3 -COF leads to higher disorder for the former and thus lower crystallinity and porosity, since there is a higher number of possible molecular conformations around the torsion angle between the central phenyl ring and the peripheral pyridine rings than between the central triazine ring and the external phenyl substituents. In contrast to the face-to-face π-stacking interactions observed in the N3 -COF, PTP-COF crystals (Figure 4a) are less ordered due to the interactions between the donor phenyl groups and the acceptor pyridine rings. Furthermore, the higher basicity of pyridine compared with triazine leads to H-bonding interactions between the pyridyl groups in PTP-COF crystals, leading to oligomers or molecules occluding the pores. In short, the different constitutive aromatic rings in the PTP-COF compared with the N3 -COF Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 8 of 17 directly point to a lower crystallinity and porosity of the former, which shows a poorer dispersibility in water as well, with the consequent diminished light absorption capacity. There are more examples in the literature demonstrating that the photocatalytic HER is improved with an increased crystallinity of the COF scaffold. This is the case for the two following works of Tan et al. dealing with CTF-COFs [20,22]. In the first example [20], the substitution of an aldehyde precursor by its corresponding alcohol analogue led to a decrease in the reaction rate of formation of the triazine-based COFs. The subsequent decrease in the nucleation rate results in a significant increase in the crystallinity degree of the final CTF-COFs obtained and thus of their photocatalytic HER activity with respect to CTF-COF analogues of low crystallinity. For example, when combined with Pt as co-catalyst, the crystalline CTF-HUST-C1 (Figure 4b) displayed a 4.75-fold increase in the H2 evolution rate than its corresponding low-crystalline analogue, CTF-HUST-1. In the second example [22], the same CTF-COF was synthesized starting from the 1,4-phenylenedimethanamine precursor instead of the previous aldehyde or alcohol precursors, which in the presence of a strong base (t BuOK) produced in a high yield (99.2%) the highly crystalline and hydrophilic (wettable) CTF-HUST-A1 COF. By using Pt as co-catalyst and TEOA as SED, this system displayed a 6.3-fold increase in the hydrogen evolution rate compared with CTF-HUST-1, that is, 9.2 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 , and a high AQE of 7.4% at 420 nm. Furthermore, in this work the authors also demonstrate a gradual increase in the crystallinity of the obtained CTF-HUST-A1 with the strength of the base used for its synthesis, which also correlates with a large increase in the lifetime of the photogenerated charges according to transient absorption spectroscopy. Similarly, the crystalline FS-COF (Figure 4d) shows a 9-fold higher H2 production than its amorphous counterpart using Pt as co-catalyst and AA as SED [24], and the crystalline sp2 c-COF shows a one order of magnitude higher photocatalytic activity than its amorphous counterpart using Pt as co-catalyst and TEOA as SED [26]. Another family of highly crystalline COFs are the sp2 C-linked ones containing trans-disubstituted C=C bonds, among which the g-C40 N3 -COF (Figure 2e, Figure 4c) is the most active in the photocatalytic HER [28]. COFs’ crystallinity is closely related to the stability of the systems in the photocatalytic HER. Thus, monitoring its evolution with time under turnover conditions becomes key to understanding the durability and fate of the tested systems. Thus, for example, the highly crystalline imine-linked Pyr-ClTPh-BT-COF [18] and the triazine-linked N3 -COF [19], pos- sessing planar π-delocalized planes and π-π stacking interactions between parallel planes, produce H2 under continuous irradiation at pH 7 for 2 days without any crystallinity or porosity loss. Other examples of crystalline COFs with long-term stability under photocat- alytic HER conditions are the β-ketoenamine-linked FS-COF [24] and the TpDTz-COF [25]. These COFs (see Section 2.5), and a recently reported thiazole (TZ)-bridged highly porous fully aromatic framework [38], all exhibit photocatalytic hydrogen evolution for more than 50 h with no sign of crystallinity degradation. There is only one exception to the rule that directly relates crystallinity and photo- chemical HER activity [32]. In this work, Seki, Abe et al. systematically analyze the effect of all possible factors on the photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of the β-ketoenamine linked honeycomb-like COFs TPh-Ant-NH2 , TPh-Tz-NH2 , and HTPh-BT-NH2 (Figure 3). The authors conclude that neither their degree of crystallinity nor the torsional angle between the external aniline rings and the central aromatic ring in TPh and derivatives are crucial for catalysis. Instead, charge mobility is facilitated by the eclipsed AA’ stacking between adjacent parallel planes compared with AB or ABC stackings, which can be obtained under different reaction conditions (solvent and temperature). Finally, in addition to the π-stacking interactions between the aromatic rings, the secondary interactions between the COFs and the solvent, water in this case, are also key to achieving high photocatalytic activities. This is the case for the FS-COF [24], where the presence of sulfone polar groups increases its effectively exposed internal surface area in front of water, thus increasing its wettability and photocatalytic activity. In consequence, under identical photocatalytic conditions, the FS-COF shows a 22-fold higher H2 produc- Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 9 of 17 tion and a superior AQE than the N3 -COF, which lacks the sulfone groups and shows reduced wettability in the reaction media. 2.3. Electronic Effects To increase the HER photocatalytic performance of COFs, one must improve: (1) their charge separation and transfer abilities; (2) their charge generation capacity (improving light absorption by bandgap tuning); and (3) the stabilization of the key intermediates formed. All these can be achieved by tuning the electronic properties of the prepared COFs. In the following subsections, we will discuss which successful strategies have been used to this aim. 2.3.1. Charge Separation and Transfer A successful way to promote charge separation and transfer consists in constructing electron donor–acceptor (D-A) interfaces that favor the formation of weak charge transfer excitons with low binding energy that easily dissociate. This leads to spatially separated charges with slower recombination kinetics. Thus, more charges can be used in catalysis (usually taking place at longer time scales). D-A arrays are especially relevant in ordered π-stacked 2D-COFs, where both in-plane and out-of-plane π charge delocalizations among the parallel planes take place. They allow for rapid charge separation and a long lifetime for spatially separated electrons and holes, which follow opposite directions across the periodic columns, therefore avoiding charge recombination (Figure 5). This clearly represents an advantage compared with 3D-COFs, where these interplanar interactions cannot exist [39]. One relevant example can be found in the fully π-conjugated 2D sp2 c-COFERDN [26] (Figure 2d, Figure 5). In this example, the effect of the electron acceptor ERDN end-capping molecules is key, since they further enhance π-conjugation through electronic D-A push– Catalysts 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 19 pull effects. In addition, the D-A COF structure leads to a more efficient electron generation thanks to the facilitated exciton splitting into free charges. Figure5.5.Structure Figure Structureof sp22c-COF ofsp c‐COFERDN ERDN [26] [26] containing containing D‐A D-A units units and paths for electrons and holes holes through through the the π-stacking π‐stacking interactions. interactions. A second A second example exampleof of aa very very active active COF COF containing containingD-AD‐Aunits units(AQE (AQEof of6.7% 6.7%at at420 420nm nm in the in the presence presence of of 33wt% wt%Pt)Pt)has hasbeen beendescribed describedfor foranother anotheralkene-linked alkene‐linkedframework, framework,in in which whichtriphenylbenzene triphenylbenzenenodes nodes(D(D units) units)areare linked through linked trans through CN-substituted trans CN‐substitutedp-dialkene p‐dial‐ benzene bridges kene benzene (A units) bridges [40]. [40]. (A units) The The efficient charge efficient separation charge andand separation transfer properties transfer proper‐ of this ties of system are due this system are to duethetostrong electron the strong withdrawing electron ability withdrawing of theofCN ability thegroups and CN groups the good electron delocalization of the whole framework, which and the good electron delocalization of the whole framework, which slow down unde‐ slow down undesired recombination sired recombinationprocesses. Likewise, processes. a recently Likewise, described a recently crystalline described bithiophene-bridged crystalline bithiophene‐ 2D 2 sp C-linked conjugated COF (2D CCP-Th), containing bothboth D (thiophene) andand A bridged 2D sp C‐linked 2 conjugated COF (2D CCP‐Th), containing D (thiophene) A (cyano) groups, shows an intense H2‐evolution photocurrent density (7.9 μA∙cm−2 at 0 V vs. RHE), superior to that of other reported 2D‐COFs [27]. Additionally, the positive effect of the presence of D‐A units can be found as well for the β‐ketoenamine linked TPh‐ Ant‐NH2, TPh‐Tz‐NH2, and HTPh‐BT‐NH2 COFs (Figure 3). The photocatalytic activity of the best system, HTPh‐BT‐NH2, has been assigned to the A ability of the benzothiadiazole Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 10 of 17 (cyano) groups, shows an intense H2 -evolution photocurrent density (7.9 µA·cm−2 at 0 V vs. RHE), superior to that of other reported 2D-COFs [27]. Additionally, the positive effect of the presence of D-A units can be found as well for the β-ketoenamine linked TPh-Ant- NH2 , TPh-Tz-NH2 , and HTPh-BT-NH2 COFs (Figure 3). The photocatalytic activity of the best system, HTPh-BT-NH2 , has been assigned to the A ability of the benzothiadiazole (BT) bridging unit [32]. Finally, an alternative way to create D-A pathways is the use of hydrazone-linked 2D porphyrinic COFs containing different metal ions (Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II)) within the porphyrin binding site [41]. Among the different assayed metals, the d10 Zn(II) system is reported to be the most active, efficiently avoiding electron–hole recombination processes. Holes travel throughout the parallel aromatic hydrazone linkers while electrons freely migrate all the way through the parallel Zn(II)-porphyrinic rings. 2.3.2. Charge Generation Together with aiding charge separation (see the previous subsection), electronic effects can also reduce the COFs’ bandgap and increase their capability of absorbing light in the visible region. By absorbing more visible photons under sunlight irradiation, the systems will be able to yield more free charges to be used in the HER. In the literature, this has been achieved via several strategies: (1) by introducing D-A units, as explained in the previous subsection; (2) by an extended conjugation of the structure of COFs; and (3) by controlled exfoliation. Several COFs bearing D-A units have shown the capacity to increase charge generation under visible light irradiation by narrowing their bandgap. For instance, the fully π- conjugated 2D sp2 c-COFERDN [26] (Figure 2d, Figure 5), apart from a more efficient charge separation, also presents a reduced bandgap from 1.90 eV (for sp2 c-COF, in the absence of ERDN) to 1.85 eV, therefore red-shifting by 33 nm its near-infrared light absorption capacity up to 800 nm. Extended conjugation is a second relevant factor influencing charge generation. An example of this effect can be found in the terphenyl (TPh) bridged g-C40 N3 -COF, where conjugation induces a decrease in the bandgap (2.36 eV) and an increase in the average fluorescence lifetime (3.31 ns) compared with the analogous COFs with shorter biphenyl (2.40 eV, 2.71 ns) or phenyl (2.52 eV, 2.58 ns) spacers [28]. Furthermore, extended conjuga- tion could also explain why the g-C40 N3 -COF is even significantly active in the absence of Pt, where DFT calculations indicate that the N atom of the pyridine ring is the dominant active site for photocatalytic H2 evolution. However, in the presence of 3 wt% Pt as co- catalyst its activity increases, reaching an AQE at 420 nm as high as 4.84% [28], exceeding that of the triazine-derived N3 -COF [19], the hydrazone-based TFPT-COF [9], and the sulfone-containing FS-COF [24]. Finally, another way to narrow the bandgap of COFs is by controlled exfoliation. This has been reported for the case of a CTF-COF in which the exfoliated nanosheets show improved visible light absorption properties and shortened diffusion lengths of the photoexcited electrons compared with the bulk CTF-COF [42]. Analogously, besides its considerable wettability, the extraordinary HER photocatalytic activity of the FS-COF has also been attributed to its partial exfoliation capacity [24]. 2.3.3. Stabilization of Key Intermediates The modulation of the HOMO and LUMO orbital energies upon COF modification can also stabilize or destabilize intermediates, affecting the probability of recombination reaction processes. For example, for Nx -COFs, the HOMO and LUMO energy levels decrease when increasing the N content of the central aryl ring [19]. A lowered HOMO energy level increases the oxidation ability of holes in Nx -COFs, thus enhancing hole removal by the sacrificial electron donor (TEOA), which correlates with an increased HER photocatalytic activity with increasing N content (a 74-fold increase in H2 production and a 4400-fold increase in AQE is observed from x = 0, central phenyl ring, to x = 3, central triazine ring, Figure 4a). Furthermore, the authors propose that the formation of a radical Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 11 of 17 anion might be the rate-determining step of the overall process, and this radical anion is stabilized with an increasing N content of the central aryl ring, as N acts as an electron- withdrawing group. Thus, the increased stability of the radical anion with increasing N content is in line with the observed trend of increased HER photocatalytic activity as the N content increases. Additionally, an increased stability of the radical anion suggests a more effective charge separation process, thus facilitating photocatalysis [19]. Contrastingly, the PTP-COF related system (Figure 4a) shows an experimental reduced non-radiative deactivation capacity of the photoexcited states via charge-transfer pathways compared with the more crystalline analogue N3 -COF [19]. Although the bandgap for PTP-COF is lower than that for N3 -COF (2.1 eV vs. 2.7 eV), theoretical calculations show that the HOMO and LUMO of the PTP-COF possess a similar spatial extent, thus facilitating the undesired charge recombination processes, and indicate as well that the radical anion in the PTP-COF is significantly less stable than in the N3 -COF due to the worse capability of pyridine rings to stabilize negative charges than triazine rings. Finally, an increase in the average lifetime of the photoexcited states and a decrease in the charge transfer barrier due to the electronic effects related to the presence of electron acceptor chlorine atoms has been reported. Thus, for the Pyr-HTPh-BT-COF and the Pyr- ClTPh-BT-COF [18] (Figure 3), although they show similar bandgaps (2.25 and 2.36 eV, respectively), the chlorination of the BT ring provokes an 8-fold enhancement of the photocatalytic HER activity due to increased delocalization of electrons and charge density, the latter assisting in a dramatical reduction in the charge transfer barrier. Further, the average lifetime of the photoexcited carriers is enhanced 1.9 times up to 3.88 ns because of suppression of radiative charge recombination processes, and the AQE increases up to 8.45% at 420 nm, whereas DFT calculations indicate that the energy barrier for the observed H* intermediate in some sites is reduced by 0.83 eV compared with the non-chlorinated sample [18]. 2.4. Heterojunctions and Encapsulation of COFs with Other Materials A very successful alternative way to facilitate the spatial separation of photogener- ated electrons and holes and thus slow down their recombination is to hybridize COFs with either metallic conductors, inorganic semiconductors, or inorganic polymers (MOFs) through the use of heterojunctions. The underlying idea consists in the good matching bandgaps of the COF and the inorganic component of the hybrid systems, favoring charge separation across the two materials. The efficient charge separation across the covalent heterojunction interface in these hybrid materials makes them greatly efficient for this photocatalytic process, yielding superior H2 formation rates. Some significant examples are listed below: (1) the 2D/2D organic/inorganic hybrid composed of a honeycomb-like β-ketoenamine linked COF deposited in situ on top of an amine-substituted titanium car- bide derivative (NH2 -Ti3 C2 Tx ) through covalent Ti-O bonds [43], yielding a H2 production as high as 14.2 mmol·g−1 ·h−1 in the presence of Pt and an elevated AQE at 420 nm of 7.75%; (2) the β-ketoenamine linked COF obtained from reaction of TP with HTPh-BT-NH2 (Figure 3) deposited on top of g-C3 N4 , yielding 11.7 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 in the absence of Pt and 26.0 H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 in the presence of Pt [44]; (3) CTF-HUST-C1 deposited on top of 2 nm-thick black phosphorus nanosheets through P-C covalent bonds, yielding 17.1 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 in the absence of Pt [45]; (4) the MOF@COF system where a 20 nm hydrazone- linked COF shell was grown on top of the octahedral NH2 -UiO-66 Zr-based MOF through imine bonds, achieving a photocatalytic H2 evolution of 7.2 mmol·g−1 ·h−1 in the presence of Pt [46]; (5) the inverse approach in which a NH2 -UiO-66 Zr-based MOF layer was de- posited through imine covalent bond formation on top of a honeycomb-like β-ketoenamine linked COF (TpPa-1-COF) generated from reaction of TP with p-phenylenediamine (Pa-1) (Figure 3) to generate an extremely active COF@MOF hybrid system that yields 23.4 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 also in the presence of Pt [47]; and (6) the doping of a biphenyl-bridged CTF-based COF (CTF-HC2) with a 2D-Ni(II) pyrimidine-2-thiolate framework [48]. Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 12 of 17 Other strategies used have consisted in (1) the encapsulation of [Mo3 S13 ]2− anionic clusters into the channels of the positively charged honeycomb-like β-ketoenamine linked COF generated from reaction of TP (Figure 3) with ethidium bromide, generating a re- markable HER photocatalyst able to produce 13.2 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 over 18 h in the absence of Pt [49]; (2) the covalent modification of graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets (GCNS) by imine covalent bonding to the imine-linked COF formed from 4,40 ,4”-(1,3,5- triazine-2,4,6-triyl)trianiline (TTA) and TP (Figure 3), yielding the extraordinary value of 46.4 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 and an AQE of 31.8% at 425 nm in the presence of Pt [50]; and (3) the covalent anchoring of TpPa-1-COF onto reduced graphene oxide (rGO), achieving 12.0 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 in the presence of Pt [51]. In addition, two very interesting systems that do not need a Pt co-catalyst to be signifi- cantly active emerge from the combination of hexagonal hematite (α-Fe2 O3 ) nanosheets on top of the honeycomb-like β-ketoenamine linked TpPa-2-COF generated from re- action of TP with 2,5-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (Pa-2) (Figure 3) [52], rendering 3.8 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 ; and from the in situ growth of the TpPa-1-COF in exfoliated MoS2 , generating a hybrid system where MoS2 is deposited on top of the TpPa-1-COF [53]. Other possibilities include the deposition of CdS NPs on top COFs, such as the TpPa- 2-COF [54] or the CTF-1-COF [55]; and the use of TiO2 nanosheets functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) to chemically bind TpPa-1-COF onto its surface by imine bond formation [56], yielding 11.2 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 and an AQE of 7.6% at 420 nm in the presence of Pt. Finally, a completely different approach to promote efficient charge separation and larger photoexcitation rates as well as decreased non-radiative recombination processes consists in the insulation of the Pt NPs with a PVP-shell, which physically separates the COF from the co-catalyst but does not avoid their mutual electronic communication through electron tunneling. In the case of the TpTa-1-COF, the presence of the PVP-shell surrounding the Pt co-catalyst increases the whole photocatalytic HER efficiency up to 32 times, yielding a H2 production of 8.4 mmol g−1 ·h−1 [57]. 2.5. Choice of Metal Co-Catalyst As stated before, only a few COFs have shown significant photochemical activity in the HER without the need to add a metal-based co-catalyst [18,27,28,52,53]. Among the different transition metals able to promote the HER, until now very few works have used a metal co-catalyst other than Pt either in the molecular form or as NPs. Apart from enhancing the HER kinetics, co-catalysts can also reduce charge recombination by spatially separating and stabilizing charges. This highlights the need to tune the COF/co-catalyst interface to enhance the charge transfer to the co-catalyst and reduce charge recombination. A clear example is the case of non-covalently bonded molecular co-catalysts. Physically separated from the COF and working through outer-sphere electron-transfer processes, they show the competitive advantage of blocking charge recombination events. Thus, Lotsch et al. incorporated three different cobaloxime(III) co-catalysts within the azine-linked N2 - COF (Figure 4a) [58]. The same research group introduced a Ni thiolate hexameric cluster assembled in situ from a Ni(II) salt and 2-mercaptoethanol within a β-ketoenamine-linked crystalline COF bearing polar water-soluble N/S-containing 2,5-diphenyl-[1,3]-thiazolo[5,4- d][1,3]thiazole (DTz, Figure 3) bridges (TpDTz-COF) [25]. The superior photocatalytic HER activity of the TpDTz-COF/Ni-cluster system when compared with its counterpart bearing surface-bonded Pt NPs as co-catalyst is assigned to an effective blocking of charge recombination by the physiosorbed co-catalyst [25]. The presence of co-catalyst stabilizing groups on the COF’s structure has been shown to be relevant in some specific cases and is a strategy that can be further exploited to fine-tune both the morphology and intrinsic kinetics of the co-catalyst and the COF/co- catalyst interface (in relation to charge transfer and recombination processes). This is, for instance, the case for the crystalline CTF-COF containing bipyridine bridges (CTF-HC6) for which both Pd and Pt NPs were grown at its surface [59]. Pd, with better affinity Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 13 of 17 than Pt for the pyridylic N atoms of the COF bridges, yielded smaller NPs (2.9 nm vs. 4.3 nm in the case of Pt) at the COF surface, which resulted in superior photocatalytic HER activity (11.1 times higher for Pd than for Pt under the same experimental conditions). In a related but more recent strategy, the introduction of covalently bonded single co-catalyst atoms into the COF’s structure through synthetic covalent functionalization (generating the so-called metal-coordinated COFS, M-COFS) has also shown potential to improve charge separation and avoid recombination events. One example can be found in a binuclear Cu-containing COF, Cu-salphen-HDCOF [33]. The imine-linked salphen-HDCOF has two perfect vacancies for the binding of two Cu(II) ions in a N,N,O,O-tetradentate Schiff base environment. Thus, reaction of salphen-HDCOF with Cu(II) acetate leads to the formation of Cu-salphen-HDCOF, which, after exfoliation into narrow nanosheets, acts as the co- catalyst during the photocatalytic HER. Another example can be found in the Co-modified hydrazone-based NUS-55 COF obtained by reaction of the COF with [Co(bpy)3 ]Cl2 [34], with a moderate photocatalytic HER activity (2.5 mmol H2 ·g−1 ·h−1 ). Overall, together with the general challenge of finding alternatives to precious metals as co-catalysts in the COF-based photocatalytic HER while keeping the overall performance, further research on the engineering of appropriate COF/co-catalyst interfaces is required. The combination of COF post-functionalization strategies with the tunability of both NPs through surface functionalization with stabilizing agents and molecular/single-atom catalysts through ligand design provides a myriad of combinations to rationally design better interfaces with optimized charge-transfer and separation properties. 3. Final Remarks Regardless of all the aspects described above, at least four other issues that cannot be disregarded at all should be tackled soon. The first is the development of cheaper and cleaner synthetic methods for the obtention of COFs. Despite the efforts made in this aspect [60], there is still much room for improvement. The second, which is related to the first, is the advancement in larger synthetic scales to make COFs economically viable for practical applications [60]. The third is the deposition of COF-based thin-films for their direct use in (photo)electrodes. In addition, deactivation pathways due to co-catalyst loss or deactivation, photochemical decomposition, or other physicochemical processes that could also take place have been almost not studied so far. In our opinion, characterizing the fate of the photocatalyst is an unambiguous source of valuable information that is mandatory for designing future COF-mediated HER photocatalytic systems suitable to be incorporated in engineered solar fuel cells. Another very urgent issue to be resolved, which is common to all solar fuel fields, is to define an objective way to properly compare the photocatalytic HER activity of COF-based systems. Until now, the hydrogen production rate has been expressed as mmol of hydrogen produced per hour and per gram of photocatalyst. However, this is somehow misleading, because the photocatalytic activity does not necessarily depend linearly on the mass of the catalyst. Thus, it would be more reliable to compare photocatalytic activity data in terms of solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency, that is, the number of photons that are effectively used in the formation of hydrogen. This STH efficiency should be measured after defining a reference reactor setup under some standardized conditions for the light source (monochro- matic vs. white light), power, filters used (if any), and operation temperature, whereas the other parameters, such as solvent (ideally water to aqueous mixtures) and pH, strongly dependent on each particular system, should thus be clearly specified. Analogously, the AQE values reported so far cannot be fully comparable between different COFs either, since they have not always been measured using the same protocol. All in all, this review shows the great possibilities of COFs for their applicability in photocatalytic processes. A new myriad of photocatalytic reduction and oxidation processes still awaits, and the great variety of diameters of their pores can be employed for allocating several types of hosts that can act as co-catalysts in these reactions. We are fully Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 14 of 17 confident that very exciting new applications of new hybrid inorganic/COF systems will be seen in the coming years. Author Contributions: N.R. and R.B. carried out the information search and wrote a first draft of the manuscript, and L.F., J.G.-A. and X.S. proposed comparative discussions and modified parts of the manuscript. Frequent meetings between the authors helped to analyze and organize the findings until the final manuscript was obtained. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the project PID2019-104171RB-I00. L.F. is indebted to the Ramón y Cajal Program (RYC2018- 025394-I Fellowship) and to the Royal Society of Chemistry (R20-8077 Research Fund). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Abbreviations A acceptor AA ascorbic acid Ant anthracene AQE apparent quantum efficiency APTES 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane BDBA benzenediboronic acid BDDA 4,40 -(buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl)dianiline BET Brunauer–Emmett–Teller Bpy 2,20 -bipyridine BPDC 2,20 -bipyridine-5,50 -dicarbohydrazine BT benzothiadiazole CB conduction band COF covalent organic framework CCP-Th bithiophene-bridged C-linked conjugated polymer CTF covalent triazine framework D donor DCTMP 3,5-dicyano-2,4,6-trimethylpyridine DEA diethylamine DFP 2,6-diformylphenol DFPTP 4,400 -diformyl-p-terphenyl DTz 2,5-diphenyl-[1,3]-thiazolo[5,4-d][1,3]thiazole EDDA 4,40 -(ethyne-1,2-diyl)dianiline ERDN 3-ethylrhodanine FS fused sulfone GCNS graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets HATP 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene HER hydrogen evolution reaction HOMO highest occupied molecular orbital HHTP hexahydroxytriphenylene HUST Huazhong University of Science and Technology LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular orbital M-COF metal coordinated COF MOF metal organic framework NP nanoparticle PDAN 1,4-phenylenediacetonitrile POP porous organic polymer PTP phenyl tripyridyl PVP polyvinylpyrrolidone Pa-1 p-phenylenediamine Pa-2 2,5-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine Pyr pyrene Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 15 of 17 Pyr-CHO 4,40 ,400 ,4000 -(pyrene-1,3,6,8-tetrayl)benzaldehyde rGO reduced graphene oxide RHE reversible hydrogen electrode SED sacrificial electron donor STH solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency TEA triethylamine TEOA triethanolamine TFPPyr 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(p-formylphenyl)pyrene TFPT 1,3,5-tris-(4-formyl-phenyl)triazine TP 1,3,5-triformylphloroglucinol TPh terphenyl TTA 4,40 ,400 -(1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triyl)trianiline Tz tetrazine TZ thiazole VB valence band References 1. Côté, A.P.; Benin, A.I.; Ockwig, N.W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks. Science 2005, 310, 1166–1170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G.; Xu, P.; Chen, M.; Xiong, T.; Zhou, C.; Li, X.; et al. Covalent Organic Framework Photocatalysts: Structures and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4135–4165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Li, Z.; He, T.; Gong, Y.; Jiang, D. Covalent Organic Frameworks: Pore Design and Interface Engineering. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1672–1685. [CrossRef] 4. Peng, Y.; Li, L.; Zhu, C.; Chen, B.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tan, C.; Han, Y.; et al. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding- Based Topology Regulation of Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 13162–13169. [CrossRef] 5. Zhao, X.; Pachfule, P.; Li, S.; Langenhahn, T.; Ye, M.; Schlesiger, C.; Praetz, S.; Schmidt, J.; Thomas, A. Macro/Microporous Covalent Organic Frameworks for Efficient Electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6623–6630. [CrossRef] 6. Low, J.; Dai, B.; Tong, T.; Jiang, C.; Yu, J. In Situ Irradiated X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Investigation on a Direct Z-Scheme TiO2 /CdS Composite Film Photocatalyst. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1802981. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 7. Martin, D.J.; Liu, G.; Moniz, S.J.A.; Bi, Y.; Beale, A.M.; Ye, J.; Tang, J. Efficient Visible Driven Photocatalyst, Silver Phosphate: Performance, Understanding and Perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7808–7828. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 8. Dong, G.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Qiu, J. A Fantastic Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Material: Electronic Structure, Photocatalytic and Photoelectronic Properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2014, 20, 33–50. [CrossRef] 9. Stegbauer, L.; Schwinghammer, K.; Lotsch, B.V. A Hydrazone-Based Covalent Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 2789–2793. [CrossRef] 10. Zhang, T.; Xing, G.; Chen, W.; Chen, L. Porous Organic Polymers: A Promising Platform for Efficient Photocatalysis. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 332–353. [CrossRef] 11. Jayakumar, J.; Chou, H.H. Recent Advances in Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution from Water Using Polymer Photocata- lysts. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 689–704. [CrossRef] 12. Rahman, M.Z.; Kibria, M.G.; Mullins, C.B. Metal-Free Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1887–1931. [CrossRef] 13. Guo, L.; Jin, S. Stable Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photochemical Applications. ChemPhotoChem 2019, 3, 973–983. [CrossRef] 14. Banerjee, T.; Gottschling, K.; Savasci, G.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. H2 Evolution with Covalent Organic Framework Photocata- lysts. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 400–409. [CrossRef] 15. Banerjee, T.; Podjaski, F.; Kröger, J.; Biswal, B.P.; Lotsch, B.V. Polymer Photocatalysts for Solar-to-Chemical Energy Conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 6. [CrossRef] 16. You, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Bao, W. Recent Developments in the Photocatalytic Applications of Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125822. [CrossRef] 17. Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.-B. Covalent Organic Frameworks for Sunlight-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Lett. 2021, 50, 676–686. [CrossRef] 18. Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Mo, D.; He, F.; Wen, Z.; Wu, X.; Xu, H.; Chen, L. Modulating Benzothiadiazole-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks via Halogenation for Enhanced Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16902–16909. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 19. Vyas, V.S.; Haase, F.; Stegbauer, L.; Savasci, G.; Podjaski, F.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. A Tunable Azine Covalent Organic Framework Platform for Visible Light-Induced Hydrogen Generation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8508. [CrossRef] 20. Liu, M.; Huang, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Jin, S.; Tan, B. Crystalline Covalent Triazine Frameworks by In Situ Oxidation of Alcohols to Aldehyde Monomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11968–11972. [CrossRef] Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 16 of 17 21. Wang, K.; Yang, L.-M.; Wang, X.; Guo, L.; Cheng, G.; Zhang, C.; Jin, S.; Tan, B.; Cooper, A. Covalent Triazine Frameworks via a Low-Temperature Polycondensation Approach. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14149–14153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 22. Zhang, S.; Cheng, G.; Guo, L.; Wang, N.; Tan, B.; Jin, S. Strong-Base-Assisted Synthesis of a Crystalline Covalent Triazine Framework with High Hydrophilicity via Benzylamine Monomer for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 6063–6070. [CrossRef] 23. Pachfule, P.; Acharjya, A.; Roeser, J.; Langenhahn, T.; Schwarze, M.; Schomäcker, R.; Thomas, A.; Schmidt, J. Diacetylene Functionalized Covalent Organic Framework (COF) for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1423–1427. [CrossRef] 24. Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Chong, S.Y.; Little, M.A.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, W.H.; Clowes, R.; Yan, Y.; Zwijnenburg, M.A.; Sprick, R.S.; et al. Sulfone-Containing Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution from Water. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 1180–1189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Biswal, B.P.; Vignolo-González, H.A.; Banerjee, T.; Grunenberg, L.; Savasci, G.; Gottschling, K.; Nuss, J.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. Sustained Solar H2 Evolution from a Thiazolo[5,4-d]Thiazole-Bridged Covalent Organic Framework and Nickel-Thiolate Cluster in Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11082–11092. [CrossRef] 26. Jin, E.; Lan, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Geng, K.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Jiang, D. 2D Sp2 Carbon-Conjugated Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water. Chem 2019, 5, 1632–1647. [CrossRef] 27. Xu, S.; Sun, H.; Addicoat, M.; Biswal, B.P.; He, F.; Park, S.W.; Paasch, S.; Zhang, T.; Sheng, W.; Brunner, E.; et al. Thiophene-Bridged Donor–Acceptor Sp2-Carbon-Linked 2D Conjugated Polymers as Photocathodes for Water Reduction. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006274. [CrossRef] 28. Bi, S.; Yang, C.; Zhang, W.; Xu, J.; Liu, L.; Wu, D.; Wang, X.; Han, Y.; Liang, Q.; Zhang, F. Two-Dimensional Semiconducting Covalent Organic Frameworks via Condensation at Arylmethyl Carbon Atoms. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2467. [CrossRef] 29. Huang, W.; Luo, W.; Li, Y. Two-Dimensional Semiconducting Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Solar Fuel Production. Mater. Today 2020, 40, 160–172. [CrossRef] 30. He, T.; Geng, K.; Jiang, D. Engineering Covalent Organic Frameworks for Light-Driven Hydrogen Production from Water. Acs Mater. Lett. 2019, 1, 203–208. [CrossRef] 31. Qian, Z.; Wang, Z.J.; Zhang, K.A.I. Covalent Triazine Frameworks as Emerging Heterogeneous Photocatalysts. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 1909–1926. [CrossRef] 32. Ghosh, S.; Nakada, A.; Springer, M.A.; Kawaguchi, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kaji, H.; Baburin, I.; Kuc, A.; Heine, T.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Identification of Prime Factors to Maximize the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution of Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 9752–9762. [CrossRef] 33. Zang, Y.; Wang, R.; Shao, P.P.; Feng, X.; Wang, S.; Zang, S.Q.; Mak, T.C.W. Prefabricated Covalent Organic Framework Nanosheets with Double Vacancies: Anchoring Cu for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic H2evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 25094–25100. [CrossRef] 34. Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Peh, S.B.; Liu, G.; Kundu, T.; Dong, J.; Ying, Y.; Qian, Y.; Zhao, D. Cobalt-Containing Covalent Organic Frameworks for Visible Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. Sci. China Chem. 2020, 63, 192–197. [CrossRef] 35. Mi, Z.; Zhou, T.; Weng, W.; Unruangsri, J.; Hu, K.; Yang, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, K.A.I.; Guo, J. Covalent Organic Frameworks Enabling Site-Isolation of Viologen-Derived Electron Transfer Mediators for Stable Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9642–9649. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Li, S.; Wu, M.F.; Guo, T.; Zheng, L.L.; Wang, D.; Mu, Y.; Xing, Q.J.; Zou, J.P. Chlorine-Mediated Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Based on Triazine Covalent Organic Framework. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 272, 118989. [CrossRef] 37. Haase, F.; Banerjee, T.; Savasci, G.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. Structure-Property-Activity Relationships in a Pyridine Containing Azine-Linked Covalent Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 201, 247–264. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 38. Wang, K.; Jia, Z.; Bai, Y.; Wang, X.; Hodgkiss, S.E.; Chen, L.; Chong, S.Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Xu, Y.; et al. Synthesis of Stable Thiazole-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks via a Multicomponent Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11131–11138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 39. Gao, Z.Z.; Wang, Z.K.; Wei, L.; Yin, G.; Tian, J.; Liu, C.Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, D.W.; Zhang, Y.B.; Li, X.; et al. Water-Soluble 3D Covalent Organic Framework That Displays an Enhanced Enrichment Effect of Photosensitizers and Catalysts for the Reduction of Protons to H2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 1404–1411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Mo, C.; Yang, M.; Sun, F.; Jian, J.; Zhong, L.; Fang, Z.; Feng, J.; Yu, D. Alkene-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Efficient Charge Separation and Transfer in the Presence of Sacrificial Electron Donors. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902988. [CrossRef] 41. Chen, R.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Mal, A.; Gao, X.Y.; Gao, L.; Qiao, L.; Li, X.B.; Wu, L.Z.; Wang, C. Rational Design of Isostructural 2D Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks for Tunable Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1354. [CrossRef] 42. Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Gong, N.; Zhang, W.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Band-Gap Engineering of Layered Covalent Organic Frameworks via Controllable Exfoliation for Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2020, 45, 2689–2698. [CrossRef] Catalysts 2021, 11, 754 17 of 17 43. Wang, H.; Qian, C.; Liu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhou, W.; Gu, L.; Wu, H.; Liu, G.; Zhao, Y. Integrating Suitable Linkage of Covalent Organic Frameworks into Covalently Bridged Inorganic/Organic Hybrids toward Efficient Photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4862–4871. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Lin, C.; Han, C.; Gong, L.; Chen, X.; Deng, J.; Qi, D.; Bian, Y.; Wang, K.; Jiang, J. Donor–Acceptor Covalent Organic Framework/g-C 3 N 4 Hybrids for Efficient Visible Light Photocatalytic H 2 Production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 2616–2621. [CrossRef] 45. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Tao, L.; Bi, Y. Direct Observation of Dynamic Interfacial Bonding and Charge Transfer in Metal-Free Photocatalysts for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 283, 119633. [CrossRef] 46. Chen, Y.; Yang, D.; Shi, B.; Dai, W.; Ren, H.; An, K.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Z. In Situ Construction of Hydrazone- Linked COF-Based Core-Shell Hetero-Frameworks for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 7724–7732. [CrossRef] 47. Zhang, F.M.; Sheng, J.L.; Yang, Z.D.; Sun, X.J.; Tang, H.L.; Lu, M.; Dong, H.; Shen, F.C.; Liu, J.; Lan, Y.Q. Rational Design of MOF/COF Hybrid Materials for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution in the Presence of Sacrificial Electron Donors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12106–12110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 48. Xu, Z.; Cui, Y.; Guo, B.; Li, H.Y.; Li, H.X. Boosting Visible-Light-Driven H2 Evolution of Covalent Triazine Framework from Water by Modifying Ni(II) Pyrimidine-2-Thiolate Cocatalyst. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 958–965. [CrossRef] 49. Cheng, Y.J.; Wang, R.; Wang, S.; Xi, X.J.; Ma, L.F.; Zang, S.Q. Encapsulating [Mo3S13]2- Clusters in Cationic Covalent Or- ganic Frameworks: Enhancing Stability and Recyclability by Converting a Homogeneous Photocatalyst to a Heterogeneous Photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13563–13566. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Luo, M.; Yang, Q.; Yang, W.; Wang, J.; He, F.; Liu, K.; Cao, H.; Yan, H. Defects Engineering Leads to Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution on Graphitic Carbon Nitride–Covalent Organic Framework Nanosheet Composite. Small 2020, 16, 1–8. [CrossRef] 51. Yao, Y.H.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Tang, H.L.; Fang, L.; Niu, G.D.; Sun, X.J.; Zhang, F.M. Facile Synthesis of a Covalently Connected RGO-COF Hybrid Material by: In Situ Reaction for Enhanced Visible-Light Induced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 8949–8956. [CrossRef] 52. Zhang, Y.P.; Tang, H.L.; Dong, H.; Gao, M.Y.; Li, C.C.; Sun, X.J.; Wei, J.Z.; Qu, Y.; Li, Z.J.; Zhang, F.M. Covalent-Organic Framework Based Z-Scheme Heterostructured Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalysts for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 4334–4340. [CrossRef] 53. Gao, M.Y.; Li, C.C.; Tang, H.L.; Sun, X.J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, F.M. Boosting Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Evolution of Covalent Organic Frameworks through Compositing with MoS2: A Promising Candidate for Noble-Metal-Free Photocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 20193–20200. [CrossRef] 54. Thote, J.; Aiyappa, H.B.; Deshpande, A.; Díaz Díaz, D.; Kurungot, S.; Banerjee, R. A Covalent Organic Framework-Cadmium Sulfide Hybrid as a Prototype Photocatalyst for Visible-Light-Driven Hydrogen Production. Chemistry 2014, 20, 15961–15965. [CrossRef] 55. Wang, D.; Zeng, H.; Xiong, X.; Wu, M.F.; Xia, M.; Xie, M.; Zou, J.P.; Luo, S.L. Highly Efficient Charge Transfer in CdS-Covalent Organic Framework Nanocomposites for Stable Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution under Visible Light. Sci. Bull. 2020, 65, 113–122. [CrossRef] 56. Li, C.C.; Gao, M.Y.; Sun, X.J.; Tang, H.L.; Dong, H.; Zhang, F.M. Rational Combination of Covalent-Organic Framework and Nano TiO2 by Covalent Bonds to Realize Dramatically Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 266, 118586. [CrossRef] 57. Ming, J.; Liu, A.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, P.; Huang, H.; Lin, H.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Hofkens, J.; et al. Hot π-Electron Tunneling of Metal–Insulator–COF Nanostructures for Efficient Hydrogen Production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 18290–18294. [CrossRef] 58. Banerjee, T.; Haase, F.; Savasci, G.; Gottschling, K.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. Single-Site Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Covalent Organic Frameworks with Molecular Cobaloxime Co-Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 16228–16234. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 59. Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, K.; Jin, S.; Tan, B. Palladium as a Superior Cocatalyst to Platinum for Hydrogen Evolution Using Covalent Triazine Frameworks as a Support. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 12774–12782. [CrossRef] 60. Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, X.H.; Gao, R.Z.; Tang, A.N.; Kong, D.M. Green Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks Based on Reaction Media. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 1253–1267. [CrossRef]