Biogeographic history of royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Palearctic caudates revealed by a critical appraisal of their Research fossil record quality and Cite this article: Macaluso L, Mannion PD, spatio-temporal distribution Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 Evans SE, Carnevale G, Monti S, Marchitelli D, Delfino M. 2022 Biogeographic history of Palearctic caudates revealed by a critical appraisal Loredana Macaluso1, Philip D. Mannion2, of their fossil record quality and spatio-temporal Susan E. Evans3, Giorgio Carnevale1, Sara Monti1, distribution. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220935 Domenico Marchitelli1 and Massimo Delfino1,4 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125, Turin, Italy 2 Department of Earth Sciences, and 3Research Department of Cell and Developmental Received: 17 July 2022 Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK 4 Accepted: 9 November 2022 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici ICTAICP, c/ Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain LM, 0000-0002-6491-0498; PDM, 0000-0002-9361-6941; GC, 0000-0002-3433-4127; MD, 0000-0001-7836-7265 Subject Category: The disjunct geographical range of many lineages of caudates Earth and Environmental Science points to a complex evolutionary and biogeographic history that cannot be disentangled by only considering the present- Subject Areas: day distribution of salamander biodiversity. Here, we provide a biogeography/palaeontology critical reappraisal of the published fossil record of caudates from the Palearctic and quantitatively evaluate the quality Keywords: of the group’s fossil record. Stem-Urodela and Karauridae amphibians, sampling biases, Urodela, Eurasia, were widespread in the Palearctic in the Middle Jurassic, suggesting an earlier, unsampled diversification for this group. salamanders Cryptobranchidae reached Europe no later than the Oligocene, but this clade was subsequently extirpated from this continent, as well as from western and central Asia. The relatively recent Authors for correspondence: appearance of hynobiids in the fossil record (Early Miocene) is Loredana Macaluso most likely an artefact of a taphonomic bias against the preservation of high-mountain, stream-type environments e-mail: loredana.macaluso@unito.it which early members likely inhabited. Salamandroids first Massimo Delfino appear in Europe, expanding into Asia by the Miocene. The e-mail: massimo.delfino@unito.it apparently enigmatic and disjunct distribution of extant caudate lineages is therefore explained by a wider past geographical range, as testified by the fossil record, which was fragmented during the late Cenozoic by a combination of Electronic supplementary material is available tectonic (i.e. the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau) and climatic online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c. drivers, resulting in regional extirpations. 6303828. © 2022 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. 1. Introduction 2 royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Caudata, the total-group that comprises extant salamanders (Urodela) and stem-representatives, is a rich and diverse clade of lissamphibians, currently numbering ca 770 living species [1,2]. Nearly all of their present- day diversity is concentrated in the Holarctic, with a small number of species endemic to South America and southeast Asia [3]. This distribution largely reflects the evolutionary history of a group that first appeared and diversified in the northern part (Laurasia) of the supercontinent Pangea at the height of its Mesozoic fragmentation; thus, the group seemingly had little time to colonize its southern counterpart, Gondwana, prior to its separation [1]. Despite the large geographical area represented by the Palearctic ecozone (comprising Eurasia, north of the Himalayas, as well as northern Afro-Arabia) within the Holarctic realm, only a small portion of the taxonomic diversity of extant caudates currently inhabits it, representing approximately 15% of species (98 of 770) and 37% of genera (24 of 65), and including members of five families [4]. Instead, much of the extant diversity of Caudata is present in the Nearctic ecozone, which Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 covers most of North America, and mostly derives from the radiation of the family Plethodontidae. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Interestingly, some families are present in both the Nearctic and Palearctic ecozone. Cryptobranchidae and Hynobiidae are sister taxa and represent the two extant families of the Cryptobranchoidea [5]. Whereas cryptobranchids are present in both North America and Asia, hynobiids are restricted to Eurasia [3]. All other extant urodelans are part of Salamandroidea, the most speciose clade, including several families endemic to the Americas [6]. Many salamandroid lineages show a disjunct geographical range spanning North America and Eurasia (e.g. Plethodontidae, Proteidae and Salamandridae). These distributional patterns point to a complex evolutionary and biogeographic history that cannot be disentangled by considering only the present-day distribution of caudate biodiversity, which represents only a temporal snapshot that has been overprinted by extirpations and anthropogenic disturbances. Information about the caudate fossil record is scattered across an extensive literature, contrasting with syntheses documenting extant species (see e.g. [3,7] and the literature therein). Crucially, there have been no recent attempts to extensively evaluate the evolutionary history of the group through time and space, with the last systematic review of its global fossil record produced by Estes [8], over 40 years ago, and partially updated by Milner [9], who included part of Eurasia, northern Africa and the Middle East. The European fossil record was reviewed and evaluated by Rocě k [10], and Gao et al. [11] worked on synthesizing the Jurassic and Cretaceous salamander occurrences in China. Several subsequent studies have focused on the evolution and biogeography of caudates from smaller geographical areas, time intervals and/or sub- clades (e.g. [12–14]). The absence of an up-to-date, taxonomically and spatio-temporally more inclusive dataset limits our ability to synthesize this information, precluding an evaluation of the macroevolutionary and biogeographical history of caudates. As a first contribution to rectify this, here we provide a critical reappraisal of the published fossil record of caudates from the Palearctic, including occurrences of extant species. In tandem, we quantitatively evaluate the quality of the group’s fossil record, to better understand how the distribution of caudate diversity has been influenced by sampling biases through time and space. 2. Material and methods Data on the distribution of Palearctic caudates were extracted from the literature, including resources such as The Paleobiology Database (https://paleobiodb.org), as a starting point. We included occurrences of fossil remains that have been formally described and/or figured. For each caudate-bearing locality, the skeletal completeness of each distinct taxon was quantified based on the presence of elements of the different skeletal regions (i.e. skull, lower jaw, hyoid, vertebrae, ribs, limbs and girdles), with a score of ‘one’ if at least one element of the relative region is preserved (electronic supplementary material, appendix S1). Subsequently, these values were summed for each region, and a mean average completeness value was calculated for each time bin, normalized to 100 (see electronic supplementary material, appendix S2). To account for heterogeneous sampling of different time bins, we also calculated the ratio of the number of occurrences per time bin relative to the number of caudate-bearing localities. Taxonomic re-identifications based on our work not commented upon in the main text are reported in electronic supplementary material, appendix S3. As the taxonomic identification of fossil remains is, in the first instance, guided by our knowledge of diagnostic characters and variation among extant species, it is likely influenced by how extensively the different regions of skeletons of extant species have been studied. To detect possible publication biases concerning the osteology of extant species, we evaluated the information on the different skeletal regions of extant urodele species present in the literature (following the approach of [15]), comparing these data with the skeletal regions described from fossil localities. The subdivision Mesozoic Cenozoic 3 middle Paleocene Early Cretaceous middle Miocene Middle Triassic Middle Jurassic early Oligocene Late Cretaceous early Paleocene middle Eocene late Oligocene early Pliocene early Miocene Early Triassic late Paleocene Early Jurassic late Pliocene Late Triassic early Eocene late Miocene Late Jurassic late Eocene Pleistocene royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos higher classification species stem-Urodela Triassurus sixtelae stem-Urodela Egoria malashichevi stem-Urodela Urupia monstrosa stem-Urodela Pangerpeton sinensis stem-Urodela Beiyanerpeton jianpingensis stem-Urodela Chunerpeton tianyiensis stem-Urodela Linglongtriton daxishanensis stem-Urodela Qinglongtriton gangouensis stem-Urodela Kulgeriherpeton ultimum Karauridae Marmorerpeton spp. Karauridae Kokartus honorarius Karauridae Karaurus sharovi incertae sedis Sinerpeton fengshanensis incertae sedis Laccotriton subsolanus incertae sedis cf. Kababisha incertae sedis Ramonellus longispinus Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 incertae sedis Regalerpeton weichangensis incertae sedis Hylaeobatrachus croyii R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 incertae sedis Jeholotriton paradoxus incertae sedis Nesovtriton mynbulakensis incertae sedis Nuominerpeton aquilonaris incertae sedis Liaoxitriton zhongjiani incertae sedis Balveherpeton hoennetalensis incertae sedis Galverpeton ibericum incertae sedis Wolterstorffiella wiggeri incertae sedis Geyeriella spp. incertae sedis Seminobatrachus boltyschkensis stem-Cryptobranchidae Ukrainurus hypsognathus Cryptobranchidae Eoscapherpeton spp. Cryptobranchidae Aviturus exsecratus Cryptobranchidae Andrias scheuchzeri Cryptobranchidae Zaissanurus beliajevae Hynobiidae Salamandrella spp. Hynobiidae Ranodon sp. Hynobiidae Parahynobius spp. stem-Salamandroidea Kiyatriton krasnolutskii stem-Salamandroidea Kiyatriton leshchinskiyi stem-Salamandroidea Apricosiren ensomi stem-Salamandroidea Valdotriton gracilis Batrachosauroididae Palaeoproteus spp. Batrachosauroididae indet. Proteidae 'Bishara backa' Proteidae Mioproteus spp. Proteidae Euronecturus grogu Plethodontidae Speleomantes sp. Salamandridae Koalliella spp. Salamandridae Chelotriton spp. Salamandridae Brachycormus noachicus Salamandridae Palaeopleurodeles hauffi Salamandridae Archaeotriton basalticus Salamandridae Carpathotriton spp. Salamandridae Megalotriton spp. Salamandridae Salamandra spp. Salamandridae Chioglossa spp. Salamandridae Mertensiella spp. Salamandridae Lissotriton spp. Salamandridae ?Ichthyosaura randeckensis Salamandridae Ichthyosaura spp. Salamandridae Oligosemia spinosa Salamandridae aff. Salamandrina Salamandridae Salamadrina sp. Salamandridae Pleurodeles sp. Salamandridae aff. Tylototriton Salamandridae Triturus (s.s.) sp. Salamandridae cf. Triturus (s.l.) Salamandridae Triturus (s.l.) Salamandridae Procynops miocenicus Figure 1. Stratigraphic ranges of fossil occurrences of Palearctic taxa of caudates. spp. = stratigraphic range referred to more than one species belonging to the genus; sp. = record with identification at the genus level. See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for details about localities. of the cranium into skull and lower jaw follows Hildebrand [16]. The complete reference list used to estimate the current knowledge of the osteology of extant species is provided in electronic supplementary material, appendix S4. Distribution maps were produced with QGIS 3.12.1 [17]. 3. Results 3.1. Distribution of spatio-temporal and osteological data A total of 234 taxonomic occurrences (taxon per locality data) from European localities and 86 from Asian localities are recognized, and only six occurrences from northern Africa. The stratigraphic range for each species is presented in figure 1 and the spatio-temporal distribution of each taxonomic group is presented in figures 2–4. Most of the occurrences are from the Neogene (167 occurrences), 55 occurrences known from the Quaternary, 42 from the Paleogene, 36 occurrences from the Cretaceous, 25 from the Jurassic 4 royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos (a) 0 1000 2000 km Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Late Miocene late Eocene Paleocene (b) Early-Late Cretaceous Middle/Late Jurassic Late Jurassic Middle Jurassic Triassic (c) Figure 2. Map of fossil localities yielding remains of Palearctic caudates: (a) stem-Urodela and Karauridae, (b) Batrachosauroididae and (c) possible stem-Salamandroidea. See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for details about taxa and localities. Black arrows indicate the possible dispersal routes of the group suggested by the stratigraphic range of the fossil occurrences. Localities with stratigraphic ranges with uncertainty or laying on the boundary between two periods were labelled as pertaining to the older period (e.g. ‘Middle–Late Jurassic’ was labelled as ‘Middle Jurassic’, but see electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for the exact range of each locality). and just one from the Triassic (figure 5). The vast majority of fossil remains (ca 87% of the occurrences) is represented by disarticulated elements and not by complete or partially articulated skeletons (figure 6). Among these, vertebrae are almost always present ( present in ca 93% of the occurrences represented by disarticulated elements), followed by skull elements and limbs ( present in ca 20.7% and 21% of occurrences, respectively), and this is constistent in all time bins (figure 7). In the published literature, most of the information about extant urodelan osteology is focused on limbs and skulls (ca 50% of the references include data on these districts), whereas vertebrae of extant Palearctic salamanders are less frequently described (in ca 35% of the references) (figure 7). 3.2. Palearctic fossil record 3.2.1. Triassic–Jurassic The stratigraphically earliest known species of caudate from Eurasia (as well as of the planet) is Triassurus sixtelae, from the Middle/Late Triassic of Kyrgyzstan [18,19]. No further caudate specimens have been 5 0 1000 2000 km royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos S2 S1 Early-Middle Pleistocene (a) Early-Late Pliocene Late Miocene Middle Miocene Early Miocene early-late Oligocene late Eocene Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 late Paleocene R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Late Cretaceous Early Cretaceous Late Jurassic Middle Jurassic (b) Figure 3. Map of fossil localities yielding remains of Palearctic Cryptobranchoidea: (a) Cryptobranchidae and (b) Hynobiidae. S1 = stem-Cryptobranchoidea (Nuominerpeton aquilonaris); S2 = stem-Cryptobranchidae (Ukrainurus hypsognathus). See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for details about taxa and localities. Black arrows indicate the possible dispersal routes of the group suggested by the stratigraphic range of the fossil occurrences. Localities with stratigraphic ranges with uncertainty or laying on the boundary between two periods were labelled as pertaining to the older period (e.g. ‘Middle–Late Jurassic’ was labelled as ‘Middle Jurassic’, but see electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for the exact range of each locality). (a) (b) Holocene Early Miocene Late Pleistocene late Oligocene Middle Pleistocene early Oligocene Early Pleistocene middle–late Eocene Late Pliocene early Eocene Early Pliocene middle–late Paleocene Late Miocene Late Cretaceous Middle Miocene Early Cretaceous (c) Figure 4. Map of fossil localities yielding remains of Palearctic Salamandroidea: (a) Proteidae, (b) Plethodontidae and (c) Salamandridae. See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for details about taxa and localities. Black arrows indicate the possible dispersal routes of the group suggested by the stratigraphic range of the fossil occurrences. Localities with stratigraphic ranges with uncertainty or laying on the boundary between two periods were labelled as pertaining to the older period (e.g. ‘Middle–Late Jurassic’ was labelled as ‘Middle Jurassic’, but see electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for the exact range of each locality). identified from the Triassic of Eurasia, and the group also lacks an Early Jurassic record from this region. The only possible report from the Early Jurassic consists of three mandibles from India reported as being from sirenids [20], but they do not belong to an urodele according to Milner [21] and Gardner [22]. A rich caudate record is documented from Middle Jurassic strata, with most taxa described from Asia [13,23] 6 (figure 2). This comprises Kokartus honorarius from Kyrgyzstan [24,25], the stem-urodeles Urupia royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos monstrosa and Egoria malashichevi from Russia [26,27], as well as Kiyatriton krasnolutskii, a possible cryptobranchoid from Russia ([28], but see the ‘Early Cretaceous’ section below for a different interpretation) (figure 1). As noted by Skutschas [13], the Russian species U. monstrosa shows close affinities to the genus Marmorerpeton, from the Middle Jurassic of the UK, in particular the species M. freemani [29], whereas E. malashichevi (from the same assemblage as U. monstrosa) is strikingly similar to a second species of Marmorerpeton, M. kermacki [29]. These similarities suggest that these Russian and UK species could belong to the same lineage of stem-salamanders, which would indicate that it was already widely dispersed across Eurasia by the Middle Jurassic. Recent analyses confirm the attribution of Marmorerpeton and Kokartus, at least, to the Karauridae ([30]; see below). A fragmentary trunk vertebra from the Middle Jurassic of Russia has been tentatively identified as an indeterminate salamandroid [31], but more complete material will be required to confidently Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 determine its affinities. Currently, Marmorerpeton is the only named caudate genus from the Middle R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Jurassic of Europe, although contemporaneous specimens belonging to two additional taxa (informally known as ‘Kirtlington Salamander A’ and ‘Kirtlington Salamander B’) have also been documented from the UK [32–34] and are currently under study. Fossils of caudates are rare on the African continent and they remain mostly undescribed. Reported occurrences from the Triassic– Jurassic interval are limited to the Middle Jurassic of Morocco and Madagascar, but their fragmentary nature means that it is uncertain whether they are even attributable to Caudata [35,36]. Several genera and species are known from the Middle/Late Jurassic boundary of China, including the stem-urodeles Chunerpeton tianyiensis [30,37,38] and Neimengtriton daohugouensis [30,39,40]. Beiyanerpeton jianpingensis [41] and Qinglongtriton gangouensis [42] were recovered in an early- branching position within Salamandroidea by Jia & Gao [43], whereas Linglongtriton daxishanensis [43] and Pangerpeton sinensis [44] were placed on the stem-hynobiid lineage [43]. However, all these taxa were identified as stem-urodeles in the recent analysis of Jones et al. [30]. In general, Jurassic taxa from China are mostly known from slabs, often as skeletal impressions, making it difficult to evaluate their relationships with other fossil species that are only known from isolated, three-dimensional remains (but see [44] and [43] for detailed studies of their possible phylogenetic relationships). No Late Jurassic caudate remains have currently been described from Europe or Afro-Arabia. Karaurus sharovi was described from the Late Jurassic of Kazakhstan by Ivakhnenko [18], who placed it in a new family, Karauridae. In addition to some indeterminate remains from the Middle Jurassic of Russia [45,46], both Kokartus and Marmorerpeton can be attributed to this family (see above). 3.2.2. Early Cretaceous The Early Cretaceous European fossil record is far richer than its Jurassic counterpart (figure 2), with Apricosiren ensomi from the UK [47], Balveherpeton hoennetalensis from Germany [48], Galverpeton ibericum and Valdotriton gracilis from Spain [49,50] and Hylaeobatrachus croyi from Belgium [8,51]. Apricosiren and Valdotriton have been suggested to be closely related taxa, placed as early diverging members of Salamandroidea [47]. One recent phylogenetic analysis, however, recovered Valdotriton as sister taxon of the extant North American ambystomatid salamandroid genus Ambystoma [43], whereas the analysis of Jones et al. [30] placed Valdotriton on the salamandroid stem. The morphology of the vertebrae (including the atlas) of Valdotriton and K. leshchinskiyi is similar, whereas the morphology of the other known species of Kiyatriton, K. krasnolutskii (see above) shares features with the morphologically plesiomorphic family Ambystomatidae, notably the unseparated articular surface of the odontoid process, the flat occipital cotyle, as well as the length (relative to the width) of the centrum (see [52]: figure 2). Based on these considerations, we agree with Jones et al. [30] that Valdotriton belongs to the stem of Salamandroidea and we suggest that Kiyatriton and Apricosiren might also occupy a similar phylogenetic position. Both Hylaeobatrachus, known from a single larval or paedomorphic specimen, and Galverpeton, known from a single trunk vertebra, have an uncertain placement within Caudata [49,50]. In the case of this latter taxon, it appears to be most similar to extant early branching North American plethodontids, given the presence of opisthocoely and a single neural crest with a posterodorsal bulge; however, the trunk vertebra lacks a fully enclosed spinal nerve, which is a synapomorphy of Plethodontidae [53], and its placement is therefore uncertain. Several approximately contemporaneous caudate occurrences from the UK have been identified as distinct taxa, but they have yet to receive a formal name and have generally been referred to as ‘Ashdown type 1–4 salamanders’, ‘Keymer salamander’ and ‘Wessex Formation type 1–3 7 salamanders’, referring to the horizons that yielded them [54]. The Ashdown type 2, 4 and Keymer royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos salamanders share some features with Balveherpethon, including a thick and strongly elongated odontoid process and a dorsoventally compressed, shallowly concave anterior cotyle, but also show differences. The morphology of these atlantes closely resembles that of the scapherpetontid species Lisserpeton bairdi from the latest Cretaceous of North America [55]. Post-atlantal vertebrae referred to Balveherpeton also show similarities with this extinct family (and Lisserpeton in particular), including the presence of a ventral keel and anterior and/or posterior basapophyses [48]. Previous authors have mentioned the presence of Scapherpetontidae in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic of Europe but have not described or figured this material [56,57]. Balveherpeton and at least some of the UK remains could be related to Scapherpetontidae, but the UK atlantes show a pronounced elongation that differentiate them from those of scapherpetontids (characterized by short atlantes) making them somewhat more similar to Ambystomatidae and stem-salamandroids. These taxa are therefore retained as incertae sedis Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 within caudates pending further study, especially with regards to variability in extant R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 ambystomatids and extinct scapherpetontids. Remains referred to an indeterminate taxon of the otherwise primarily North American extinct family Batrachosauroididae were reported from the Early Cretaceous of the UK [47]. Among the UK remains described by Sweetman & Evans [54] is a postatlantal vertebra, BEXHM: 2010 16.14, with an unusual morphology. This specimen shares characters with some extant proteid species, including a strongly posteriorly projecting neural arch that extends beyond the postzygapophyses, and the combination of a hollow parapophysis and solid diapophysis [58]. Whereas it differs from the European lineage of Mioproteus/Proteus (see below), BEXHM: 2010 16.14 shares these (and other) features with the extant North American genus Necturus, whose fossil record extends back to the late Paleocene of Canada [58]. Because of this close similarity, it is possible that BEXHM: 2010 16.14 represents an early occurrence of a proteid lineage distinct from Mioproteus/Proteus, possibly leading to the species Euronecturus grogu, recently described from the Middle Miocene of Germany ([59]; see below). Ramonellus longispinus, from the Early Cretaceous of Israel [60], represents a possible caudate of uncertain affinities and is the sole pre-Pleistocene fossil occurrence of the group known from the Arabian Peninsula or Levant region [36]. No caudate remains have been described from the Early Cretaceous of Africa [36]. The Asian record is rich in the Early Cretaceous. Chinese taxa are represented by the proposed stem- hynobiids Nuominerpeton aquilonaris and Liaoxitriton zhongjiani [42,61], the possible salamandroid Regalerpeton weichangensis [62,63], as well as Jeholotriton paradoxus [64] (figures 1 and 3). However, the phylogenetic positions of all of these Chinese species are uncertain [43], with cryptobranchoid [65], salamandroid [63] and stem caudate [30] affinities proposed. Sinerpeton fengshanensis and Laccotriton subsolanus are non-salamandroid caudates of uncertain placement described by Gao & Shubin [66] and Gao et al. [67], respectively. A stratigraphically younger species of the putative salamandroid Kiyatriton (K. leshchinskiyi) is recognized from the Early Cretaceous of Russia [68,69], as is the stem- urodele Kulgeriherpeton ultimum [70]. 3.2.3. Late Cretaceous The European record of Late Cretaceous caudates is scarce, limited to indeterminate and/or undescribed remains from France, Portugal and Spain (e.g. [71–74]). Among these, Garcia et al. [73] proposed that a specimen from France has possible plethodontid affinities, but a Batrachosauroididae affinity cannot be ruled out based on the published descriptions. Generically indeterminate remains of this family have also been described from a coeval locality in France [75], and indeterminate remains described by Duffaud & Rage [72] from Spain might also be referrable to this family. There is a slightly richer record from Asia, although these occurrences are restricted to Central Asia [13,23]. Several localities have yielded remains attributed to the cryptobranchid Eoscapherpeton, with E. asiaticum and E. (Horezmia) gracilis recognized in Uzbekistan [13,76], and specifically indeterminate remains from Kazakhstan [23] and Tajikistan ([13]; originally described as E. superum by Nessov [77]). Cryptobranchoid affinities have also been suggested with caution for Nessovtriton mynbulakensis, from Uzbekistan [13,78]. Finally, Nessov [24,77] described Bishara backa from Kazakhstan, which he tentatively identified as a prosirenid. Skutschas [13] noted that the known material of Bishara backa (a partial atlas, now lost) could be referred to the family Proteidae. An additional atlas figured by Skutschas [13] bears a striking similarity with the extinct proteid Mioproteus [79,80], whereas it clearly differs from both Euronecturus and Necturus [59]. As such, we agree with Skutschas [13] that Bishara backa 8 potentially represents another proteid lineage in the Cretaceous of Eurasia. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Several occurrences of caudate have been documented from the Late Cretaceous of Africa [36]. Two species of Kababisha (K. humarensis and K. sudanensis) were described by Evans et al. [81] from the Late Cretaceous of Sudan. As Sudan is not part of the Palearctic ecozone, these species were not included in the dataset used for the completeness analysis (electronic supplementary material, appendix S1), but they are discussed here due to their uniqueness, as the only caudates (extinct or extant) ever reported south of the Sahara Desert. Morphologically, Kababisha shows a close affinity with the extant North American early-branching salamandroid family Sirenidae [81]. Fossil material from the Late Cretaceous of Niger and Morocco has been regarded as similar to this genus (cf. Kababisha; [82,83]). No stratigraphically younger caudate fossil occurrences have been described from Africa prior to the Pleistocene. Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 3.2.4. Paleocene R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 The Paleocene record of Eurasian caudates is scarce. The stratigraphically oldest remains come from the early Paleocene Hainin site in Belgium [84–86], with material attributed to Palaeoproteus gallicus [87], a member of the enigmatic batrachosauroidid clade (figures 1 and 2). Palaeoproteus gallicus was firstly described from the late Paleocene of northeastern France [87,88] (figure 2). The highest diversity of Eurasian caudates from this epoch is represented at the middle Paleocene Walbeck locality in northeastern Germany, with three puzzling caudate taxa (Geyeriella mertensi, Koalliella genzeli and Wolterstorffiella wiggeri) described by Herre [89]. Geyeriella mertensi is represented in this fossil assemblage by 19 disarticulated post-atlantal vertebrae and was referred to the salamandroid ambystomatid subfamily Dicamptodontinae (genus Dicamptodon, currently belonging to the Dicamptodontidae family) by Estes [8]. These vertebrae share several characters with the Mesozoic taxon Valdotriton, including double-headed transverse processes, anterior basapophyses and a posteriorly projecting neural arch that results in a short, horizontal neural spine. Estes [8] suggested that Geyeriella might be congeneric with the salamandroid Bargmannia wettsteini, from the Late Miocene of Slovakia [90], and here we agree with his interpretation. From the same Paleocene locality as G. mertensi, an atlas was referred by Herre [89] to the salamandrid Koalliella genzeli, but, although we agree with him that the morphology of both trunk and caudal vertebrae attributed to Koalliella shows the typical salamandrid morphology, the atlas does not exhibit diagnostic characters that would support this attribution. The unseparated articular surface of the odontoid process, as well as the flat, vertical occipital cotyle, means that the atlas is most similar to those of Kiyatriton krasnolutskii and Geyeriella wettsteini [28,90]. Therefore, we suggest that the atlas referred by Herre [89] to Koalliella genzeli is more likely to belong to Geyeriella mertensi. These atlantes have the same plesiomorphic salamandroid atlantal morphology as those of Valdotriton and Kiyatriton, and resemble that of the extant genus Ambystoma [52], pointing to a possible stem-salamandroid position for these remains (figure 2c). Wolterstorffiella wiggeri appears to have a close affinity with Cryptobranchoidea, based on a suite of characters, including amphicoelous vertebrae, absence of ventral keel and basapophyses, confluent diapophyses and parapophyses, and a posterodorsal bulge formed by the neural arch and the horizontal neural spine in trunk vertebrae, which is replaced in the caudal vertebrae by two divergent bulges ([89]: figures 1, 4, 5). The overall size of the vertebrae figured by Herre [89] points to a cryptobranchid affinity; however, the relatively small vertebral centrum (compared with the neural arch) is closer to that of hynobiids, including the extant taxon Salamandrella [91], as well as the extinct genus Parahynobius (see below; [92]). Wolterstorffiella is therefore herein considered a putative cryptobranchoid species, even though only first-hand observation of the material can confirm this attribution (i.e. the absence of the foramina for the exit of the spinal nerve needs to be confirmed). Koalliella genzeli is known solely from isolated vertebrae, showing the typical morphology of salamandrids ([89]: fig. 11). In particular, these vertebrae are characterized by the dorsally enlarged neural crest typical of the extinct Neogene Eurasian taxa Chelotriton and Lissotriton rohrsi (see below), as well as extant crocodile-newts from southeast Asia (i.e. the Tylototriton/Echinotriton group; [93,94]). Two isolated vertebrae from Cernay (late Paleocene of France) were identified as Koalliella sp. by Estes et al. [88]. One of these vertebrae differs from the Koalliella type material (as well as the other Cernay vertebra) in that it has posterior basapophyses. However, this is perhaps not surprising, given that several salamandrid species are characterized by posterior basapophyses in the first or second caudosacral vertebrae, representing the first bulge of the haemal arch [95]. This interpretation of vertebral position is supported by the transverse processes in the Cernay specimen, which are 9 dorsoventrally developed (forming a vertical lamina in lateral view) and lack articulations for ribs, as royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos is typical for non-rib-bearing caudosacral vertebrae. The general outline of the vertebra figured by Estes et al. [88] is indeed similar to Koalliella genzeli, but also shows some similarities with the North American salamandrid genus Taricha, including the extinct species T. miocenica and T. oligocenica [8]. In particular, it shares the presence of lateral eversion of the dorsal capping plates (sensu [96]) covering the neural crest, which also characterizes the extant European species of Salamandrina. The attribution to Koalliella is herein tentatively supported, pending further study on its relationship with other genera of caudates that show vertebral capping on the neural crest. A putative salamandrid (cf. Salamandra sp.) was also reported from the Cernay assemblage by Estes et al. [88], further supporting the presence of that clade in the Paleocene of Europe. However, it is highly unlikely that this specimen is referrable to Salamandra, as the ventral lamina of the vertebra is expanded, contrasting with the absent or reduced ventral crest that typically characterizes vertebrae Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 of Salamandra [95]. The material is too fragmentary to provide a generic attribution and is herein R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 regarded as an indeterminate specimen belonging to Salamandridae. Seminobatrachus boltyschkensis is known from multiple skeletons from Ukraine; however, its stratigraphic age is poorly constrained, and it could be late Paleocene or early Eocene [65] (figure 1). The affinities of Seminobatrachus are uncertain, but the phylogenetic analysis of Skutschas & Gubin [65] suggested a close relationship with Ambystomatidae. An unequivocal attribution to this family was excluded by the presence of a ventral keel on trunk vertebrae, but this structure is highly variable and evolved and disappeared several times independently in different salamander groups (e.g. Batrachosauroididae, Proteidae). Furthermore, the vertebrae of the putative stem-salamandroid Geyeriella are also characterized by the presence of a ventral keel [89,90]. The Asian record is limited to a single locality in the late Paleocene of Mongolia (figure 3a), which has yielded the cryptobranchid Aviturus exsecratus [97,98]. A second species, Ulanurus fractus, was also described from this locality by Gubin [97], but this has since been synonymized with Aviturus exsecratus by Vasilyan et al. [99]. 3.2.5. Eocene A second species of the batrachosauroidid, Palaeoproteus, was described from the middle Eocene of Germany by Herre [100]. This species, P. klatti, is known from almost complete skeletons [100]. The salamandrid Chelotriton is one of the most common taxa in European vertebrate assemblages, spanning the middle Eocene through to the Pliocene (figures 1 and 4c; [8,14,79,101–120]). According to Marjanović & Witzmann [115], Chelotriton is an early-branching member of the extant salamandrid group Pleurodelinae (the sub-family including all extant ‘newts’). The taxonomic history of this genus is complex and controversial. Most of the remains attributed to this genus have been referred to the species Chelotriton paradoxus, originally described by Pomel [121] from the late Oligocene and Early Miocene of France and Germany, respectively. Estes [8] synonymized several taxa from the Oligocene–Miocene of Germany with Chelotriton paradoxus, namely Tylototriton primigenius [122], Heliarchon [123], and Grippiella, Palaeosalamandrina and Tischleriella (all described by Herre [124]). The species Chelotriton robustus was described based on a single, complete and articulated skeleton from the middle Eocene of Germany by Westphal [125]. Nussbaum & Brodie [126] considered the species Tylototriton weigelti [100], from the middle Eocene of Germany, as a valid species of the extant pleurodeline Asian genus Tylototriton; however, Roček [127] argued that this species should be referred to Chelotriton, with which we agree. Whether these Eocene remains should be assigned to C. paradoxus or they belong to one or two separate species requires further study. Pending detailed descriptions of the specimens, we tentatively consider C. robustus and C. weigelti as valid species of Chelotriton. Chelotriton ogygius (= Salamandra ogygia sensu [128] = Polysemia ogygia sensu [123] = Epipolysemia ogygia sensu [129]) was described based on a nearly complete skeleton from the Early Miocene of Germany [8] and has been regarded as a nomen dubium by many authors (e.g. [116]). Given that the type material seems to be lost, Estes [8] argued that possible synonymy of C. ogygius with C. paradoxus cannot be conclusively demonstrated. As such, we tentatively retain C. ogygius as a distinct species of Chelotriton. An indeterminate salamandrid was described from the early Eocene of Portugal by Rage & Augé [130]. The vertebrae of this specimen show the typical cap of the neural crest of Koalliella and Salamandrina, and a general morphology compatible with these two taxa. Based on the known stratigraphic distributions of these two genera, these remains are herein referred to cf. Koalliella sp., pending further study clarifying the relationship of this taxon. A vertebra from the early Eocene of 10 Dormaal, Belgium, was described as similar to Tylototriton by Hecht & Hoffstetter [131]. However, it royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos was assigned to Koalliella sp. by Godinot et al. [132] and Estes [8]. From the same time interval, Augé et al. [133] described vertebrae with a similar dermal capping of the neural crest from France, referring them to an indeterminate salamandrid. As these specimens were not figured, we refrain from providing a more refined attribution than Salamandridae indet, but it is possible that these Belgian and French remains will ultimately be referable to cf. Koalliella sp. Fragmentary remains from contemporaneous French deposits have also been attributed to a salamandrid [134]; the only preserved vertebra lacks dorsal capping of the neural crest and we regard this material as representing an indeterminate salamandrid. An exceptional finding is represented by the species Phosphotriton sigei from the middle/late Eocene of France [135,136], a mummified salamandrid of uncertain placement. An additional salamandrid, Megalotriton filholi, was described from the late Eocene or early Oligocene of France [137,138] Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 (figure 1); it was subsequently reported from the late Eocene of Switzerland [8] and Early Miocene of R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Spain [139]. According to Estes [8], this taxon shows the closest affinity with Salamandra sansaniensis (see below), differentiated by the larger diameter of the transverse processes, cotyle, and condyle of trunk vertebrae in Megalotriton filholi. We retain it as a distinct genus, but it could represent the earliest known member of the Salamandra lineage. The published Asian record of Eocene caudates is scarce [12]. It is restricted to the cryptobranchoid Zaissanurus beliajevae [140], which is known from specimens from the late Eocene and early Oligocene of Kazakhstan [12] (figure 3a). 3.2.6. Oligocene The most common (extinct) species of Eurasian cryptobranchoid during the late Paleogene–Neogene is the cryptobranchid Andrias scheuchzeri [141]. Its stratigraphic range extends from the late Oligocene to the Late Miocene, and it is known from several localities in Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic, as well as Kazakhstan ([140,142,143], see also [12]) (figure 3a). Excluding the two possible Cretaceous occurrences mentioned above, the stratigraphically oldest unequivocal occurrence of a proteid is Mioproteus gardneri (figures 1 and 4a). This taxon was described from the early Oligocene of Romania by Venczel & Codrea [80] and it appears to be closely related to the extant European genus Proteus [59,144]. The salamandrid Salamandra sansaniensis, first described by Lartet [145], is one of the most common late Paleogene–Neogene species in Europe (figures 1 and 4c). Its stratigraphic range extends from the early Oligocene to the Late Miocene, including several localities in Austria, France, Germany and Spain [8,90,101,103,104,112,114,146–148]. Rage [149] referred a specimen from the middle Eocene of France to Salamandra sansaniensis. Although this would not necessitate a large stratigraphic range extension, we are doubtful of its attribution based on an absence of clear Salamandra synapomorphies and because of the mainly size-dependent separation between this latter genus and the Eocene taxon Megalotriton (see above). Salamandra sansaniensis was regarded as the senior synonym of several contemporaneous fossil salamandrid taxa by Estes [8], including Salamandra broilii, Salamandra laticeps, and the species included in the genera Heteroclitotriton, Dehmiella, Voigtiella and Palaeosalamandra, which we broadly follow. However, the synonimization of Salamandra laticeps, from the Early Miocene of Germany, with S. sansaniensis was questioned by Nussbaum & Brodie [126], who noted similarities between the holotype of the former species (figured by Meyer [123]) and the extant East Asian crocodile newt Echinotriton. In particular, the triangular skull of Salamandra laticeps is much broader than long, and the size and shape of the ribs are more similar to those typical of the crocodile newt, and, especially, of Echinotriton. Palaeopleurodeles hauffi, from the late Oligocene of Germany [8,126,150], also shares similarities with Echinotriton. As such, we suggest that ‘Salamandra’ laticeps and Palaeopleurodeles hauffi are probable members of this pleurodeline lineage. The salamandrid Archaeotriton basalticus, from the early Oligocene of the Czech Republic and Germany, was described as a Triturus-group newt [8,151]. It has very high neural crests in both trunk and caudal vertebrae, with the neural crest twice as high as the remainder of the vertebra [8]. As such, this species might represent an early member of this pleurodeline lineage. Brachycormus noachius, from the late Oligocene of Germany, was initially described by Goldfuss [128], and subsequently by Meyer [123]. A revision of the morphology and systematics of this salamandrid species was presented by Roček [152]. This author also regarded Tylototriton kosswigi, from the Oligocene of Germany [124], as a junior synonym of B. noachius [152], contrasting with the hypothesis of Nussbaum & Brodie [126] of it pertaining to the extant Asian genus. We agree with the taxonomic 11 proposal of Roček [152], with Tylototriton entirely absent from the European fossil record. Two royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos isolated vertebrae from the late Oligocene of Germany have been considered to have affinities with to Brachycormus [143]. Böhme [143] noted a clear resemblance between these vertebrae and those of the extant genus Salamandrina, but also commented that the absence of a zygosphene/zygantrum complex in the fossil remains excludes attribution to this genus. However, as discussed above, the presence and degree of development of this complex is highly variable in extant Salamandrina [153]. Based on the figure published by Böhme [143], we agree that these vertebrae share a striking similarity with those of Salamandrina, and could represent its stratigraphically earliest occurrence, prior to its richer Miocene fossil record [154]. These remains are herein attributed to aff. Salamandrina, pending further study of Brachycormus vertebrae. Numerous specifically indeterminate remains have been referred to Triturus from the late Oligocene to Middle Pleistocene of Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, the UK and Ukraine [91,101,105,108–112,143,144,155–167] R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 (figure 4c). The possible attribution of some of these remains to an extant species should be reassessed, given the high degree of interspecific variation shown by Triturus [95,168,169]. Two species referred to Triturus sensu lato are based on larval specimens: ‘Triturus opalinus’ from the late Oligocene of the Czech Republic and Oligosemia spinosa from the Late Miocene of Spain [170]. These were instead referred by Estes [8] to Lissotriton vulgaris and Triturus marmoratus, respectively, but here we regard these as indeterminate Pleurodelinae. Triturus rohrsi was originally described by Herre ([90], figure 6) from the Middle Miocene of the Czech Republic, but the earliest remains are found in the late Oligocene of Germany [143]. After the taxonomic splitting of the Triturus genus, this species has been assigned to Lissotriton rohrsi [119,143] or Ommatotriton rohrsi [171], and we follow the former referral. The species has also been reported from the Early Miocene of Austria [104]. A few remains were referred to an indeterminate species of Lissotriton, closely related to L. rohrsi, from the Early Miocene of the Czech Republic [110], Middle Miocene of Romania [111] and the Miocene/Pliocene boundary of Greece [119]. We agree with Böhme [143] that vertebrae referred to T. roehrsi by Miklas [79] from the Late Miocene of Austria do not belong to this taxon. The dorsal surface of the neural crest of the trunk vertebrae of Lissotriton rohrsi is comparable to that of some specimens of the extant species Lissotriton boscai (LM, 2022,pers. obs.), although the general proportions of the neural crest, which is especially high and posteriorly narrow, are more similar to those of the vertebrae of the extant genera Pleurodeles and Tylototriton. The morphology of the neural crest of the trunk vertebrae of L. rohrsi is also similar to the Paleocene species K. genzeli [89,90]. Although the latter species requires revision, it seems that at least one lineage of newts with robust, capped, and/or ornamented neural crests, morphologically close to the extant crocodile newts from southeast Asia, was widespread in Europe since the Paleocene (figure 1). It is interesting to note that a similarly robust and capped neural crest characterizes the vertebrae of the extant Salamandrina, today restricted to Italy, but widespread in Europe during the Miocene [154]. This latter genus could represent a relict of a more widespread lineage of salamanders, as testified by the number of extinct species showing a similar vertebral morphology. However, pending further taxonomic and phylogenetic studies, this hypothesis remains highly speculative, considering that it seems more likely that the robust, capped structure of the neural crest is a plesiomorphic character, secondarily lost in one or more lineages of salamandrids. Remains from the late Oligocene of Germany were described as Chioglossa cf. meini by Böhme [143]. This material appears to represent a close relative of the extant Iberian salamandrine species, Chioglossa lusitanica. Chioglossa meini is otherwise known from the Early and Middle Miocene of the Czech Republic [110] and France, respectively ([101,105], see [172] for an overview of the fossil record of this genus). 3.2.7. Miocene A third species of Palaeoproteus, P. miocenicus, was recently described by Vasilyan & Yanenko [87] from the Late Miocene of Austria and Ukraine (figure 2b). The stratigraphic range of this enigmatic genus is therefore significantly extended by this recent finding (figure 1). Whereas Andrias scheuchzeri (see above) represents the stratigraphically oldest member of Cryptobranchidae present in Europe, it is seemingly not the earliest branching member of the pan-group. Ukrainurus hypsognathus, a stem-cryptobranchid, was described from the Middle Miocene of Ukraine by Vasilyan et al. [99]. Remains from the Late Miocene of Kazakhstan and two atlantes from the Miocene/ Pliocene boundary of Greece also represent indeterminate specimens belonging to Cryptobranchidae [14,119]. The oldest unequivocal occurrences of Hynobiidae are specifically indeterminate remains of the 12 extant genus Salamandrella from the late Early Miocene of Russia (figure 2b; [173]) and Middle royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Miocene of Kazakhstan [14]. From the Late Miocene, the fossil record of Hynobiidae becomes relatively rich, including several remains attributable to Salamandrella from Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine, with the most recent of these dated to the Middle Pleistocene [14,91,174]. The extinct species Parahynobius kordosi was described by Venczel [92] from the Late Miocene of Hungary and remains attributed to this genus are present in the Central European record until the Middle Pleistocene [164]. In addition to the aforementioned Geyeriella wettsteini, from the Late Miocene of Slovakia [90], the salamandroid species Mioproteus caucasicus, first described by Estes & Darevsky [144], has been reported from Middle to Late Miocene deposits in Austria, Hungary, Russia and Ukraine [79,106– 108,175]. Several remains referred to indeterminate species of Mioproteus have also been documented in the Czech Republic, Moldova, Kazakhstan and Russia, spanning the Early Miocene to the Early Pliocene [14,91,110]. As mentioned above, a distinct proteid genus, Euronecturus grogu, more closely Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 related to the North American Necturus than to Mioproteus, was recently described from the Middle R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Miocene of Germany [59]. Orthophyia longa, from the Middle Miocene of Germany [123], should be considered a nomen dubium, representing an indeterminate proteid [8,59]. The stratigraphically earliest unambiguous occurrence of Plethodontidae is from the Middle Miocene of Slovakia [176] (figures 1b and 4b). This specimen was attributed to a specifically indeterminate occurrence of the extant genus Speleomantes, which is currently found only in Italy and south-eastern France [177]. The only extinct salamandrid species known from China is Procynops miocenicus (figure 1). This Early Miocene species was described by Young [178] and shows affinities with the extant Asian genus Cynops. The European salamandrid fossil record is much richer, with extinct species and specifically indeterminate occurrences of extant genera reported from the Miocene onwards. Specifically indeterminate occurrences of the extant genus Mertensiella have been reported from the Early and Late Miocene of the Czech Republic and Hungary, respectively [110,164]. The extinct species Mertensiella mera has been reported from the Early Miocene of the Czech Republic [110], the Early Pliocene of Slovakia (from where it was originally described; [156]) and the Late Pliocene of Poland [155]. This species is regularly found in sympatry with Chioglossa meini, and it seems likely that the characters differentiating these two species derive from intraspecific variation [95]. Following Macaluso et al. [95], we therefore suggest that Mertensiella mera is a junior synonym of Chioglossa meini. Fossils referred to Salamandra sp. or the extant species Salamandra salamandra (which is smaller and with less evident crests than S. sansaniensis) have been described from Late Miocene to Late Pleistocene deposits in Belgium, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and Turkey [119,155,156,164,179–182]. Remains referred to indeterminate species of the genus Salamandrina (see above) span the Early Miocene to the Early Pleistocene of Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Spain [119,154,164,183]. Two extinct species of the extant pleurodeline genus Ichthyosaura were present in the Miocene of Europe, although remains are scarce and limited to a couple of German localities, represented by I. randeckensis from the Early/Middle Miocene [184] and I. wintershofi from the Early Miocene [185]. Marjanovic ́ & Witzmann [115] suggested that I. randeckensis might not be referrable to Ichthyosaura, although we retain it in this genus pending further assessment. Carpathotriton matraensi is a newt from the Middle Miocene of Hungary [186,187] (figure 1). The same genus was also identified in the Middle Miocene of Romania [111]. It is characterized by vertebrae with particularly high neural crests, comparable to those of the Oligocene taxon Archaeotriton basalticus. Remains attributed to extant species of Lissotriton (or to specifically indeterminate occurrences of this genus) are present in Eurasia from the Early Miocene to the Holocene, documented from localities in Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain and the UK [91,105,106,108,109,111–114,118,119,155–159,164–167,179,183,188–192] (figure 4c). Considering the high intra- and interspecific variation seen in extant Lissotriton, any specific attribution should be carefully reassessed [95,168,169]. Remains referred to Triturus sensu lato from the early Eocene and late Oligocene of France [103,133] might conceivably also belong to this genus. 3.2.8. Pliocene–Pleistocene Chelotriton pliocenicus was described by Bailon [102] from the Late Pliocene of France. The separation from C. paradoxus was mainly based on the presence of a zygosphene/zygantrum articulation in C. pliocenicus. Given considerable variation in this feature in extant species of Salamandrina [95,153], it is possible that this is also the case in Chelotriton. However, considering the stratigraphic distance between 13 C. paradoxus and C. pliocenicus, and the absence of a zygosphene/zygantrum complex in specimens of C. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos paradoxus (see [116]), we retain C. pliocenicus as a valid species. Fossil remains referred to the extant salamandrid genus Pleurodeles have been reported from the Late Pliocene of Spain [191] and from the Early and Late Pleistocene of Morocco [193]. These areas are within the current geographical range of the extant species Pleurodeles waltl [194]. A third species referred to the proteid Mioproteus, Mioproteus wezei, has been reported from the Pliocene of Poland, France, and Russia [160,195,196] and Early Pleistocene of Moldova [197] (figure 4a). Mioproteus wezei was erroneously reported to be present in the Pleistocene of Poland in figure 5 of Macaluso et al. [59], but this locality (Weze II) is actually Late Pliocene in age (MN 16 according to Młynarski et al. [195] and Stefaniak [198]). The proteid Proteus bavaricus and an indeterminate sirenid, from the Pleistocene of Germany, were described by Brunner [199] based on parasphenoids. These remains are doubtfully attributed and probably do not belong to caudates, with Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 a teleostean attribution previously suggested [8,59]. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 A second extinct species of the hynobiid Parahynobius (P. betfianus) was described by Venczel [92] from the Middle Pleistocene of Romania (figure 1). Averianov & Tjutkova [200] assigned material from the Early Pleistocene of Kazakhstan to the extant Central Asian salamander genus, as Ranodon cf. sibiricus. Specifically indeterminate remains of Speleomantes have been reported from the Early and Late Pleistocene of Italy [161,177,201]. Remains comparable to and possibly referable to the extant species Ichthyosaura alpestris have been reported from the Early Pleistocene of Italy [201] and from the Middle Pleistocene of Russia [91]. The extant salamandrid Ommatotriton was reported from the Middle Pleistocene of Israel [202]. A Late Pleistocene–Holocene Japanese locality yielded several isolated remains referred to the two extant species Cynops ensicauda and Echinotriton andersoni [203], representing the first fossils unequivocally attributed to these genera. 4. Discussion 4.1. Spatio-temporal sampling of the Palearctic caudate fossil record Based on the number of occurrences in each time bin (figure 5), it is evident that our knowledge of the fossil record of Palearctic caudates is biased by the fragmentary and spatio-temporally heterogeneous nature of the fossil record (e.g. [204]). In particular, not all time bins are equally well-represented, with both the stratigraphically earliest and the most recent intervals the least sampled for caudates. The first and last intervals of the evolutionary history of a taxon are characterized by sampled diversity that is often lower than ‘true’ biological diversity (e.g. [205]), and thus this might account for part of the pattern we observe. Therefore, the restriction of the fossil record of early caudates to the Eurasian species Triassurus sixtelae prior to the Middle Jurassic does not necessarily reflect the true diversity of Palearctic caudates at this time. There is a relatively rich terrestrial tetrapod fossil record from the Late Triassic of Europe and Early Jurassic of Asia (e.g. [206,207]), but this does not typically represent the mesic environments which caudates (and other amphibians) occupied. Although it is possible that caudate diversity remained genuinely depauperate in the Palearctic during the group’s early evolutionary history, which is consistent with an effective slow initial radiation of the three modern orders of amphibians, as suggested by molecular data [208], their absence might instead reflect a sampling bias, with the Middle Jurassic ‘radiation’ merely reflecting increased sampling of mesic environments. The highest taxa to localities ratios in the Mesozoic occur in the Middle Jurassic and (to a lesser extent) the Early Cretaceous. Whereas this Mesozoic record is dominated by Asian occurrences, the Cenozoic record of caudates is predominantly from Europe (with the exception of the Early Pleistocene). This pattern might be explained by a combination of geographical and anthropogenic biases. Continental outcrops are relatively uncommon in Europe for much of the Jurassic and Cretaceous (e.g. [209]), and mainly limited to its western part (figure 2). By contrast, not only is Asia characterized by a more extensive continental record for this interval (e.g. [210]), it also preserves several Lagerstätten. These deposits have received a large amount of attention because of the exquisitely preserved dinosaur and mammal fossils they have yielded [211–214], but they have also produced numerous, exceptionally preserved specimens of caudates (e.g. [37,40,42]). No comparable Lagerstätten are known from the Jurassic or Cretaceous of Europe (with the exception of Las Hoyas in Spain; [215]). By contrast, the Cenozoic continental record of Europe is rich, but there is also an extensive Asian record. The description of fossil caudates from Asia has recently escalated, with 81% of papers describing caudate fossils from Asia published in the last two decades. We propose occurrences per time bin localities occurrences/localities 14 royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Holocene Europe Asia Late Pleistocene Middle Pleistocene Early Pleistocene Late Pliocene Early Pliocene Late Miocene Middle Miocene Early Miocene late Oligocene early Oligocene late Eocene middle Eocene Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 early Eocene R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 late Paleocene middle Paleocene early Paleocene Late Cretaceous Early Cretaceous Late Jurassic Middle Jurassic Early Jurassic Triassic 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 20 40 0 1 2 3 Figure 5. Total occurrences per time bin from each continent. Number of localities per time bin in yellow. Average diversity per locality per time bin (ratio of occurrences/localities). Localities with ranges of uncertainty or with ages on the boundary between two periods were counted in the older period (e.g. ‘Middle–Late Jurassic’ was counted in the column of ‘Middle Jurassic’). See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 for details about taxa and localities. Mesozoic Paleogene Neogene Quaternary articulated skeletons disarticulated elements Figure 6. Fossil occurrences preserved as articulated skeletons versus disarticulated skeletal elements. See electronic supplementary material, appendix S1 and S2 for details about taxa and localities. that the relatively depauperate fossil record of caudates in the Cenozoic of Asia likely reflects a collector or describer bias. For example, several cryptobranchoid fossil remains from the Cenozoic of Asia have been mentioned in the literature, but have either not been formally described and/or figured, or have yet to be referred to a particular species (e.g. [12] for Cryptobranchidae; [216] for Hynobiidae). This is supported by molecular analyses that suggest a Cenozoic diversification of Hynobiidae, coeval with the initial uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, 50 Ma [217]. Zhang et al. [217] suggested that a high-mountain, stream-type lifestyle that characterizes most extant hynobiid species is ancestral for the group, with the low-land, pond-type adaptation of some living taxa (e.g. Salamandrella) evolving later. A prominent taphonomic bias therefore might affect the fossil record of hynobiids, as suitable depositional environments are extremely rare in mountain habitats [218]. It is possible that the appearance of crown hynobiids in the fossil record in the Middle Miocene (figure 3b) coincided with the evolution of pond-like adaptations in the group and thus increased their preservation potential. The general pattern during the early Paleogene is of low observed diversity. This might be a genuine reflection of a long recovery period in the aftermath of the K/Pg mass extinction, with caudates severely affected by this event [219,220]. Nevertheless, both the Paleocene and Eocene are poorly sampled (figure 5), and so this low diversity could be partly artefactual. Most of the remains from these two time-intervals are referred to extinct taxa (e.g. Chelotriton and Koalliella; figure 1), including more studies about osteology of extant dry specimens Quaternary Neogene Paleogene Mesozoic 15 royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos ribs girdle elements limb elements Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 elements of the hyobranchial skeleton R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 skull elements elements of the lower jaw vertebrae 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 percentages of occurrences Figure 7. Percentages of occurrences preserved as disarticulated elements of the different skeletal regions (vertebrae, lower jaw, skull, hyobranchial skeleton, limbs, girdles and ribs). Percentages are calculated on the basis of the total occurrences of remains preserved as disarticulated elements, which is to say the total occurrences minus the occurrences preserved as articulated skeletons. See electronic supplementary material, appendix S2 for more details. Black columns refer to the osteological information present in the literature, listed in electronic supplementary material, appendix S4, concerning extant species of Palearctic urodeles (see [15] for further details). inclusive taxonomic groups with no living representatives (e.g. Batrachosauroididae; figure 1). The increasing diversity observed in the Oligocene coincides with the first appearance of most of the extant genera of salamandrids. This interval is characterized by an increase in speciation rates and a decline in extinction rates in caudates [220], and it is therefore likely that the Oligocene represents a genuine interval of heightened diversification in this clade relative to that of the early Paleogene. During the Neogene and Quaternary, Palearctic caudates known from articulated skeletal remains are proportionally rare, whereas they are much more common in the Mesozoic and Paleogene (figure 6). The lack of articulated skeletons constitutes a problem for determining the taxonomic identity of specimens, as well as for understanding the phylogenetic relationships of extinct taxa known from limited skeletal remains. For example, most phylogenetic analyses that incorporate fossil taxa only include species known from essentially complete skeletons (e.g. [30,115,187]). Furthermore, taphonomic biases influence the preservation of disarticulated remains, with the largest and most robust elements more often represented than other parts of the skeleton in palaeontological collections [95,153]. As such, limb and girdle elements are often found as fragmentary bones that do not bear diagnostic features and are thus consequently identified as indeterminate caudate or vertebrate remains, whereas vertebrae are more commonly identified, described and attributed to a specific taxon (figure 7). However, osteological studies of extant Palearctic species are limited as far as the vertebrae are concerned, with a greater emphasis on limbs (nearly exclusively as proxies for age determination through skeletochronology) and the skull (figure 7). The lower jaw is also not extensively studied in extant species, preventing a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between fossil and present-day caudate occurrences. Projects such as the Global Herpetological Osteology initiative [15], which aims to evaluate how much is known about the osteology of extant species of reptiles and amphibians, might be essential for 16 understanding how and where palaeontological and osteological research should be oriented. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos The low sampling of recent time bins reflects a common trend in palaeoherpetology. In many groups (e.g. lizards and turtles; [221,222]), including caudates, the highest observed diversity of Eurasian taxa occurs in the Miocene, with a substantial reduction in the Pliocene (figure 5). It is likely that a true biological diversity pattern is recognizable herein: molecular analyses indicate that the last major radiations in caudates occurred in the Late Miocene [220]. Furthermore, there was a substantial turnover in Palearctic terrestrial faunas in the latest Miocene to earliest Pliocene, with the extinction of numerous species, including mammals (e.g. [223,224]), squamates [222], turtles [221] and crocodylians (e.g. [225– 227]), in addition to caudates. However, based on the number of localities from the Early, Middle and Late Miocene (figure 5), it is evident that this epoch is far better sampled than previous and subsequent ones. Thus, at least part of this trend could pertain to sampling bias, with continental Pliocene outcrops less well-sampled than their Miocene counterparts. This interpretation is supported by the ratio of the Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 number of taxa to the number of localities per time bin, with the Miocene ratio equivalent to that of R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 the Pliocene (figure 5). Furthermore, Villa & Delfino [222] suggested that potentially rich Pliocene localities are indeed present, but that their palaeoherpetofaunas often remain unstudied or unexcavated, with a collector bias towards other taxa (e.g. mammals) and stratigraphically earlier time intervals yielding extinct taxa. Once ‘corrected’ for the number of localities (figure 5), diversity in the Early and Middle Pleistocene is not substantially different from that of the Pliocene, whereas it is particularly low in the Middle/Late Pleistocene, suggesting that biodiversity might genuinely have been low at this time. Present-day caudate diversity is depauperate when compared with the Miocene. Given that sampling- corrected diversity indicates little change in late Neogene to early Quaternary Palearctic caudate diversity, it is probable that low present-day diversity was primarily shaped by extinction in the Late Pleistocene. This was probably the result of increased severity of climatic oscillations during this interval, both in terms of temperature and frequency of the shifts [228]. 4.2. Implications for the biogeographical history of Palearctic caudates Our review and evaluation of the fossil record of Palearctic caudates documents the extinction of many species and several groups, including the demise of numerous taxa known from the Plio-Pleistocene. Furthermore, it reveals that caudate clades were more broadly distributed in the Palearctic in the past, with the present-day distribution of some extant taxa contracted relative to that of their recent past (figures 2–4). Stem urodeles and karaurids are represented in western Asia and the UK in the Middle Jurassic, demonstrating that non-urodele caudates were already widespread by this time interval (figure 2a). This is consistent with the hypothesis of a diversification and distribution across Laurasia during the Early Jurassic [229,230]. The Asian origin of Cryptobranchoidea, already suggested by several authors (e.g. [229]), is supported by the presence of the putative stem-member Nuominerpeton aquilonaris from the Early Cretaceous of China [30] (figure 3a). The fossil record of Cryptobranchidae, as currently understood, would suggest a progressive colonization of western areas, first appearing in the Cretaceous of western Asia, but only reaching Europe by the Oligocene (figure 3a), where this family is now extirpated. By contrast, the fossil record of Hynobiidae is poorer and the biogeographic pattern less evident, as unequivocal representatives of the crown group do not appear anywhere in the fossil record until the Miocene [173]. However, the first hynobiid remains are from the Middle Miocene of western Asia, suggesting also in this case an east-to-west colonization of the western Palearctic (figure 3b; see above for the taphonomic biases that might affect the fossil record of Hynobiidae). Stem salamandroids are rare in the Palearctic fossil record. The only taxon supported as a stem salamandroid by phylogenetic analyses [30] is Valdotriton from the Early Cretaceous Spain, and a possible stem salamandroid position is herein suggested for the contemporaneous UK genus Apricosiren, as well as Kiyatriton from the Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous of Russia, although these taxa are only known from disarticulated elements. As such, the scarce record prevents any possible consideration on the Palearctic biogeographic history of the clade Salamandroidea. The extant salamandroid clade Ambystomatidae is today restricted to North America, and there is no current support for its presence in the Palearctic fossil record (contra [8]). Although the highest known diversity of the extinct salamandroid group Batrachosauroididae comes from North America, the stratigraphically oldest putative remains are from the Early Cretaceous of Europe [47], predating the earliest North American remains (Late Cretaceous; [231]). As such, it remains possible that Batrachosauroididae originated in Europe and subsequently dispersed into North America. Fossil remains unequivocally attributed to Plethodontidae are extremely rare, limited to the Middle 17 Miocene of Slovakia [176] as well as the Pleistocene of northern Italy and southern France [177,201] royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos (figure 4b). All the European records of plethodontids are characterized by the presence of amphicoelous vertebrae. This vertebral morphology is rare in extant members of this family and in North American members it is only present in a few genera [53]. However, the two extant Eurasian genera, Speleomantes (closely related to the North American genus Hydromantes) and Karsenia, share this vertebral morphology. These two extant taxa have a disjunct distribution, with Speleomantes restricted to northern and central Italy (Sardinia island included) and southern France, and Karsenia present in South Korea [232]. Based on their recovery as sister taxa, Vieites et al. [232] suggested that the most parsimonious biogeographic scenario for the Eurasian plethodontids is that they originated in northeastern Asia, from where Speleomantes dispersed to western Eurasia. However, more recent analyses do not support a close relationship between Karsenia and Hydromantes/Speleomantes [233] and the scenario proposed by Vieites et al. [232] is therefore not supported. The fossil record of plethodontids is too poor to test other Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 biogeographic scenarios (for a comprehensive discussion on the biogeography of this group predating R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 the discovery of Karsenia, see [177]). Fossil remains of Proteidae are widely distributed in Europe and western Asia from the Oligocene onwards, and they are also found in Miocene outcrops in Asia (figure 4a). The oldest specimen attributed to this family is the putative proteid vertebra from the Early Cretaceous of Europe ([54]; see above for the taxonomic assignment) that predates the oldest North American occurrence (Paranecturus garbanii from the Late Cretaceous; [234]), suggesting a possible European origin for this clade. The low number of localities yielding unambiguous proteid remains in North America (only three localities; [58,96,234]) might also support this hypothesis. However, given the strong bias affecting the fossil record of this group (composed entirely of isolated remains and mostly vertebrae) and the consequent lack of a robust understanding of its phylogenetic relationships, any biogeographic scenario is tentative. Proteids are entirely absent from Asia today and their European distribution is restricted to the extant species Proteus anguinus in the Balkan Peninsula [235]. This follows the extinction of the Eurasian genus Mioproteus by the Pleistocene [91,160,197], possibly caused by the climatic oscillations that severely affected many European reptiles and amphibians ([236] and references therein). Fossil Salamandridae show mainly European occurrences (figure 4c), with a rich and widespread fossil record from the Paleocene [10]. Such a high diversity seems to confirm the hypothesis of a European origin for the clade, as suggested by several previous works (e.g. [229,237]). The first taxa that occur in central and eastern Asia are Procynops (Early Miocene of China), closely related to the extant Chinese genus Cynops, and Chelotriton ( present in central Asia in the Early and Middle Miocene), which shows close similarities to the extant crocodile newts Tylototriton and Echinotriton from southeast Asia [94]. This implies that the expansion to the east of Salamandridae happened not later than the Miocene, with subsequent extirpation from central Asia. This extirpation, that led to the present-day disjunct distribution of Eurasian salamandrids, might have been caused by increased aridity and the resultant expansion of the steppe-desert biome in the Late Miocene as a consequence of Tibetan uplift ([238]; see also [239]). 5. Conclusion The fossil record of Palearctic caudates is not evenly distributed through time or space. Taxa known from articulated skeletal remains or imprints on slabs are proportionally rare, with isolated remains common, especially vertebrae. This constitutes a problem for taxonomic identification, as well as for reconstructing the evolutionary interrelationships of caudates, especially as phylogenetic datasets primarily focus on species with relatively completely known skeletons. The stratigraphically oldest known caudate worldwide is from the Middle/Late Triassic of central Asia and, following a substantial stratigraphic gap, stem-Urodela and Karauridae are present in both western Asia and the UK in the Middle Jurassic. High observed diversity in this latter time bin, together with that of the latest Early Cretaceous, is driven primarily by Asian Lagerstätten. The apparent radiation of caudates in the Middle Jurassic might be an artefact of a lack of sampling of suitable mesic depositional environments earlier in the Mesozoic, although it remains possible that the early evolution of amphibians is characterized by low diversification rates. A possible member of stem-Cryptobranchoidea has been reported from the Early Cretaceous of eastern Asia, prompting suggestions of an Asiatic origin of this clade. Only a few species of Cryptobranchidae were present in Europe, first appearing here in the Oligocene, and were subsequently extirpated on this continent, as well as in western and central Asia. Salamandrids appear to have originated in Europe, expanding into Asia by the Miocene. Their disjunct present-day 18 distribution reflects local extirpations, with a likely role for climatic and habitat changes linked to the royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos uplift of the Tibetan Plateau. Within the Palearctic, the extinct family Batrachosauroididae is only reported from Europe, and the same is true at the moment for the fossil occurrences of the extant family Plethodontidae. Fossil remains of proteids are present in Europe and central Asia from the Oligocene, showing a strong range contraction by the Pleistocene, to their present-day restriction to the Balkan Peninsula. The Miocene provides a rich caudate record, with an apparent decline in diversity at the beginning of the Pliocene. However, this decline appears to be mainly an artefact of uneven sampling. Instead, low present-day caudate diversity in the Palearctic was primarily shaped by climatically driven extinction and range contraction in the Late Pleistocene. Data accessibility. The data are provided in electronic supplementary material [240]. Authors’ contributions. L.M.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; P.D.M.: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; S.E.E.: data curation, validation, writing—review R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 and editing; G.C.: funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing; S.M.: data curation, formal analysis, resources, visualization; D.M.: data curation, resources, visualization; M.D.: conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein. Conflict of interest declaration. We declare we have no competing interests. Funding. This work was supported by grants (ex-60% 2018–2020) from the Università degli Studi di Torino. M.D. acknowledges the Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA Program), and the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (CGL2016-76431-P, AEI/FEDER, EU). P.D.M.’s contribution was supported by a research fellowship from The Royal Society (UF160216). Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to Jim Gardner and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript, and to Emily Lindsey and Peter Haynes for editorial support. Additional thanks to Jim Gardner, Andrea Villa, and Maayan Lev for providing relevant literature and for critical discussion. This is Paleobiology Database official publication number 438. References 1. Pough FH, Andrews RM, Crump ML, Savitzky 4 (eds H Heatwole, RL Carrol), pp. 1412–1444. (eds GF Ficetola, R Sacchi, S Scali, R Manenti, AH, Wells KD, Brandley MC. 2015 Herpetology, New South Wales: Chipping Norton. A Coladonato, A Melotto et al.), 335 4th edn, 591 pp. Oxord, UK: Sinauer Associates, 10. Roček Z. 1994 A review of the fossil Caudata of pp. Program and Abstracts. S.E.H., Oxford University Press. Europe. Abhandlungen und Berichte für Milano. P. 181. 2. Frost DR. 2021 Amphibian species of the world: Naturkunde 17, 51–56. 16. Hildebrand M. 1982 Analysis of vertebrate an online reference. Version 6.1 (06-12-2021). 11. Gao KQ, Chen J, Jia J. 2013 Taxonomic diversity, structure. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Electronic Database. See https:// stratigraphic range, and exceptional preservation 17. QGIS Development Team. 2021 QGIS amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php. of Juro-Cretaceous salamanders from northern Geographic Information System. Open Source New York, NY: American Museum of Natural China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 50, 255–267. (doi:10. Geospatial Foundation Project. See http://qgis. History. 1139/e2012-039) osgeo.org. 3. Sparreboom M. 2014 Salamanders of the 12. Böhme M, Vasilyan D, Winklhofer M. 2012 18. Ivakhnenko M. 1978 Urodeles from the Triassic Old world: the salamanders of Europe, Habitat tracking, range dynamics and and Jurassic of Soviet inner Asia. Paleontological Asia and Northern Africa. Zeist: KNNV palaeoclimatic significance of Eurasian giant J. 12, 362–368. Publishing. salamanders (Cryptobranchidae)—indications 19. Schoch RR, Werneburg R, Voigt S. 2020 A 4. Borkin LJ, Litvinchuk SN. 2013 Amphibians of for elevated Central Asian humidity during Triassic stem-salamander from Kyrgyzstan and the Palearctic: taxonomic composition. Turkish Cenozoic global warm periods. Palaeogeogr. the origin of salamanders. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. J. Zool. 17, 494–541. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 342, 64–72. (doi:10. USA 117, 11 584–11 588. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 5. Cogger HG, Zweifel RG. 1998 Encyclopedia of 1016/j.palaeo.2012.04.032) 2001424117) reptiles and amphibians, 2nd edn. San Diego, 13. Skutschas PP. 2013 Mesozoic salamanders and 20. Yadagiri P. 1986 Lower Jurassic lower CA: Academic Press. albanerpetontids of Middle Asia, Kazakhstan, vertebrates from Kota Formation, Pranhita- 6. Pyron RA, Wiens JJ. 2011 A large-scale and Siberia. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 93, Godavari Valley, India. J. Palaeontol. Soc. India phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 441–457. (doi:10.1007/s12549-013-0126-8) 31, 89–96. species, and a revised classification of extant 14. Vasilyan D, Zazhigin VS, Böhme M. 2017 21. Milner AR. 1993 Amphibian-grade Tetrapoda. In frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol. Neogene amphibians and reptiles (Caudata, The fossil record 2 (ed. MJ Benton), pp. Phylogenet. Evol. 61, 543–583. (doi:10.1016/j. Anura, Gekkota, Lacertilia, and Testudines) from 665–679. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. ympev.2011.06.012) the south of western Siberia, Russia, and 22. Gardner JD. 2003 Revision of Habrosaurus 7. Raffaëlli J. 2013 Les urodèles du monde, 2nd northeastern Kazakhstan. PeerJ 5, 1–65. Gilmore (Caudata; Sirenidae) and relationships edn, 480 pp. Penclen, France: Penclen Édition. (doi:10.7717/peerj.3025) among sirenid salamanders. Palaeontology 46, 8. Estes R. 1981 Encyclopedia of paleoherpetology, 15. Delfino M et al. 2019 Global Herpetological 1089–1122. (doi:10.1046/j.0031-0239.2003. 115 pp. Stuttgart: Fischer. Osteology: a preliminary overview on the 00335.x) 9. Milner AR. 2000 Mesozoic and Tertiary Caudata European taxa. In XX European Congress of 23. Shishkin MA, Benton MJ, Unwin DM, Kurochkin and Albanerpetontidae. In Amphibian biology, vol. Herpetology, Milan, 2–6 September 2019. EN. 2000 Mesozoic amphibians from Mongolia and the Central Asiatic republics. In The age of Arabian Plate. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 52. Boardman GS, Schubert BW. 2011 First Mio-Pliocene 19 dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia (eds MJ 96, 169–220. (doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0221-0) salamander fossil assemblage from the southern Benton, MA Shishkin, DM Unwin, EN 37. Gao KQ, Shubin NH. 2003 Earliest known crown- Appalachians. Palaeontol. Electron. 14, 16A. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Kurochkin), pp. 297–308. Cambridge, UK: group salamanders. Nature 422, 424–428. 53. Wake DB. 1966 Comparative osteology and Cambridge University Press. (doi:10.1038/nature01491) evolution of the lungless salamanders, family 24. Nessov LA. 1988 Late Mesozoic amphibians and 38. Rong Y-F, Vasilyan D, Dong LP, Wang Y. 2020 Plethodontidae. Memoires South Californian lizards of Soviet Middle Asia. Acta Zool. Revision of Chunerpeton tianyiense Acad. Sci. 4, 1–111. Cracovienska 31, 475–486. (Lissamphibia, Caudata): is it a cryptobranchid 54. Sweetman S, Evans SE. 2011 Lissamphibians 25. Skutschas PP, Martin T. 2011 Cranial anatomy salamander? Palaeoworld 30, 708–723. (doi:10. (frogs, salamanders and albanerpetontids). In of the stem salamander Kokartus 1016/j.palwor.2020.12.001) 2011 English Wealden fossils. Palaeontological honorarius (Amphibia: Caudata) from the Middle 39. Wang Y. 2004 A new Mesozoic caudate association field guide to fossils, 14 (eds P Forey, Jurassic of Kyrgyzstan. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 161, (Liaoxitriton daohugouensis sp. nov.) from Inner SC Sweetman), pp. 240–263. London, UK: The 816–838. (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00663.x) Mongolia, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 49, 858–860. Palaeontological Assocation. 26. Skutschas PP, Krasnolutskii SA. 2011 A new (doi:10.1007/BF02889761) 55. Estes R. 1965 A new fossil salamander from genus and species of basal salamanders from 40. Jia J, Anderson JS, Gao KQ. 2021 Middle Montana and Wyoming. Copeia 1965, 90–95. the Middle Jurassic of Western Siberia, Russia. Jurassic stem hynobiids from China shed (doi:10.2307/1441245) Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 Proc. Zool. Institute RAS 315, 167–175. (doi:10. light on the evolution of basal salamanders. 56. Smith T et al. 2014 First Clarkforkian equivalent R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 31610/trudyzin/2011.315.2.167) Iscience 24, 102744. (doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021. land mammal age in the latest Paleocene basal 27. Skutschas P, Kolchanov V, Krasnolutskii S, 102744) Sparnacian facies of Europe: fauna, flora, Averianov A, Schellhorn R, Schultz J, Martin T. 41. Gao KQ, Shubin NH. 2012 Late Jurassic paleoenvironment and (bio) stratigraphy. PLoS 2020 A new small-sized stem salamander from salamandroid from western Liaoning, China. ONE 9, e86229. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. the Middle Jurassic of Western Siberia, Russia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5767–5772. 0086229) PLoS ONE 15, e0228610. (doi:10.1371/journal. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1009828109) 57. Böhme M, Spassov N, Fuss J, Troscher A, Deane pone.0228610) 42. Jia J, Gao KQ. 2016 A new basal salamandroid AS, Prieto J, Lechner T, Begun DR. 2019 A new 28. Skutschas PP. 2016 A new crown-group (Amphibia, Urodela) from the Late Jurassic of Miocene ape and locomotion in the ancestor of salamander from the Middle Jurassic of Western Qinglong, Hebei province, China. PLoS ONE 11, great apes and humans. Nature 575, 489–493. Siberia, Russia. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 1–35. (doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1731-0) 96, 41–48. (doi:10.1007/s12549-015-0216-x) 43. Jia J, Gao KQ. 2019 A new stem hynobiid 58. Naylor BG. 1978 The earliest known Necturus 29. Evans SE, Milner AR, Mussett F. 1988 The salamander (Urodela, Cryptobranchoidea) from (Amphibia, Urodela), from the paleocene earliest known salamanders (Amphibia, the Upper Jurassic (Oxfordian) of Liaoning ravenscrag formation of Saskatchewan. Caudata): a record from the Middle Jurassic of Province, China. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 39, 1–22. J. Herpetol. 12, 565–569. (doi:10.2307/ England. Geobios 21, 539–552. (doi:10.1016/ (doi:10.1080/02724634.2020.1761370) 1563363) S0016-6995(88)80069-X) 44. Wang Y, Evans SE. 2006 A new short-bodied 59. Macaluso L, Villa A, Mors T. 2022 A new proteid 30. Jones MEH, Benson RBJ, Skutschas P, Hill L, salamander from the Upper Jurassic-Lower salamander (Urodela; Proteidae) from the middle Panciroli E, Schmitt A, Walsh S, Evans SE. 2022 Cretaceous of China. Acta Palaeontol. Polonica Miocene of Hambach (Germany) and implications Middle Jurassic fossils document an early stage 51, 127–130. for the evolution of the family. Palaeontology 65, in salamander evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 45. Skutschas PP, Leshchinskiy SV, Rezvyi AS, e12585. (doi:10.1111/pala.12585) USA 119, e2114100119. (doi:10.1073/pnas. Fayngerts AV, Krasnolutskii SA. 2005 Remains of 60. Nevo E, Estes R. 1969 Ramonellus longispinus, 2114100119) salamanders from the Middle Jurassic of the an Early Cretaceous salamander from Israel. 31. Skutschas PP, Kolchanov VV, Sennikov AG, Krasnoyarsk Territory. In Modern paleontology: Copeia 1969, 540–547. (doi:10.2307/1441934) Syromyatnikova EV. 2022 Discovery of a crown classical and newest methods (eds AY Rozanov, 61. Dong ZM, Wang Y. 1998 A new urodele salamander in the Middle Jurassic (Bathonian) AV Lopatin, PY Parkhaev), pp. 121–124. (Liaoxitriton zhongjiani gen. et sp. nov.) from the Moskvoretskaya formation of the Moscow Moscow: Paleontological Institute RAS, [In Early Cretaceous of western Liaoning Province, Region, Russia. Hist. Biol. 1–4. (doi:10.1080/ Russian]. China. Vertebr. PalAsiatica 36, 159–172. 08912963.2022.2133605) 46. Averianov AO, Martin T, Skutschas PP, Rezvyi AS, 62. Zhang G, Wang Y, Jones ME, Evans SE. 2009 A 32. Evans SE, Milner AR. 1994 Middle Jurassic Bakirov AA. 2008 Amphibians from the Middle new Early Cretaceous salamander (Regalerpeton microvertebrate assemblages from the British Jurassic Balabansai Svita in the Fergana weichangensis gen. et sp. nov.) from the Isles. In In the shadow of the dinosaurs: early Depression, Kyrgyzstan (Central Asia). Huajiying formation of northeastern China. Mesozoic Tetrapods (eds NC Fraser, HD Sues), Palaeontology 51, 471–485. (doi:10.1111/j. Cretaceous Res. 30, 551–558. (doi:10.1016/j. pp. 303–321. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge 1475-4983.2007.00748.x) cretres.2008.10.004) University Press. 47. Evans S, McGowan GJ. 2002 Lissamphibian 63. Rong Y-F. 2018 Restudy of Regalerpeton 33. Evans SE, Waldman M. 1996 Small reptiles and remains from the Purbeck Limestone Group, weichangensis (Amphibia: Urodela) from the amphibians from the Middle Jurassic of Skye, southern England. Special Papers Palaeontol. 68, Lower Cretaceous of Hebei, China. Vertebr. Scotland. The continental Jurassic. Bull. Mus. 103–119. PalAsiatica 56, 121–136. Northern Arizona 60, 219–226. 48. Skutschas PP, Kolchanov VV, Schwermann AH. 64. Wang Y. 2000 A new salamander (Amphibia: 34. Panciroli E, Benson RB, Walsh S, Butler RJ, 2020 First salamander from the Lower Caudata) from the Early Cretaceous Jehol biota. Castro TA, Jones ME, Evans SE. 2020 Diverse Cretaceous of Germany. Cretaceous Res. 116, Vertebr. PalAsiatica 38, 100–103. vertebrate assemblage of the Kilmaluag 1–11. (doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104606) 65. Skutschas PP, Gubin YM. 2012 A new Formation (Bathonian, Middle Jurassic) of Skye, 49. Estes R, Sanchíz B. 1982 Early cretaceous lower salamander from the late Paleocene—early Scotland. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. vertebrates from Galve (Teruel), Spain. Eocene of Ukraine. Acta Palaeontol. Polonica 57, Edinburgh 111, 135–156. (doi:10.1017/ J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2, 21–39. (doi:10.1080/ 135–148. (doi:10.4202/app.2010.0101) S1755691020000055) 02724634.1982.10011915) 66. Gao KQ, Shubin NH. 2001 Late Jurassic 35. Haddoumi H et al. 2016 Guelb el Ahmar (Bathonian, 50. Evans SE, Milner AR. 1996 A metamorphosed salamanders from northern China. Nature 410, Anoual Syncline, eastern Morocco): first continental salamander from the Early Cretaceous of las 574–577. (doi:10.1038/35069051) flora and fauna including mammals from the Hoyas, Spain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 67. Gao KQ, Cheng ZW, Xu X. 1998 First report on Middle Jurassic of Africa. Gondwana Res. 29, 627–646. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0061) the Mesozoic urodele fossils from China. Chinese 290–319. (doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.12.004) 51. Dollo L. 1884 Note sur les batracien de Geol. 1, 40–41. (in Chinese) 36. Gardner JD, Rage JC. 2016 The fossil record of Bernissart. Bulletin du Musée royal d’Histoire 68. Averianov AO, Voronkevich AV. 2002 A new lissamphibians from Africa, Madagascar, and the Naturelle de Belgique 3, 85–96. crown-group salamander from the Early Cretaceous of Western Siberia. Russ. J. Herpetol. 83. Rage JC, Dutheil DB. 2008 Amphibians and Mongolia. PLoS ONE 7, 1–9. (doi:10.1371/ 20 9, 209–214. squamates from the Cretaceous (Cenomanian) journal.pone.0040665) 69. Skutschas PP. 2014 Kiyatriton leshchinskiyi of Morocco-A preliminary study, with 99. Vasilyan D, Böhme M, Chkhikvadze VM, royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Averianov et Voronkevich, 2001, a crown-group description of a new genus of pipid frog. Semenov YA, Joyce WG. 2013 A new giant salamander from the Lower Cretaceous of Palaeontogr. Abteilung A 286, 1–22. (doi:10. salamander (Urodela, Pancryptobrancha) from Western Siberia, Russia. Cretaceous Res. 51, 1127/pala/285/2008/1) the Miocene of eastern Europe (Grytsiv, 88–94. (doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2014.05.014) 84. Groessens Van Dyck MC. 1981 Etude des Ukraine). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 33, 301–318. 70. Skutschas PP, Kolchanov VV, Averianov AO, Amphibiens du Montien continental de Hainin. (doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.722151) Martin T, Schellhorn R, Kolosov PN, Vitenko DD. Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie 90, 100. Herre W. 1935 Die Schwanzlurche der 2018 A new relict stem salamander from the 87–101. mitteleociinen (oberlutetischen) Braunkohle des Early Cretaceous of Yakutia, Siberian Russia. 85. Groessens Van Dyck MC. 1981 Note préliminaire Geiseltales und die Phylogenie der Urodelen Acta Palaeontol. Polonica 63, 519–525. (doi:10. sur les Urodèles du gisement Montien unter Ein schluss der fossilen Formen. Zoologica 4202/app.00498.2018) continental de Hainin (Belgique). Mémoires de 87, 1–85. 71. Antunes MT, Pais J. 1978 Notas sobre depósitos l’Institut Géologique de l’Université de Louvain 101. Estes R, Hoffstetter R. 1976 Les urodèles du de Taveiro. Estratigrafia, paleontologia, idade, 31, 323–333. Miocène de la Grive-Saint-Alban (Isère, France). paleoecologia. . Ciências da Terra/Earth Sci. J. 4, 86. Folie A. 2007 Evolution of the amphibians and Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 109–128. squamates of the continental Cretaceous— Naturelle, Série 3, Sciences de la Terre 57, R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 72. Duffaud S, Rage J-C. 1999 Amphibians from the Paleogene transition in Europe. J. Vertebr. 297–343. Upper Cretaceous of Laño Basque Country, Paleontol. 27, 75A. 102. Bailon S. 1989 Les amphibiens et les reptiles du Spain. Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales 87. Vasilyan D, Yanenko V. 2020 The last Pliocène supérieur de Balaruc II (Hérault, de Alava 14, 111–120. Palaeoproteus (Urodela: Batrachosauroididae) of France). Palaeovertebrata 19, 7–28. 73. Garcia G, Duffaud S, Feist M, Marandat B, Europe. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12. (doi:10.1038/ 103. Augé M, Rage JC. 1995 Le Garouillas et les sites Tambareau Y, Villatte J, Sigé B. 2000 La Neuve, s41598-020-59255-1) contemporains (Oligocene, MP 25) des gisement à plantes, invertébrés et vertébrés du 88. Estes R, Hecht MK, Hoffstetter R. 1967 Phosphorites du Quercy (Lot, Tarn-et-Garonne, Bégudien (Sénonien supérieur continental) du Paleocene amphibians from Cernay, France. Am. France) et leurs faunes de vertebres. 2. bassin d’Aix-en-Provence. Geodiversitas 22, Museum Novitates 2295, 1–25. Amphibiens et squamates. Palaeontographica 325–348. 89. Herre W. 1950 Schwanzlurche aus dem paleocan Abt. A 236, 11–32. (doi:10.1127/pala/236/ 74. Szentesi Z, Company J. 2017 Late Maastrichtian von Walbeck. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung 1995/11) small-sized herpetofauna from Valencia für Systematik 35, 286–301. 104. Sanchiz B. 1998 Vertebrates from the Early province, eastern Spain. Hist. Biol. 29, 43–52. 90. Herre W. 1955 Die Fauna der miozänen Miocene lignite deposits of the opencast mine (doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1122004) Spaltenfüllung von Neudorf ad March (ČSR.): Oberdorf (Western Styrian Basin, Austria): 2. 75. Duffaud S. 1995 A Batrachosauroididae Amphibia (Urodela). Sitzungsberichte Der Amphibia. Annalen des Naturhistorischen (Amphibia, Caudata) from the late Cretaceous of Akademie Der Wissenschaften Mathematisch- Museums in Wien 99, 13–29. Champ-Garimond (Southern France). DGF Online Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 164, 783–803. 105. Rage JC, Hossini S. 2000 Les amphibiens du Series. 91. Ratnikov VY. 2010 A review of tailed amphibian Miocène moyen de Sansan. Mémoires du 76. Nessov LA. 1981 Cretaceous salamanders and remains from late Cenozoic sediments of the Muséum national d’histoire naturelle 183, frogs of Kizylkum Desert. Proc. Zool. Institute East European plain. Russ. J. Herpetol. 17, 177–217. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 101, 57–88. 59–66. 106. Roček Z. 2004 Late Miocene Amphibia from 77. Nessov LA. 1997 Cretaceous nonmarine 92. Venczel M. 1999 Land salamanders of the Rudabánya. Palaeontogr. Italica 90, 11–29. vertebrates of Northern Eurasia (in Russian). family Hynobiidae from the Neogene and 107. Roček Z. 2019 A contribution to the Posthumous edition by Golovneva LB, Quaternary of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 20, herpetofauna from the late Miocene of Gritsev AverianovAO. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo 401–412. (doi:10.1163/156853899X00448) (Ukraine). C.R. Palevol 18, 817–847. (doi:10. Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. 93. Buckley D, Sanchiz B. 2012 Untrained versus 1016/j.crpv.2019.07.003) 78. Skutschas PP. 2009 Re-evaluation of Mynbulakia specialized paleontological systematics: a 108. Tempfer PM. 2005 The Herpetofauna Nessov, 1981 (Lissamphibia: Caudata) and phylogenetic validity test using (Amphibia: Caudata, Anura; Reptilia: description of a new salamander genus from the morphostructural conspicuity as character Sclerogiossa) of the Upper Miocene Locality Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. weight. Spanish J. Palaeontol. 27, 131–142. Kohfidisch (Burgenland, Austria). Beiträge zur 29, 659–664. (doi:10.1671/039.029.0326) (doi:10.7203/sjp.27.2.18121) Paläontologie 29, 145–253. 79. Miklas PM. 2002 Die Amphibienfauna 94. Pogoda P, Zuber M, Baumbach T, Schoch RR, 109. Rage JC, Bailon S. 2005 Amphibians and (Amphibia: Caudata, Anura) der obermiozänen Kupfer A. 2020 Cranial shape evolution of squamate reptiles from the late early Miocene Fundstelle Götzendorf an der Leitha (südliches extant and fossil crocodile newts and its relation (MN 4) of Béon 1 (Montréal-du-Gers, Wiener Becken, Niederösterreich). Annalen des to reproduction and ecology. J. Anat. 237, southwestern France). Geodiversitas 27, Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie A für 285–300. (doi:10.1111/joa.13201) 413–441. Mineralogie und Petrographie, Geologie und 95. Macaluso L, Wencker L, Castrovilli M, Carnevale G, 110. Ivanov M. 2008 Early Miocene amphibians Paläontologie, Anthropologie und Prähistorie Delfino M. 2022 A comparative atlas of selected (Caudata, Salientia) from the Mokrá-Western 103, 161–211. skeletal elements of European urodeles for Quarry (Czech Republic) with comments on the 80. Venczel M, Codrea VA. 2018 A new proteid palaeontological investigations. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. evolution of early Miocene amphibian salamander from the early Oligocene of Romania Published online on the 8th September 2022. assemblages in Central Europe. Geobios 41, with notes on the paleobiogeography of Eurasian (doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac063) 465–492. (doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2007.11.004) proteids. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 38, e1508027. 96. Naylor BG. 1978 The frontosquamosal arch in 111. Venczel M, Stiuca E. 2008 Late middle Miocene (doi:10.1080/02724634.2018.1508027) newts as a defence against predators. Can. J. amphibians and squamate reptiles from Taut, 81. Evans SE Milner AR, Werner C. Sirenid Zool. 56, 2211–2216. (doi:10.1139/z78-297) Romania. Geodiversitas 30, 731–763. salamanders and a gymnophionan amphibian 97. Gubin YM. 1991 Paleocene salamanders from 112. Böhme M. 2010 Ectothermic vertebrates from the Cretaceous of the Sudan. Southern Mongolia. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal (Actinopterygii, Allocaudata, Urodela, Anura, Palaeontology 39, 77–95. 1991, 96–106. Crocodylia, Squamata) from the Miocene of 82. Rage JC, Marshall LG, Gayet M. 1993 Enigmatic 98. Vasilyan D, Böhme M. 2012 Pronounced Sandelzhausen (Germany, Bavaria) and their Caudata (Amphibia) from the Upper Cretaceous peramorphosis in lissamphibians—Aviturus implications for environment reconstruction and of Gondwana. Géobios 26, 515–519. (doi:10. exsecratus (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae) from the palaeoclimate. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 84, 1016/S0016-6995(06)80234-2) Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum of 3–41. (doi:10.1007/s12542-010-0050-4) 113. Böhme M, Vasilyan D. 2014 Ectothermic development in the Tertiary Salamandridae. (Northern Bavaria, Germany). Courier 21 vertebrates from the late Middle Miocene of J. Morphol. 230, 187–197. (doi:10.1002/ Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 260, 161–183. Gratkorn (Austria, Styria). Palaeobiodivers. (SICI)1097-4687(199611)230:2<187::AID- 144. Estes R, Darevsky I. 1977 Fossil amphibians from royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Palaeoenviron. 94, 21–40. (doi:10.1007/s12549- JMOR6>3.0.CO;2-E) the Miocene of the North Caucasus, USSR. 013-0143-7) 128. Goldfuss GA. 1831 Beiträge zur kenntnis J. Palaeontol. Soc. India 20, 164–169. 114. Venczel M, Hír J. 2015 Lissamphibians and verschiedener Reptilien der Vorwelt (Vol. 11). 145. Lartet É. 1851 Notice sur la colline de Sansan, squamate reptiles from the early middle Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino- 42 pp. Auch: J.-A. Portes. Miocene of Litke, Northern Hungary. Carolinae 15, 61–128. 146. Schlosser M. 1922 Untermiocäne Wirbeltierreste Geobios 48, 491–504. (doi:10.1016/j.geobios. 129. Brame AH. 1973 A new name for the fossil aus einer Spalte im Jurakalk von Oberkochen in 2015.09.001) salamandrid, Polysemia Meyer, 1860. Württemberg. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, 115. Marjanović D, Witzmann F. 2015 An extremely Herpeton. J. Southwestern Herpetol. Soc. 7, 4–5. Geologie und Paläontologie 1922, 57–60. peramorphic newt (Urodela: Salamandridae: 130. Rage JC, Augé M. 2003 Amphibians and 147. Rage JC, Augé M. 2015 Valbro: a new site of Pleurodelini) from the latest Oligocene of squamate reptiles from the lower Eocene of vertebrates from the early Oligocene (MP 22) of Germany, and a new phylogenetic analysis Silveirinha (Portugal). Ciências da Terra (UNL) France (Quercy). III-Amphibians and squamates. of extant and extinct salamandrids. PLoS ONE 15, 103–116. Annales de Paléontologie 10, 29–41. (doi:10. 10, e0137068. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 131. Hecht M, Hoffstetter R. 1962 Note préliminaire 1016/j.annpal.2014.10.002) Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 0137068) sur les Amphibiens et les Squamates du 148. Villa A, Gobbi S, Delfino M. 2022 Additions to the R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 116. Schoch RR, Poschmann M, Kupfer A. 2015 The Landénien supérieur et du Tongrien de early Miocene herpetofauna of Weisenau salamandrid Chelotriton paradoxus from Enspel Belgique. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences (Germany): urodeles and squamates from and Randeck Maars (Oligocene–Miocene, naturelles de Belgique 38, 1–30. a rediscovered historical collection in Italy. Germany). Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 95, 132. Godinot M, Broin F, Buffetaut E, Rage JC, PalZ 96, 113–127. (doi:10.1007/s12542-021- 77–86. (doi:10.1007/s12549-014-0182-8) Russell DE. 1978 Dormaal : Une des plus 00571-w) 117. Tesakov AS et al. 2017 Late Miocene (Early anciennes faunes éocènes d´Europe. Comptes 149. Rage J-C. 1988 Le gisement du Bretou Turolian) vertebrate faunas and associated biotic Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de (Phosphorites du Quercy, Tarn-et-Garonne, record of the Northern Caucasus: geology, ĺAcadémie des Sciences Série D Sci Nat 287, France) et sa faune des vertebres de l’Eocene palaeoenvironment, biochronology. Fossil 1273–1276. superieur; 1. Amphibiens et reptiles. Imprint 73, 383–444. (doi:10.2478/if- 133. Augé M, Duffaud S, Lapparent De Broin F, Rage Palaeontogr. Abteilung A 205, 3–27. 2017-0021) J-C, Vasse D. 1997 Les amphibiens et les reptiles 150. Herre W. 1941 Palaeopleurodeles hauffi nov. 118. Colombero S et al. 2017 Late Messinian de Prémontré (Cuisien, Bassin parisien) : une Gen., nov. Spec., ein fossiler Schwanzlurch aus mollusks and vertebrates from Moncucco herpétofaune de référence pour l’Eocène dem Miozän Süddeutschlands. Zoologischer Torinese, north-western Italy. Paleoecological inférieur. Géologie de la France 1, 23–33. Anzeiger 134, 1–17. and paleoclimatological implications. Palaeontol. 134. Laurent Y et al. 2010 La Borie (Saint-Papoul, 151. Böhme M. 1998 Archaeotriton basalticus (v. Electron. 20, 1–66. Aude) : un gisement exceptionnel dans l’Éocène Meyer, 1859) (Urodela, Salamandridae) aus dem 119. Georgalis GL, Villa A, Ivanov M, Vasilyan D, basal du Sud de la France. Bulletin de la Société Unteroligozän von Hammerunterwiesenthal Delfino M. 2019 Fossil amphibians and reptiles d’Iistoire Naturelle de Toulouse 146, 89–103. (Freistaat Sachsen). Abhandlungen des from the Neogene locality of Maramena 135. Tissier J, Rage JC, Boistel R, Fernandez V, Pollet Staatlichen Museums für Mineralogie und (Greece), the most diverse European N, Garcia G, Laurin M. 2016 Synchrotron analysis Geologie zu Dresden 43/44, 265–280. herpetofauna at the Miocene/Pliocene transition of a ‘mummified’ salamander (Vertebrata: 152. Roček Z. 1996 The salamander Brachycormus boundary. Palaeontol. Electron. 22.3.68, 1–99. Caudata) from the Eocene of Quercy, France. noachicus from the Oligocene of Europe, and 120. Vasilyan D. 2020 Fish, amphibian and reptilian Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177, the role of neoteny in the evolution of assemblage from the middle Miocene locality 147–164. salamanders. Palaeontology 39, 477–496. Gračanica—Bugojno palaeolake, Bosnia and 136. Tissier J, Rage J, Laurin M 2017 Exceptional soft 153. Macaluso L, Villa A, Pitruzzella G, Rook L, Herzegovina. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 100, tissues preservation in a mummified frog-eating Pogoda P, Kupfer A, Delfino M. 2020 Osteology 437–455. (doi:10.1007/s12549-019-00381-8) Eocene salamander. PeerJ 5, e3861. of the Italian endemic spectacled salamanders, 121. Pomel NA. 1853 Catalogue méthodique et 137. Zittel KA. 1890 Handbuch der palaeontologie Salamandrina spp. (Amphibia, Urodela, descriptif des vertébrés fossiles découverts dans (Vol. 5), 948 pp. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg. Salamandridae): selected skeletal elements for le bassin hydrographique supérieur de la Loire et 138. De Stefano G. 1903 Sui batraci urodeli delle palaeontological investigations. J. Morphol. 281, surtout dans la vallée de son affluent principal, Fosforiti del Quercy. Bollettino della Societa 1391–1410. (doi:10.1002/jmor.21254) l’Allier/par pomel. J.-B. Baillière. Geologica Italiana 22, 40–50. 154. Macaluso L, Villa A, Pitruzzella G, Rook L, 122. Noble GK. 1928 Two new fossil amphibia of 139. Sanchiz B. 1977 Nuevos anfibios del Neógeno y Carnevale G, Delfino M. 2021 A progressive zoögeographic importance from the Miocene of Cuaternario de Europa. Origen, desarrollo y extirpation: an overview of the fossil record of Europe. Am. Museum Nat. Hist. 308, 1–13. relaciones de la batracofauna española. PhD Salamandrina (Salamandridae, Urodela). Hist. 123. Meyer HV. 1860 Salamandrinen aus der dissertation, 863 pp. Universidad Complutense Biol. 33, 3723–3740. (doi:10.1080/08912963. Braunkohle am Rhein und in Böhmen. de Madrid. 2021.1888946) Palaeontographica 1846–1933, 47–73. 140. Čkhikvadze VM. 1982 On the findings of fossil 155. Sanchiz B, Młynarski M. 1979 Pliocene 124. Herre W. 1949 Neue Tatsachen zur Cryptobranchidae in the USSR and Mongolia. salamandrids (Amphibia, Caudata) from Poland. Stammesgeschichte der Schwanzlurche. Vertebr. Hungarica 21, 63–67. Acta zool. Cracov 24, 175–188. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Systematik 141. Tschudi JV. 1837 Über den Homo diluvii testis, 156. Hodrová M. 1984 Salamandridae of the Upper 78, 217–236. Andrias scheuchzeri. Neues Jahrbuch für Pliocene Ivanovce locality (Czechoslovakia). Acta 125. Westphal F. 1980 Chelotriton robustus n. sp., ein Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 4, 331–352. Salamandride aus dem Eozän der Grube Messel Petrefaktenkunde 5, 545–547. 157. Holman JA, Stuart AJ, Clayden JD. 1990 A bei Darmstadt. Senckenb lethaea 60, 475–487. 142. Tempfer PM. 2004 Andrias scheuchzeri (Caudata: Middle Pleistocene herpetofauna from Cudmore [German with English abstract.]. Cryptobranchidae) aus der obermiozänen (MN7/ Grove, Essex, England, and its paleogeographic 126. Nussbaum RA, Brodie ED. 1982 Partitioning of 8) Fundstelle Mataschen/Steiermark. Joannea and paleoclimatic implications. J. Vertebr. the salamandrid genus Tylototriton Anderson Geologie und Paläontologie 5, 257–268. Paleontol. 10, 86–94. (doi:10.1080/02724634. (Amphibia: Caudata) with a description of a 143. Böhme M. 2008 Ectothermic vertebrates 1990.10011793) new genus. Herpetologica 12, 320–332. (Teleostei, Allocaudata, Urodela, Anura, 158. Holman JA, Stuart AJ. 1991 Amphibians of the 127. Roček Z. 1996 Skull of the neotenic salamandrid Testudines, Choristodera, Crocodylia, Squamata) Whitemoor Channel early Flandrian site near amphibian Triturus alpestris and abbreviated from the Upper Oligocene of Oberleichtersbach Bosley, East Cheshire; with remarks on the fossil distribution of Bufo calamita in Brita. Herpetol. 174. Syromyatnikova EV. 2022 New Neogene 189. Masini F, Giannini T, Abbazzi L, Fanfani F, 22 J. 1, 568–573. Hynobiidae (Amphibia: Caudata) from Eastern Delfino M, Maul LC, Torre D. 2005 A latest 159. Holman JA. 1992 The Boxgrove, England, Europe. Russ. J. Herpetol. 29, 156–160. (doi:10. Biharian small vertebrate fauna from the royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos middle Pleistocene herpetofauna: 30906/1026-2296-2022-29-3-156-160) lacustrine succession of San Lorenzo Paleogeographic, evolutionary, stratigraphic, and 175. Malakhov DV. 2003 The earliest known record of (Sant’Arcangelo Basin, Basilicata, Italy). paleoecological relationships. Hist. Biol. 6, Mioproteus (Caudata; Proteidae) from the middle Quat. Int. 131, 79–93. (doi:10.1016/j.quaint. 263–279. (doi:10.1080/10292389209380435) Miocene of Central Kazakhstan. Biota 4, 67–72. 2004.07.008) 160. Bailon S. 1995 Présence de Mioproteus wezei 176. Venczel M, Sanchíz B. 2005 A fossil 190. Venczel M. 2007 Late Middle Miocene (Amphibia, Proteidae) dans le Pliocène plethodontid salamander from the Middle amphibians and reptiles from Subpiatra (Bihor supérieur (MN 16) d’Europe de l’Ouest. Nuovo Miocene of Slovakia (Caudata, Plethodontidae). district, Romania). Nymphaea (Folia naturae Annuario di Geologia e Paleontologia, Libri Amphibia-Reptilia 26, 408–411. (doi:10.1163/ Bihariae) 34, 39–66. mensili 1, 1–8. 156853805774408586) 191. De Soler BG et al. 2012 A new key locality for 161. Delfino M. 2004 The middle Pleistocene 177. Delfino M, Razzetti E, Salvidio S. 2005 European the Pliocene vertebrate record of Europe: the herpetofauna of Valdemino Cave (Liguria, plethodontids: palaeontological data and Camp dels Ninots maar (NE Spain). Geol. Acta North-Western Italy). Herpetol. J. 14, 113–128. biogeographical considerations. Atti Museo 10, 1–17. 162. Hír J, Venczel M. 2005 New middle Miocene Civico Storia Nat. Genova 97, 45–58. 192. Villa A, Carnevale G, Pavia M, Rook L, Sami M, Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 vertebrate localities from Subpiatră (Bihor District, 178. Young C. 1965 On the first occurrence of the Szyndlar Z, Delfino M. 2021 An overview of the R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 Romania). Acta Palaeontol. Romaniae 5, 211–221. fossil salamanders from the upper Miocene of late Miocene vertebrates from the fissure fillings 163. D’Orazi Porchetti S, Manni R, Sottili G. 2012 A Shantung, China. Acta Palaeontol. Sinica 13, of Monticino Quarry (Brisighella, Italy), with salamandrid from the middle Pleistocene of 455–459. new data on non-mammalian taxa. Rivista northern Latium (Fosso di San Martino, Rome, 179. Blain HA, López-García JM, Cuenca-Bescós G. Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 127, Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica 2011 A very diverse amphibian and reptile 297–354. Italiana 51, 1–8. assemblage from the late Middle Pleistocene of 193. Bailon S, Stoetzel E, Rage JC. 2011 First fossil 164. Venczel M, Hir J. 2013 Amphibians and the Sierra de Atapuerca (Sima del Elefante, representative of the salamander crown-group squamates from the Miocene of Felsőtárkány Burgos, Northwestern Spain). Geobios 44, from a Gondwanan continent: Pleurodeles cf. Basin, N-Hungary. Palaeontogr. Abteilung A 157–172. (doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2010.08.003) waltl from the Quaternary of Morocco. 300, 117–158. (doi:10.1127/pala/300/ 180. Blain HA, López-García JM, Cordy JM, Pirson S, Amphibia-Reptilia 32, 245–252. (doi:10.1163/ 2013/117) Abrams G, Di Modica K, Bonjean D. 2014 Middle 017353711X565501) 165. Villa A, Blain HA, van den Hoek Ostende LW, to Late Pleistocene herpetofauna from Scladina 194. Sillero N et al. 2014 Updated distribution and Delfino M. 2018 Fossil amphibians and reptiles and Sous-Saint-Paul caves (Namur, Belgium). biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of from Tegelen (Province of Limburg) and the C.R. Palevol 13, 681–690. (doi:10.1016/j.crpv. Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia 35, 1–31. (doi:10. early Pleistocene palaeoclimate of The 2014.03.006) 1163/15685381-00002935) Netherlands. Quat. Sci. Rev. 187, 203–219. 181. Bartolini S, Cioppi E, Rook L, Delfino M. 2014 195. Młynarski M, Szyndlar Z, Estes R, Sanchiz B. (doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.03.020) Late Pleistocene fossils and the future 1984 Amphibians and reptiles from the Pliocene 166. Villa A, Bon M, Delfino M. 2020 Trapped in a distribution of Rana temporaria (Amphibia, locality of Weze II near Dzialoszyn (Poland). roman well: amphibians and reptiles from Anura) along the Apennine Peninsula (Italy). Acta Palaeontol. Polonica 29, 209–226. Tenuta Zuccarello near Marcon, Venice, Italy. Zool. Stud. 53, 1–10. (doi:10.1186/s40555-014- 196. Syromyatnikova E, Tesakov A, Frolov P, Titov V. Hist. Biol. 32, 55–70. (doi:10.1080/08912963. 0076-5) 2021 A Pliocene Mioproteus (Urodela: Proteidae) 2018.1470170) 182. Syromyatnikova E, Georgalis GL, Mayda S, Kaya from the Taman Peninsula (Russia). 167. Vasile Ș, Venczel M, Petculescu A. 2021 Early T, Saraç G. 2019 A new early Miocene Russ. J. Herpetol. 28, 125–128. (doi:10.30906/ Pleistocene amphibians and squamates from herpetofauna from Kilçak, Turkey. 1026-2296-2021-28-2-125-128) Copăceni (Dacian Basin, southern Romania). Russ. J. Herpetol. 26, 205. (doi:10.30906/1026- 197. Averianov AO. 2001 New records of proteid Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. 101, 967–983. 2296-2019-26-4-205-224) salamanders (Amphibia, Caudata) from the (doi:10.1007/s12549-020-00465-w) 183. Delfino M, Bailon S, Pitruzzella G. 2011 The Late Pliocene of Ukraine and Lower Pleistocene of 168. Ratnikov VY, Litvinchuk SN. 2007 Comparative Pliocene amphibians and reptiles from ‘Capo Moldavia. Vestnik zoologii 35, 43–46. morphology of trunk and sacral vertebrae of Mannu D1 Local Fauna’(Mandriola, Sardinia, 198. Stefaniak K. 1995 Late Pliocene cervids from tailed amphibians of Russia and adjacent Italy). Geodiversitas 33, 357–382. (doi:10.5252/ Weze 2 in southern Poland. Acta Palaeontol. countries. Russ. J. Herpetol. 14, 177–190. g2011n2a10) Polonica 40, 327–340. 169. Ratnikov VY, Litvinchuk SN. 2009 Atlantal 184. Schoch RR, Rasser MW. 2013 A new 199. Brunner G. 1956 Nachtrag zur Kleinen vertebrae of tailed amphibians of Russia and salamandrid from the Miocene Randeck Maar, Teufelshöhle bei Pottenstein (Oberfranken). adjacent countries. Russ. J. Herpetol. 16, 57–68. Germany. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 33, 58–66. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 170. Navás RPL. 1922 Algunos Fósiles de Libros (doi:10.1080/02724634.2012.716113) Monatshefte 2, 75–100. (Teruel). Boletín de la Sociedad Ibérica de 185. Lunau H. 1950 Ein neuer fossiler Wassermolch 200. Averianov AO, Tjutkova LA. 1995 Ranodon cf. Ciencias Naturales 21, 52–61. der Gattung Triturus aus dem Miocän sibiriens (Amphibia, Caudata) from the upper 171. Martin AC, Zarazaga MAA, Sanchiz B. 2012 Süddeutschlands. Zoologischer Anzeiger (Suppl.) pliocene of Southern Kazakhstan: the first fossil Nomenclatural notes on living and fossil 14, 67–70. record of the family Hynobiidae. amphibians. Graellsia: Revista de Zoología 186. Gál E, Hír J, Kessler E, Kókay J, Venczel M. 2000 Paläontologische Zeitschrift 69, 257–264. 68, 159–180. (doi:10.3989/graellsia.2012. Middle Miocene fossils from the section of the (doi:10.1007/BF02985989) v68.056) road at the Rákóczi Chapel, Mátraszőlős. II. 201. Villa A, Blain HA, Delfino M. 2018 The Early 172. Blain HA, López-García JM, Cuenca-Bescós G, Locality Mátraszőlős 2. Folia Historico Naturalia Pleistocene herpetofauna of Rivoli Veronese Alonso C, Vaquero M, Alonso S. 2009 Première Musei Matraensis 24, 39–75. (Northern Italy) as evidence for humid and mise en évidence fossile du chioglosse portugais 187. Venczel M. 2008 A new salamandrid amphibian forested glacial phases in the Gelasian of Chioglossa lusitanica (Amphibia, Caudata) et son from the Middle Miocene of Hungary and its Southern Alps. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. implication pour l’histoire biogéographique de phylogenetic relationships. J. Syst. Paleontol. 6, Palaeoecol. 490, 393–403. (doi:10.1016/j. l’espèce. C.R. Palevol 8, 693–703. (doi:10.1016/ 41–59. (doi:10.1017/S1477201907002283) palaeo.2017.11.016) j.crpv.2009.06.002) 188. Delfino M, Bailon S. 2000 Early Pleistocene 202. Biton R, Bailon S, Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, 173. Syromyatnikova EV. 2014 The first record of herpetofauna from Cava Dell’Erba and Cava Pirro Rabinovich R. 2019 Pleistocene amphibians and Salamandrella (Caudata: Hynobiidae) from the (Apulia, Southern Italy). Herpetol. J. 10, squamates from the Upper Jordan Rift Valley, Neogene of Russia. Russ. J. Herpetol. 21, 217–220. 95–110. Gesher Benot Ya’aqov and Nahal Mahanayeem Outlet (MIS 20–18 and MIS 4/3). Quat. Res. 91, Hoyas Konservat-Lagerstätte (La Huérguina 228. Sun Y, Yin Q, Crucifix M, Clemens SC, Araya- 23 345–366. (doi:10.1017/qua.2018.82) Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Iberian Ranges, Melo P, Liu W et al. 2019 Diverse manifestations 203. Nakamura Y, Ota H. 2015 Late Pleistocene- Spain). J. Iberian Geol. 36, 297–326. (doi:10. of the mid-Pleistocene climate transition. Nat. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Holocene amphibians from Okinawajima Island 5209/rev_JIGE.2010.v36.n2.13) Commun. 10, 1–11. (doi:10.1038/s41467-018- in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan: Reconfirmed 216. Venczel M. 1999 Fossil land salamanders (Caudata, 07882-8) faunal endemicity and the Holocene range Hynobiidae) from the Carpathian Basin: relation 229. Milner AR. 1983 The biogeography of collapse of forest-dwelling species. Palaeontol. between extinct and extant genera. Acta salamanders in the Mesozoic and Early Caenozoic: Electron. 18, 1–26. Palaeontol. Romaniae 2, 489–492. a cladistic-vicariance model. In Evolution, time, 204. Close RA, Benson RBJ, Alroy J, Carrano MT, 217. Zhang P, Chen YQ, Zhou H, Liu YF, Wang XL, and space. The emergence of the biosphere (ed. GR Cleary TJ, Dunne EM, Mannion PD, Uhen MD, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB, Qu LH. 2006 Phylogeny, Noonan), pp. 431–468. New York, NY: Academic Butler RJ. 2020 The apparent exponential evolution, and biogeography of Asiatic Press. radiation of Phanerozoic land vertebrates is Salamanders (Hynobiidae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 230. Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986 Biology of an artefact of spatial sampling biases. USA 103, 7360–7365. (doi:10.1073/pnas. amphibians, 670 pp. Baltimora, Johns Hopkins Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20200372. (doi:10.1098/ 0602325103) University Press. rspb.2020.0372) 218. Nichols G. 2009 Sedimentology and stratigraphy. 231. Oreska MPJ, Carrano MT, Dzikiewicz KM. 2013 205. Signor PW, Lipps JH. 1982 Sampling bias, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Vertebrate paleontology of the Cloverly Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 12 December 2022 gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in 219. Wilson GP, DeMar Jr DG, Carter G. 2014 Formation (Lower Cretaceous), I: faunal R. Soc. Open Sci. 9: 220935 the fossil record. In Geological implications of Extinction and survival of salamander and composition, biogeographic relationships, impacts of large asteroids and comets on the salamander-like amphibians across the and sampling. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. earth (eds LT Silver, PH Schultz), vol. 190, Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary in northeastern 33, 264–292. (doi:10.1080/02724634.2012. pp. 291–296. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of Montana, USA. In Through the end of the 717567) America. cretaceous in the type locality of the hell creek 232. Vieites DR, Min MS, Wake DB. 2007 Rapid 206. Lucas SG. 2018 Permian tetrapod biochronology, formation in montana and adjacent areas (eds diversification and dispersal during periods of correlation and evolutionary events. Geological GP Wilson, WA Clemens, JR Horner, JH global warming by plethodontid salamanders. Society of London Special Publications 450, Hartman), vol. 503, pp. 271–297. Boulder, CO: Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19 903–19 907. 405–444. Geological Society of America. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0705056104) 207. Dunne EM, Farnsworth A, Greene SE, Lunt DJ, 220. Jetz W, Pyron RA. 2018 The interplay of past 233. Shen XX, Liang D, Chen MY, Mao RL, Wake DB, Butler RJ. 2021 Climatic drivers of latitudinal diversification and evolutionary isolation with Zhang P. 2016 Enlarged multilocus data set variation in Late Triassic tetrapod diversity. present imperilment across the amphibian tree provides surprisingly younger time of origin for Palaeontology 64, 101–117. (doi:10.1111/pala. of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 850–858. (doi:10. the Plethodontidae, the largest family of 12514) 1038/s41559-018-0515-5) salamanders. Syst. Biol. 65, 66–81. (doi:10. 208. Roelants K, Gower DJ, Wilkinson M, Loader SP, 221. Chesi F, Delfino M, Rook L. 2009 Late Miocene 1093/sysbio/syv061) Biju SD, Guillaume K, Moriau L, Bossuyt F. 2007 Mauremys (Testudines, Geoemydidae) from 234. DeMar DG. 2013. A new fossil salamander Global patterns of diversification in the history Tuscany (Italy): evidence of terrapin persistence (Caudata, Proteidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of modern amphibians. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA after a mammal turnover. J. Paleontol. 83, (Maastrichtian) Hell Creek Formation, Montana, 104, 887–892. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0608378104) 379–388. (doi:10.1666/08-134.1) USA. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 33, 588-598. 209. Smith AB, McGowan AJ. 2007 The shape of the 222. Villa A, Delfino M. 2019 Fossil lizards and worm 235. Sket B. 1997 Distribution of Proteus (Amphibia: Phanerozoic marine palaeodiversity curve: how lizards (Reptilia, Squamata) from the Neogene Urodela: Proteidae) and its possible explanation. much can be predicted from the sedimentary and Quaternary of Europe: an overview. Swiss J. Biogeogr. 24, 263–280. (doi:10.1046/j.1365- rock record of Western Europe? Palaeontology J. Palaeontol. 138, 177–211. (doi:10.1007/ 2699.1997.00103.x) 50, 765–774. (doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007. s13358-018-0172-y) 236. Macaluso L, Villa A, Carnevale G, Delfino M. 00693.x) 223. Van der Made J, Morales J, Montoya P. 2006 2021 Past, present, and future climate space of 210. Benson RB, Mannion PD, Butler RJ, Upchurch P, Late Miocene turnover in the Spanish mammal the only endemic vertebrate genus of the Italian Goswami A, Evans SE. 2013 Cretaceous tetrapod record in relation to palaeoclimate and the peninsula. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–8. (doi:10.1038/ fossil record sampling and faunal turnover: Messinian Salinity Crisis. Palaeogeogr. s41598-021-01492-z) implications for biogeography and the rise of Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 238, 228–246. 237. Estes R. 1970 Origin of the recent North modern clades. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. (doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.03.030) American lower vertebrate fauna: an inquiry Palaeoecol. 372, 88–107. (doi:10.1016/j.palaeo. 224. Cantalapiedra JL, Domingo MS, Domingo L. into the fossil record. Forma et Functio 3, 2012.10.028) 2018 Multi-scale interplays of biotic and abiotic 139–163. 211. Sullivan C, Hone D, Xu X. 2012 The search for drivers shape mammalian sub-continental 238. Barbolini N et al. 2020 Cenozoic evolution dinosaurs in Asia. The Complete Dinosaur 5, diversity over millions of years. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8. of the steppe-desert biome in Central Asia. 61–73. (doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31699-6) Sci. Adv. 6, eabb8227. (doi:10.1126/sciadv. 212. Sullivan C, Wang Y, Hone DW, Wang Y, Xu X, 225. Delfino M, Rossi MA. 2013 Fossil crocodylid abb8227) Zhang F. 2014 The vertebrates of the Jurassic remains from Scontrone (Tortonian, Southern 239. Yuan ZY, Wu YK, Yan F, Murphy RW, Papenfuss Daohugou Biota of northeastern China. Italy) and the late Neogene Mediterranean TJ, Wake DB, Zhang YP, Che J. 2022 J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 34, 243–280. (doi:10. biogeography of crocodylians. Geobios 46, Comparative multi-locus assessment of modern 1080/02724634.2013.787316) 25–31. (doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2012.10.006) Asian newts (Cynops, Paramesotriton, and 213. Zhou ZH, Wang Y. 2010 Vertebrate diversity of 226. Mannion PD, Benson RB, Carrano MT, Tennant Pachytriton: Salamandridae) in southern China the Jehol Biota as compared with other JP, Judd J, Butler RJ. 2015 Climate constrains suggests a shared biogeographic history. Zool. lagerstätten. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, the evolutionary history and biodiversity of Res. 43, 706–718. (doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095- 1894–1907. (doi:10.1007/s11430-010-4094-9) crocodylians. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9. (doi:10. 8137.2022.080) 214. Zhou ZH, Wang Y. 2017 Vertebrate assemblages 1038/ncomms9438) 240. Macaluso L, Mannion PD, Evans SE, Carnevale G, of the Jurassic Yanliao Biota and the Early 227. Nicholl CS, Rio JP, Mannion PD, Delfino M. 2020 Monti S, Marchitelli D, Delfino M. 2022 Data Cretaceous Jehol Biota: comparisons and A re-examination of the anatomy and from: Biogeographic history of Palearctic implications. Palaeoworld 26, 241–252. (doi:10. systematics of the tomistomine crocodylians caudates revealed by a critical appraisal of their 1016/j.palwor.2017.01.002) from the Miocene of Italy and Malta. J. Syst. fossil record quality and spatiotemporal 215. Buscalioni AD, Fregenal-Martínez MA. 2010 A Paleontol. 18, 1853–1889. (doi:10.1080/ distribution. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare. holistic approach to the palaeoecology of Las 14772019.2020.1855603) c.6303828)