3d83ce9b3838414ca40d3a63c8f6a652 revcatdrepub_a2022m06d30n64iEng.pdf 224e533628ad27a8116db20ae33c9c38e23b6326 revcatdrepub_a2022m06d30n64iEng.pdf b81e78977a5c3836c0316cd5953f6a3b7dda8d0585a4b54d6e514866f22d372b revcatdrepub_a2022m06d30n64iEng.pdf Title: The limits of privacy by design Subject: Privacy by design (PbD), an approach to systems engineering included in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, now forms part of the EU’s legal safeguards. This article examines the scope of this reliance on privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs). More specifically, it assesses their limits and the problems with their real-world application. One aspect worthy of particular consideration is the lack of co-ordination between our legal and our technology communities: we shall be providing examples of supposedly privacy-enhancing technologies that are ineffective in practice, as well as those that are unlawful and, finally, those that do not take account of the legal concept of privacy in the design of the protection they afford. The article concludes by suggesting some possible ways of remedying this situation and of leveraging the full co-regulatory potential of privacy-enhancing technologies. El principi de privadesa pel disseny, incorporat finalment al Reglament general de protecció de dades, forma part ara de les garanties jurídiques. Analitzem, en aquest treball, l’abast d’aquesta crida a la tecnologia garant. Concretament, ens interessa valorar els seus límits o problemes d’aplicació. Un aspecte que mereixerà especial atenció és la falta de coordinació entre les comunitats jurídiques i tècniques, i les seves conseqüències. Així, descriurem casos d’ús de tecnologies pretesament garants que no ho són en la pràctica; també veurem casos de tecnologia garant contrària a dret, i, finalment, mencionarem casos d’eines que no tenen en compte el concepte jurídic de privadesa a l’hora de dissenyar la seva protecció. Dedicarem la part final del treball a suggerir possibles vies per redreçar la situació i treure tot el potencial corregulador de les eines tècniques garants. Author: Antoni Roig Batalla Creator: Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Windows) Producer: Adobe PDF Library 15.0 CreationDate: Tue Jun 7 11:22:37 2022 CEST ModDate: Tue Jun 7 11:22:47 2022 CEST Tagged: no UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: none JavaScript: no Pages: 13 Encrypted: no Page size: 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4) Page rot: 0 File size: 448278 bytes Optimized: yes PDF version: 1.7 name type encoding emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- --------- JSQDBA+TimesNewRomanPSMT CID TrueType Identity-H yes yes yes 147 0 HCVDZE+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT CID TrueType Identity-H yes yes yes 154 0 ROXQJK+TimesNewRomanPSMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 138 0 DBEIUM+Arial-BoldMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 149 0 XFSVPY+Arial-ItalicMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 155 0 AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 156 0 AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 157 0 DBEIUM+DINAlternate-Bold TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 191 0 DBEIUM+Arial-BoldMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 193 0 NDCQES+DINNextLTPro-Bold TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 197 0 XTRYUY+ArialMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 77 0 XTRYUY+ArialMT TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 75 0 ZRISRU+Calibri TrueType WinAnsi yes yes yes 81 0 Jhove (Rel. 1.22.1, 2019-04-17) Date: 2023-02-18 02:40:03 CET RepresentationInformation: revcatdrepub_a2022m06d30n64iEng.pdf ReportingModule: PDF-hul, Rel. 1.12.1 (2019-04-17) LastModified: 2023-01-27 01:34:51 CET Size: 448278 Format: PDF Version: 1.7 Status: Well-Formed and valid SignatureMatches: PDF-hul MIMEtype: application/pdf Profile: Linearized PDF, ISO PDF/A-1, Level B PDFMetadata: Objects: 210 FreeObjects: 1 IncrementalUpdates: 1 DocumentCatalog: ViewerPreferences: HideToolbar: false HideMenubar: false HideWindowUI: false FitWindow: false CenterWindow: false DisplayDocTitle: true NonFullScreenPageMode: UseNone Direction: L2R ViewArea: CropBox ViewClip: CropBox PrintArea: CropBox PageClip: CropBox PageLayout: SinglePage PageMode: UseNone Language: en-GB Outlines: Item: Title: 1 Relying on technology: privacy by design Item: Title: 2 Are PETs always needed? Item: Title: 3 Ineffective PETs Item: Title: 4 Which are the best effective PETs? Item: Title: 5 Effective but disproportionate PETs Item: Title: 6 PETs based on a non-legal concept of ‘privacy’ Item: Title: 7 How can you tell if a PET is effective? Item: Title: 8 The necessary institutionalisation of reliance on technology Item: Title: 9 Conclusions Item: Title: References Info: Title: The limits of privacy by design Author: Antoni Roig Batalla Subject: Privacy by design (PbD), an approach to systems engineering included in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, now forms part of the EU’s legal safeguards. This article examines the scope of this reliance on privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs). More specifically, it assesses their limits and the problems with their real-world application. One aspect worthy of particular consideration is the lack of co-ordination between our legal and our technology communities: we shall be providing examples of supposedly privacy-enhancing technologies that are ineffective in practice, as well as those that are unlawful and, finally, those that do not take account of the legal concept of privacy in the design of the protection they afford. The article concludes by suggesting some possible ways of remedying this situation and of leveraging the full co-regulatory potential of privacy-enhancing technologies. El principi de privadesa pel disseny, incorporat finalment al Reglament general de protecció de dades, forma part ara de les garanties jurídiques. Analitzem, en aquest treball, l’abast d’aquesta crida a la tecnologia garant. Concretament, ens interessa valorar els seus límits o problemes d’aplicació. Un aspecte que mereixerà especial atenció és la falta de coordinació entre les comunitats jurídiques i tècniques, i les seves conseqüències. Així, descriurem casos d’ús de tecnologies pretesament garants que no ho són en la pràctica; també veurem casos de tecnologia garant contrària a dret, i, finalment, mencionarem casos d’eines que no tenen en compte el concepte jurídic de privadesa a l’hora de dissenyar la seva protecció. Dedicarem la part final del treball a suggerir possibles vies per redreçar la situació i treure tot el potencial corregulador de les eines tècniques garants. Creator: Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Windows) Producer: Adobe PDF Library 15.0 CreationDate: Tue Jun 07 11:22:37 CEST 2022 ModDate: Tue Jun 07 11:22:47 CEST 2022 ID: 0xed6757465dfcaf4081f336c832bcef13, 0xde9ee77a4d5f3244a0058bf5dbd04634 Filters: FilterPipeline: FlateDecode FilterPipeline: JPXDecode Images: Image: NisoImageMetadata: FormatName: image/jpx ImageWidth: 16 ImageHeight: 16 BitsPerSample: 8 BitsPerSampleUnit: integer Filter: JPXDecode Intent: RelativeColorimetric Name: X Fonts: Type0: Font: BaseFont: JSQDBA+TimesNewRomanPSMT Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: HCVDZE+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT Encoding: Identity-H ToUnicode: true TrueType: Font: BaseFont: ZRISRU+Calibri FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 32 FontDescriptor: FontName: ZRISRU+Calibri Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -503, -312, 1240, 1026 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: DBEIUM+Arial-BoldMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 146 FontDescriptor: FontName: DBEIUM+Arial-BoldMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -628, -376, 2000, 1018 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: ROXQJK+TimesNewRomanPSMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 242 FontDescriptor: FontName: ROXQJK+TimesNewRomanPSMT Flags: Serif, Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -568, -307, 2000, 1007 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: XFSVPY+Arial-ItalicMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 205 FontDescriptor: FontName: XFSVPY+Arial-ItalicMT Flags: Nonsymbolic, Italic FontBBox: -517, -325, 1359, 998 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 116 FontDescriptor: FontName: AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT Flags: Serif, Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -558, -307, 2000, 1026 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 32 LastChar: 121 FontDescriptor: FontName: AABDFS+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT Flags: Serif, Nonsymbolic, Italic FontBBox: -498, -307, 1333, 1023 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true Font: BaseFont: XTRYUY+ArialMT FontSubset: true FirstChar: 48 LastChar: 57 FontDescriptor: FontName: XTRYUY+ArialMT Flags: Nonsymbolic FontBBox: -665, -325, 2000, 1006 FontFile2: true Encoding: WinAnsiEncoding ToUnicode: true CIDFontType2: Font: BaseFont: HCVDZE+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: HCVDZE+TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT Flags: Serif, Symbolic, Italic FontBBox: -498, -307, 1333, 1023 FontFile2: true Font: BaseFont: JSQDBA+TimesNewRomanPSMT CIDSystemInfo: Registry: Adobe Registry: Identity Supplement: 0 FontDescriptor: FontName: JSQDBA+TimesNewRomanPSMT Flags: Serif, Symbolic FontBBox: -568, -307, 2000, 1007 FontFile2: true XMP: application/pdf Privacy by design (PbD), an approach to systems engineering included in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, now forms part of the EU’s legal safeguards. This article examines the scope of this reliance on privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs). More specifically, it assesses their limits and the problems with their real-world application. One aspect worthy of particular consideration is the lack of co-ordination between our legal and our technology communities: we shall be providing examples of supposedly privacy-enhancing technologies that are ineffective in practice, as well as those that are unlawful and, finally, those that do not take account of the legal concept of privacy in the design of the protection they afford. The article concludes by suggesting some possible ways of remedying this situation and of leveraging the full co-regulatory potential of privacy-enhancing technologies. El principi de privadesa pel disseny, incorporat finalment al Reglament general de protecció de dades, forma part ara de les garanties jurídiques. Analitzem, en aquest treball, l’abast d’aquesta crida a la tecnologia garant. Concretament, ens interessa valorar els seus límits o problemes d’aplicació. Un aspecte que mereixerà especial atenció és la falta de coordinació entre les comunitats jurídiques i tècniques, i les seves conseqüències. Així, descriurem casos d’ús de tecnologies pretesament garants que no ho són en la pràctica; també veurem casos de tecnologia garant contrària a dret, i, finalment, mencionarem casos d’eines que no tenen en compte el concepte jurídic de privadesa a l’hora de dissenyar la seva protecció. Dedicarem la part final del treball a suggerir possibles vies per redreçar la situació i treure tot el potencial corregulador de les eines tècniques garants. Antoni Roig Batalla The limits of privacy by design privacy by design PbD privacy-enhancing technologies PETs co-regulation law and technology privadesa pel disseny eines garants de la privadesa corregulació dret i tecnologia 2022-06-07T11:22:37+02:00 2022-06-07T11:22:47+02:00 2022-06-07T11:22:47+02:00 Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Windows) uuid:98009418-dfa6-4f1e-8aa2-c1610dec9110 xmp.did:E981601902F9E211B9488A0131FC7D8E xmp.id:341122d8-bccd-4343-b3df-87bf946fc5fc proof:pdf xmp.iid:a25c1edc-c528-a245-a99e-85d4628a139f xmp.did:57c959d7-97f5-e140-97db-a4e340cabe33 xmp.did:E981601902F9E211B9488A0131FC7D8E default converted from application/x-indesign to application/pdf Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Windows) / 2022-06-07T11:22:37+02:00 True https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.ca Adobe PDF Library 15.0 False Pages: Page: Sequence: 1 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 68, 53, 176, 29 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 490, 53, 546, 29 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 468, 134, 542, 122 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 81, 124, 162, 112 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 88, 82, 243, 70 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 2 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 752, 263, 738 ActionDest: 24 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 730, 192, 716 ActionDest: 26 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 708, 155, 694 ActionDest: 28 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 687, 232, 672 ActionDest: 30 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 665, 236, 650 ActionDest: 41 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 643, 286, 628 ActionDest: 46 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 621, 249, 607 ActionDest: 48 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 599, 341, 585 ActionDest: 50 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 577, 133, 563 ActionDest: 57 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 70, 556, 119, 541 ActionDest: 57 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 3 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 4 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 5 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 6 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 112, 99, 177, 88 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 171, 89, 222, 78 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 297, 89, 332, 78 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 459, 89, 544, 78 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 7 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 202, 105, 223, 93 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 8 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 9 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 10 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 221, 181, 413, 169 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 413, 181, 415, 169 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 11 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 12 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 214, 657, 437, 642 Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 233, 609, 392, 594 Thumb: true Page: Sequence: 13 Annotations: Annotation: Subtype: Link Rect: 130, 543, 343, 529 Thumb: true Checksum: cdfdd636 Type: CRC32 Checksum: 3d83ce9b3838414ca40d3a63c8f6a652 Type: MD5 Checksum: 224e533628ad27a8116db20ae33c9c38e23b6326 Type: SHA-1