Journal of Clinical Medicine Article Cord Blood Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease Iris Soveral 1,2 , Laura Guirado 1 , Maria C. Escobar-Diaz 3,4 , María José Alcaide 5,6 , Josep Maria Martínez 1,7,8,9 , Víctor Rodríguez-Sureda 1,9 , Bart Bijnens 8,10 , Eugenia Antolin 6,11 , Elisa Llurba 12,13 , Jose L. Bartha 6,11 , Olga Gómez 1,7,8,9, * and Fàtima Crispi 1,7,8,9 1 BCNatal, Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), 08028 Barcelona, Spain 2 Obstetrics Department, Hospital General de Hospitalet, 08906 Barcelona, Spain 3 Pediatric Cardiology Department, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950 Barcelona, Spain 4 Cardiovascular Research Group, Sant Joan de Deu Research Institute, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5 Laboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain 6 Research Institute IdiPAZ, 28029 Madrid, Spain 7 Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain 8 Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain 9 Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), 28029 Madrid, Spain 10 Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies ICREA, 08010 Barcelona, Spain 11 Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain 12 Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Santa Creu i Sant Pau University Hospital, 08025 Barcelona, Spain 13 Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: ogomez@clinic.cat; Tel.: +34-932-27-9333 Citation: Soveral, I.; Guirado, L.; Abstract: Fetal echocardiography has limited prognostic ability in the evaluation of left-sided con- Escobar-Diaz, M.C.; Alcaide, M.J.; genital heart defects (left heart defects). Cord blood cardiovascular biomarkers could improve the Martínez, J.M.; Rodríguez-Sureda, V.; prognostic evaluation of left heart defects. A multicenter prospective cohort (2013–2019) including Bijnens, B.; Antolin, E.; Llurba, E.; fetuses with left heart defects (aortic coarctation, aortic stenosis, hypoplastic left heart, and multilevel Bartha, J.L.; et al. Cord Blood obstruction (complex left heart defects) subdivided according to their outcome (favorable vs. poor), Cardiovascular Biomarkers in and control fetuses were evaluated in the third trimester of pregnancy at three referral centers in Left-Sided Congenital Heart Disease. Spain. Poor outcome was defined as univentricular palliation, heart transplant, or death. Cord J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119. https:// blood concentrations of N-terminal precursor of B-type natriuretic peptide, Troponin I, transforming doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237119 growth factor β, placental growth factor, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 were determined. Academic Editor: A total of 45 fetuses with left heart defects (29 favorable and 16 poor outcomes) and 35 normal Roland Axt-Fliedner fetuses were included, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range 1.4–3.9). Left heart Received: 10 October 2022 defects with favorable outcome showed markedly increased cord blood transforming growth factor Accepted: 25 November 2022 β (normal heart median 15.5 ng/mL (6.8–21.4) vs. favorable outcome 51.7 ng/mL (13.8–73.9) vs. Published: 30 November 2022 poor outcome 25.1 ng/mL (6.9–39.0), p = 0.001) and decreased placental growth factor concentrations (normal heart 17.9 pg/mL (13.8–23.9) vs. favorable outcome 12.8 pg/mL (11.7–13.6) vs. poor outcome Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral 11.0 pg/mL (8.8–15.4), p < 0.001). Poor outcome left heart defects had higher N-terminal precur- with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- sor of B-type natriuretic peptide (normal heart 508.0 pg/mL (287.5–776.3) vs. favorable outcome iations. 617.0 pg/mL (389.8–1087.8) vs. poor outcome 1450.0 pg/mL (919.0–1645.0), p = 0.001) and drastically reduced soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations (normal heart 1929.7 pg/mL (1364.3–2715.8) vs. favorable outcome (1848.3 pg/mL (646.9–2313.6) vs. poor outcome 259.0 pg/mL (182.0–606.0), p < 0.001). Results showed that fetuses with left heart defects present a distinct cord blood biomarker Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. profile according to their outcome. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article Keywords: congenital heart defects; fetal echocardiography; B-type natriuretic peptide; transforming distributed under the terms and growth factor beta; aortic stenosis; aortic coarctation; hypoplastic left heart syndrome; angiogenic conditions of the Creative Commons factors; fetal cardiac remodeling Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237119 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 2 of 13 1. Introduction Left-sided congenital heart defects (left-CHD) are the most common group of severe congenital heart defects and a major contributor to neonatal morbi-mortality [1]. In special- ized settings, prenatal diagnosis is feasible in up to 90% of CHD [2]. Thus, fetal cardiology is now focused on predicting medium- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. However, fetal echocardiography has shown limited prognostic ability, and therefore, new parameters are necessary to improve the prognostic evaluation of these anomalies in fetal life. Several existing biomarkers are promising candidates. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its N-terminal precursor (NT-proBNP) have demonstrated utility in screening for CHD in newborns [3] and in predicting surgical outcomes in children with CHD [4]. Increased levels of Troponin, a specific marker of myocardial damage [5], have been found in the cord blood of neonates with single ventricle CHD and seem to relate to poorer prognosis [6]. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), a cytokine implicated in different physiological and pathological responses [7,8], is expressed mainly by endothelial cells (at the cardiovascular level) and has been associated with fibrotic and hypertrophic remodeling (in heart failure and myocardial infarction), and extracellular matrix modulation in cardiac pressure overload [9–11]. However, it has never been studied in fetuses with CHD. Additional biomarkers with a possible role in CHD are placental growth factor (PlGF) and its soluble receptor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1). PlGF regulates trophoblas- tic endothelial growth and is expressed by cardiomyocytes affecting ventricular remodeling in response to stress [12–14]. sFlt1 prevents the interaction of PlGF with cell receptors. An imbalance between PlGF and sFlt1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction [15]. Increased sFlt1 has also been detected in the cord blood of fetuses with CHD [16]. However, the role of PlGF and sFlt1 in CHD pathogenesis, associated cardiovascular remodeling, and/or prognosis has been insufficiently studied. Thus, a differential expression profile of BNP, TGFβ, Troponin I, PIGF, and sFlt1 in cord blood could improve our understanding of cardiac remodeling in CDH and eventually help to identify those cases with poorer prognosis. We designed a prospective, multicenter study to measure cord blood biomarkers in fetuses with left-CHD and evaluate its association with disease severity. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Study Population A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted between 2013 and Novem- ber 2019, including fetuses prenatally diagnosed with left-CHD. The cardiac outcome of these fetuses was regularly evaluated, and analysis was performed in terms of cardiac outcome. Fetuses with structurally normal hearts were also included as a non-exposed co- hort. Pregnancies of women older than 18 years with accurate gestational age calculated by first-trimester crown–rump length [17] were considered eligible. Fetal standard ultrasound and echocardiography were performed in the third trimester, cord blood was obtained at delivery, and perinatal results and cardiac outcome data were collected. Fetuses with left-CHD were recruited at the Fetal Cardiology Units from three tertiary Spanish referral centers: BCNatal (Hospitals Clinic and Sant Joan de Déu) and Hospital Vall d’Hebrón in Barcelona, and Hospital La Paz in Madrid. The group of left-CHD included aortic coarctation (CoA), aortic stenosis (AoS), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), and complex left-CHD with multilevel left ventricular (LV) tract obstruction, including complete or incomplete Shone syndrome. Fetuses with CoA were included based on high prenatal echocardiographic suspicion (significant right dominance and aortic isthmus diameter < −2 z-score) [18] with postnatal diagnostic confirmation. AoS was defined based on fetal echocardiographic visualization of thickened aortic valve with abnormal Doppler flow and diastolic length of the left ventricle > −2 z-score at the time of evaluation [19]. HLHS was defined by an absent or small left ventricle (LV length < −2 or −3 z-score) with weak contractility with the absence of antegrade flow through the aortic valve and ascending aorta hypoplasia of variable degree [19]. This J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 3 of 13 group included cases of mitral and/or aortic atresia and evolving HLHS secondary to severe aortic stenosis. Diagnosis of complex left-CHD was considered in fetuses with multilevel LV tract obstruction, including complete Shone syndrome (supravalvular mitral membrane, parachute mitral valve, muscular or membranous subvalvular aortic stenosis, and coarctation of aorta) and partial forms involving only two or three out of the four anomalies (incomplete Shone syndrome) [20]. Exclusion criteria in the left-CHD population included pre or postnatal diagnosis of additional major cardiac malformations, presence of major extracardiac malformations, or genetic anomalies. Minor cardiovascular anomalies (such as small ventricular septal defects, persistent left superior vena cava, or aberrant right subclavian artery) were not exclusion criteria. Clinical outcome was obtained from medical records at least one year after birth and reevaluated yearly if necessary. Prior to analysis, left-CHD cases were classified into favorable vs. poor cardiac outcome. Poor cardiac outcome was defined by the presence of at least one of the following: postnatal univentricular surgical palliation, need for heart transplant, or death related to CHD or its complications. Control fetuses with structurally normal hearts were recruited from singleton un- complicated and spontaneously conceived pregnancies attended at the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department at BCNatal in Barcelona. They were matched for gestational age (±2 weeks) at scan with left-CHD fetuses. Exclusion criteria in this group included pre or postnatal diagnosis of CHD, extracardiac malformations, genetic anomalies or conditions potentially affecting fetal cardiac function, or cord biomarkers such as intrauterine growth restriction [21–24], maternal diabetes [25,26], exposure to toxins [27], or macrosomia [26]. 2.2. Fetal Standard Ultrasound and Echocardiography Standard obstetric ultrasound and fetal echocardiography were performed using a Siemens Sonoline Antares (Siemens Medical Systems, Malvern, PA, USA) or Voluson E8 (General Electric, Zipf, Austria) using a curved-array 2–6 MHz transducer. Fetal ultrasound was performed according to recommended guidelines and included calculation of estimated fetal weight [28] and centile [29], extracardiac and cardiac detailed examinations [30], and measurement of mean uterine artery, umbilical artery, and middle cerebral artery pulsatility indices [31]. The cerebroplacental ratio was calculated as the quotient between the median cerebral artery and umbilical artery pulsatility indices [32]. IUGR was defined as estimated fetal weight below the 3rd centile or below the 10th centile with abnormal maternal or fetal Doppler values [33]. The fetal cardiac morphometric assessment included cardiothoracic ratio [34,35], car- diac sphericity [35], atrial and ventricular-to-heart ratios [35], right-to-left ventricular ratio [35], and septal myocardium thickness [36,37]. Cardiac measurements were obtained in a two-dimensional apical or basal four-chamber view at end-diastole, except atrial areas, which were measured at end-systole. Cardiac function evaluation included heart rate, right ventricular fractional area change [38], LV shortening fraction [39], and filling and ejection time fractions [40]. LV filling and ejection time fractions were only measured when LV inflow or outflow waves could be identified, thus excluding cases with mitral and aortic atresia. 2.3. Cord Blood Biomarkers Cord blood samples were obtained from the umbilical vein after cord clamping at birth. Plasma was separated from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-treated blood using centrifugation at 1400× g for 10 min at 4 ◦ C. Serum was separated using centrifugation at 2000× g for 10 min at room temperature. Sample aliquots were immediately stored at −80 ◦ C until assayed. N-terminal precursor of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and Troponin I con- centrations was measured in plasma by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay using Siemens Atellica IM NT-proBNP and High Sensitivity Troponin I, respectively (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ) was measured J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 4 of 13 in serum by conventional ELISA assay Quantikine Human TGF-beta1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1) were determined in serum by the fully automated Elec- sys assays for sFlt-1 and PlGF on an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay platform Cobas analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Concentrations of cord NT- proBNP, TGFβ, PlGF, and sFlt1 are presented as continuous variables (NT-proBNP, PlGF, and sFtl1 in pg/mL and TGFβ in ng/mL). Troponin I was treated as a dichotomous variable, and concentrations above the technical detection limit (>0.017 ng/mL) were considered positive [41]. 2.4. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 statistical package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test of normality was performed for con- tinuous variables. Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation, as appropriate. For normally distributed variables, overall differences between study groups were examined using parametric analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by post hoc Bonferroni tests for pairwise comparison. Differ- ences between study groups in non-normally distributed variables were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the Dunn–Bonferroni approach. Categorical variables are presented as n (percentage %), and differences between the groups were compared using the appropriate chi-square test. When necessary and appropriate, Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test was also used. A significance level of 0.05 was used throughout. Analysis of baseline variables for possible confounders (included maternal age, mater- nal body mass index, nulliparity, smoking, pregestational diabetes, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, gender, mode of delivery, and echocardiographic diagnosis), identified an association between cesarean section and in- creased levels of NT-proBNP (cesarean section median 547.0 pg/mL (interquartile range 304.0–996.0) vs. vaginal delivery 893.0 pg/mL (488.5–1523.8), p = 0.026); thus, NT-proBNP was analyzed separately according to delivery route. The remaining cord biomarkers were not affected by the delivery route, and no other confounders were identified. Logistic regression analysis adjusted by cardiac anatomy and delivery mode was performed, and receiver–operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for cord blood biomarkers in the form of areas under the curve to investigate the presence of a cutoff value that might be predictive of outcome in those fetuses with expected biventricular outcome. 3. Results 3.1. Study Populations The study population consisted of 35 healthy control pregnancies and 45 fetuses with left-CHD divided into favorable (n = 29) and poor (n = 16) cardiac outcome (Figure 1). Left-CHD with favorable cardiac outcome included 19 fetuses with CoA, 5 with AoS, and 5 cases of complex left-CHD. The poor cardiac outcome group was formed by 1 fetus with CoA, 2 with AoS, 2 cases of complex left-CHD, and 11 fetuses with HLHS. Univentricular surgical palliation was performed in the 14 newborns in the poor cardiac outcome group (87.5%), and there were 5 postnatal deaths (31.3%), of which 4 corresponded to surgical complications of the univentricular palliation procedure. The remaining case corresponded to a 5-month-old infant with complex left-CHD that died from severe pulmonary hyper- tension after biventricular management. One 3-year-old infant with complex left-CHD and biventricular management is awaiting a heart transplant at the time of writing. The medium follow-up of left-CHD cases was 3.1 years (interquartile range 1.4–3.9). corresponded to a 5-month-old infant with complex left-CHD that died from severe pulmonary hypertension after biventricular management. One 3-year-old infant with complex left-CHD and biventricular management is awaiting a heart transplant at the time J. Clin. Med. 2022, of writing. The medium follow-up of left-CHD cases was 3.1 years (interquartile 11, 7119 5 of 13 range 1.4–3.9). Figure 1. FlowchartFigure of fetuses withofleft-side 1. Flowchart congenital fetuses with heart defects left-side congenital included heart defects includedin in the study. the study. Maternal baseline characteristics, standard obstetrical ultrasound results, and peri- Maternal baseline characteristics, natal results are shown in Tablestandard 1. The three obstetrical ultrasound study populations were similarresults, in terms ofand perinatal results are shown maternal in Tablegestational characteristics, 1. The three age at study populations scan, estimated were fetal weight, andsimilar infetal centile and terms Doppler. The mean uterine artery pulsatility index was more frequently abnormal (>95th of maternal characteristics, gestational age at scan, estimated fetal weight, and centile and centile) in the favorable cardiac outcome left-CHD group as compared to the normal heart fetal Doppler. The mean group. uterineage Gestational artery pulsatility at delivery index was similar acrosswas more groups, and frequently only two fetuses abnormal were (>95th centile) inborn theprematurely favorable(one cardiac outcome control and left-CHD one favorable cardiacgroup outcomeas compared left-CHD). to the Cesarean section was more frequent in the poor cardiac outcome group. Prevalence of pregnancy normal heart group. Gestational age at delivery was similar across groups, and only two complications was similar in the three groups, including gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, fetuses were bornbirthweight prematurely (one control < 3rd centile, and oneBirthweight, and macrosomia. favorableApgar cardiac score,outcome left-CHD). and umbilical artery Cesarean section was more frequent in the poor cardiac outcome group. Prevalence of pH were also similar. pregnancy complications was similar in the three groups, including gestational diabetes, Table 1. Maternal baseline characteristics, standard ultrasound, and perinatal results in the study preeclampsia, birthweight populations. < 3rd centile, and macrosomia. Birthweight, Apgar score, and umbilical artery pH were also similar. Normal Heart Favorable Outcome Poor Outcome p (n = 35) Left-CHD (n = 29) Left-CHD (n = 16) Table 1. Maternal baseline characteristics, standard ultrasound, and perinatal results in the study Maternal baseline characteristics populations. Maternal age (years) 33.2 ± 5.2 31.9 ± 6.7 33.7 ± 5.6 0.567 Maternal body mass index 23.2 ± 3.2 Normal Heart Favorable25.6 ± 3.7 Outcome Poor25.6 ± 5.4 Outcome 0.095 p Nulliparity (n = 35)17 (48.6%) Left-CHD (n = 29) 15 (51.7%) Left-CHD (n = 16) 7 (43.8%) 0.877 Smoking Maternal baseline characteristics 4 (11.4%) 4 (13.8%) 1 (6.3%) 0.745 ernal age (years)Pregestational diabetes 33.2 ± 5.20 (0%) 31.9 0± (0%) 6.7 33.70 (0%) ± 5.6 0.567 1.000 al body mass index 23.2 ± 3.2 25.6 ±3.7 25.6 ± 5.4 0.095 Nulliparity 17 (48.6%) 15 (51.7%) 7 (43.8%) 0.877 Smoking 4 (11.4%) 4 (13.8%) 1 (6.3%) 0.745 stational diabetes 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.000 Standard Obstetrical Ultrasound J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 6 of 13 Table 1. Cont. Normal Heart Favorable Outcome Poor Outcome p (n = 35) Left-CHD (n = 29) Left-CHD (n = 16) Standard Obstetrical Ultrasound Gestational age at scan (weeks) 33.1 (29.6–35.1) 33.1 (32.3–34.3) 33.1 (32.3–34.3) 0.646 Female fetus 14 (40%) 15 (51.7%) 6 (37.6%) 0.548 Estimated fetal weight (g) 2011 ± 681 2037 ± 560 1918 ± 680 0.933 Estimated fetal weight centile 58.0 (27.0–76.0) 32.5 (18.3–73.0) 84.0 (43.0–86.5) 0.132 Intrauterine growth restriction 0 (0%) 2 (6.9%) 0 (0%) 0.165 Umbilical artery PI 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.723 Umbilical artery PI >95th centile 0 (0%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.410 Median cerebral artery PI 2.0 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 0.087 Median cerebral artery <5th centile 1 (2.9%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.765 Cerebro-placental ratio 2.0 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.5 0.111 Cerebro-placental ratio <5th centile 2 (5.7%) 2 (6.7%) 0 (0%) 0.577 Mean Uterine Artery PI 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.7 (0.7–0.9) 0.074 Mean Uterine Artery PI >95th centile 1 (2.9%) 5 (17.2%) 0 (0%) 0.042 Perinatal Results Gestational age delivery (weeks) 39.8 (38.6–40.5) 39.7 (38.4–40.3) 40.0 (39.5–40.0) 0.723 Cesarean section 8 (22.8%) 6 (21.4%) 7 (63.6%) * 0.019 Spontaneous preterm birth < 37 weeks 1 (2.9%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.765 Gestational diabetes 3 (8.6%) 3 (10.3%) 2 (12.5%) 0.907 Preeclampsia 0 (0%) 1 (3.4%) 1 (6.3%) 0.381 Birth weight (g) 3256 ± 416 3173 ± 525 3275 ± 415 0.660 Birth weight < 3rd centile 0 (0%) 2 (6.9%) 0 (0%) 0.165 Birth weight > 4000 g 0 (0%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.410 5-min Apgar score < 7 0 (0%) 1 (3.4%) 0 (0%) 0.410 Umbilical artery pH 7.22 (7.17–7.27) 7.25 (7.18–7.27) 7.26 (7.20–7.30) 0.416 Cardiovascular outcome Follow-up (years) ——- 3.1 (1.4–3.9) ——- Univentricular circulation ——- ——- 11 (68.8%) ——- Cardiac transplant ——- ——- 1 (6.3%) ——- Death ——- ——- 5 (31.3%) ——- Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or n (percentage %) as appropriate. Left-CHD: left-sided congenital heart disease. Poor outcome defined as postnatal univentricular surgical palliation, need for heart transplant, or death. PI: pulsatility index. Intrauterine growth restriction is defined as estimated fetal weight below the 3rd centile or below the 10th centile with abnormal maternal or fetal Doppler values. p is shown for the ANOVA between the 3 groups. * p < 0.05 in pairwise comparisons in ANOVA post hoc Bonferroni or Dunn–Bonferroni tests of favorable and poor outcome vs. normal heart. Cardiac morphological and functional evaluation in control, left-CHD with favorable and poor cardiac outcome fetuses are shown in Table 2. The cardiothoracic ratio was higher in both left-CHD groups compared to the normal heart group. Left atrial-to-heart and left ventricular-to-heart ratios were significantly lower in left-CHD, more markedly so in the poor cardiac outcome group. Concerning the right side of the heart, right atrial-to-heart and right ventricular-to-heart ratios were significantly increased in the poor cardiac outcome left-CHD compared to the normal heart group but not in the favorable cardiac outcome J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 7 of 13 group. Right-to-left ventricular ratio (basal transverse diameter) was significantly increased in both groups of left-CHD. Septal thickness tended to be higher in left-CHD with poor prognosis; however, in post hoc pairwise comparison, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.068). Heart rate was similar in the three groups. The left shortening fraction was increased in the favorable cardiac outcome group of left-CHD and decreased in the poor cardiac outcome left-CHD compared to the normal heart group. The remaining functional parameters evaluated did not show significant differences between the three study populations. Table 2. Fetal echocardiographic results in the study populations. Favorable Outcome Poor Outcome Normal Heart p Parameter Left-CHD Left-CHD (n = 35) (n = 29) (n = 16) Cardiac morphometric parameters Gestational age at scan (weeks) 33.1 (29.6–35.1) 33.1 (32.3–34.3) 33.1 (32.3–34.3) 0.646 Cardio-thoracic ratio 0.28 ± 0.04 0.30 ± 0.05 * 0.32 ± 0.05 * 0.002 Cardiac sphericity index 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 0.087 Left atrial-to-heart ratio 0.15 ± 0.04 0.13 ± 0.03 * 0.10 ± 0.03 * <0.001 Left ventricular-to-heart ratio † 0.23 (0.19–0.28) 0.15 (0.14–0.20) * 0.11 (0.03–0.14) * <0.001 Right atria-to-heart ratio 0.17 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.08 * 0.001 Right ventricle-to-heart ratio 0.23 (0.20–0.27) 0.24 (0.21–0.26) 0.29 (0.25–0.36) * 0.016 Right-to-left ventricular ratio (basal) 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.4 (1.3–1.7) * 2.1 (1.9–3.7) * <0.001 Septal wall thickness (mm) 3.1 (2.6–3.7) 3.5 (3.0–4.1) 3.6 (3.4–3.9) 0.040 Cardiac function parameters Heart rate 141 (134–144) 137 (131–145) 140 (131–141) 0.693 Left ventricular Shortening Fraction ‡ 36.7 ± 8.8 44.3 ± 12.9 * 21.0 ± 11.2 * <0.001 Left filling time fraction ‡ 43.2 ± 4.9 42.0 ± 3.6 41.2 ± 14.6 0.633 Left ejection time fraction ‡ 41.0 (338.9–43.4) 42.1 (37.9–44.8) 45.1 (38.4–64.6) 0.282 Right ventricular Fractional Area Change 30.4 ± 8.4 30.7 ± 11.2 35.6 ± 10.6 0.371 Right filling time fraction 40.4 (37.6–43.9) 42.3 (38.4–44.2) 38.9 (35.4–43.4) 0.480 Right ejection time fraction 42.6 ± 3.3 41.8 ± 3.8 43.0 ± 4.1 0.577 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). Left-CHD: left-sided congenital heart disease. Poor cardiac outcome defined by the presence of postnatal univentricular circulation, need for heart transplant, or death. † Measured when the left ventricle was visible (n = 10 in the poor outcome group). ‡ Measured when left ventricular inflow/outflow was detectable (n = 5 in the poor outcome group). P is shown for the ANOVA between the 3 groups. * p < 0.05 in pairwise comparisons in ANOVA post hoc Bonferroni or Dunn–Bonferroni tests of favorable and poor outcome vs. normal heart. 3.2. Cord Blood Biomarkers Results Results of cord blood biomarkers in left-CHD and normal heart groups are presented in Table 3 and Figure 2. Compared to the normal heart group, left-CHD cases with favorable cardiac outcome presented preserved NT-proBNP concentrations. Cord blood Troponin I seemed to be more frequently elevated in the favorable cardiac outcome group, but this was not statistically significant. Fetuses with a favorable outcome also presented a markedly increased cord blood concentration of TGFβ and lower PlGF with no significant changes in sFlt1. Conversely, poor outcome left-CHD cases presented increased concentrations of NT-proBNP, which was independent of delivery mode. Troponin I showed positive results in a similar proportion to the control group. In the poor prognosis group, TGFβ concentrations were not significantly higher than in the normal heart group. Finally, PlGF J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 8 of 13 was slightly reduced, while cord blood sFlt1 concentrations were drastically reduced in this group. These findings were independent of the specific anatomy. Table 3. Concentrations of N-terminal precursor of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-Pro-BNP), Troponin I, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1) in the cord blood of control fetuses and fetuses with favorable versus poor outcome left congenital heart defects. Favorable Outcome Poor Outcome J. Clin. Med. 2022, Cord11, x FOR Blood PEER REVIEW Cardiovascular Normal Heart p Left-CHD Left-CHD Biomarkers (n = 35) (n = 29) (n = 16) NT Pro-BNP (pg/mL) 508.0 (287.5–776.3) 617.0 (389.8–1087.8) 1450.0 (919.0–1645.0) * 0.001 TroponinI (% positive) 7/31 (22.6%) 9/19 (47.4%) 2/9 (22.2%) 0.153 PlGF (pg/mL) TGFβ (ng/mL) 17.9 (13.8–23.9) 15.0 (6.8–21.4) 12.8 (11.7–13.6) *25.1 (6.9–39.0) 11.0 (8.8–15.4) 51.7 (13.8–73.9) * 0.001 * sFlt1 (pg/mL) PlGF (pg/mL) 1929.7 (1364.3–2715.8) 17.9 (13.8–23.9) 1848.3 12.8 (646.9–2313.6) (11.7–13.6) * 11.0 (8.8–15.4)259.0 * (182.0–606.0) <0.001 sFlt1 (pg/mL) Data are1929.7 presented as median (1364.3–2715.8) 1848.3(interquartile (646.9–2313.6) range) or n (percentage). 259.0 (182.0–606.0) * <0.001 Left-C congenital heart disease. Troponin I was considered positive when higher Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or n (percentage). Left-CHD: left-sided congenital heart disease. than 0. Troponin I was considered positive when higher than 0.017 ng/mL. P is shown for shown for the ANOVA or chi-square tests between the 3 groups. * p < 0.05 in pairwi the ANOVA or chi-square tests between the 3 groups. * p < 0.05 in pairwise comparisons in ANOVA post hoc Dunn–Bonferroni tests of favorable in ANOVA and poor outcomepost hoc heart. vs. normal Dunn–Bonferroni tests of favorable and poor outcome vs. norm Figure 2. Concentrations of N-terminal precursor of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-Pro-BNP), Tro- Figure 2. Concentrations of N-terminal precursor of B-type natriuretic peptide ponin I, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), placental growth factor (PlGF), and soluble fms-like Troponin I, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), placental growth factor (PlGF), a tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1) in the cord blood of fetuses with normal heart and with favorable and poor like tyrosine outcome kinase-1 left congenital heart(sFlt1) defects. in the Poor cordoutcome cardiac blood isofdefined fetuses with normal as univentricular heart and wit circulation, poor outcome left congenital heart defects. Poor cardiac outcome is defined as heart transplant, or death. p-values are shown for significantly different (p < 0.05) comparisons. circulation, heart transplant, or death. p-values are shown for significantly diff Logistic regression analysis and evaluation of ROC curves of concentration of cord comparisons. blood biomarkers for the prediction of outcome in fetuses with expected biventricular repair, adjusted for cardiac anatomy and cesarean section, found that only sFlt1 was useful Logistic as an outcome regression predictor. analysis The sFlt1ROC curveand evaluation had an AUC of 0.848of ROC (95% curves confidence of concent interval 0.706–0.991) with a cutoff value of 1520.7, having a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of blood biomarkers for the prediction of outcome in fetuses with expected 72% for a favorable outcome (Figure 3). repair, adjusted for cardiac anatomy and cesarean section, found that o useful as an outcome predictor. The sFlt1ROC curve had an AUC of 0.848 (9 interval 0.706–0.991) with a cutoff value of 1520.7, having a specificity o sensitivity of 72% for a favorable outcome (Figure 3). blood biomarkers for the prediction of outcome in fetuses with expected b repair, adjusted for cardiac anatomy and cesarean section, found that on useful as an outcome predictor. The sFlt1ROC curve had an AUC of 0.848 (95% J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 interval 0.706–0.991) with a cutoff value of 1520.7, having a specificity 9 of 13 of sensitivity of 72% for a favorable outcome (Figure 3). (a) (b) Figure 3.(a) Figure 3. (a)Concentrations Concentrations of soluble of soluble fms-like fms-like tyrosine tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1)kinase-1 in the cord(sFlt1) blood ofin the cord bl control fetuses and fetuses andfetuses withwith fetuses expected biventricular expected repair, classified biventricular according repair, to outcome classified (red triangle, according to outcome favorable outcome; black star, poor outcome. Reference line set at 1520.7 pg/mL identified at (b) ROC favorable outcome; black star, poor outcome. Reference line set at 1520.7 pg/mL id curve for sFlt1 as a predictor of favorable outcome in fetuses with expected biventricular outcome. 4. Discussion Cord blood cardiovascular biomarkers are differentially expressed according to the clinical outcome of left-CHD. Fetuses with left-CHD and favorable outcome showed an active cardiac remodeling biomarker profile, with an increase in TGFβ and Troponin I cord blood concentrations. Conversely, fetuses with left-CHD and poor outcome presented a compensatory and proangiogenic biomarker profile with increased NT-proBNP and decreased sFlt1 concentrations. Prior studies reported increased NT-proBNP concentrations in children with systemic right ventricle and in single ventricle CHD before completion of staged palliation [42–44]. A different study evaluated cord blood NT-proBNP and Troponin T plus an echocardiographic score (including aortic size and cardiomegaly) to predict mortality in a variety of single ventricle CHD (approximately half were left-CHD) [6]. Both NT-proBNP and Troponin T were found to be useful predictors in this setting [6]. While obvious differences exist between both studies [6] in terms of CHD included and outcome definition, increased NT-proBNP seems to be reflecting fetal adaptation to ventricular stretching or hypoxia and correlate with the disease severity and outcome. Positive cord blood Troponin I was more frequent in left-CHD with favorable cardiac outcome than in fetuses with normal hearts or fetuses with poor outcome. Differences were not statistically significant, and these results must be interpreted with caution as the normal heart group presented higher positive rates of Troponin I than previously reported in healthy fetuses [41,45,46]. In a prior study, Troponin I was detected more frequently in children with pressure overload CHD (CoA, AoS, and pulmonary stenosis) rather than volume overload CHD (atrial septal defect and patent ductus arteriosus) [45]. In the present study, most cases of pressure overload (AoS and complex left-CHD) presented a favorable outcome, while the poor outcome group included mostly fetuses with HLHS (right ventricular volume overload), which may explain our findings. Increased levels of Troponin I in cord blood might reflect endocardial hypoxia and myocardial damage secondary to increased end-diastolic ventricular pressure and wall stress [47]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate cord blood concentrations of TGFβ in fetuses with CHD, showing increased TGFβ concentrations in left-CHD with favorable J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 10 of 13 outcome. High levels of circulating TGBβ are usually associated with increased endothelial shear stress, secondary to abnormal fluid dynamics within blood vessels [48,49]. All cases in the favorable outcome group presented anatomical impediments to normal blood flow and, thus, turbulent flow and increased endothelial shear stress that could stimulate the production of TGFβ by endothelial cells. In addition, increased TGFβ expression has been related to extracellular matrix deposition and fibrosis and arterial intima-media thickening and can be detected by immunohistochemistry at the coarctation site, especially in infants with a closed arterial duct [9,10,50]. On the other hand, TGFβ concentrations were not increased in the poor outcome group, which was mostly composed of fetuses with full cardiac output handled by the right heart and laminar flow through the pulmonary artery. Cord blood concentrations of PlGF were found to be modestly decreased in left- CHD compared to normal heart fetuses. However, sFlt1 was markedly decreased in the poor outcome group conferring a proangiogenic profile of PlGF and sFlt1. Such low levels of sFlt1 had not been described previously in pregnancy, and their cause is unclear. However, sFlt1 is down-regulated by hypoxia [51], and therefore, our findings might be explained by the hypoxic damage of the left ventricular endocardium of fetuses with poor outcome left-CHD [52,53]. A previous study including a mixed group of CHDs, including atrioventricular septal defects (A-V defects), conotruncal anomalies, and left-CHD reported similar PlGF but increased sFlt1 cord blood levels in CHD [16]. This inconsistency might be explained by the different types of CHD included in both studies. The presence of a high proportion of A-V defects and conotruncal anomalies, as well as missing information in terms of left-CHD types and/or severity, precludes direct comparison between both studies. Finally, cord blood sFlt1 was identified for the first time as a possible outcome predictor in fetuses with expected biventricular repair and may eventually help to identify cases at risk of an unexpectedly poor prognosis despite favorable anatomy. Naturally, due to the limited number of cases in this subgroup, confirmation in larger cohorts is required prior to clinical application. A larger number of cases might also demonstrate the utility of NT-proBNP or TGFβ in these patients in which a poor prognosis comes as a surprise. Strengths and Limitations To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate cord blood biomarkers in a specific set of CHDs and to evaluate TGFβ in the cord blood of fetuses with CHDs. It is also the first study to identify TGFβ and specially sFlt1 as potentially useful cardiovascular biomarkers in left-CHD. This is mainly an exploratory study, and therefore, the eventual clinical application of our findings will likely be distant. The main limitation of this (and other studies) is the limited number of cases that precludes the evaluation of these biomarkers in each specific type of CHD. Interpretation of results is also limited by the presence of mixed pathologies in the favorable and poor outcome left-CHD groups. Cord blood biomarker levels were analyzed after adjustment for possible confounders; however, additional confounders might exist. Additionally, levels of Troponin I in the cord blood of normal fetuses were higher than previously reported [41,45,46], which limits the interpretation of our results. 5. Conclusions This study provides evidence of a differential biomarker profile in left-CHD accord- ing to its outcome. It opens new opportunities for improving prognosis prediction and potentially helping in prenatal monitoring, neonatal management, and parental counseling. If confirmed in future studies, these biomarkers could potentially be useful as a progno- sis tool in prenatal or neonatal life. In addition, future studies are warranted to study cardiovascular biomarkers in different matrices such as amniotic fluid or maternal blood. Long-term multicenter studies might be able to include enough patients and allow specific evaluation and analysis of each individual type of left-CHD. Additionally, the investigation of these biomarkers in the cord blood of other CHDs might also yield interesting results. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 11 of 13 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, I.S., O.G. and F.C.; methodology, I.S., O.G. and F.C.; software, I.S.; validation, I.S. and L.G.; formal analysis, I.S., O.G. and F.C.; investigation, I.S., O.G., L.G., M.C.E.-D., M.J.A., V.R.-S., J.M.M., E.A., E.L., J.L.B. and F.C.; resources I.S., O.G., L.G., M.C.E.-D., M.J.A., V.R.-S., J.M.M., B.B., E.A., E.L., J.L.B. and F.C.; data curation, I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S.; writing—review and editing, I.S., O.G., M.C.E.-D., M.J.A., J.M.M., E.A., E.L., J.L.B. and F.C.; visualization, I.S.; supervision, O.G. and F.C.; project administration, O.G., B.B., E.A., E.L., J.L.B. and F.C.; funding acquisition, I.S., O.G., J.M.M., B.B., E.A., E.L., J.L.B. and F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by grants from Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (Ajut Josep Font 2015, Barcelona, Spain), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00263, PI17/00675, PI20/00246, INT21/00027) within the Plan Nacional de I+D+I and co-financed by Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Subdirección General de Evaluación together with the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) “Una manera de hacer Europa”, Fundación Jesús Serra, “LaCaixa” Foundation under grant agreements LCF/PR/GN14/10270005 and LCF/PR/GN18/10310003AS, Cerebra Foundation for the Brain In- jured Child (Carmarthen, Wales, UK), Fundació La Marató de TV3 (Ref 202016-30-31), and Maternal and Child Health and Development Network (SAMID), RD16/0022/0015. This publication reflects the views of the authors only, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any usage, which may be made of the information contained therein. No industry funding was used in the development of this work. Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of BCNatal (Hospitals Clinic and Sant Joan de Déu. PR (AMI)317/2012, May 2013) and Hospital Vall d’Hebrón in Barcelona, and Hospital La Paz in Madrid. Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Biobanks of Clínic-IDIBAPS and Fundació Sant Joan de Déu for the valuable management of samples. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. References 1. Wren, C.; Reinhardt, Z.; Khawaja, K. Twenty-Year Trends in Diagnosis of Life-Threatening Neonatal Cardiovascular Malformations. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93, F33–F35. [CrossRef] 2. Khoo, N.S.; Van Essen, P.; Richardson, M.; Robertson, T. Effectiveness of Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Defects in South Australia: A Population Analysis 1999–2003. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008, 48, 559–563. [CrossRef] 3. Davlouros, P.A.; Karatza, A.A.; Xanthopoulou, I.; Dimitriou, G.; Georgiopoulou, A.; Mantagos, S.; Alexopoulos, D. Diagnostic Role of Plasma BNP Levels in Neonates with Signs of Congenital Heart Disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 147, 42–46. [CrossRef] 4. Cantinotti, M.; Giordano, R.; Scalese, M.; Molinaro, S.; Della Pina, F.; Storti, S.; Arcieri, L.; Murzi, B.; Marotta, M.; Pak, V.; et al. Prognostic Role of BNP in Children Undergoing Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: Analysis of Prediction Models Incorporating Standard Risk Factors. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2015, 53, 1839–1846. [CrossRef] 5. Agewall, S.; Giannitsis, E.; Jernberg, T.; Katus, H. Troponin Elevation in Coronary vs. Non-Coronary Disease. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 404–411. [CrossRef] 6. Lee, S.M.; Kwon, J.E.; Song, S.H.; Kim, G.B.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Lee, J.H.; Park, C.W.; Park, J.S.; Jun, J.K. Prenatal Prediction of Neonatal Death in Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease. Prenat. Diagn. 2016, 36, 346–352. [CrossRef] 7. Dabek, J.; Kułach, A.; Monastyrska-Cup, B.; Gasior, Z. Transforming Growth Factor β and Cardiovascular Diseases: The Other Facet of the “Protective Cytokine”. Pharmacol. Rep. 2006, 58, 799–805. 8. Clark, D.A.; Coker, R. Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1998, 30, 293–298. [CrossRef] 9. Guerri-Guttenberg, R.A.; Castilla, R.; Francos, G.C.; Müller, A.; Ambrosio, G.; Milei, J. Transforming Growth Factor B1 and Coronary Intimal Hyperplasia in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. Can. J. Cardiol. 2013, 29, 849–857. [CrossRef] 10. Doetschman, T.; Barnett, J.V.; Runyan, R.B.; Camenisch, T.D.; Heimark, R.L.; Granzier, H.L.; Conway, S.J.; Azhar, M. Transforming Growth Factor Beta Signaling in Adult Cardiovascular Diseases and Repair. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 347, 203–223. 11. Dobaczewski, M.; Chen, W.; Frangogiannis, N.G. Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β Signaling in Cardiac Remodeling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2011, 51, 600–606. [CrossRef] 12. Iwama, H.; Uemura, S.; Naya, N.; Imagawa, K.I.; Takemoto, Y.; Asai, O.; Onoue, K.; Okayama, S.; Somekawa, S.; Kida, Y.; et al. Cardiac Expression of Placental Growth Factor Predicts the Improvement of Chronic Phase Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 1559–1567. [CrossRef] J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 12 of 13 13. Nakamura, T.; Funayama, H.; Kubo, N.; Yasu, T.; Kawakami, M.; Momomura, S.I.; Ishikawa, S.E. Elevation of Plasma Placental Growth Factor in the Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2009, 131, 186–191. [CrossRef] 14. Accornero, F.; Molkentin, J.D. Placental Growth Factor as a Protective Paracrine Effector in the Heart. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2011, 21, 220–224. [CrossRef] 15. Chau, K.; Hennessy, A.; Makris, A. Placental Growth Factor and Pre-Eclampsia. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 782–786. [CrossRef] 16. Llurba, E.; Sanchez, O.; Ferrer, Q.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Ruiz, A.; Dominguez, C.; Sanchez-de-Toledo, J.; Garcia-Garcia, B.; Soro, G.; Arevalo, S.; et al. Maternal and Foetal Angiogenic Imbalance in Congenital Heart Defects. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 701–707. [CrossRef] 17. Robinson, H.P.; Sweet, E.M.; Adam, A.H. The Accuracy of Radiological Estimates of Gestational Age Using Early Fetal Crown- Rump Length Measurements by Ultrasound as a Basis for Comparison. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1979, 86, 525–528. [CrossRef] 18. Familiari, A.; Morlando, M.; Khalil, A.; Sonesson, S.-E.; Scala, C.; Rizzo, G.; Del Sordo, G.; Vassallo, C.; Elena Flacco, M.; Manzoli, L.; et al. Risk Factors for Coarctation of the Aorta on Prenatal UltrasoundClinical Perspective. Circulation 2017, 135, 772–785. [CrossRef] 19. Schneider, C.; McCrindle, B.W.; Carvalho, J.S.; Hornberger, L.K.; McCarthy, K.P.; Daubeney, P.E.F. Development of Z-Scores for Fetal Cardiac Dimensions from Echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 26, 599–605. [CrossRef] 20. Shone, J.D.; Sellers, R.D.; Anderson, R.C.; Adams, P.; Lillehei, C.W.; Edwards, J.E. The Developmental Complex of “Parachute Mitral Valve,” Supravalvular Ring of Left Atrium, Subaortic Stenosis, and Coarctation of Aorta. Am. J. Cardiol. 1963, 11, 714–725. [CrossRef] 21. Rodríguez-López, M.; Cruz-Lemini, M.; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.; Garcia-Otero, L.; Sitges, M.; Bijnens, B.; Gratacos, E.; Crispi, F. Descriptive Analysis of the Different Phenotypes of Cardiac Remodeling in Fetal Growth Restriction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 207–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 22. Crispi, F.; Bijnens, B.; Figueras, F.; Bartrons, J.; Eixarch, E.; Le Noble, F.; Ahmed, A.; Gratacos, E. Fetal Growth Restriction Results in Remodeled and Less Efficient Hearts in Children. Circulation 2010, 121, 2427–2436. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Barker, D.J.P. Adult Consequences of Fetal Growth Restriction. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 49, 270–283. [CrossRef] 24. Kocylowski, R.D.; Dubiel, M.; Gudmundsson, S.; Sieg, I.; Fritzer, E.; Alkasi, Ö.; Breborowicz, G.H.; von Kaisenberg, C.S. Biochemical Tissue-Specific Injury Markers of the Heart and Brain in Postpartum Cord Blood. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 200, 273.e1–273.e25. [CrossRef] 25. Patey, O.; Carvalho, J.S.; Thilaganathan, B. Perinatal Changes in Fetal Cardiac Geometry and Function in Diabetic Pregnancy at Term. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 54, 634–642. [CrossRef] 26. Mert, M.K.; Satar, M.; Özbarlas, N.; Yaman, A.; Özgünen, F.T.; Asker, H.S.; Çekinmez, E.K.; Tetiker, T. Troponin T and NT ProBNP Levels in Gestational, Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetic Mothers and Macrosomic Infants. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2016, 37, 76–83. [CrossRef] 27. García-Otero, L.; López, M.; Gómez, O.; Goncé, A.; Bennasar, M.; Martínez, J.M.; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.; Rodriguez-López, M.; Sitges, M.; Loncà, M.; et al. Zidovudine Treatment in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Is Associated with Fetal Cardiac Remodelling. AIDS 2016, 30, 1393–1401. [CrossRef] 28. Hadlock, F.P.; Harrist, R.B.; Shah, Y.P.; King, D.E.; Park, S.K.; Sharman, R.S. Estimating Fetal Age Using Multiple Parameters: A Prospective Evaluation in a Racially Mixed Population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987, 156, 955–957. [CrossRef] 29. Figueras, F.; Meler, E.; Iraola, A.; Eixarch, E.; Coll, O.; Figueras, J.; Francis, A.; Gratacos, E.; Gardosi, J. Customized Birthweight Standards for a Spanish Population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 136, 20–24. [CrossRef] 30. Carvalho, J.; Allan, L.; Chaoui, R.; Copel, J.; DeVore, G.; Hecher, K.; Lee, W.; Munoz, H.; Paladini, D.; Tutschek, B.; et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (Updated): Sonographic Screening Examination of the Fetal Heart. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 41, 348–359. [CrossRef] 31. Bhide, A.; Acharya, G.; Bilardo, C.M.; Brezinka, C.; Cafici, D.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Kalache, K.; Kingdom, J.; Kiserud, T.; Lee, W.; et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Use of Doppler Ultrasonography in Obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 41, 233–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 32. Baschat, A.A.; Gembruch, U. The Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio Revisited. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 21, 124–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 33. Figueras, F.; Gratacós, E. Update on the Diagnosis and Classification of Fetal Growth Restriction and Proposal of a Stage-Based Management Protocol. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2014, 36, 86–98. [CrossRef] 34. Paladini, D.; Chita, S.K.; Allan, L.D. Prenatal Measurement of Cardiothoracic Ratio in Evaluation of Heart Disease. Arch. Dis. Child. 1990, 65, 20–23. [CrossRef] 35. García-Otero, L.; Soveral, I.; Sepúlveda-Martínez, Á.; Rodriguez-lópez, M.; Torres, X.; Guirado, L.; Nogué, L.; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.; Martínez, J.M.; Gratacós, E.; et al. Reference Ranges for Fetal Cardiac, Ventricular and Atrial Relative Size, Sphericity, Ventricular Dominance, Wall Asymmetry and Relative Wall Thickness from 18 to 41 Weeks of Gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 58, 388–397. [CrossRef] 36. Sepúlveda-Martínez, A.; García-Otero, L.; Soveral, I.; Guirado, L.; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.; Torres, X.; Rodriguez-Lopez, M.; Gratacos, E.; Gómez, O.; Crispi, F. Comparison of 2D versus M-Mode Echocardiography for Assessing Fetal Myocardial Wall Thickness. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2018, 32, 2319–2327. [CrossRef] J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7119 13 of 13 37. García-Otero, L.; Gómez, O.; Rodriguez-López, M.; Torres, X.; Soveral, I.; Sepúlveda-Martínez, Á.; Guirado, L.; Valenzuela- Alcaraz, B.; López, M.; Martínez, J.M.; et al. Nomograms of Fetal Cardiac Dimensions at 18–41 Weeks of Gestation. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2020, 47, 387–398. [CrossRef] 38. Guirado, L.; Crispi, F.; Soveral, I.; Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B.; Rodriguez-López, M.; García-Otero, L.; Torres, X.; Sepúlveda- Martínez, Á.; Escobar-Diaz, M.C.; Martínez, J.M.; et al. Nomograms of Fetal Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change by 2D Echocardiography. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2020, 47, 399–410. [CrossRef] 39. DeVore, G.R.; Siassi, B.; Platt, L.D. Fetal Echocardiography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1984, 150, 981–988. [CrossRef] 40. Soveral, I.; Crispi, F.; Guirado, L.; García-Otero, L.; Torres, X.; Bennasar, M.; Sepúlveda-Martínez, Á.; Nogué, L.; Gratacós, E.; Martínez, J.M.; et al. Cardiac Filling and Ejection Time Fractions by Pulsed Doppler: Fetal Nomograms and Potential Clinical Application. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 58, 83–91. [CrossRef] 41. Trevisanuto, D.; Pitton, M.; Altinier, S.; Zaninotto, M.; Plebani, M.; Zanardo, V. Cardiac Troponin I, Cardiac Troponin T and Creatine Kinase MB Concentrations in Umbilical Cord Blood of Healthy Term Neonates. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2003, 92, 1463–1467. [CrossRef] 42. Eindhoven, J.A.; Van Den Bosch, A.E.; Jansen, P.R.; Boersma, E.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W. The Usefulness of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 2140–2149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 43. Holmgren, D.; Westerlind, A.; Berggren, H.; Lundberg, P.A.; Wåhlander, H. Increased Natriuretic Peptide Type B Level after the Second Palliative Step in Children with Univentricular Hearts with Right Ventricular Morphology but Not Left Ventricular Morphology. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2008, 29, 786–792. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Wåhlander, H.; Westerlind, A.; Lindstedt, G.; Lundberg, P.A.; Holmgren, D. Increased Levels of Brain and Atrial Natriuretic Peptides after the First Palliative Operation, but Not after a Bidirectional Glenn Anastomosis, in Children with Functionally Univentricular Hearts. Cardiol. Young 2003, 13, 268–274. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Eerola, A.; Jokinen, E.O.; Savukoski, T.I.; Pettersson, K.S.I.; Poutanen, T.; Pihkala, J.I. Cardiac Troponin I in Congenital Heart Defects with Pressure or Volume Overload. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2013, 47, 154–159. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 46. Sugimoto, M.; Ota, K.; Kajihama, A.; Nakau, K.; Manabe, H.; Kajino, H. Volume Overload and Pressure Overload Due to Left-to-Right Shunt-Induced Myocardial Injury: Evaluation Using a Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin-I Assay in Children with Congenital Heart Disease. Circ. J. 2011, 75, 2213–2219. [CrossRef] 47. Goodwill, A.G.; Dick, G.M.; Kiel, A.M.; Tune, J.D. Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 7, 321–382. [CrossRef] 48. Briana, D.D.; Liosi, S.; Gourgiotis, D.; Boutsikou, M.; Marmarinos, A.; Baka, S.; Hassiakos, D.; Malamitsi-Puchner, A. Fetal Concentrations of the Growth Factors TGF-α and TGF-B1 in Relation to Normal and Restricted Fetal Growth at Term. Cytokine 2012, 60, 157–161. [CrossRef] 49. Walshe, T.E.; Dela Paz, N.G.; D’Amore, P.A. The Role of Shear-Induced Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling in the Endothe- lium. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2608–2617. [CrossRef] 50. Swartz, M.F.; Morrow, D.; Atallah-Yunes, N.; Cholette, J.M.; Gensini, F.; Kavey, R.E.; Alfieris, G.M. Hypertensive Changes within the Aortic Arch of Infants and Children with Isolated Coarctation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013, 96, 190–195. [CrossRef] 51. Ikeda, T.; Sun, L.; Tsuruoka, N.; Ishigaki, Y.; Yoshitomi, Y.; Yoshitake, Y.; Yonekura, H. Hypoxia Down-Regulates SFlt-1 (SVEGFR-1) Expression in Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells by a Mechanism Involving MRNA Alternative Processing. Biochem. J. 2011, 436, 399–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 52. Salhiyyah, K.; Sarathchandra, P.; Latif, N.; Yacoub, M.H.; Chester, A.H. Hypoxia-Mediated Regulation of the Secretory Properties of Mitral Valve Interstitial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2017, 313, H14–H23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 53. Lee, J.W.; Ko, J.; Ju, C.; Eltzschig, H.K. Hypoxia Signaling in Human Diseases and Therapeutic Targets. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]