Supporting Information Table S1. Crystallographic data for compound [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) determined by SR-PXRD. Compound [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) Empirical formula C38H16F24N6O8Cu2 Formula weight 1267.67 Measurement T (K) 298(2) Wavelength (Å) 0.49587 System, space group Monoclinic, P21 (4) a (Å) 10.5172(2) b (Å) 25.4118(4) c (Å) 10.0730(2) α (°) 90 β (°) 112.974(1) γ (°) 90 Volume (Å3) 2478.60(10) Z 2 Dcalc (g cm-3) 1.699 2θ range (°) collected (step) 0.776 to 43.496 (0.006) Rietveld refinement details: Profile function Pseudo-Voigt 2θ range (°) used for refinement 1.800 to 30.000 Number of reflections 3029 Number of data points 4700 Parameters1 250 Restraints 265 Rwp 0.0623 Rexp 0.0035 χRietveld/ χPattern-Matching 1.56 1 Parameters: 233 atomic coordinates, zero, scale factor, 9 atomic displacements, 2 profile, 4 cell. 2 Restraints: 86 bond distances, 118 bond angles, 61 distances to a plane Table S2. Crystallographic data for compound [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) determined by single crystal XRD. Compound [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) Empirical formula C28H14F12N6O5.5Cu Formula weight 813.99 Measurement T (K) 100(2) Wavelength (Å) 0.72932 System, space group P 21 21 2 a (Å) 20.001(9) b (Å) 26.390(3) c (Å) 6.3800(3) α (°) 90 β (°) 90 γ (°) 90 Volume (Å3) 3367.6(16) Z 4 Dcalc (g cm-3) 1.606 µ (mm-1) 0.812 F(000) 1620.0 Crystal size (mm3) 0.050x0.040x0.010 hkl ranges -26≤h≤26, -35≤k≤35, -8≤l≤8 2θ range (°) 1.311 to29.089 Reflections collected/unique/[Rint] 53652/8357/[Rint = 0.0418] Completeness 100% Refinement method Full matrix least-squares on |F|2 Data/restrains/parameters 8357/0/ 475 Goodness of fit (GOF) on |F|2 1.034 Final R indices [I>2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0660, wR2 = 0.1827 R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0689, wR2 = 0.1863 Extinction coefficient 0.0029(10) Largest. Diff. peak and hole (e Å-3) 2.898 and -0.697 FIGURE S1. Crystal structure of [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) displaying the detail of the coordination sphere of the two independent Cu(II) atoms (Cu1a and Cu1b). Only the linked pyridine ring of the 4-tpt ligand is shown. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. FIGURE S2. Crystal structure of [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) showing the interaction between pentacoordinated Cu(II) atoms and the triazine ring of a neighbor chain. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. FIGURE S3. Crystal structure of [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) detailing the coordination sphere of the Cu(II) atom. Only the linked pyridine ring of 4-tpt ligands is shown. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. FIGURE S4. Crystal structure of [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) showing the interchain interactions involving the non-coordinated pyridine ring and the triazine ring of an adjacent chain. FIGURE S5. Void space analysis of [(Cu(hfa)2) (4-tpt)]n (2). FIGURE S6. FTIR-ATR spectra of compounds [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) (down, black line) and [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) (up, red line). FIGURE S7. PXRD patterns of [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) obtained by phase transformation of (1): (bottom, blue line) simulated from crystal structure data; (medium, black line) sample obtained from treatment of (1) in EtOEt and after activation under vacuum; and (up, red line), for comparison, sample obtained from the amorphous compound precipitated in CHCl3 and recrystallized in EtOET after activation under vacuum. FIGURE S8. TGA curves of [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1) (black line) and [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2) (red line). FIGURE S9. Void space analysis of [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1). FIGURE S10. Calculated Isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst) at different surface coverages of CO2 on [(Cu(hfa)2)(4-tpt)]n (2). FIGURE S11. Observed (red points), calculated (black line) and difference (blue line) PXRD patterns for [(Cu(hfa)2)2(4-tpt)]n (1). Positions of the Bragg reflections are represented by vertical green bars.