TYPE Review PUBLISHED 27 February 2023 DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1129296 The development of highly OPEN ACCESS dense highly protected EDITED BY Kirill Afonin, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, surfactant ionizable lipid RNA United States REVIEWED BY loaded nanoparticles Paolo Macor, University of Trieste, Italy Borislav Angelov, Ramon González-Rioja 1, Vivian A. Salazar 1, Neus G. Bastús 1,2 Institute of Physics (ASCR), Czechia and Victor Puntes 1,2,3,4* *CORRESPONDENCE Victor Puntes 1 Institut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (ICN2), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones victor.puntes@icn2.cat Científicas (CSIC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain, 2 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) en SPECIALTY SECTION Bioingenierı´a, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en This article was submitted to Bioingeniería Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain, 3 Malalties Infeccioses, Molecular Innate Immunity, Nanopartícules farmacocinétiques, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain, 4 Institució a section of the journal Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain Frontiers in Immunology RECEIVED 21 December 2022 ACCEPTED 14 February 2023 PUBLISHED 27 February 2023 The long quest for efficient drug administration has been looking for a universal CITATION carrier that can precisely transport traditional drugs, new genomic and proteic González-Rioja R, Salazar VA, Bastús NG therapeutic agents. Today, researchers have found conditions to overcome the and Puntes V (2023) The development of highly dense highly protected surfactant two main drug delivery dilemmas. On the one side, the versatility of the vehicle to ionizable lipid RNA loaded nanoparticles. efficiently load, protect and transport the drug and then release it at the target Front. Immunol. 14:1129296. place. On the other hand, the questions related to the degree of PEGylation which doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1129296 are needed to avoid nanoparticle (NP) aggregation and opsonization while COPYRIGHT © 2023 González-Rioja, Salazar, Bastús and preventing cellular uptake. The development of different kinds of lipidic drug Puntes. This is an open-access article delivery vehicles and particles has resulted in the development of ionizable lipid distributed under the terms of the Creative nanoparticles (iLNPs), which can overcome most of the typical drug delivery Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other problems. Proof of their success is the late approval and massive administration forums is permitted, provided the original as the prophylactic vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. These ILNPs are built by electrostatic author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in aggregation of surfactants, the therapeutic agent, and lipids that self-segregate this journal is cited, in accordance with from an aqueous solution, forming nanoparticles stabilized with lipid polymers, accepted academic practice. No use, such as PEG. These vehicles overcome previous limitations such as low loading distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. and high toxicity, likely thanks to low charge at the working pH and reduced size, and their entry into the cells via endocytosis rather than membrane perforation or fusion, always associated with higher toxicity. We herein revise their primary features, synthetic methods to prepare and characterize them, pharmacokinetic (administration, distribution, metabolization and excretion) aspects, and biodistribution and fate. Owing to their advantages, iLNPs are potential drug delivery systems to improve the management of various diseases and widely available for clinical use. KEYWORDS ionizable lipid nanoparticles, RNA-loading, drug delivery carriers, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and clearance Frontiers in Immunology 01 frontiersin.org González-Rioja et al. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1129296 Introduction nanoscale, allowing for the rapid and widespread development of new, more precise and more functional DDS. Interestingly, the The modern concept of drug delivery probably started with initial vehicles were called microspheres and then renamed German Nobel laureate Paul Erlich’s “magic bullet” in 1907, a bullet nanocarriers, even if some nanocarriers were bigger than that cannot miss its target (1, 2) and became common with some microspheres. penicillin in the early 20th century (3, 4). The initial idea was to Among DDS, polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) were the first to be kill prokaryotes leaving eukaryotes unharmed, thus reducing employed, showing significant therapeutic benefits but damage to the body associated with uncontrolled biodistribution. accompanied by polymeric toxicity, high cost, and lack of Soon it was also developed to improve dosing and, with it, feasibility for scaling up. Besides, liposomes have traditionally therapeutic effects. More recently, the concept was actualized for been the more developed and implemented DDS. Lipid-based chemotherapy due to its severe side effects, and thus, the firsts Drug NPs made of lipids and surfactants (amphipathic molecules) are Delivery Systems (DDS) were developed to improve the transport of simple and safe, but there is typically a low degree of loading and antitumoral drugs such as doxorubicin (5). Before, excipients structural fragility. They have become an up-and-coming delivery allowed the drug to solubilize and properly reach their target, but platform for hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances or a their capacity was limited to solubility issues, with poor capabilities combination of both (13, 14). These carriers can penetrate in directing and protecting the drugs during the journey to the abnormal tissue, remain for a long time and release their cargo target. Similarly, if the development of DDS was initially intended drugs, increasing drug efficacy. For example, in-vitro studies by for solubilizing common drugs, it rapidly opened the possibility of Wang et al. (15, 16) have shown the successful target delivery of loading other substances, such as genetic material or proteins – resveratrol, a poor aqueous solubility drug and curcumin antibodies, enzymes, etc.-. These substances cannot be administered hydrophobic polyphenol in breast cancer. Recently developed in a free form since they are highly immunogenic and rapidly lipid-based formulations included micro and nanoemulsions, self- biodegraded. Therefore, the full development of DDS will not only emulsifying formulations, liposomes, lipid NPs and lipid-drug optimize the pharmacology of current drugs but also dramatically conjugates. Among the extensive range of lipid formulations, the expand the pharmacopoeia we have available for the cure, which solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) (17–19), the nanostructured lipid will have a clear impact on population health. carried (NLCs) (14, 20), and the lipid-based nucleic acid It is important to note that therapeutic effectiveness strongly therapeutics (21, 22) have probably centered the majority of the depends on pharmacokinetic aspects, on how drugs travel and attention due to their successful activities toward multiples disease interact through the body, reach their target, perform their intended models. Other alternatives have been protein aggregates for effect, are modified (metabolized), and excreted. Up to now, unsoluble chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel in pharmacokinetic principles were based on small drug properties, Abraxane ® (23) or made of biological molecules such as where balanced hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity allow it to reach polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PGLA) NPs, which has been all corners of the body (6) so that reaching the target was assured at considered one of the first universal nanocarrier platforms (24, 25). the expense of undesirable side effects. For example, after cisplatin In this work, we refer to those NPs made of a mixture of lipids, injection, a common chemotherapeutic agent, 60% goes to the ionizable surfactants, and nucleic acids, which spontaneously form kidney causing nephrotoxicity, 36% irreversibly binds to albumin NPs by the electrostatic and hydrophobic collapse in water. These losing its activity, and only a small fraction of the remaining 4% lead to highly dense and highly protective NPs, which can be reaches the tumor cell’s DNA and performs its therapeutic action singularized as ionizable lipid nanoparticles, iLNPs. These NPs (7). In this scenario, protecting the drug and carrying it to the can overcome the main biological barriers to cell transfection, region of interest is a natural evolution of pharmacology. including protection from endonucleases, and RNases, and Together with the quest for efficient drug administration, selective targeting, when targeting moieties such as antibodies or chemists and nanochemists have searched for a universal carrier aptamers are included, to improve the contact with the targeted that can accommodate many different substances. In addition, the tissues or cells (26), cell internalization, and intracellular release. carrier has to be safe, more than its loading. DDSs have to be so safe Herein we focus on RNA-ionizable lipid NPs. RNA is not only a that repeated administrations across one person’s life should not be major player in genetic medicine that needs to be transported, but it a problem. Also, for practical reasons, they have to be easy to is also a model of macromolecule that has to be protected until produce and easy to store. delivered inside the cells. As expected, DDS have been developed and exploited to From a historical perspective, ionizable lipids evolved from enhance the delivery of drugs in treating several diseases showing years of working with permanently charged cationic lipids for potential benefits in terms of pharmaceutical flexibility, selectivity, transfection. The mechanism by which these cationic lipids dose reduction and minimization of adverse effects (8). In these capture nucleic acids is through complexing them by ionic platforms, different drugs, ligands and biomolecules can be interaction between the negatively charged phosphate groups on combined by absorption (9), loading (10), coordination bonding the nucleic acid molecules and a positively charged group on the (11), and entrapment (12) to perform different tasks. While DDS lipid head, forming nucleotides-lipid complexes-, probably starting popularization started in the 80s and developed as a full academic in 1987 with DOTMA, the first bi-layer forming cationic lipid, and technological discipline, nanotechnology irrupted in the 2000s specifically designed and used for DNA transfection (27). However, offering unprecedented control of mater structured at the due to its net positive charge, it presented unacceptable levels of Frontiers in Immunology 02 frontiersin.org González-Rioja et al. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1129296 toxicity at the doses necessary to produce therapeutically relevant Ionizable lipid nanoparticles: levels of transgene expression, especially in vivo animal models, making its transition into clinical praxis impossible (28–30). In Structure, composition addition, the positive net charge induces plasma protein adsorption and characterization and rapid clearance by the immune system, negatively affecting transfection efficiency (31). They commonly present hemodynamic Ionizable Lipid NPs consist of nanometrically sized particles (39) toxicities, such as the activation of the complement system and an could be understood as a dense condensation of surfactants, lipids and increase in blood coagulation time (32–34). Ionizable lipids entered genetic material. These NPs can be synthesized quickly and efficiently the field as an answer to this problem. These lipids are a pivotal to encapsulate genetic material with high efficiency (high density) and element of the iLNP systems (35) and are characterized by having have sufficient stability and robustness to travel through the body to an ionizable functional group in their polar head with an acid- their destination without being degraded or opsonized, protecting their dissociation constant (pKa) below 7.0 (36). Their pH-tunable cargo, and able to carry out an efficient cytoplasmic delivery of the charge allows them to be neutral at physiological pH, minimizing genetic material. Their standard composition consists of 5 different their cationic burden and toxicity but be protonated at a lower pH compounds: i) the genetic material which has to be delivered, ii) an at the maturing, acidified endosome. Their cationic nature inside ionizable cationic lipid to interact with the genetic material and render the endosome will help its break and escape by enabling the it hydrophobic, iii) a helper amphipathic molecule, usually a interaction with the anionic membrane lipids (and subsequent phospholipid such as DSPC, iv) a helper sterol lipid, in the majority formation of non-by-layer phases), allowing cytosolic delivery. of cases Cholesterol, to making the structure more robust, and v) a Indeed, the ability to activate and deactivate the ionizable lipid PEG-lipid at the particle surface for surface stabilization and to avoid cationicity, when necessary, enables it to adapt to the needs of the NP aggregation and opsonization. The ratio between these components synthesis (charge on), distribution within the body (charge off) and varies among different formulations, but typically it can be around: escape from the endosome (charge on). These positively charged ionizable lipid 50%mol (60%mass), phospholipid 10%mol (15%mass), vesicles present the advantages of a liposome-mediated transfection Cholesterol 38%mol (15%mass), PEG-lipid 1,5%mol (8%mass). (e.g., fusion with the cell membrane, protection from degradation, These components interact and spontaneously structure digestion, opsonization, etc.) and of a cationic-mediated themselves through a self-assembly process based on the ethanol transfection (e.g., complex formation with nucleic acids, injection method, which consists of rapid mixing of an ethanol association with the negatively charged cell surface). phase, where the lipids are dissolved, into an aqueous phase, where Today, iLNPs have proven to be an efficient vehicle for the nucleic acids are dissolved in an acidic buffer. This rapid mixing effectively delivering RNA inside the cells, opening the doors to induces the sudden supersaturation of the lipidic molecules, which gene therapy. Their rapid implantation in several medicines already leads to burst nucleation and their assembly into NPs, trapping the approved for human use is an unprecedented success within the surfactants and genetic material (36). The process by which the community of nanomedicine, drug delivery and gene therapy. genetic material is encapsulated in the lipid structure takes place in Though, to date, only three different systems of RNA delivery are the first steps of the synthesis process when the ethanolic phase is approved by the FDA: antitumoral Patisiran and two RNA COVID- mixed with the aqueous phase and self-assembly of lipids occurs. 19 vaccines (Pfizer/BionTech and Moderna) (37), and many others The first force that drives this self-assembly is an electrostatic are under clinical trial. Encouraged by the successful application of interaction between the polar head of the positively-charged the SarCov2 mRNA-lipid vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer ionizable lipids at acidic pH and the negative charges of the companies, the high biocompatibility of the lipid nanocarriers is nucleic acid chains at the working pH (typically around 4), and being explored to treat many other diseases. Thus, in a continuous the second is the increase in polarity of the lipidic solvent by the effort to cure other viral diseases, other mRNA vaccines are addition of water, expulsing lipidic material from the liquid phase developing to fight against etiological agents such as into the NPs. Thus, as the polarity of the solvent progressively Cytomegalovirus, Syncytial respiratory, or influenza viruses (Trial increases, inverted micelle-like structures coalesce, interacting with number: NCT05085366, NCT05127434, NCT04956575). In the the rest of the lipids and surfactants, which at the NP surface closes field of cancer disease, the pharmaceutical companies Moderna the particle in a spherical form making the NPs soluble in water. and BioNTech are advancing in the commercialization of a potent The PEG-lipid anchors to the NP surface’s lipidic domains therapy based on mRNA vaccines for melanoma; their clinical trials while extending its water-soluble part away from the NP, forming a are in phases 1 and 2, respectively (Trial number: NCT0389788, hydrophilic steric barrier that provides colloidal stability and NCT04526899). The multifunctional characteristics of the iLNPs prevents NP aggregation and opsonization (40). The whole phase also have been advancing in treating solid tumors. In a lack of mixing and complexation of the nucleic acid is done at pH<3.0.CO;2-H 0591-y 70. Song L. Y., Ahkong Q. F., Rong Q., Wang Z., Ansell S., Hope M. J., et al. 46. Maier MA, Jayaraman M, Matsuda S, Liu J., Barros S., Querbes W., et al. Characterization of the inhibitory effect of PEG-lipid conjugates on the intracellular Biodegradable lipids enabling rapidly eliminated lipid nanoparticles for systemic delivery of plasmid and antisense DNA mediated by cationic lipid liposomes. Biochim delivery of RNAi therapeutics. Mol Ther (2013) 21(8):1570–8. doi: 10.1038/ Biophys Acta (2002) 1558(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(01)00399-6 mt.2013.124 71. Mui BL, Tam YK, Jayaraman M, Ansell S. M., Du X., Tam Y. Y., et al. Influence 47. Whitehead KA, Dorkin JR, Vegas AJ, Chang P. H., Veiseh O., Matthews J., et al. of polyethylene glycol lipid desorption rates on pharmacokinetics and Degradable lipid nanoparticles with predictable in vivo siRNA delivery activity. Nat pharmacodynamics of siRNA lipid nanoparticles. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids (2013) 2 Commun (2014) 5(1):4277. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5277 (12):e139. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2013.66 48. Hao J, Kos P, Zhou K, Miller J. B., Xue L., Yan Y., et al. Rapid synthesis of a 72. Hashiba K, Sato Y, Harashima H. pH-labile PEGylation of siRNA-loaded lipid lipocationic polyester library via ring-opening polymerization of functional nanoparticle improves active targeting and gene silencing activity in hepatocytes. J valerolactones for efficacious siRNA delivery. J Am Chem Soc (2015) 137(29):9206–9. Control Release (2017) 262:239–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.046 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03429 73. Francia V, Schiffelers RM, Cullis PR, Witzigmann D. The biomolecular corona 49. Semple SC, Akinc A, Chen J, Sandhu A. P., Mui B. L., Cho C. K., et al. Rational of lipid nanoparticles for gene therapy. Bioconjug Chem (2020) 31(9):2046–59. doi: design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery. Nat Biotechnol (2010) 28(2):172–6. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00366 10.1038/nbt.1602 74. Walczyk D, Bombelli FB, Monopoli MP, Lynch I, Dawson KA. What the cell "sees" in 50. Li AV, Moon JJ, Abraham W, Suh H., Elkhader J., Seidman M. A., et al. bionanoscience. J Am Chem Soc (2010) 132(16):5761–8. doi: 10.1021/ja910675v Generation of effector memory T cell-based mucosal and systemic immunity with pulmonary nanoparticle vaccination. Sci Transl Med (2013) 5(204):204ra130. doi: 75. Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Biomolecular coronas provide 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006516 the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat Nanotechnol (2012) 7(12):779–86. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.207 51. Miller JB, Kos P, Tieu V, Zhou K, Siegwart DJ. Development of cationic quaternary ammonium sulfonamide amino lipids for nucleic acid delivery. ACS Appl 76. Cai R, Chen C. The crown and the scepter: Roles of the protein corona in Mater Interfaces (2018) 10(3):2302–11. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15982 nanomedicine. Adv Mater (2019) 31(45):e1805740. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805740 52. Han X, Zhang H, Butowska K, Swingle K. L., Alameh M. G., Weissman D., et al. 77. Nguyen VH, Lee BJ. Protein corona: A new approach for nanomedicine design. An ionizable lipid toolbox for RNA delivery. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):7233. doi: Int J Nanomedicine (2017) 12:3137–51. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S129300 10.1038/s41467-021-27493-0 78. Casals E, Pfaller T, Duschl A, Oostingh GJ, Puntes V. Time evolution of the 53. Crawford R, Dogdas B, Keough E, Haas R. M., Wepukhulu W., Krotzer S., et al. nanoparticle protein corona. ACS Nano (2010) 4(7):3623–32. doi: 10.1021/nn901372t Analysis of lipid nanoparticles by cryo-EM for characterizing siRNA delivery vehicles. 79. Akinc A, Querbes W, De S, Qin J., Frank-Kamenetsky M., Jayaprakash K. N., Int J Pharm (2011) 403(1-2):237–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.025 et al. Targeted delivery of RNAi therapeutics with endogenous and exogenous ligand- 54. Chen C, Chen C, Li Y, Gu R, Yan X. Characterization of lipid-based based mechanisms. Mol Ther (2010) 18(7):1357–64. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.85 nanomedicines at the single-particle level. Fundam Res (2022). doi: 10.1016/ 80. Qiu M, Tang Y, Chen J, Muriph R., Ye Z., Huang C., et al. Lung-selective mRNA j.fmre.2022.09.011 delivery of synthetic lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of pulmonary 55. Bunjes H, Unruh T. Characterization of lipid nanoparticles by differential lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2022) 119(8):e2116271119. scanning calorimetry, X-ray and neutron scattering. Advanced Drug Delivery Rev doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116271119 (2007) 59:379–402. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.013 81. Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D. Size-dependent internalization of 56. Schilt Y, Berman T, Wei X, Barenholz Y, Raviv U. Using solution X-ray particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J scattering to determine the high-resolution structure and morphology of PEGylated (2004) 377(Pt 1):159–69. doi: 10.1042/bj20031253 liposomal doxorubicin nanodrugs. Biochim Biophys Acta (2016) 1860(1 Pt A):108–19. 82. Geranio L, Heuberger M, Nowack B. The behavior of silver nanotextiles during doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.09.012 washing. Environ Sci Technol (2009) 43(21):8113–8. doi: 10.1021/es9018332 Frontiers in Immunology 12 frontiersin.org González-Rioja et al. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1129296 83. Elzey S, Grassian VH. Agglomeration, isolation and dissolution of commercially 104. Brusini R, Varna M, Couvreur P. Advanced nanomedicines for the treatment manufactured silver nanoparticles in aqueous environments. J Nanoparticle Res (2009) of inflammatory diseases. Adv Drug Delivery Rev (2020) 157:161–78. doi: 10.1016/ 12(5):1945–58. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9783-y j.addr.2020.07.010 84. Li X, Lenhart JJ, Walker HW. Aggregation kinetics and dissolution of coated 105. Rennick JJ, Johnston APR, Parton RG. Key principles and methods for silver nanoparticles. Langmuir (2012) 28(2):1095–104. doi: 10.1021/la202328n studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nat 85. Li X, Lenhart JJ, Walker HW. Dissolution-accompanied aggregation kinetics of Nanotechnol (2021) 16(3):266–76. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00858-8 silver nanoparticles. Langmuir (2010) 26(22):16690–8. doi: 10.1021/la101768n 106. Herrera M, Kim J, Eygeris Y, Jozic A, Sahay G. Illuminating endosomal escape 86. Liu J, Hurt RH. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano- of polymorphic lipid nanoparticles that boost mRNA delivery. Biomater Sci (2021) 9 silver colloids. Environ Sci Technol (2010) 44(6):2169–75. doi: 10.1021/es9035557 (12):4289–300. doi: 10.1039/D0BM01947J 87. Hwang J, Sullivan MO, Kiick KL. Targeted drug delivery via the use of ECM- 107. Hafez IM, Maurer N, Cullis PR. On the mechanism whereby cationic lipids mimetic materials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2020) 8:69. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00069 promote intracellular delivery of polynucleic acids. Gene Ther (2001) 8(15):1188–96. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301506 88. Henke E, Nandigama R, Ergün S. Extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment and its impact on cancer therapy. Front Mol Biosci (2020) 6. 108. Miao L, Lin J, Huang Y, Li L., Delcassian D., Ge Y., et al. Synergistic lipid doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00160 compositions for albumin receptor mediated delivery of mRNA to the liver. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):2424. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16248-y 89. Ernst LM, Casals E, Italiani P, Boraschi D, Puntes V. The interactions between nanoparticles and the innate immune system from a nanotechnologist perspective. 109. Cullis PR, Hope MJ. Lipid nanoparticle systems for enabling gene therapies. Nanomaterials (Basel) (2021) 11(11):2991. doi: 10.3390/nano11112991 Mol Ther (2017) 25(7):1467–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.013 90. Arana L, Bayon-Cordero L, Sarasola LI, Berasategi M., Ruiz S., Alkorta I., et al. 110. Behr J-P. The proton sponge: A trick to enter cells the viruses did not exploit. Solid lipid nanoparticles surface modification modulates cell internalization and Chimia (1997) 51(1-2):34. doi: 10.2533/chimia.1997.34 improves chemotoxic treatment in an oral carcinoma cell line. Nanomaterials (Basel) 111. Tredan O, Galmarini CM, Patel K, Tannock IF. Drug resistance and the solid (2019) 9(3):464. doi: 10.3390/nano9030464 tumor microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 99(19):1441–54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/ 91. Sebak AA. Limitations of pegylated nanocarriers: Unfavourable djm135 physicochemical properties, biodistribution patterns and cellular and subcellular 112. Papi M, Pozzi D, Palmieri V, Caracciolo G. Principles for optimization and fates. Int J Appl Pharmaceutics (2018) 10(5):6–12. doi: 10.22159/ijap.2018v10i5.27568 validation of mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccines against COVID-19 using 3D 92. Hoang Thi TT, Pilkington EH, Nguyen DH, Lee J. S., Park K. D., Truong N. P., bioprinting. Nano Today (2022) 43:101403. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101403 et al. The importance of poly(ethylene glycol) alternatives for overcoming PEG 113. Ruenraroengsak P, Cook JM, Florence AT. Nanosystem drug targeting: Facing immunogenicity in drug delivery and bioconjugation. Polymers (Basel) (2020) 12 up to complex realities. J Control Release (2010) 141(3):265–76. doi: 10.1016/ (2):298. doi: 10.3390/polym12020298 j.jconrel.2009.10.032 93. Goy-Lopez S, Juarez J, Alatorre-Meda M, Casals E., Puntes V. F., Taboada P., 114. Perrault SD, Walkey C, Jennings T, Fischer HC, Chan WC. Mediating tumor et al. Physicochemical characteristics of proteina-NP bioconjugates: the role of particle targeting efficiency of nanoparticles through design. Nano Lett (2009) 9(5):1909–15. curvature and solution conditions on human serum albumin conformation and doi: 10.1021/nl900031y fibrillogenesis inhibition. Langmuir (2012) 28(24):9113–26. doi: 10.1021/la300402w 115. Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev 94. Ojea-Jimenez I, Puntes V. Instability of cationic gold nanoparticle bioconjugates: the Cancer (2006) 6(8):583–92. doi: 10.1038/nrc1893 role of citrate ions. J Am Chem Soc (2009) 131(37):13320–7. doi: 10.1021/ja902894s 116. Chen BM, Cheng TL, Roffler SR. Polyethylene glycol immunogenicity: 95. Casals E, Barrena R, Garcia A, Gonzalez E., Delgado L., Busquets-Fite M., et al. Theoretical, clinical, and practical aspects of anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies. ACS Programmed iron oxide nanoparticles disintegration in anaerobic digesters boosts Nano (2021) 15(9):14022–48. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c05922 biogas production. Small (2014) 10(14):2801–8, 2741. doi: 10.1002/smll.201303703 117. Kong YW , Dreaden EC. PEG: Will it come back to you? polyethelyne 96. Bastus NG, Casals E, Vá zquez-Campos S, Puntes V. Reactivity of engineered glycol immunogenicity, COVID vaccines, and the case for new PEG derivatives and inorganic nanoparticles and carbon nanostructures in biological media. Nanotoxicology alternatives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2022) 10:879988. doi: 10.3389/ (2008) 2(3):99–112. doi: 10.1080/17435390802217830 fbioe.2022.879988 97. Barua S, Mitragotri S. Challenges associated with penetration of nanoparticles 118. Talegaonkar S, Bhattacharyya A. Potential of lipid nanoparticles (SLNs across cell and tissue barriers: A review of current status and future prospects. Nano and NLCs) in enhancing oral bioavailability of drugs with poor intestinal Today (2014) 9(2):223–43. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.04.008 permeability. AAPS PharmSciTech (2019) 20(3):121. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019- 98. Dal Magro R, Ornaghi F, Cambianica I, Beretta S., Re F., Musicanti C., et al. 1337-8 ApoE-modified solid lipid nanoparticles: A feasible strategy to cross the blood-brain 119. Ball RL, Bajaj P, Whitehead KA. Oral delivery of siRNA lipid nanoparticles: barrier. J Control Release (2017) 249:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.039 Fate in the GI tract. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):2178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20632-6 99. Carlander U, Li D, Jolliet O, Emond C, Johanson G. Toward a general 120. Sung J, Alghoul Z, Long D, Yang C, Merlin D. Oral delivery of IL-22 mRNA- physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for intravenously injected loaded lipid nanoparticles targeting the injured intestinal mucosa: A novel therapeutic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine (2016) 11:625–40. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S94370 solution to treat ulcerative colitis. Biomaterials (2022) 288(August):121707. doi: 100. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121707 and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release (2000) 121. Wang Y, Rajala A, Rajala RV. Lipid nanoparticles for ocular gene delivery. J 65(1-2):271–84. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00248-5 Funct Biomater (2015) 6(2):379–94. doi: 10.3390/jfb6020379 101. Martin F, Huang A, Uziely B, Kaufman B., Safra T., Gabizon A., et al. 122. Toualbi L, Toms M, Moosajee M. The landscape of non-viral gene Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of augmentation strategies for inherited retinal diseases. Int J Mol Sci (2021) 22(5):1– doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Researc 14. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052318 (1994) 54(4):987–92. 123. Garces A, Amaral MH, Sousa Lobo JM, Silva AC. Formulations based on solid 102. Safra T, Muggia F, Jeffers S, Tsao-Wei D. D., Groshen S., Lyass O., et al. lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for cutaneous use: A Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): Reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients review. Eur J Pharm Sci (2018) 112(September 2017):159–67. doi: 10.1016/ reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2. Ann Oncol (2000) 11(8):1029– j.ejps.2017.11.023 33. doi: 10.1023/A:1008365716693 124. Gainza G, Bonafonte DC, Moreno B, Aguirre J. J., Gutierrez F. B., Villullas S., 103. Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Barenholz Y. Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal et al. The topical administration of rhEGF-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers doxorubicin: Review of animal and human studies. Clin Pharmacokinet (2003) 42 (rhEGF-NLC) improves healing in a porcine full-thickness excisional wound model. (5):419–36. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002 J Control Release (2015) 197:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.033 Frontiers in Immunology 13 frontiersin.org