biomedicines Review Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Disease, and COVID-19: A Narrative Review Carles Vilaplana-Carnerero 1,2,3 , Maria Giner-Soriano 1,3 , Àngela Dominguez 2,4 , Rosa Morros 1,5,6 , Carles Pericas 2,7 , Dolores Álamo-Junquera 2,8,9 , Diana Toledo 2,4 , Carmen Gallego 2,10 , Ana Redondo 11 and María Grau 4,12,13, * 1 Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), 08007 Barcelona, Spain 2 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain 3 School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 4 Biomedical Research Consortium in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain 5 Biomedical Research Consortium in Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), 28029 Madrid, Spain 6 Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 7 Epidemiology Service, Public Health Agency of Barcelona (ASPB), 08023 Barcelona, Spain 8 Quality, Process and Innovation Direction, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain 9 Health Services Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain 10 Methodology, Quality and Medical Care Assessment Department, Direcció d’Atenció Primària Metropolitana Sud, Catalan Institute of Health (ICS), 08908 Barcelona, Spain 11 Hospital Universitario Bellvitge, Catalan Institute of Health (ICS), 08907 Barcelona, Spain 12 Serra Húnter Fellow, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain 13 August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: mariagrau@ub.edu Citation: Vilaplana-Carnerero, C.; Giner-Soriano, M.; Dominguez, À.; Abstract: Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative process that mainly occurs Morros, R.; Pericas, C.; in large- and medium-sized arteries and is morphologically characterized by asymmetric focal Álamo-Junquera, D.; Toledo, D.; thickenings of the innermost layer of the artery, the intima. This process is the basis of cardiovascular Gallego, C.; Redondo, A.; Grau, M. diseases (CVDs), the most common cause of death worldwide. Some studies suggest a bidirectional Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular link between atherosclerosis and the consequent CVD with COVID-19. The aims of this narrative Disease, and COVID-19: A Narrative review are (1) to provide an overview of the most recent studies that point out a bidirectional relation Review. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206. between COVID-19 and atherosclerosis and (2) to summarize the impact of cardiovascular drugs on https://doi.org/10.3390/ biomedicines11041206 COVID-19 outcomes. A growing body of evidence shows that COVID-19 prognosis in individuals with CVD is worse compared with those without. Moreover, various studies have reported the Academic Editor: Chiara Caselli emergence of newly diagnosed patients with CVD after COVID-19. The most common treatments Received: 28 February 2023 for CVD may influence COVID-19 outcomes. Thus, their implication in the infection process is Revised: 12 April 2023 briefly discussed in this review. A better understanding of the link among atherosclerosis, CVD, and Accepted: 17 April 2023 COVID-19 could proactively identify risk factors and, as a result, develop strategies to improve the Published: 18 April 2023 prognosis for these patients. Keywords: COVID-19; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; long COVID; bidirectional link; cardiovascular disease treatments Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and 1. Introduction conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// From the beginning of the outbreak in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has spread all over the world with more than 4.0/). Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041206 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicines Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 2 of 14 600 million cases and more than 6 million deaths [1]. The signs and symptoms of coron- avirus disease (COVID-19) range from fever or fatigue, mainly in the acute nonsevere forms, to systemic complications (e.g., pulmonary, cardiovascular, endocrinological, neurological, and psychiatric symptoms) in more severe forms. These signs and symptoms could last 6 months and more, in a form called long COVID [2–5]. A growing body of evidence has shown that SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, such as influenza, may lead to cardiovascular damage and the consequent disease onset [6–11]. Atherosclerosis is the physiopathological injury that comes before most cases of CVDs. It is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative process that mainly occurs in large- and medium-sized arteries and is morphologically characterized by asymmetric focal thickenings of the innermost layer of the artery, the intima [12]. The accumulation of fatty and/or fibrous material in the intima layer of arteries forms an atherosclerotic plaque or atheroma. As time progresses, atheroma becomes fibrous and accumulates calcium minerals. In this stage, the plaque can encroach upon the arterial lumen reducing drastically the blood flow and leading to tissue ischemia or provoking the formation of a thrombus that can also occlude the lumen causing a more acute ischemia [13]. A pro-inflammatory and thrombophilic state is an integral feature of atherosclerosis, potentially increasing vulnerability to severe COVID-19 because the underlying endothelial dysfunction might represent the ideal deregulated immunological setting in which SARS-CoV-2 triggers a “cytokine storm” [14]. In addition, atherosclerosis causes coronary artery calcifications when evolved and becomes the main cause of CVDs [15]. A confirmatory analysis has observed that influenza might contribute substantially to the burden of ischemic heart disease, the most common diseases within the group of CVDs [16]. This association has also been explored for SARS-CoV-2 infection, with several scientific works pointing out an increased incidence of myocardial injury, acute coronary syndrome, thromboembolism, and other CVDs [6,17]. This relationship could be explained by the role of these infections in the development of atherosclerosis, driven by an endothelial dysfunction caused by the virus [10]. In the particular case of SARS-CoV-2, the endothelial cells and cardiac pericytes express abundant angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). SARS-CoV-2 uses this enzyme to facilitate the entry to target cells and to initiate infection mediated by transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) and cathepsin L [18]. Once inside, the virus disrupts the immune system, by a hyperinflammatory state, by the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, by activating vasoconstriction, inflammation and fibrotic pathways, and thrombotic balance via a prothrombotic environment caused by the activation of the coagulation cascade and the suppression of fibrinolytic mechanisms. The overall dysregulation of the endothelial injury results in a vicious cycle that causes end-organ dysfunction affecting cardiovascular, pulmonary, and immune systems [19]. As a result, a correlation among inflammatory response, COVID-19, atherosclerosis, and the clinical forms of CVDs, such as acute coronary syndromes, has been observed. Indeed, several manuscripts describe a bidirectional cause–effect relationship between COVID-19 and atherosclerosis [11,17,20,21]. Then, inflammatory and cytokine pathways of COVID-19 and atherosclerosis present similarities. Endothelial dysfunction, hyperinflammation, and coagulopathy are common in persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 and are also prevalent features of atherosclerosis [22] (Figure 1). On the one hand, the history of previous CVDs increases the risk of severe disease and death in individuals virally infected [9,23]. On the other hand, COVID-19 itself can induce myocardial injury, arrhythmia, acute coronary syn- drome, venous thromboembolism, and accelerating CVD [24,25]. Thus, pharmacological agents used for atherosclerotic conditions and CVDs can modify the association in both directions [21,22,26]. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 3 of 14 The objectives of this narrative review are (1) to provide an overview of the most recent studies that point out a bidirectional relation between COVID-19 and atherosclero- Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 3 of 14 sis and (2) to summarize the impact of cardiovascular drugs on COVID-19 outcomes. Figure Figure 1. Bidirectional association 1. Bidirectional association between between atherosclerosis atherosclerosis and and SARS-CoV2 SARS-CoV2 infection infection (adapted (adapted from from Vinciguerra et al. [27]). Vinciguerra et al. [27]). The objectivesand 2. Atherosclerosis of this CVD narrative reviewRisk as COVID-19 are (1) to provide an overview of the most Factors recent studies that point out a bidirectional relation between COVID-19 and atherosclerosis From the initial stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, studies have stated that a previous and (2) to summarize the impact of cardiovascular drugs on COVID-19 outcomes. or underlying history of CVD is directly associated with a worse prognosis and severity of Atherosclerosis 2. COVID-19 [26–34]. and This CVDassociation as COVID-19 wasRiskstill Factors existent in a subgroup analysis by sex, region, Fromdisease type,stages the initial disease ofoutcome, the COVID-19 and study design, outbreak, suggesting studies stablethat have stated findings [35]. a previous In addition, individuals with cardiovascular risk factors have or underlying history of CVD is directly associated with a worse prognosis and severity more risk of developing se- vere COVID-19 and have a higher risk of admission to the intensive of COVID-19 [26–34]. This association was still existent in a subgroup analysis by sex, care unit (ICU) and hospitaldisease region, death. type, The role of cardiovascular disease outcome, and risk study factors design, on suggesting mortality isstable accumulative, findings [35].and the greater number of such factors, the higher the risk of In addition, individuals with cardiovascular risk factors have more risk of developingmortality and the poorer the prognosis severe in individuals COVID-19 and have diagnosed a higherwithrisk ofCOVID-19. admissionThus, to the careful consideration intensive care unit (ICU)is re- quired and in the death. hospital mutualThe management of CVD and risk role of cardiovascular COVID-19 factors[33,36–40]. on mortality Sheppard et al. in a is accumulative, cohort and theofgreater more than number45,000 individuals, of such factors,showed the higher the the cumulative effect of hypertension risk of mortality and the poorer in COVID-19 patients. Older patients with controlled blood the prognosis in individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. Thus, careful consideration ispressure diagnosed for longer had a higher required in the risk of death mutual by COVID-19 management thanand of CVD those with a recent COVID-19 diagnosis [33,36–40]. of hypertension Sheppard et al. in a and uncontrolled cohort of more than blood pressure. 45,000 The authors individuals, showed hypothesized the cumulative thateffect olderofindividuals hypertension could in have more patients. COVID-19 advancedOlder atherosclerosis patients with andcontrolled target organ blooddamage pressure thatdiagnosed predisposefor tolonger worse COVID-19 had a higheroutcomes risk of death[41].byRegarding COVID-19the thanlipid thoseprofile, with athe results recent from aofmeta-analysis diagnosis hypertension showed and that a significant uncontrolled decreaseThe blood pressure. in the levelshypothesized authors of total cholesterol,that olderhigh-density individuals lipopro- could tein (HDL) cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) have more advanced atherosclerosis and target organ damage that predispose to worse cholesterol are associated with severity and COVID-19 mortality outcomes in COVID-19 [41]. Regarding patients. the lipid Hence, profile,the thelipid results profile frommay be used for a meta-analysis assessing showed thea severity that significant and prognosis decrease of levels in the COVID-19 of total[42]. In another cholesterol, study conducted high-density lipoproteinin a large cohort (HDL) of more cholesterol, andthan 28,000 subjects low-density without(LDL) lipoprotein previous CVD and cholesterol areaassociated positive SARS- with CoV-2 test, severity and the high estimates mortality in COVID-19 of the 10-year patients. atherosclerotic Hence, cardiovascular the lipid profile may be used disease for assessing (ASCVD) the riskseverity and prognosis score measured of COVID-19 continuously [42]. In another were associated with astudy greater conducted likelihood inof a large cohort of more severe COVID-19 [43]. than 28,000 subjects without previous CVD and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, Some the high estimates initial of thebehind hypotheses 10-year theatherosclerotic high prevalence cardiovascular of CVD in COVID-19 disease (ASCVD) patients risk score measured are related with advanced continuously were associated age, functionally impairedwith immune a greater system, likelihood or elevated of severe levels COVID-19 of ACE2 [28]. [43].In addition, an unbalanced immune response and hyperinflammatory pro- cess Some causedinitial by thehypotheses viral infection behind leadsthetohigh prevalence vascular damage, ofsuch CVDasinvasculitis. COVID-19 The patients storm are related with advanced age, functionally impaired immune of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α); system, or elevated levels of ACE2 [28]. interleukins In 1, (ILs) addition, 6, 8, andan unbalanced others; neutrophil immune response activation trapsand hyperinflammatory (NETs); and toll-like re- process caused by the viral infection leads to vascular ceptor (TLR) or macrophages result in the production of reactive oxidative damage, such as vasculitis. species (ROS) The storm of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α); interleukins (ILs) 1, 6, 8, and others; neutrophil activation traps (NETs); and toll- like receptor (TLR) or macrophages result in the production of reactive oxidative species (ROS) [17,19,22]. Thus, in individuals with a previous history of CVD, their inflammation would be accelerated and finally could be more affected by COVID-19 [17] (Figure 1). Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 4 of 14 Additionally, subclinical atherosclerosis can impact the course of COVID-19. Coronary artery calcification, a specific imaging marker of coronary atherosclerosis that correlates with the plaque burden, can reveal previously undiagnosed CVD in COVID-19 patients [44]. In a retrospective study of 457 individuals without a history of clinical coronary artery disease who underwent chest CT imaging during COVID-19 hospitalization, coronary artery calcification was detected in 42.9% of the patients. The presence of coronary artery calcification was associated with mechanical ventilation (p = 0.01), ICU admission (p = 0.02), in-hospital or 30-day mortality (p < 0.01), and hospital length of stay (p < 0.001) [45]. More- over, a recent meta-analysis that included eight studies showed an increase in mortality in the presence of coronary artery calcifications (relative risk 2.24, 95% confidence interval, 1.41–3.56; p < 0.001) [46]. Table 1 includes the prevalence of several cardiovascular risk factors and CVDs in individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 analyzed in three different systematic reviews and meta-analyses [31,47,48]. Despite the differences found in all three studies, hypertension was the most common condition in all instances. Table 1. Prevalence and range (%) of cardiovascular risk factors and CVDs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Pellicori [31] Yang [47] Emami [48] Cardiovascular risk factors Hypertension 36.1% (4.5% to 100%) 21.1% (13.0% to 27.2%) 16.4% (10.2% to 23.7%) Obesity 21.6% (0.2% to 57.6%) – – Diabetes 22.1% (0.0% to 100%) 9.7% (7.2% to 12.2%) 7.9% (6.6% to 9.3%) CVDs Ischemic heart disease 22.1% (0.0% to 100%) – – Cardiovascular disease 23.5% (0.7% to 68.7%) 8.4% (3.8% to 13.8%) 12.1% (4.4% to 22.8%) Heart failure 6.5% (0.0% to 28.0%) – – Cerebrovascular accident 5.1% (0.5% to 19.6%) – – Atrial fibrillation 11.1% (1.0% to 22.8%) – – Valve disease 3.7% (1.8% to 6.8%) – – 3. COVID-19 as a Risk Factor of Atherosclerosis or CVD COVID-19 itself can also induce cardiovascular manifestations including myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, acute coronary syndrome, and thromboembolism [20]. On the one hand, Hessami et al. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included studies with hospitalized symptomatic COVID-19 patients. The authors found a high burden of CVDs among COVID-19 patients in different countries and a high prevalence of specific cardiovascular complications in this population, such as hypertension, myocardial damage, acute cardiac injury, arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, heart failure, valve heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and heart palpitation. Nevertheless, the study was unable to determine the causal relationship between COVID-19 and cardiovascular complications because there could be pre-existing conditions in patients or either developed by the infection [33]. On the other hand, the study of Pillarisetti et al. analyzed data of the TriNetX COVID-19 global research network, a cohort of 81,844 patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The study found that 9.3% of patients developed cardiac complications after diagnosis of COVID-19. Heart failure, atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia, and acute coronary syndrome were the most incident. Death occurred in 20% of patients with cardiac complications. Although the analysis was adjusted for sex and greater number of comorbidities, the mortality was significantly higher in that group than in the one without cardiac complications [49]. Table 2 includes the incidence of several CVDs in individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 analyzed in two different systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The results Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 5 of 14 were heterogeneous, with arrythmia being the most common complication in one of them [31] and heart failure in the other [8]. Table 2. Incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with COVID-19. Pellicori [31] Kunutsor [8] Myocardial infarction/Acute 1.7% (0.0% to 3.6%) 6.2% (1.8% to 12.3%) Coronary syndrome Stroke 1.2% (0.0% to 9.6%) 1.6% (0.6% to 4.7%) Heart failure 6.8% (0.0% to 24.0%) 17.6% (14.2% to 21.2%) Venous thromboembolism 7.4% (0.0% to 46.2%) 1.6% (0.6% to 4.7%) Coagulopathy 8.0% (0.5% to 38.0%) – Arrythmia 9.3% (0.0% to 30.3%) 9.3% (5.1% to 14.6%) 4. Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of COVID-19 Long COVID is defined as the continuation or development of new symptoms three months after the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, with these symptoms lasting for at least 2 months with no other explanation [50]. Currently, three years after the declaration of the pandemic, emerging long-term outcome data demonstrate a significant burden of CVD following acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 [51]. Maestre-Muñiz et al. followed 581 surviving adult patients for 1 year who were discharged after hospital admission due to acute COVID-19. New-onset hypertension and de novo heart failure were present in 2% of the patients, and there was an increased need for readmission [52]. Raisei-Estabragh et al. found that in a matched cohort with 17,871 COVID-19 cases followed until the first episode of a specific outcome (heart failure, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, pericardi- tis, and mortality), most events occurred in the early post-infection period, typically within the first 30 days. The increased risk of the outcomes remained statistically significant after 30 days but with a smaller effect size [24]. Negreira-Caamaño et al. followed up on 673 patients for 1 year after discharge for COVID-19 hospitalization. Most major cardiovas- cular events (acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular event, venous thromboembolic disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death) occurred more than one month after hospitalization, although 75% of the venous thromboembolic disease cases occurred within the first 30 days [53]. Xie et al. studied a cohort of 153,760 veterans who survived COVID-19 comparing it with two different cohorts, one of 5,859,411 noninfected patients during 2017 and another of 5,637,647 patients with no evidence of SARS-CoV-2. The incident rates of CVDs during the 12-month follow-up after infection were significantly higher than those in the pre-exposure period, showing that post-COVID patients had an increased risk of a broad range of CVDs (e.g., cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and nonischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure, and throm- boembolic disease) [25]. Wang et al. followed 4,131,717 subjects from 30 days to 12 months after a test of SARS-CoV-2 had been performed. Compared to non-COVID-19 controls (n = 2,249,533), the 12-month risk of incidental CVDs (including cerebrovascular diseases, inflammatory heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and other cardiac disorders, such as heart failure and thromboembolic disorders) was substantially higher in the COVID-19 survivors (n = 691,455) [54]. Knight et al. took a population of 44,964,486 people and com- pared COVID-19-diagnosed patients hospitalized (118,879) and nonhospitalized (1,248,180) vs. non-COVID-19 patients. The authors found that 1 to 2 weeks after diagnosis there was a substantial increase in the relative incidence of arterial thrombotic and venous throm- boembolic events. Although there was a decline with time since diagnosis, the incidence of venous thromboembolic events persisted for up to 49 weeks after diagnosis [55]. On the other hand, Rezel-Potts et al. followed a matched cohort of 428,650 COVID-19 patients without diabetes mellitus and CVD for 1 year after infection date [56]. The incidence of CVD increased in the first 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis, while the incidence of diabetes mellitus remained elevated for at least 12 weeks [56]. All this evidence might point to the fact that post-COVID-19 sequelae, such as worsening hypertension, diabetes, Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 6 of 14 renal damage, inflammation, induced dyslipidemia, and endothelial dysfunction, could contribute to early atherosclerosis, accelerate vascular aging, and arterial stiffness [17] (Figure 1). 5. How the Most Common Treatments for CVD Prevention Influence SARS-CoV-2 Infection Because CVD is a common comorbidity in COVID-19 patients, CVD pharmacological treatments for primary and secondary prevention are commonly used in this population. Thus, from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVD treatments were pointed to influence COVID-19 outcomes [57,58]. The fact that patients with CVD have a higher expression of ACE2 led to the suspicion that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) had an unfavorable influence. Another example of CVD treatment influence is that statins for the pleiotropic effect that lead to a reduction in inflammatory response, were hypothesized to be useful in COVID-19 [21]. Finally, coagulopathy is also common in persons infected with SARS-CoV-2, being a preva- lent feature of atherosclerosis [22]. Thus, anticoagulants and aspirin might be potentially useful drugs for COVID-19 [59]. Moreover, pharmacological treatments with deleterious cardiovascular effects have not worked for COVID-19. Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been associated with prolonged QT; azithromycin and remdesivir with conduction defects, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure; and lopinavir/ritonavir and interleukin therapies with ischemic heart disease and abnormalities of the lipid pro- file [9]. The interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMVr) and cardiovascular drugs in patients with COVID-19 have been recently described. Ritonavir, the pharmaceutical enhancer used in NMVr, is an inhibitor of the enzymes of the CYP450 pathway, particularly CYP3A4 and to a lesser degree CYP2D6, and affects the P-glycoprotein pump. Coadminis- tration of NMVr with medications commonly used to manage cardiovascular conditions can potentially cause significant drug–drug interactions and may lead to severe adverse effects [60]. 5.1. ACEIs and ARBs Some initial evidence showed that a higher percentage of individuals with COVID-19 received either ACEIs or ARBs than those with severe or critical COVID-19. Particularly, in the study conducted by Feng et al., 87.9% of individuals with moderate COVID-19 were treated with ACEIs or ARBs, whereas this percentage was 6.1% for those in the severe and critical COVID-19 categories [26]. This observation raised the suspicion of a protective effect of such drugs. Indeed, given the relationship between the ACE2 receptor and SARS-CoV-2, ACEIs and ARBs could have an important role in the disease. Thus, the use of such drugs could potentially increase viral entry into cells. Both treatments are widely used for hypertension, and discontinuing or adding these treatments has been a difficult question to answer during the pandemic because of the lack of evidence available relating to the benefit or harm that could result [20,28,61]. The results regarding these active principles have been controversial, with some of them showing a decreased risk of severe disease or death by COVID-19 in those treated with ACEIs or ARBs [62,63], whereas, other studies including randomized controlled trials, showed no significant improvement or deleterious effect in SARS-CoV-2 infection [32,64–68]. ACEIs are excreted unchanged in the urine, translating into no significant interactions with NMVr, making them safe to continue [60]. However, ritonavir could reduce the antihypertensive effects of irbesartan, and, in contrast, the coadministration of NMVr with losartan can lead to hypotension [69]. The weak inhibition of the hepatic uptake transporter by NMVr may increase the concentration of both valsartan and the active metabolite of sacubitril, warranting close blood pressure monitoring [70]. Table 3 shows the most recent meta-analysis results on the effects of ACEIs and ARBs published during the last year. As previously summarized, the results were heterogeneous Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 7 of 14 with half of the meta-analyses included showing a protective effect of such drugs on mortality and disease severity. Table 3. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of the effects of ACEIs and ARBs on COVID-19 outcomes. Mortality Severity * Gnanenthiran [71] 0.95 (0.69 to 1.30) 1.00 (0.77 to 1.30) Huang [72] 0.61 (0.52 to 0.70) 0.99 (0.83 to 1.17) Kurdi [73] 0.80 (0.75 to 0.86) 0.86 (0.78 to 0.95) Lee [74] 0.75 (0.61 to 0.92) 0.80 (0.58 to 1.10) Liu [63] 0.80 (0.41 to 1.57) 0.62 (0.44 to 0.88) * Hospital or ICU admission. 5.2. Statins Statins have been thought to confer a potential advantage against progression to severe COVID-19 infection with different proposed effects including anti-inflammatory, antithrom- botic, antiviral protease, and protection against endothelial dysfunction [75]. Thus, at the beginning of the pandemic, the evidence pointed out that statin use was associated with im- proved survival [76] and seemed to lower the incidence of severe COVID-19 and mortality rates [22]. So far, several publications showed that statin use could even decrease the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes [77–85]. Overall, statin usage in Western patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was associated with nearly 40% lower odds of progressing toward severe illness or death. These estimates were observed after excluding studies in which statin therapy was started during hospital admission [80]. In addition, prior statin treatment was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 test positivity, diagnosis, hospitalization, and mortality in three different cohorts that included 572,695 patients followed up until Jan 2021 in Sweden [85]. Finally, in a cohort of 146,413 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, those who had a continuous (home and hospital) use of atorvastatin had a 35% reduction in the odds of mortality compared to patients who received only atorvastatin at home [86]. Nevertheless, the results from randomized controlled trials were not as conclusive as those observed in the cohort studies [87,88]. Thus, in the RESIST trial, the treatment with ator- vastatin did not prevent clinical deterioration [87]. Additionally, the use of atorvastatin increased the length of stay at the hospital and frequency of ICU admission in patients with COVID-19 [88], and Matli et al. observed no improvement in the clinical outcomes in those with COVID-19 treated with atorvastatin [89]. Finally, and according to Hejazi et al., atorvastatin significantly reduced the supplemental oxygen need, hospitalization duration, and serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mild to moderate hospitalized COVID-19 patients [90]. The coadministration of ritonavir/saquinavir and simvastatin increased its 24-h area under the curve (AUC) by 3059% [91]. Therefore, NMVr should not be administered with simvastatin or lovastatin owing to the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis [60]. Table 4 includes the most recent meta-analysis on the effect of statins published during the last year. The results confirm the protective effect of statins on COVID-19 mortality and severity. Table 4. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of the effects of statins on COVID-19 outcomes. Mortality Severity * Lao [78] 0.72 (0.67 to 0.77) 0.94 (0.89 to 0.99) Pal [79] 0.51 (0.41 to 0.63) 1.02 (0.69 to 1.50) Zein [92] 0.72 (0.55 to 0.95) – * Hospital or ICU admission. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 8 of 14 5.3. Anticoagulants and Aspirin At the beginning of the pandemics and due to the concerns of an extended pro- thrombotic risk with COVID-19, the use of extended thromboprophylaxis was considered although there were no clinical trial data [93]. On the one hand, Nadkarni et al. found a lower risk of mortality and intubation in individuals treated with anticoagulant drugs [94]. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no association was found between the intensity of thromboprophylaxis and the rate of thrombotic events although the rate of clinically rel- evant bleeding complications among patients who received intermediate- or full-dose anticoagulation exceeded that recorded among those treated with preventive doses [95]. Finally, in young to middle-aged patients with few comorbidities and with a predomi- nantly mild disease, prophylactic anticoagulation was not recommended due to no venous thromboembolism event during post-hospitalization [96]. Regarding the interaction of anticoagulants with COVID-19 drugs, particularly NMVr, when direct oral anticoagulants cannot be interrupted or dose-adjusted, NMVr should not be administered. Complete withdrawal of anticoagulation while on NMVr should be reserved for extremely low-risk patients, knowing that COVID-19 infection can itself increase the risk of a thromboembolic event [60]. Recent data suggest that aspirin use is associated with improved COVID-19 patient outcomes, including a decreased risk of thromboembolism, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and mortality [97–103]. Aspirin has been proposed to act on the intracellular signaling pathway involved with viral replication and reduction in systemic inflammation, cytokine release, platelet activity, and hypercoagulability [22,104] (Figure 1). No significant interactions are expected between aspirin and NMV use. Aspirin is metabolized by hepatic conjugation with glycin or glucuronic acid. Ritonavir weakly induces glucuronidation and can theoretically increase aspirin metabolism. However, there are no reported clinical adverse events, and it is safe to take it with NMVr [60,105]. Table 5 includes the results of the most recent meta-analysis on the effect of antico- agulants and aspirin. The results confirm the protective effect of the latter on COVID-19 mortality, whereas no significant effect has been found for the first. Table 5. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of the effects of anticoagulants and aspirin on COVID-19 outcomes. Anticoagulants Mortality Severity * Reis [106] 1.03 (0.86 to 1.24) – Zeng [107] 1.08 (0.90 to 1.30) 1.50 (0.72 to 3.12) Aspirin Kow [108] 0.50 (0.32 to 0.77) – Martha [101] 0.46 (0.35 to 0.61) – Salah [109] 1.12 (0.84 to 1.50) – Srivastava [110] 0.70 (0.63 to 0.77) – * Hospital or ICU admission. 6. Summary and Future Research This review provides the latest insights into the interaction between COVID-19 and atherosclerosis and the cardiovascular event caused by these vascular injuries. Indeed, both atherosclerosis and COVID-19 present a bidirectional association. A history of CVD is considered a major risk factor for COVID-19 disease, and the follow-up of individuals with COVID-19 has shown that the disease increases the risk of CVD events. The pathophys- iological effects of both diseases (e.g., inflammation, immune response, and endothelial damage) have been proposed as the main potential mechanisms behind this bidirectional interplay. Moreover, research works have identified the interaction between several CVD treatments that might play a role in preventing COVID-19 complications. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 9 of 14 The primary and secondary prevention of CVD is crucial in clinical practice for three reasons. First, CVD is the leading cause of mortality in the world and continues to increase in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Second, noncommunicable diseases, such as CVDs, are characterized by a long induction period that is generally asymptomatic. Indeed, its first manifestation is frequently a vital event, such as an acute myocardial infarction or a stroke. Finally, the control of risk factors, that is, factors associated with CVD, leads to a reduction in its incidence. The control of CVD, whose morbidity and mortality are very high, will have an impact not only on the individual at risk, but also on the population overall, as many individual attitudes are shaped by the community’s attitude toward health problems. Thus, an accurate and reliable identification of the individual risk is imperative to decrease the incidence of CVD. To improve the estimation of such risk, a better understanding of the link among atherosclerosis, CVD, and COVID-19 is vital. As a result, public health strategies will be developed to improve the prognosis for patients with CVD and COVID-19 or to mitigate the short-, mid- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, more high-quality scientific works exploring the bidirectional link between atherosclerosis–CVD and COVID-19 are required to improve the knowledge in this field. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, C.V.-C. and M.G.; methodology, C.V.-C., R.M., À.D. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V.-C. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, C.V.-C., R.M., À.D., C.P., M.G.-S., D.Á.-J., D.T., C.G., A.R. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https: //covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 14 March 2023). 2. Ma, Y.; Deng, J.; Liu, Q.; Du, M.; Liu, M.; Liu, J. Long-term consequences of COVID-19 at 6 months and above: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6865. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Rey-Reñones, C.; Martinez-Torres, S.; Martín-Luján, F.M.; Pericas, C.; Redondo, A.; Vilaplana-Carnerero, C.; Dominguez, A.; Grau, M. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: A narrative review. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2089. [CrossRef] 4. Lee, C.C.E.; Ali, K.; Connell, D.; Mordi, I.R.; George, J.; Lang, E.M.; Lang, C.C. COVID-19-associated cardiovascular complications. Diseases 2021, 9, 47. [CrossRef] 5. Garg, M.; Maralakunte, M.; Garg, S.; Dhooria, S.; Sehgal, I.; Bhalla, A.S.; Vijayvergiya, R.; Grover, S.; Bhatia, V.; Jagia, P.; et al. The conundrum of ‘Long-COVID-19’: A narrative review. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 2491–2506. [CrossRef] 6. Seeherman, S.; Suzuki, Y.J. Viral infection and cardiovascular disease: Implications for the molecular basis of COVID-19 pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 7. Streblow, D.N.; Orloff, S.L.; Nelson, J.A. Do pathogens accelerate atherosclerosis? J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 2798S–2804S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 8. Kunutsor, S.K.; Laukkanen, J.A. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e139–e141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. Aggarwal, G.; Cheruiyot, I.; Aggarwal, S.; Wong, J.; Lippi, G.; Lavie, C.J.; Henry, B.M.; Sanchis-Gomar, F. Association of cardiovascular disease with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity: A meta-analysis. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2020, 45, 100617. [CrossRef] 10. Madjid, M.; Aboshady, I.; Awan, I.; Litovsky, S.; Casscells, S.W. Influenza and cardiovascular disease: Is there a causal relationship? Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2004, 31, 4–13. [PubMed] 11. Jalili, M.; Sayehmiri, K.; Ansari, N.; Pourhossein, B.; Fazeli, M.; Azizi Jalilian, F. Association between influenza and COVID-19 viruses and the risk of atherosclerosis: Meta-analysis study and systematic review. Adv. Respir. Med. 2022, 90, 338–348. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Hansson, G.K. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1685–1695. [CrossRef] Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 10 of 14 13. Libby, P.; Buring, J.E.; Badimon, L.; Hansson, G.K.; Deanfield, J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Tokgözoğlu, L.; Lewis, E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Makarova, Y.A.; Ryabkova, V.A.; Salukhov, V.V.; Sagun, B.V.; Korovin, A.E.; Churilov, L.P. Atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disorders and COVID-19: Comorbid pathogenesis. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 478. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Frostegård, J. Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 117. [CrossRef] 16. Chaves, S.S.; Nealon, J.; Burkart, K.G.; Modin, D.; Biering-Sørensen, T.; Ortiz, J.R.; Vilchis-Tella, V.M.; Wallace, L.E.; Roth, G.; Mahe, C.; et al. Global, regional and national estimates of influenza-attributable ischemic heart disease mortality. EClinicalMedicine 2022, 55, 101740. [CrossRef] 17. Saeed, S.; Tadic, M.; Larsen, T.H.; Grassi, G.; Mancia, G. Coronavirus disease 2019 and cardiovascular complications: Focused clinical review. J. Hypertens. 2021, 39, 1282–1292. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 18. Liu, T.; Luo, S.; Libby, P.; Shi, G.P. Cathepsin L-selective inhibitors: A potentially promising treatment for COVID-19 patients. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 213, 107587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 19. Siddiqi, H.K.; Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M. COVID-19—A vascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 31, 1–5. [CrossRef] 20. Nishiga, M.; Wang, D.W.; Han, Y.; Lewis, D.B.; Wu, J.C. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: From basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 543–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 21. Grzegorowska, O.; Lorkowski, J. Possible correlations between atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndromes and COVID-19. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3746. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 22. Sagris, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Tsioufis, C.; Oikonomou, E.; Antoniades, C.; Crea, F.; Kaski, J.C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory mechanisms in COVID-19 and atherosclerosis: Current pharmaceutical perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Li, M.; Dong, Y.; Wang, H.; Guo, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.; Tian, C.; Du, K.; Zhu, R.; Wang, L.; et al. Cardiovascular disease potentially contributes to the progression and poor prognosis of COVID-19. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 1061–1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Raisi-Estabragh, Z.; Cooper, J.; Salih, A.; Raman, B.; Lee, A.M.; Neubauer, S.; Harvey, N.C.; Petersen, S.E. Cardiovascular disease and mortality sequelae of COVID-19 in the UK Biobank. Heart 2022, 109, 119–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Xie, Y.; Xu, E.; Bowe, B.; Al-Aly, Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 583–590. [CrossRef] 26. Feng, Y.; Ling, Y.; Bai, T.; Xie, Y.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Xiong, W.; Yang, D.; Chen, R.; Lu, F.; et al. COVID-19 with different severities: A multicenter study of clinical features. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, 1380–1388. [CrossRef] 27. Vinciguerra, M.; Romiti, S.; Fattouch, K.; De Bellis, A.; Greco, E. Atherosclerosis as Pathogenetic Substrate for SARS-CoV2 Cytokine Storm. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2095. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Clerkin, K.J.; Fried, J.A.; Raikhelkar, J.; Sayer, G.; Griffin, J.M.; Masoumi, A.; Jain, S.S.; Burkhoff, D.; Kumaraiah, D.; Rabbani, L.; et al. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2020, 141, 1648–1655. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 29. Lazcano, U.; Cuadrado-Godia, E.; Grau, M.; Subirana, I.; Martínez-Carbonell, E.; Boher-Massaguer, M.; Rodríguez-Campello, A.; Giralt-Steinhauer, E.; Fernández-Pérez, I.; Jiménez-Conde, J.; et al. Increased COVID-19 mortality in people with previous cerebrovascular disease: A population-based cohort study. Stroke 2022, 53, 276–1284. [CrossRef] 30. Naeini, M.B.; Sahebi, M.; Nikbakht, F.; Jamshidi, Z.; Ahmadimanesh, M.; Hashemi, M.; Ramezani, J.; Miri, H.H.; Yazdian-Robati, R. A meta-meta-analysis: Evaluation of meta-analyses published in the effectiveness of cardiovascular comorbidities on the severity of COVID-19. Obes. Med. 2021, 22, 100323. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 31. Pellicori, P.; Doolub, G.; Wong, C.M.; Lee, K.S.; Mangion, K.; Ahmad, M.; Berry, C.; Squire, I.; Lambiase, P.D.; Lyon, A.; et al. COVID-19 and its cardiovascular effects: A systematic review of prevalence studies. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 3, CD013879. [CrossRef] 32. Khawaja, S.A.; Mohan, P.; Jabbour., R.; Bampouri., T.; Bowsher, G.; Hassan, A.M.M.; Huq, F.; Baghdasaryan, L.; Wang, B.; Sethi, A.; et al. COVID-19 and its impact on the cardiovascular system. Open Heart 2021, 8, e001472. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 33. Hessami, A.; Shamshirian, A.; Heydari, K.; Pourali, F.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Moosazadeh, M.; Abrotan, S.; Shojaie, L.; Sedighi, S.; Shamshirian, D.; et al. Cardiovascular diseases burden in COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 46, 382–391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 34. Buja, L.M.; Wolf, D.A.; Zhao, B.; Akkanti, B.; McDonald, M.; Lelenwa, L.; Reilly, N.; Ottaviani, G.; Elghetany, M.T.; Trujillo, D.O.; et al. The emerging spectrum of cardiopulmonary pathology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Report of 3 autopsies from Houston, Texas, and review of autopsy findings from other United States cities. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2020, 48, 107233. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 35. Xu, J.; Xiao, W.; Liang, X.; Shi, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H. A meta-analysis on the risk factors adjusted association between cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 severity. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1533. [CrossRef] 36. Collard, D.; Nurmohamed, N.S.; Kaiser, Y.; Reeskamp, L.F.; Dormans, T.; Moeniralam, H.; Simsek, S.; Douma, R.; Eerens, A.; Reidinga, A.C.; et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalised patients: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e045482. [CrossRef] 37. Mostaza, J.M.; Salinero-Fort, M.A.; Cardenas-Valladolid, J.; Rodriguez-Artalejo, F.; Díaz-Almiron, M.; Vich-Pérez, P.; San Andres- Rebollo, F.J.; Vicente, I.; Lahoz, C. Pre-infection HDL-cholesterol levels and mortality among elderly patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Atherosclerosis 2022, 341, 13–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 11 of 14 38. Fathi, M.; Vakili, K.; Sayehmiri, F.; Mohamadkhani, A.; Hajiesmaeili, M.; Rezaei-Tavirani, M.; Eilami, O. The prognostic value of comorbidity for the severity of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246190. [CrossRef] 39. Liang, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, S.; Qin, G. Coronary heart disease and COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Med. Clin. 2021, 156, 547–554. [CrossRef] 40. García-Guimaraes, M.; Mojón, D.; Calvo, A.; Izquierdo, A.; Belarte-Tornero, L.; Salvatella, N.; Llagostera, M.; Negrete, A.; Mas-Stachurska, A.; Ruiz, S.; et al. Influence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in COVID-19 patients. Data from a large prospective Spanish cohort. REC CardioClin. 2021, 56, 108–117. 41. Sheppard, J.P.; Nicholson, B.D.; Lee, J.; McGagh, D.; Sherlock, J.; Koshiaris, C.; Oke, J.; Jones, N.R.; Hinton, W.; Armitage, L.; et al. Association between blood pressure control and coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes in 45 418 symptomatic patients with hypertension: An observational cohort study. Hypertension 2021, 77, 846–855. [CrossRef] 42. Mahat, R.K.; Rathore, V.; Singh, N.; Singh, N.; Singh, S.-K.; Shah, R.K.; Garg, C. Lipid profile as an indicator of COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 45, 91–101. [CrossRef] 43. Arif, Y.A.; Stefanko, A.M.; Garcia, N.; Beshai, D.A.; Fan, W.; Wong, N.D. Estimated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: Disparities and severe COVID-19 outcomes (from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative). Am. J. Cardiol. 2022, 183, 16–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Budoff, M.J.; Mayrhofer, T.; Ferencik, M.; Bittner, D.; Lee, K.L.; Lu, M.T.; Coles, A.; Jang, J.; Krishnam, M.; Douglas, P.S.; et al. PROMISE Investigators. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation 2017, 136, 1993–2005. [CrossRef] 45. Kotlo, S.; Thorgerson, A.; Kulinski, J. Coronary artery calcification as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Am. Heart J. Plus 2023, 28, 100288. [CrossRef] 46. Lee, K.K.; Rahimi, O.; Lee, C.K.; Shafi, A.; Hawwass, D. A Meta-analysis: Coronary artery calcium score and COVID-19 prognosis. Med. Sci. 2022, 10, 5. [CrossRef] 47. Yang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Gou, X.; Pu, K.; Chen, Z.; Guo, Q.; Ji, R.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 94, 91–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 48. Emami, A.; Javanmardi, F.; Pirbonyeh, N.; Akbari, A. Prevalence of underlying diseases in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 8, e35. 49. Pillarisetti, J.; Cheema, M.S.; Haloot, J.; Panday, M.; Badin, A.; Mehta, A.; Anderson, A.S.; Prasad, A. Cardiac complications of COVID-19: Incidence and outcomes. Indian Heart J. 2022, 74, 170–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Lai, C.C.; Hsu, C.K.; Yen, M.Y.; Lee, P.I.; Ko, W.C.; Hsueh, P.R. Long COVID: An inevitable sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2023, 56, 1–9. [CrossRef] 51. Tobler, D.L.; Pruzansky, A.J.; Naderi, S.; Ambrosy, A.P.; Slade, J.J. Long-term cardiovascular effects of COVID-19: Emerging data relevant to the cardiovascular clinician. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2022, 24, 563–570. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 52. Maestre-Muñiz, M.M.; Arias, Á.; Mata-Vázquez, E.; Martín-Toledano, M.; López-Larramona, G.; Ruiz-Chicote, A.M.; Nieto- Sandoval, B.; Lucendo, A.J. Long-term outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 at one year after hospital discharge. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2945. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 53. Negreira-Caamaño, M.; Martínez-Del Río, J.; Águila-Gordo, D.; Mateo-Gómez, C.; Soto-Pérez, M.; Piqueras-Flores, J. Cardiovas- cular events after COVID-19 hospitalization: Long-term follow-up. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl. Ed.) 2022, 75, 100–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 54. Wang, W.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, S.I.; Wei, J.C. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in COVID-19 survivors among non-vaccinated population: A retrospective cohort study from the TriNetX US collaborative networks. EClinicalMedicine 2022, 53, 101619. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 55. Knight, R.; Walker, V.; Ip, S.; Cooper, J.A.; Bolton, T.; Keene, S.; Denholm, R.; Akbari, A.; Abbasizanjani, H.; Torabi, F.; et al. CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium and the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing COVID-19 National Core Study. Association of COVID-19 with major arterial and venous thrombotic diseases: A population-wide cohort study of 48 million adults in England and Wales. Circulation 2022, 146, 892–906. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 56. Rezel-Potts, E.; Douiri, A.; Sun, X.; Chowienczyk, P.J.; Shah, A.M.; Gulliford, M.C. Cardiometabolic outcomes up to 12 months after COVID-19 infection. A matched cohort study in the UK. PLoS Med. 2022, 19, e1004052. [CrossRef] 57. Task Force for the management of COVID-19 of the European Society of Cardiology. European Society of Cardiology guidance for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 1033–1058. [CrossRef] 58. Task Force for the management of COVID-19 of the European Society of Cardiology. ESC guidance for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 2-care pathways, treatment, and follow-up. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 1618–1666. [CrossRef] 59. Al-Ani, F.; Chehade, S.; Lazo-Langner, A. Thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. A scoping review. Thromb. Res. 2020, 192, 152–160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 60. Abraham, S.; Nohria, A.; Neilan, T.G.; Asnani, A.; Saji, A.M.; Shah, J.; Lech, T.; Grossman, J.; Abraham, G.M.; McQuillen, D.P.; et al. Cardiovascular drug interactions with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients with COVID-19: JACC review topic of the week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022, 80, 1912–1924. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 12 of 14 61. Fang, L.; Karakiulakis, G.; Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e21. [CrossRef] 62. Fu, L.; Liu, X.; Su, Y.; Ma, J.; Hong, K. Prevalence and impact of cardiac injury on COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Cardiol. 2021, 44, 276–283. [CrossRef] 63. Liu, Q.; Fu, W.; Zhu, C.J.; Ding, Z.H.; Dong, B.B.; Sun, B.Q.; Chen, R.C. Effect of continuing the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 53. [CrossRef] 64. Li, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Deng, A. Association of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors with severity or risk of death in patients with hypertension hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 825–830. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 65. Mancia, G.; Rea, F.; Ludergnani, M.; Apolone, G.; Corrao, G. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and the risk of COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2431–2440. [CrossRef] 66. Haroon, S.; Subramanian, A.; Cooper, J.; Anand, A.; Gokhale, K.; Byne, N.; Dhalla, S.; Acosta-Mena, D.; Taverner, T.; Okoth, K.; et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and susceptibility to COVID-19 in patients with hypertension: A propensity score-matched cohort study in primary care. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 262. [CrossRef] 67. Najmeddin, F.; Solhjoo, M.; Ashraf, H.; Salehi, M.; Rasooli, F.; Ghoghaei, M.; Soleimani, A.; Bahreini, M. Effects of renin- angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors on early outcomes of hypertensive COVID-19 patients: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Am. J. Hypertens. 2021, 34, 1217–1226. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 68. Puskarich, M.A.; Ingraham, N.E.; Merck, L.H.; Driver, B.E.; Wacker, D.A.; Black, L.P.; Jones, A.E.; Fletcher, C.V.; South, A.M.; Murray, T.A.; et al. Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Based Lung Protective Strategies for Inpatients with COVID-19 (ALPS-IP) Investigators. Efficacy of losartan in hospitalized patients with COVID-19-induced lung injury: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e222735. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 69. Fichtenbaum, C.J.; Gerber, J.G. Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2002, 41, 1195–1211. [CrossRef] 70. Hanna, I.; Alexander, N.; Crouthamel, M.H.; Davis, J.; Natrillo, A.; Tran, P.; Vapurcuyan, A.; Zhu, B. Transport properties of valsartan, sacubitril and its active metabolite (LBQ657) as determinants of disposition. Xenobiotica 2018, 48, 300–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 71. Gnanenthiran, S.R.; Borghi, C.; Burger, D.; Caramelli, B.; Charchar, F.; Chirinos, J.A.; Cohen, J.B.; Cremer, A.; Di Tanna, G.L.; Duvignaud, A.; et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials led by the International Society of Hypertension. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e026143. [CrossRef] 72. Huang, N.X.; Yuan, Q.; Fang, F.; Yan, B.P.; Sanderson, J.E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of ACEI/ARB in East-Asian patients with COVID-19. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280280. [CrossRef] 73. Kurdi, A.; Mueller, T.; Weir, N. An umbrella review and meta-analysis of renin-angiotensin system drugs use and COVID-19 outcomes. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 53, e13888. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 74. Lee, M.M.Y.; Docherty, K.F.; Sattar, N.; Mehta, N.; Kalra, A.; Nowacki, A.S.; Solomon, S.D.; Vaduganathan, M.; Petrie, M.C.; Jhund, P.S.; et al. Renin-angiotensin system blockers, risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes from COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 2022, 8, 165–178. [CrossRef] 75. Adam, S.; Ho, J.H.; Bashir, B.; Iqbal, Z.; Ferdousi, M.; Syed, A.A.; Soran, H. The impact of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, dyslipidaemia and lipid lowering therapy on Coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes: An examination of the available evidence. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2021, 32, 231–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 76. Lala, A.; Johnson, K.W.; Januzzi, J.L.; Russak, A.J.; Paranjpe, I.; Richter, F.; Zhao, S.; Somani, S.; Van Vleck, T.; Vaid, A.; et al. Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 533–546. [CrossRef] 77. Permana, H.; Huang, I.; Purwiga, A.; Kusumawardhani, N.Y.; Sihite, T.A.; Martanto, E.; Wisaksana, R.; Soetedjo, N.N.M. In-hospital use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19): Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol. Rep. 2021, 73, 769–780. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 78. Lao, U.S.; Law, C.F.; Baptista-Hon, D.T.; Tomlinson, B. Systematic review and meta-analysis of statin use and mortality, intensive care unit admission and requirement for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 79. Pal, R.; Banerjee, M.; Yadav, U.; Bhattacharjee, S. Statin use and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad. Med. J. 2022, 98, 354–359. [CrossRef] 80. Onorato, D.; Pucci, M.; Carpene, G.; Henry, B.M.; Sanchis-Gomar, F.; Lippi, G. Protective effects of statins administration in European and North American patients infected with COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 47, 392–399. [CrossRef] 81. Scheen, A.J. Statins and clinical outcomes with COVID-19: Meta-analyses of observational studies. Diabetes Metab. 2021, 47, 101220. [CrossRef] 82. Kollias, A.; Kyriakoulis, K.G.; Kyriakoulis, I.G.; Nitsotolis, T.; Poulakou, G.; Stergiou, G.S.; Syrigos, K. Statin use and mortality in COVID-19 patients: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2021, 330, 114–121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 13 of 14 83. Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Mohammadi, S.M.; Banach, M.; Beni, F.H.; Guest, P.C.; Al-Rasadi, K.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Improved COVID-19 outcomes following statin therapy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 1901772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 84. Torres-Peña, J.D.; Katsiki, N.; Perez-Martinez, P. Could statin therapy be useful in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 775749. [CrossRef] 85. Santosa, A.; Franzén, S.; Nåtman, J.; Wettermark, B.; Parmryd, I.; Nyberg, F. Protective effects of statins on COVID-19 risk, severity and fatal outcome: A nationwide Swedish cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 12047. [CrossRef] 86. Andrews, L.; Goldin, L.; Shen, Y.; Korwek, K.; Kleja, K.; Poland, R.E.; Guy, J.; Sands, K.E.; Perlin, J.B. Discontinuation of atorvastatin use in hospital is associated with increased risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients. J. Hosp. Med. 2022, 17, 169–175. [CrossRef] 87. Ghati, N.; Bhatnagar, S.; Mahendran, M.; Thakur, A.; Prasad, K.; Kumar, D.; Dwivedi, T.; Mani, K.; Tiwari, P.; Gupta, R.; et al. Statin and aspirin as adjuvant therapy in hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A randomised clinical trial (RESIST trial). BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 606. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 88. Ghafoori, M.; Saadati, H.; Taghavi, M.; Azimian, A.; Alesheikh, P.; Mohajerzadeh, M.S.; Behnamfar, M.; Pakzad, M.; Rameshrad, M. Survival of the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 receiving atorvastatin: A randomized clinical trial. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 3160–3168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 89. Matli, K.; Al Kotob, A.; Jamaleddine, W.; Al Osta, S.; Salameh, P.; Tabbikha, R.; Chamoun, N.; Moussawi, A.; Saad, J.M.; Atwi, G.; et al. Managing endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 with statins, beta blockers, nicorandil, and oral supplements: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2022, 15, 2323–2330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 90. Hejazi, S.; Mircheraghi, F.; Elyasi, S.; Davoodian, N.; Salarbashi, D.; Mehrad-Majd, H. Atorvastatin efficacy in the management of mild to moderate hospitalized COVID-19: A pilot randomized triple-blind placebo- controlled clinical trial. Recent Adv. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 2022, 17, 212–222. [CrossRef] 91. Wiggins, B.S.; Lamprecht, D.G., Jr.; Page, R.L., 2nd; Saseen, J.J. Recommendations for managing drug-drug interactions with statins and HIV medications. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2017, 17, 375–389. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 92. Zein, A.F.M.Z.; Sulistiyana, C.S.; Khasanah, U.; Wibowo, A.; Lim, M.A.; Pranata, R. Statin and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled adjusted effect estimates from propensity-matched cohorts. Postgrad. Med. J. 2022, 98, 503–508. [CrossRef] 93. Doyle, A.J.; Thomas, W.; Retter, A.; Besser, M.; MacDonald, S.; Breen, K.A.; Desborough, M.J.R.; Hunt, B.J. Updated hospital associated venous thromboembolism outcomes with 90-days follow-up after hospitalisation for severe COVID-19 in two UK critical care units. Thromb. Res. 2020, 196, 454–456. [CrossRef] 94. Nadkarni, G.N.; Lala, A.; Bagiella, E.; Chang, H.L.; Moreno, P.R.; Pujadas, E.; Arvind, V.; Bose, S.; Charney, A.W.; Chen, M.D.; et al. Anticoagulation, bleeding, mortality, and pathology in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 1815–1826. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 95. Jiménez, D.; García-Sanchez, A.; Rali, P.; Muriel, A.; Bikdeli, B.; Ruiz-Artacho, P.; Le Mao, R.; Rodríguez, C.; Hunt, B.J.; Monreal, M. Incidence of VTE and bleeding among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2021, 159, 1182–1196. [CrossRef] 96. Tan, J.Y.; Tan, C.W.; Wong, W.H.; Cheong, M.A.; Lee, L.H.; Kalimuddin, S.; Low, J.G.H.; Ng, H.J. Post-hospitalization venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients: Evidence against routine post-hospitalization prophylactic anticoagulation. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2022, 44, e4–e7. [CrossRef] 97. Chow, J.H.; Khanna, A.K.; Kethireddy, S.; Yamane, D.; Levine, A.; Jackson, A.M.; McCurdy, M.T.; Tabatabai, A.; Kumar, G.; Park, P.; et al. Aspirin use is associated with decreased mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Anesth. Analg. 2021, 132, 930–941. [CrossRef] 98. Abdelwahab, H.W.; Shaltout, S.W.; Sayed Ahmed, H.A.; Fouad, A.M.; Merrell, E.; Riley, J.B.; Salama, R.; Abdelrahman, A.G.; Darling, E.; Fadel, G.; et al. Acetylsalicylic acid compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of thrombosis and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study. Clin. Drug Investig. 2021, 41, 723–732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 99. Osborne, T.F.; Veigulis, Z.P.; Arreola, D.M.; Mahajan, S.M.; Röösli, E.; Curtin, C.M. Association of mortality and aspirin prescription for COVID-19 patients at the Veterans Health Administration. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246825. [CrossRef] 100. Meizlish, M.L.; Goshua, G.; Liu, Y.; Fine, R.; Amin, K.; Chang, E.; DeFilippo, N.; Keating, C.; Liu, Y.; Mankbadi, M.; et al. Intermediate-dose anticoagulation, aspirin, and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19: A propensity score-matched analysis. Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 96, 471–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 101. Martha, J.W.; Pranata, R.; Lim, M.A.; Wibowo, A.; Akbar, M.R. Active prescription of low-dose aspirin during or prior to hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 6–12. [CrossRef] 102. Wijaya, I.; Andhika, R.; Huang, I.; Purwiga, A.; Budiman, K.Y. The effects of aspirin on the outcome of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2021, 12, 100883. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 103. RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Aspirin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): A randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet 2022, 399, 143–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 104. Long, B.; Chavez, S.; Carius, B.M.; Brady, W.J.; Liang, S.Y.; Koyfman, A.; Gottlieb, M. Clinical update on COVID-19 for the emergency and critical care clinician: Medical management. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022, 56, 158–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1206 14 of 14 105. Liverpool Drug Interactions Group. Interactions with Essential Medicines and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir. Available online: https://www.covid19-druginteractions.org/ (accessed on 12 March 2023). 106. Reis, S.; Popp, M.; Schießer, S.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Kranke, P.; Meybohm, P.; Weibel, S. Anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb. Res. 2022, 219, 40–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 107. Zeng, J.; Liu, F.; Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Nasr, B.; Lu, C.; Zhang, Q. The effect of previous oral anticoagulant use on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022, 54, 107–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 108. Kow, C.S.; Hasan, S.S. Use of antiplatelet drugs and the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 52, 124–129. [CrossRef] 109. Salah, H.M.; Mehta, J.L. Meta-analysis of the effect of aspirin on mortality in COVID-19. Am. J. Cardiol. 2021, 142, 158–159. [CrossRef] 110. Srivastava, R.; Kumar, A. Use of aspirin in reduction of mortality of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e14515. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.