Web of Science: 8 citas, Scopus: 8 citas, Google Scholar: citas,
Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor : A Systematic Review
Avalos-Durán, Georgina (Laboratorio de Fertilización In-Vitro, Clínica de infertilidad y Reproducción Asistida de Toluca, IN-FIV, Metepec, Estado de México, México)
Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del (Departamento de Medicina Reproductiva, FILIUS, Centro de Medicina Reproductiva, San Luis Potosí, México)
Rivero-Murillo, Juana (Departamento de Medicina Reproductiva, URH, Unidad de Reproducción Humana, Quito, Ecuador)
Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc (Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud, Secretaria de Salud, Ciudad de México, México)
Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza (Laboratorio de Fertilización In-Vitro, Centro Mexicano de Fertilidad Dr. Alberto Kably, Estado de México, México)
Checa-Vizcaíno, Miguel Ángel (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública)

Fecha: 2018
Resumen: To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor.
Derechos: Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. Creative Commons
Lengua: Anglès
Documento: article ; article de revisió ; publishedVersion
Materia: PICSI ; Physiological ICSI ; Hyaluronic acid ; HA sperm selection ; Male factor
Publicado en: JBRA Assisted Reproduction, Vol. 22 (2018) , p. 139-147, ISSN 1518-0557

DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180027
PMID: 29672006


9 p, 3.3 MB

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos publicados

 Registro creado el 2018-06-18, última modificación el 2021-04-09



   Favorit i Compartir