Advancing understanding of natural resource governance : a post-Ostrom research agenda
Cumming, Graeme S. (James Cook University)
Epstein, Graham (University of Waterloo)
Anderies, John Marty (Arizona State University)
Apetrei, Cristina I. (Leuphana University)
Baggio, Jacopo (University of Central Florida)
Bodin, Örjan (Stockholm University. Stockholm Resilience Centre)
Chawla, Sivee (James Cook University)
Clements, Hayley Susan (Stellenbosch University. Centre for Complex Systems in Transition)
Cox, Michael (Dartmouth College)
Egli, Lukas (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Department Computational Landscape Ecology)
Gurney, Georgina (James Cook University)
Lubell, Mark (University of California. Department of Environmental Science and Policy)
Magliocca, Nicholas R. (University of Alabama. Department of Geography)
Morrison, Tiffany (James Cook University)
Müller, Birgit (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Department of Ecological Modelling)
Seppelt, Ralf (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. Department Computational Landscape Ecology)
Schlüter, Maja (Stockholm University. Stockholm Resilience Centre)
Unnikrishnan, Hita (Azim Premji University)
Villamayor Tomás, Sergio (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals)
Weible, Christopher M. (University of Colorado Denver)

Data:	2020
Resum:	Institutions are vital to the sustainability of social-ecological systems, balancing individual and group interests and coordinating responses to change. Ecological decline and social conflict in many places, however, indicate that our understanding and fostering of effective institutions for natural resource management is still lacking. We assess theoretical and methodological challenges facing positivist institutional analysis, focusing on natural resource governance according to Ostrom's social-ecological systems (SES) framework. Rather than adding more variables, progress requires a clearer, more consistent approach to selecting, defining and measuring institutional elements; stronger links between theory and empirical research; a greater focus on mechanisms and causality; and the development and application of new methods, including quantitative approaches. Strengthening the connections between theory, models, and data suggests several promising avenues for advancing institutional analysis through the study of relationships between institutional structure, process, function, context, and outcomes.
Nota:	Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2019-000940-M
Drets:	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, i la comunicació pública de l'obra, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. No es permet la creació d'obres derivades.
Llengua:	Anglès
Document:	Article de revisió ; recerca ; Versió acceptada per publicar
Matèria:	SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production ; SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Publicat a:	Current opinion in environmental sustainability, Vol. 44 (June 2020) , p. 26-34, ISSN 1877-3435

DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005

Postprint 27 p, 492.5 KB

El registre apareix a les col·leccions:
Documents de recerca > Documents dels grups de recerca de la UAB > Centres i grups de recerca (producció científica) > Ciències > Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA)
Articles > Articles de recerca
Articles > Articles publicats