Web of Science: 13 citas, Scopus: 14 citas, Google Scholar: citas
Systematic review : Third-line susceptibility-guided treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection
Puig, Ignasi (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina)
López-Góngora, Sheila (Corporació Sanitària Universitària Parc Taulí)
Calvet, Xavier (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina.)
Villoria, Albert (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina)
Baylina, Mireia (Hospital de Sabadell. Unitat d'Epidemiologia i Avaluació)
Sanchez-Delgado, Jordi (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina)
Suarez, David (Hospital Universitario de la Princesa. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa)
García-Hernando, Victor (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Medicina)
Pérez Gisbert, Javier (Hospital Universitario de la Princesa. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa)

Fecha: 2016
Resumen: Background: Susceptibility-guided therapies (SGTs) have been proposed as preferable to empirical rescue treatments after two treatment failures. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of SGT as third-line therapy. Methods: A systematic search was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting cure rates of Helicobacter pylori with SGT in third-line therapy were selected. A qualitative analysis describing the current evidence and a pooled mean analysis summarizing the cure rates of SGT in third-line therapy was performed. Results: No randomized controlled trials or comparative studies were found. Four observational studies reported cure rates with SGT in third-line treatment, and three studies which mixed patients with second- and third-line treatment also reported cure rates with SGT. The majority of the studies included the patients when culture had been already obtained, and so the effectiveness of SGT and empirical therapy has never been compared. A pooled mean analysis including four observational studies (283 patients) showed intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates with SGT of 72% (95% confidence interval 56-87%; I: 92%) and 80% (95% confidence interval 71-90%; I: 80%), respectively. Conclusions: SGT may be an acceptable option as rescue treatment. However, cure rates are, at best, moderate and this approach has never been compared with a well-devised empirical therapy. The evidence in favor of SGT as rescue therapy is currently insufficient to recommend its use.
Derechos: Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. Creative Commons
Lengua: Anglès.
Documento: article ; recerca ; publishedVersion
Publicado en: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, Vol. 9, Núm. 4 (January 2016) , p. 437-448, ISSN 1756-2848

DOI: 10.1177/1756283X15621229
PMID: 27366212


12 p, 216.0 KB

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos de investigación
Artículos > Artículos publicados

 Registro creado el 2019-04-04, última modificación el 2019-09-30



   Favorit i Compartir