Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh : proportional meta-analysis
Morales Conde, Salvador (Universidad de Sevilla)
Hernández-Granados, Pilar (Universidad Rey Juan Carlos)
Tallón-Aguilar, Luis (Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Sevilla, Andalusia))
Verdaguer-Tremolosa, M. (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
López-Cano, Manuel (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Fecha:	2022
Resumen:	The use of mesh is a common practice in ventral hernia repair (VHR). Lack of consensus on which prosthetic material works better in different settings remains. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the available evidence on hernia recurrence and complications after repair with synthetic, biologic, or biosynthetic/bioabsorbable meshes in hernias grade 2-3 of the Ventral Hernia Working Group modified classification. A literature search was conducted in January 2021 using Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and MEDLINE (via PubMed) databases. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and observational studies with adult patients undergoing VHR with either synthetic, biologic, or biosynthetic/bioabsorbable mesh were included. Outcomes were hernia recurrence, Surgical Site Occurrence (SSO), Surgical Site Infection (SSI), 30 days re-intervention, and infected mesh removal. Random-effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions were performed. Quality of the studies was assessed, and heterogeneity was explored through sensitivity analyses. 25 articles were eligible for inclusion. Mean age ranged from 47 to 64 years and participants' follow-up ranged from 1 to 36 months. Biosynthetic/bioabsorbable mesh reported a 9% (95% CI 2-19%) rate of hernia recurrence, lower than synthetic and biologic meshes. Biosynthetic/bioabsorbable mesh repair also showed a lower incidence of SSI, with a 14% (95% CI 6-24%) rate, and there was no evidence of infected mesh removal. Rates of seroma were similar for the different materials. This meta-analysis did not show meaningful differences among materials. However, the best proportions towards lower recurrence and complication rates after grade 2-3 VHR were after using biosynthetic/slowly absorbable mesh reinforcement. These results should be taken with caution, as head-to-head comparative studies between biosynthetic and synthetic/biologic meshes are lacking. Although, biosynthetic/bioabsorbable materials could be considered an alternative to synthetic and biologic mesh reinforcement in these settings. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10. 1007/s10029-022-02668-w.
Derechos:	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
Lengua:	Anglès
Documento:	Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada
Materia:	Ventral hernia ; Mesh ; Biosynthetic mesh ; Synthetic mesh ; Biologic mesh
Publicado en:	Hernia, Vol. 26 (september 2022) , p. 1459-1471, ISSN 1248-9204

DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02668-w
PMID: 36098869

13 p, 1.1 MB

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos > Artículos de investigación
Artículos > Artículos publicados