| Fecha: |
2009 |
| Resumen: |
Most methods for small-area estimation are based on composite estimators derived from designor model-based methods. A composite estimator is a linear combination of a direct and an indirect estimator with weights that usually depend on unknown parameters which need to be estimated. Although model-based small-area estimators are usually based on random-effects models, the assumption of fixed effects is at face value more appropriate. Model-based estimators are justified by the assumption of random area effects; in practice, however, areas can not be substituted for one another in a random manner (we say, they are not interchangeable). In the present paper we empirically assess the quality of several small-area estimators in the setting in which the area effects are treated as fixed. We consider two settings: one that draws samples from a theoretical population, and another that draws samples from an empirical population of a labour force register maintained by the National Institute of Social Security (NISS) of Catalonia. We distinguish two types of composite estimators: a) those that use weights that involve area specific estimates of bias and variance; and, b) those that use weights that involve a common variance and a common squared bias estimate for all the areas. We assess their precision and discuss alternatives to optimizing composite estimation in applications. |
| Ayudas: |
Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia SEJ2006-13537
|
| Derechos: |
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, i la comunicació pública de l'obra, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. No es permet la creació d'obres derivades.  |
| Documento: |
Article |
| Materia: |
Small area estimation ;
Composite estimator ;
Monte Carlo study ;
Random effect model ;
BLUP ;
Empirical BLUP |
| Publicado en: |
SORT : statistics and operations research transactions, Vol. 33, Núm. 1 (January-June 2009), p. 85-104, ISSN 2013-8830 |
visitante ::
identificación
