Governance and Conservation Effectiveness in Protected Areas and Indigenous and Locally Managed Areas
Zhang, Yin (Chongqing University)
West, Paige (Columbia University. Department of Anthropology)
Thakholi, Lerato (Wageningen University)
Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh (Canadian Institute for Advanced Research)
Supuma, Miriam (Biocultural Diversity)
Straub, Dakota (Columbia University. Department of Anthropology)
Sithole, Samantha S. (University of Lausanne)
Sharma, Roshan (RMIT University)
Schleicher, Judith (Cambridge Conservation Forum)
Ruli, Ben (University of South Bohemia. Department of Zoology)
Rodríguez-Rodríguez, David (University of Malaga)
Rasmussen, Mattias Borg (Copenhagen University. Department of Food and Resource Economics)
Ramenzoni, Victoria C. (Rutgers University-New Brunswick. Department of Human Ecology)
Qin, Siyu (Humboldt-University Berlin. Geography Department)
Pugley, Deborah Delgado (Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. Department of Social Sciences)
Palfrey, Rachel (University of Leeds)
Oldekop, Johan (University of Manchester)
Nuesiri, Emmanuel O. (African Leadership College)
Nguyen, Van Hai Thi (University of Bern)
Ndam, Nouhou (U.S. Agency for International Development)
Mungai, Catherine (International Union for Conservation of Nature)
Milne, Sarah (Australian National University)
Mabele, Mathew Bukhi (University of Dodoma. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies)
Lucitante, Sadie (University of Texas at San Antonio. Department of Anthropology)
Lucitante, Hugo (University of Texas at San Antonio. Department of Anthropology)
Liljeblad, Jonathan (Australian National University)
Kiwango, Wilhelm Andrew (University of Dodoma. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies)
Kik, Alfred (University of South Bohemia. Department of Zoology)
Jones, Nikoleta (University of Warwick)
Johnson, Melissa (Southwestern University. Sociology & Anthropology Department)
Jarrett, Christopher (Field Museum of Natural History)
James, Rachel Sapery (WWF-Australia, Canberra)
Holmes, George (University of Leed)
Gibson, Lydia N. (University College London. Department of Anthropology)
Ghoddousi, Arash (Humboldt-University Berlin. Geography Department)
Geldmann, Jonas (University of Copenhagen)
Gebara, Maria Fernanda (Independent Scholar)
Edwards, Thera (University of the West Indie. Department of Geography and Geology)
Dressler, Wolfram H. (University of Melbourne)
Douglas, Leo R. (New York University)
Dimitrakopoulos, Panayiotis G. (University of the Aegean. Department of Environment)
Davidov, Veronica (Monmouth University. Department of History and Anthropology)
Compaoré-Sawadogo, Eveline M.F.W. (Institute for Environment and Agricultural Research)
Collins, Yolanda Ariadne (University of St. Andrews)
Cepek, Michael (University of Texas at San Antonio. Department of Anthropology)
Burow, Paul Berne (Stanford University. Department of Earth System Science)
Brockington, Dan (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals)
Balinga, Michael Philippe Bessike (University of Bern)
Austin, Beau J. (Charles Darwin University)
Astuti, Rini (Australian National University)
Ampumuza, Christine (Kabale University. Department of Tourism and Hospitality)
Agyei, Frank Kwaku (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Department of Silviculture and Forest Management)

Fecha:	2023
Resumen:	Increased conservation action to protect more habitat and species is fueling a vigorous debate about the relative effectiveness of different sorts of protected areas. Here we review the literature that compares the effectiveness of protected areas managed by states and areas managed by Indigenous peoples and/or local communities. We argue that these can be hard comparisons to make. Robust comparative case studies are rare, and the epistemic communities producing them are fractured by language, discipline, and geography. Furthermore the distinction between these different forms of protection on the ground can be blurred. We also have to be careful about the value of this sort of comparison as the consequences of different forms of conservation for people and nonhuman nature are messy and diverse. Measures of effectiveness, moreover, focus on specific dimensions of conservation performance, which can omit other important dimensions. With these caveats, we report on findings observed by multiple study groups focusing on different regions and issues whose reports have been compiled into this article. There is a tendency in the data for community-based or co-managed governance arrangements to produce beneficial outcomes for people and nature. These arrangements are often accompanied by struggles between rural groups and powerful states. Findings are highly context specific and global generalizations have limited value.
Ayudas:	European Commission 101054259 Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación CEX2019-000940-M European Commission 802605
Nota:	Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu CEX2019-000940-M
Derechos:	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
Lengua:	Anglès
Documento:	Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada
Materia:	Governance ; Conservation
Publicado en:	Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 48 (November 2023) , p. 559-588, ISSN 1545-2050

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-081348

34 p, 327.8 KB

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Documentos de investigación > Documentos de los grupos de investigación de la UAB > Centros y grupos de investigación (producción científica) > Ciencias > Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA)
Artículos > Artículos de investigación
Artículos > Artículos publicados