Addressing the life cycle of sewers in contrasting cities through an eco-Efficiency approach
Petit Boix, Anna (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals)
Arnal, Carla (Cetaqua. Centro Tecnólogico del Agua (Barcelona))
Marín, Desirée (Cetaqua. Centro Tecnólogico del Agua (Barcelona))
Josa Garcia-Tornel, Alejandro (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental)
Gabarrell Durany, Xavier (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals)
Rieradevall, Joan (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals)

Fecha:	2018
Resumen:	Evaluating the sustainability of the urban water cycle is not straightforward, although a variety of methods have been proposed. Given the lack of integrated data about sewers, we applied the eco-efficiency approach to two case studies located in Spain with contrasting climate, population, and urban and sewer configurations. Our goal was to determine critical variables and life cycle stages and provide results for decision making. We used life cycle assessment and life cycle costing to evaluate their environmental and economic impacts. Results showed that both cities have a similar profile, albeit their contrasting features, that is, operation and maintenance, was the main environmental issue (50% to 70% of the impacts) and pipe installation registered the greatest economic capital expenditure (70% to 75%) due to labor. The location of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is an essential factor in our analysis mainly due to the topography effects (e. g. , the annual pump energy was 13 times greater in Calafell). Using the eco-efficiency portfolio, we observed that sewers might be less eco-efficient than WWTPs and that we need to envision their design in the context of an integrated WWTP-sewer management to improve sewer performance. In terms of methodological approach, the bidimensional nature of eco-efficiency enables the benchmarking of product systems and might be more easily interpreted by the general public. However, there are still some constraints that should be addressed to improve communication, such as the selection of indicators discussed in the article.
Ayudas:	Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2014/SGR-1412 Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte FPU13/01273 Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad 2015-MDM-0552
Nota:	Unidad de excelencia María de Maeztu MdM-2015-0552
Nota:	Altres ajuts: LIFE+ Aquaenvec project (LIFE10/ENV/ES/520)
Derechos:	Aquest material està protegit per drets d'autor i/o drets afins. Podeu utilitzar aquest material en funció del que permet la legislació de drets d'autor i drets afins d'aplicació al vostre cas. Per a d'altres usos heu d'obtenir permís del(s) titular(s) de drets.
Documento:	Article
Materia:	Eco-efficiency ; Eco-innovation ; Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Life cycle costing (LCC) ; Water cycle ; Wastewater
Publicado en:	Journal of industrial ecology, Vol. 22, issue 5 (Oct. 2018), p. 1092-1104, ISSN 1088-1980

Postprint 35 p, 1.4 MB

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Documentos de investigación > Documentos de los grupos de investigación de la UAB > Centros y grupos de investigación (producción científica) > Ciencias > Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA) > Sostenibilidad y Prevención Ambiental (Sostenipra)
Artículos > Artículos de investigación
Artículos > Artículos publicados