Web of Science: 1 citas, Scopus: 1 citas, Google Scholar: citas
Comparative study of electrical and rheological properties of different solutions used in endoscopic mucosal resection
Bon, Ignacio (Institut Germans Trias i Pujol. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol)
Bartolí Solé, Ramon (Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)
Cano Sarabia, Antonia María (Institut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia)
Ossa, Napoleón de la (Institut Germans Trias i Pujol. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol)
Moreno de Vega, Vicente (Institut Germans Trias i Pujol. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol)
Marín Fernández, Ingrid (Institut Germans Trias i Pujol. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol)
Boix, Jaume (Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)
Lorenzo Zúñiga, Vicente (Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology)

Fecha: 2019
Resumen: Background and Aim: The study of electrical and rheological properties of solutions to carry out endoscopic resection procedures could determinate the best candidate. An ex vivo study with porcine stomachs was conducted to analyze electrical resistivity (R) and rheological properties (temperature, viscosity, height and lasting of the cushion) of different substances used in these techniques. Methods: Tested solutions were: 0. 9% saline (S), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Gliceol (GC), hyaluronic acid 2% (HA), Pluronic-F127 20% (PL), saline with 10% glucose (GS), Gelaspan (GP), Covergel-BiBio (TB) and PRP with TB (PRP+TB). Measurements of electrical and rheological properties were done at 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after submucosal injection. Results: Solutions showed a wide variability of transepithelial R after submucosal injection. Substances able to maintain the highest R 60 min postinjection were TB (7 × 10 Ω), HA (7 × 10 Ω) and PL (7 × 10 Ω). Protective solutions against deep thermal injury (Tª lower than 60°C) were PL (47. 6°C), TB (55°C) and HA (56. 63°C). Shortest time to carry out resections were observed with GC (17. 66″), PRP (20. 3″) and GS (23. 45″). Solutions with less cushion decrease (<25%) after 60 min were TB (11. 74%), PL (18. 63%) and PRP (22. 12%). Conclusions: Covergel-BiBio, PL and HA were the best solutions with long-term protective effects (transepithelial R, lower thermal injury and less cushion decrease). Solutions with quicker resection time were GC, PRP and GS.
Derechos: Tots els drets reservats.
Lengua: Anglès.
Documento: article ; recerca ; acceptedVersion
Materia: Electrical property ; Endoscopic mucosal resection ; Endoscopic submucosal dissection ; Rheological property ; Submucosal injection
Publicado en: Digestive endoscopy, Vol. 31, Issue 3 (May 2019) , p. 276-282, ISSN 1443-1661

DOI: 10.1111/den.13297


Disponible a partir de: 2020-05-31
Postprint

El registro aparece en las colecciones:
Documentos de investigación > Documentos de los grupos de investigación de la UAB > Centros y grupos de investigación (producción científica) > Ciencias de la salud y biociencias > Institut d'Investigació en Ciencies de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP)
Documentos de investigación > Documentos de los grupos de investigación de la UAB > Centros y grupos de investigación (producción científica) > Ciencias > Institut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (ICN2)
Artículos > Artículos de investigación
Artículos > Artículos publicados

 Registro creado el 2019-07-02, última modificación el 2019-07-29



   Favorit i Compartir