Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening : a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures
Selva, A. (Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT))
Selva, C. (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Estudis de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació)
Álvarez-Pérez, Yolanda (Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC))
Torà, N. (Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa)
López, P. (Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT))
Terraza-Núñez, R. (Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Salut)
Rodríguez, V. (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)
Solà, Ivan (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau)
Buron, Andrea (Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques)
Macià, Francesc (Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques)
Machlab, Salvador Tarek (Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT))
Pericay, Carles (Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT))
Puig, Teresa (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Date:	2021
Abstract:	Background: Patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening can determine adherence to screening programs. An evaluation of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring experience or satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening does not exist. Our objective was to identify and critically appraise validated questionnaires for measuring patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. We conducted searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and BiblioPRO and assessed the methodological quality of studies and measurement properties of questionnaires according to the COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019118527. Results: We included 80 studies that used 75 questionnaires, of which only 5 were validated. Four questionnaires measured satisfaction with endoscopy: two in the context of colorectal cancer screening (for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy) and two for non-screening endoscopy. One questionnaire measured satisfaction with bowel preparation. The methodological quality of studies was variable. The questionnaires with evidence for sufficient content validity and internal consistency were: the CSSQP questionnaire, which measures safety and satisfaction with screening colonoscopy, and the Post-Procedure questionnaire which measures satisfaction with non-screening endoscopic procedures. Conclusions: This systematic review shows that a minority of existing PROMs for measuring patient satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening are validated. We identified two questionnaires with high potential for further use (CSSQP and the Post-Procedure questionnaire).
Grants:	Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18-00460
Rights:	Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.
Language:	Anglès
Document:	Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada
Subject:	Patient satisfaction ; Patient experience ; Colorectal cancer screening ; Systematic review ; Patient reported outcome measures ; PROM ; Instruments ; Questionnaires
Published in:	BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (december 2021) , p. 230, ISSN 1471-2288

DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7
PMID: 34706652

15 p, 1013.2 KB

The record appears in these collections:
Research literature > UAB research groups literature > Research Centres and Groups (research output) > Health sciences and biosciences > Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute (I3PT
Research literature > UAB research groups literature > Research Centres and Groups (research output) > Health sciences and biosciences > Institut de Recerca Sant Pau
Articles > Research articles
Articles > Published articles