Web of Science: 1 citations, Scopus: 1 citations, Google Scholar: citations,
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Triple Therapy with Budesonide/ Glycopyrronium/ Formoterol Fumarate versus Dual Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Spain
Trigueros, Juan Antonio (Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha)
Garin, Noe (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau)
Baloira, Adolfo (Hospital Universitario de Pontevedra)
Aceituno, Susana (Outcomes'10)
Calvo, Ana (Outcomes'10)
Prades, Miriam (Outcomes'10)
Touron, Carolina (AstraZeneca Farmacéutica España)
Martínez, Anisia (AstraZeneca Farmacéutica España)
Torres, Covadonga (AstraZeneca Farmacéutica España)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Date: 2022
Abstract: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol (BUD/GLY/FOR) versus LAMA/LABA and ICS/ LABA, respectively, in patients with moderate to severe COPD, from the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective. A lifetime Markov model with monthly cycle length was developed with baseline and treatment effect data from ETHOS clinical trial, together with utility values from literature and Spanish healthcare resource costs (€, 2021). A 3% annual discount rate was used for costs and benefits. The model comprised ten health states: nine forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)-related, which were divided by three levels of severity: moderate (FEV1 ≥50% and <80%); severe (FEV1 ≥30% and <50%) and very severe (FEV1 <30%) and a death state. Each FEV1-health state was divided into no exacerbation, moderate exacerbation, and severe exacerbations. An expert panel validated data and assumptions. Outcomes were measured as incremental cost per exacerbation avoided, per life year (LY) gained, and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ICUR). One-way (OWSA), scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. According to this cost-effectiveness analysis based on a Markov model, BUD/GLY/FOR was associated with a lower totals exacerbation per patient (12. 80) compared to LAMA/LABA (13. 36) and ICS/LABA (13. 23) and higher LYs (10. 32 vs 10. 14 and 10. 06, respectively) and QALYs (7. 55 vs 7. 41 and 7. 32, respectively). The incremental costs were €850. 95, and €2422. 26, respec-tively, per exacerbation avoided, €2733. 38 and €4111. 15, respectively, per LY gained and €3461. 19 and €4545. 24 per QALY gained. OWSA showed that the model was most sensitive to the costs of treatments following discontinuation, but the ICUR remained below the cost-effectiveness threshold of €25,000 per QALY gained. In the PSA, the probability of BUD/GLY/FOR being cost-effective was 91. 32% vs LAMA/LABA and 99. 29% vs ICS/LABA. BUD/GLY/FOR is a cost-effective treatment strategy for Spanish NHS patients with COPD compared to dual therapies.
Rights: Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. Creative Commons
Language: Anglès
Document: Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada
Subject: COPD ; Economic evaluation ; Exacerbation ; Inhaled bronchodilator ; Inhaled corticosteroid ; Single-inhaler triple therapy
Published in: International journal of COPD, Vol. 17 (2022) , p. 2905-2917, ISSN 1178-2005

DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S384591
PMID: 36411773


13 p, 938.1 KB

The record appears in these collections:
Research literature > UAB research groups literature > Research Centres and Groups (research output) > Health sciences and biosciences > Institut de Recerca Sant Pau
Articles > Research articles
Articles > Published articles

 Record created 2024-03-25, last modified 2024-05-04



   Favorit i Compartir