Web of Science: 9 cites, Scopus: 11 cites, Google Scholar: cites,
Efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B and anidulafungin using an antifungal lock technique (ALT) for catheter-related Candida albicans and Candida glabrata infections in an experimental model
Basas Satorras, Jana (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Palau Gauthier, Marta (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Gomis, Xavier (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Almirante Gragera, Benito (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Gavaldà, Joan (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Institut de Recerca)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Data: 2019
Resum: Objective: The aims of this study were as follows. First, we sought to compare the in vitro susceptibility of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and anidulafungin on Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms growing on silicone discs. Second, we sought to compare the activity of LAmB versus anidulafungin for the treatment of experimental catheter-related C. albicans and C. glabrata infections with the antifungal lock technique in a rabbit model. Methods: Two C. albicans and two C. glabrata clinical strains were used. The minimum biofilm eradication concentration for 90% eradication (MBEC ) values were determined after 48h of treatment with LAmB and anidulafungin. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the morphology and viability of yeasts growing in biofilms. Central venous catheters were inserted into New Zealand rabbits, which were inoculated of each strain of C. albicans and C. glabrata. Then, catheters were treated for 48h with saline or with antifungal lock technique using either LAmB (5mg/mL) or anidulafungin (3. 33mg/mL). Results: In vitro: anidulafungin showed greater activity than LAmB against C. albicans and C. glabrata strains. For C. albicans: MBEC of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CA176, 0. 03 vs. 128 mg/L; CA180, 0. 5 vs. 64 mg/L. For C. glabrata: MBEC of anidulafungin versus LAmB: CG171, 0. 5 vs. 64 mg/L; CG334, 2 vs. 32 mg/L. In vivo: for C. albicans species, LAmB and anidulafungin achieved significant reductions relative to growth control of log cfu recovered from the catheter tips (CA176: 3. 6±0. 3 log CFU, p0. 0001; CA180: 3. 8±0. 1 log CFU, p0. 01). For C. glabrata, anidulafungin lock therapy achieved significant reductions relative to the other treatments (CG171: 4. 8 log CFU, p0. 0001; CG334: 5. 1 log CFU, p0. 0001) Conclusions: For the C. albicans strains, both LAmB and anidulafungin may be promising antifungal lock technique for long-term catheter-related infections; however, anidulafungin showed significantly higher activity than LAmB against the C. glabrata strains.
Ajuts: Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI070394
Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD12/0015
Nota: Funding: This study was co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund "A way to achieve Europe" ERDF and partially by Pfizer, Inc.
Drets: Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. Creative Commons
Llengua: Anglès
Document: Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada
Matèria: Amphotericin B ; Anidulafungin ; Animals ; Antifungal Agents ; Biofilms ; Candida ; Candida albicans ; Candida glabrata ; Candidiasis ; Catheter-Related Infections ; Catheters ; Models, Theoretical ; Rabbits
Publicat a: PloS one, Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (february 2019) , p. e0212426, ISSN 1932-6203

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212426
PMID: 30779771


11 p, 1.9 MB

El registre apareix a les col·leccions:
Articles > Articles de recerca
Articles > Articles publicats

 Registre creat el 2020-06-03, darrera modificació el 2023-10-01



   Favorit i Compartir