| Data: |
2022 |
| Resum: |
This paper contrasts a Bolognese postverbal subject construction and other grammars with the common Romance one (also in Bolognese) that has longdistance full agreement of the tensed verb and the Case Licensed subject, with an expletive satisfying EPP. In the new Bolognese data, full agreement is absent, a special clitic occurs, and the postverbal subject is person restricted. Lack of subject agreement also raises questions about its licensing. The Minimalist proposal is that grammars like Bolognese can specify a feature set on the expletive that checks EPP in this data, and that it is thus an independent second nominal in the domain of the sole agreement and Case Licensing probe, T. This specified expletive is shown to explain all the properties of this data. For the person restrictions and Case Licensing of the postverbal subject, it applies Cyclic/Multiple Agree, the elaboration of Agree underlying PCCeffects, to the two nominals. The analysis is extended to other grammars with similar but slightly differing data by simple manipulation of the featureset on the specified expletive and of the clitic inventory of the grammar. |
| Drets: |
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.  |
| Llengua: |
Anglès |
| Document: |
Article ; recerca ; Versió publicada |
| Matèria: |
Non-agreement ;
Clitics ;
Northern Italian ;
Expletives ;
Person restrictions |
| Publicat a: |
Isogloss, Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2022) , p. 1-16 (RLLT 17 Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory - GoRo Paris) , ISSN 2385-4138 |
visitant ::
identificació
(University of Utah)
