| Abstract: |
Aim: To assess the appropriateness of systemic oncological treatments (SOT) provided to patients diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer (EC) across a group of participating hospitals. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study in five Spanish hospitals including newly confirmed advanced EC cases between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, with a 5-year follow-up. Results: We identified 157 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (median age: 65 years, 85. 9% males). Most patients, 125 (79. 6%) were treated at least with one active treatment, and 33% received two or more lines of SOT. The 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 30. 3% [95%CI: 23. 8, 38. 7], 14. 0% [95%CI: 9. 3, 21. 0], and 7. 1% [95% CI: 3. 8, 13. 1] respectively, and the median survival time 8 months (95% CI: 6, 19) for stages IIIb IIIc and 7 months (95% CI: 5, 9) for stage IV. Clinical stage, receiving more than one line of SOT, and treatment with radiotherapy accelerated the time to death (0. 4, 0. 9-, and 0. 8-times shorter survival respectively, p < 0. 05). Better performance status (ECOG < 2) extended survival time by 2. 2 times (p = 0. 04). Age < 65 years (OR 9. 4, 95% CI 3. 2, 31. 4, p < 0. 001), and being treated in one particular hospital (OR 0. 2, 95% CI 0. 0, 0. 8, p < 0. 01) were associated with the administration of two or more lines of SOT. Altogether, 18. 9% and 9. 0% of patients received chemotherapy in the last four and two weeks of life, respectively. Moreover, 2. 5% of patients were prescribed a new line of chemotherapy during the last month of life. The proportion of all patients who did not have access to palliative care reached 29. 3%, and among those who had access to it, 34. 2% initiated it in the last month of life. Conclusion: A high proportion of advanced EC patients receive many treatments not based on sound evidence and they do not benefit enough from palliative care services. The most accepted appropriateness indicators point out that some of the analyzed patients could have been overtreated. This study provides important insights into the quality of care provided to advanced EC, and furthermore, for giving valuable insight and opportunities for improvement. |
guest ::
(Institut de Recerca Sant Pau)
