Timing of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Readmitted Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease : A Randomized Clinical Trial
Güell-Rous, Maria Rosa (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Catalunya))
Morante-Vélez, Fatima (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Catalunya))
Flotats-Farré, Gemma (Corporación Fisiogestión)
Paz-del Río, Luis Daniel (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Catalunya))
Closa-Rusinés, Conxita (Corporación Fisiogestión)
Ouchi, Dan 
(Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública)
Segura-Medina, Macarena (Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Catalunya))
Bolibar i Ribas, Ignasi
(Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau)
| Data: |
2020 |
| Descripció: |
9 pàg. |
| Resum: |
Early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), started during hospitalization or within the first month after discharge, has been shown to reduce exacerbations and improve health-related-quality of life (HRQoL) and exercise capacity. However, no randomized clinical trials (RCT) have compared the efficacy of PR started during hospitalization (DHPR) to PR initiated one month post-hospitalization (PHPR). We conducted an RCT to compare DHPR to PHPR in severe patients with COPD readmitted for exacerbations in a tertiary hospital setting. Patients were randomized to receive three months of DHPR or PHPR. Outcomes were assessed at completion of the PR programme and at months 3 and 9. A total of 53 patients (26 DHPR and 27 PHPR) were included. There were no between-group differences in the number of exacerbations (mean, 3. 62 vs. 3. 04 in the DHPR and PHPR groups, respectively; p = 0. 403). Dyspnea in activities of daily living, exercise capacity, and all HRQoL parameters improved in the PHPR group. In the DHPR group, improvement was observed only for some HRQoL parameters. All gains in both groups were lost during follow-up. More adverse events were observed in the DHPR group (20 vs 5, p = 0. 023), although none of these were clinically significant. In this sample of patients with severe COPD readmitted to the hospital for exacerbations, both approaches to PR were safe, but PHPR yielded better outcomes overall. These findings suggest that, PR should be initiated in patients with severe COPD only after hospital discharge when the patients' clinical condition has stabilized. |
| Nota: |
Timing of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Readmitted Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Drets: |
Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, sempre que no sigui amb finalitats comercials, i sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.  |
| Llengua: |
Anglès |
| Document: |
Article ; recerca ; Versió sotmesa a revisió |
| Matèria: |
Exacerbations ;
Home pulmonary rehabilitation ;
Hospital pulmonary rehabilitation ;
Severe COPD patients |
| Publicat a: |
COPD : Journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2020) , p. 26-34, ISSN 1541-2563 |
DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1856059
PMID: 33287581
El registre apareix a les col·leccions:
Documents de recerca >
Documents dels grups de recerca de la UAB >
Centres i grups de recerca (producció científica) >
Ciències de la salut i biociències >
Institut de Recerca Sant PauArticles >
Articles de recercaArticles >
Articles publicats
Registre creat el 2024-09-13, darrera modificació el 2025-05-02